A List So Sick Hillary Hopes Democrat Voters Never See It. Anyone thinking of voting for Hillary because they don't like Trump needs to read and assimilate this information!

[M]

Anyone thinking of voting for Hillary because they don't like Trump needs to read and assimilate this information!

Source; http://www.americanpatriotdaily.com/featured/a-list-so-sick-hillary...

Before taking the chance to expose Hillary as one of the biggest frauds in the realm of politics it’s important to say in a capitalistic society you should be paid what you’re worth.

If you provide value then you should be compensated accordingly.

Most free market capitalists aren’t going to argue with that.

However, when you’re a high earning individual you can’t pretend to be one of the people. You might have come from low stock but your income changes you and what you’re concerned about. That’s just the truth.

Hillary Clinton has been trying to pull the wool over Democrat voters’ eyes for decades pretending that she and her husband have always been and always will be nothing more than simple attorneys from Podunk Arkansas.

There’s only one problem with that – it’s simply not true. In fact in the past 3 years Mrs. Clinton has earned way more than what the average Hillary voter could ever imagine.

In the list below you’ll see a detailed report on how much she earned giving speeches in just two years.

Though the information is out there Mrs. Clinton hopes desperately to keep these numbers hidden from view, especially because she knows if Democrat voters see she’s been lying about her financially status for as long as she has they might turn their backs on her.

 

• 4/18/2013, Morgan Stanley, Washington, DC: $225,000
• 4/24/2013, Deutsche Bank, Washington, DC: $225,000
• 4/24/2013, National Multi Housing Council, Dallas, Texas: $225,000
• 4/30/2013, Fidelity Investments, Naples, Fla.: $225,000
• 5/8/2013, Gap Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $225,000
• 5/14/2013, Apollo Management Holdings LP, New York, NY: $225,000
• 5/16/2013, Itau BBA USA Securities, New York, NY: $225,000
• 5/21/2013, Vexizon Communications Inc., Washington, DC: $225,000
• 5/29/2013, Sanford C. Bernstein and Co. LLC, New York, NY: $225,000
• 6/4/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, Palmetto Bluffs, SC: $225,000
• 6/6/2013, Spencer Stuart, New York, NY: $225,000
• 6/16/2013, Society for Human Resource Management, Chicago, Ill.: $285,000
• 6/17/2013, Economic Club of Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, Mich.: $225,000
• 6/20/2013, Boston Consulting Group Inc., Boston, Mass.: $225,000
• 6/20/2013, Let’s Talk Entertainment Inc., Toronto, Canada: $250,000
• 6/24/2013, American Jewish University, Universal City, Calif.: $225,000
• 6/24/2013, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Company LP, Palos Verdes, Calif.:$225,000
• 7/11/2013, UBS Wealth Management, New York, NY: $225,000
• 8/7/2013, Global Business Travel Association, San Diego, Calif.: $225,000
• 8/12/2013, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, Las Vegas, Nev.: $225,000
• 9/18/2013, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, Ill.: $225,000
• 9/19/2013, American Society of Travel Agents Inc., Miami, Fla.: $225,000
• 10/4/2013, Long Island Association, Long Island, NY: $225,000
• 10/15/2013, National Association of Convenience Stores, Atlanta, Ga.: $265,000
• 10/23/2013, SAP Global Marketing Inc., New York, NY: $225,000
• 10/24/2013, Accenture, New York, NY: $225,000
• 10/24/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, New York, NY: $225,000
• 10/27/2013, Beth El Synagogue, Minneapolis, Minn.: $225,000
• 10/28/2013, Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, Chicago, Ill.:$400,000
• 10/29/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, Tuscon, Ariz.: $225,000
• 11/4/2013, Mase Productions Inc., Orlando, Fla.: $225,000
• 11/4/2013, London Drugs Ltd., Mississauga, Canada: $225,000
• 11/6/2013, Beaumont Health System, Troy, Mich.: $305,000
• 11/7/2013, Golden Tree Asset Management, New York, NY: $275,000
• 11/9/2013, National Association of Realtors, San Francisco, Calif.: $225,000
• 11/13/2013, Mediacorp Canada Inc., Toronto, Canada: $225,000
• 11/13/2013, Bank of America, Bluffton, SC: $225,000
• 11/14/2013, CB Richard Ellis Inc., New York, NY: $250,000
• 11/18/2013, CIIE Group, Naples, Fla.: $225,000
• 11/18/2013, Press Ganey, Orlando, Fla.: $225,000
• 11/21/2013, U.S. Green Building Council, Philadelphia, Pa.: $225,000
• 01/06/2014, GE, Boca Raton, Fla.: $225,500
• 01/27/2014, National Automobile Dealers Association, New Orleans, La.:$325,500
• 01/27/2014, Premier Health Alliance, Miami, Fla.: $225,500
• 02/06/2014, Salesforce.com, Las Vegas, Nev.: $225,500
• 02/17/2014, Novo Nordisk A/S, Mexico City, Mexico: $125,000
• 02/26/2014, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Orlando, Fla.:$225,500
• 02/27/2014, A&E Television Networks, New York, NY: $280,000
• 03/04/2014, Association of Corporate Counsel – Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.:$225,500
• 03/05/2014, The Vancouver Board of Trade, Vancouver, Canada: $275,500
• 03/06/2014, tinePublic Inc., Calgary, Canada: $225,500
• 03/13/2014, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, Orlando, Fla.:$225,500
• 03/13/2014, Drug Chemical and Associated Technologies, New York, NY:$250,000
• 03/18/2014, Xerox Corporation, New York, NY: $225,000
• 03/18/2014, Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal, Montreal, Canada:$275,000
• 03/24/2014, Academic Partnerships, Dallas, Texas: $225,500
• 04/08/2014, Market° Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $225,500
• 04/08/2014, World Affairs Council, Portland, Ore.: $250,500
• 04/10/2014, Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc., Las Vegas, Nev.:$225,500
• 04/10/2014, Lees Talk Entertainment, San Jose, Calif.: $265,000
• 04/11/2014, California Medical Association (via satellite), San Diego, Calif.:$100,000
• 05/06/2014, National Council for Behavioral Healthcare, Washington, DC:$225,500
• 06/02/2014, International Deli-Dairy-Bakery Association, Denver, Colo.: $225,500
• 06/02/2014, Lees Talk Entertainment, Denver, Colo.: $265,000
• 06/10/2014, United Fresh Produce Association, Chicago, Ill.: $225,000
• 06/16/2014, tinePublic Inc., Toronto, Canada: $150,000
• 06/18/2014, tinePublic Inc., Edmonton, Canada: $100,000
• 06/20/2014, Innovation Arts and Entertainment, Austin, Texas: $150,000
• 06/25/2014, Biotechnology Industry Organization, San Diego, Calif.: $335,000
• 06/25/2014, Innovation Arts and Entertainment, San Francisco, Calif.: $150,000
• 06/26/2014, GTCR, Chicago, Ill.: $280,000
• 07/22/2014, Knewton Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $225,500
• 07/26/2014, Ameriprise, Boston, Mass.: $225,500
• 07/29/2014, Coming Inc., Coming, NY: $225,500
• 08/28/2014, Nexenta Systems Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $300,000
• 08/28/2014, Cisco, Las Vegas, Nev.: $325,000
• 09/04/2014, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, Calif.: $225,500
• 09/15/2014, Caridovascular Research Foundation, Washington, DC: $275,000
• 10/02/2014, Commercial Real Estate Women Network, Miami Beach, Fla.:$225,500
• 10/06/2014, Canada 2020, Ottawa, Canada: $215,500
• 10/07/2014, Deutsche Bank AG, New York, NY: $280,000
• 10/08/2014, Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), Chicago, Ill.:$265,000
• 10/13/2014, Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers, Colorado Springs, Colo.:$225,500
• 10/14/2014, Salesforce.com, San Francisco, Calif.: $225,500
• 10/14/2014, Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, Calif.: $335,000
• 12/04/2014, Massachusetts Conference for Women, Boston, Mass.: $205,500
• 01/21/2015, tinePublic Inc., Winnipeg, Canada: $262,000
• 01/21/2015, tinePublic Inc., Saskatoon, Canada: $262,500
• 01/22/2015, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Whistler, Canada: $150,000
• 02/24/2015, Watermark Silicon Valley Conference for Women, Santa Clara, Calif.:$225,500
• 03/11/2015, eBay Inc., San Jose, Calif.: $315,000
• 03/19/2015, American Camping Association, Atlantic City, NJ: $260,000

Total: $21,667,000

Those totals are simply staggering to think about, especially for the average Democrat voter. These speeches are probably 10x times what Democrat voters make in a year, and yet these same voters blindly support Hillary because they think she really cares about ending “unfair distributions of wealth.”

The truth is this is only brushing the surface when it comes to her impropriety in dealing with money.

There are ledgers full of how she and her husband have mishandled money for years.

If her voting base actually knew what she was guilty of they might reconsider voting for her.

How do you feel about this list and Democrats who support Hillary?

 

[charles royer]

AP calls it for hillary
It's Official: Hillary Clinton Wins The Democratic Presidential Nomination
What was supposed to be an all-important California primary tomorrow just became moot moments ago, when in a surprising announcement, AP just called the race for Hillary who according to the newswire's calculations has earned enough delegates to become the presumptive Democratic nominee, making her the first woman ever to win a major party nomination.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-06/ap-calls-race-hillary-clin...

[M]

I see the fix is already in!

[M]

Charles;

Now that the AP has crowned Hillary as the presumptive Democrat Party winner, thus making the people who still will be voting in primaries want to "Go With A Winner" that is the strategy to get the low to no information voters to vote like nice little robots for the politician of choice by the Elites. They use it constantly in the General Elections by posting the presumed winners long before the polls close, and in doing that they are able to legally skew the remaining votes towards their ( the Elites) pick for whatever office in National elections.

[M]

Further reasons why Hillary should not be President but should be charged and tried;

Source; http://eheadlines.com/every-time-she-opens-her-mouth-she-lies-judge...

Here's what Judge Janine has to say.

Judge Jeanine Pirro said on “Hannity” last night that she expects the FBI to recommend criminal charges for Hillary Clinton, but the question is whether the Justice Department proceeds with that recommendation.

“Every time she opens her mouth, she lies. I don’t think she even knows the difference between the truth and a lie,” Judge Jeanine said.

She pointed out that Clinton has repeatedly changed the narrative surrounding the private email she used as secretary of state, including claiming that her unusual email practices were allowed by the State Department – when they clearly were not – and also that she got permission.

“This woman is just a liar,” Judge Jeanine stated, noting that there are lingering questions not just about her emails, but also about the Benghazi terror attack and the finances behind the Clinton Foundation.

Judge Jeanine said that one reason she believes the Justice Department will be reluctant to indict Clinton in the email scandal is because President Obama was aware of her private email, meaning he would be called as a witness if she is indeed indicted.

Read Full Story At Fox News

[M]

[charles royer]

“Wherever they go, whatever they do, ethics are trashed and suspicions of criminal conduct follow them like night follows day.”

[jack ludwig]

as long as there is an opposing party that view will always be true, 

[M]

Jack,

It's true because they are doing that not because of an opposing party. Democrats promoted Slavery. Democrats promoted the buffalo hunts to starve out the native American people who depended on them for everything. The Democrats reversed the reconstruction and took away the rights to citizenship and voting rights from the black race of freed slaves, under Rutherford B. Hayes, who won because of a back room deal when the original reports had Tilden the winner,( http://elections.harpweek.com/09Ver2Controversy/Overview-1.htm ) and Hayes made a deal to end reconstruction as Tilden had promised to do. That move by Hayes took away most of the rights of the Blacks for almost a century. Yes, I do know that Hayes was a Republican, but he promoted the Democrat agenda like Obama promotes the Elitist agenda today. The Democrats from the South (Dixiecrats) kept the bias against the blacks with the Jim Crow laws and kept them going until Eisenhower first integrated the Military Services. The Jim Crow laws kept on until Kennedy championed Civil Rights and then Johnson found a way to further enslave the black population through his "Great Society" that he paid for by Robbing the money that working people were required by law to put into Social Security and we are still paying for that failed fiasco today.

So Jack, how can you say or imply it's because of an opposing party's viewpoint instead of the reality of the situation?

[M]