Clinton Foundation and Hillary Profit From Kremlin Deal That Exposes U.S. To Russian Spies

[M]

Source; http://observer.com/2016/08/hillarys-secret-kremlin-connection-is-q... and John Schindler, a former NSA Anaylist and counter intelligence Officer

>

What deals did Hillary cut with the Kremlin? The answers to that need to become public knowledge BEFORE Nov, 8 2016 so the public can make an informed decision on whether to vote for her or not. The latest e-mails and follow up news reporting make it look like Hillary had a lucrative pay for play system operating when she was Secretary of State under Obama. All indicators point to Hillary extracting "Donations" to the Clinton Slush Fund Foundation to insure access to the boss. This has serious ramifications on future Foreign Policy and if should Hillary become President "Will she sell access to the US and/or it's National Security?? Also considering the "Donations" that the Clinton's admit come from Foreign sources, is it possible that she has already sold that access to the Oval Office and our National Security possibly to agents of Moscow or Islamic interests?

>

While Donald Trump is sometimes portrayed as a dupe to Putin's agendas, but, Hillary has definite Moscow links, and those links need to be fully disclosed before the Election. One issue that needs to be expanded on is the Podesta Group headed by her campaign chairman's brother, and how and why Kremlin money found it's way into that organization. Other issues that are just as critical focus around Peter Schweizer's report based on years of investigation into the Clinton's of how rooted are Hillary's ties in Moscow, and with what Russian personages she has them. 

>

Schweizer uncovered information that while John Podesta sat on the board of a Dutch Registered company, which by the way he failed to disclose to the Feds, in violation of Legal Requirements, he did not register as an agent of a foreign power, that company received $35 million from the Kremlin. It is unknown what his commission was for that deal as it is still unknown.

>

It has also been disclosed that the Clinton's made money on the Russians even though Russia conducted aggression against the Ukraine. Even though American State Department interests were failures, Clinton profited by the relationship with Moscow. That being over and above the Podesta profits. Some of the agenda's of Hillary's were the encouragement of investment in Russia by America and Europe primarily in Skolkovo which is a Russian counterpart to Silicone Valley. The major big investors were encouraged by the State Department and they were also Major Donors to the Clinton Foundation. Schweizer found out of the 28 companies that participated in Skolkovo 17 were Clinton Foundation "Donors" and all of them 'Hired' Bill Clinton at what is believed to be 'extortionate rates' to give speeches. It is estimated that the pay was between $6.5 and $23.5 Million Dollars but since the Clinton Slush Fund Foundation has not released information on all it's "Donors" the figure could be very much more.

>

Bear in mind that Skolkovo is in the Russian tradition, a State funded, owned, and operated enterprise, with the politburo having complete control to give orders to do the bidding of Putin and the Russian government. It is also a key player in Russia's defense and Security areas. So I ask the question; "Why did Hillary involve major American and European companies in an enterprise that brought Russia up to date to fully compete with and possibly overwhelm Western defense systems should hostilities break out?" The other factor is the report from U.S. European Command showing Skolkovo to be a stealth Russian Military Industrial complex dedicated to clandestine industrial espionage to steal Western Hi-Tech secrets, and that's just what the Unclassified report says. I wonder what the classified section of that report determined.

>

We do get a glimpse of what might be hidden under secret classification in that report by a public statement by none less than the FBI's Boston Field office warning American firms (4/2014) about Skolkovo as a major source that needed to be addressed. The FBI termed it " A means for the Russian Government to access our nations sensitive or classified research, development facilities and dual-use technologies with commercial and military applications", The FBI also warned American firms that Skolkovo had commercial contracts with the Russian military armored vehicle manufacturer Kamaz and there were reasonable fears that Kamaz would profit from and provide the Russian military with the innovations gleaned from the U.S. partners compromising our military vehicles in combat situations.

>

Further FBI and other agencies investigations into Skolkovo found direct links to Russian Federal Security Service (Modern Day KGB) and is the site of FSB's information warfare centers (Propaganda Departments) and this indicates their hacker division is much more able to do what is charged about the DNC hack, from the very Complex Hillary Aided Russia in Developing.  Tell me again WHY Hillary should be trusted with American Military and Security secrets as President? How much more damage could she do if she had the authority to Declassify and distribute all of our secrets? This information comes only from the Unclassified Pentagon and FBI reports. How much more damage has hillary wrought that is still classified? Probably it's still classified so our enemies don't know the actual depth they have penetrated into our National Defense and Commercial Research projects.

>

Another chilling and also Hillary Damning report comes from a European intelligence official who ferreted out information that many of the top management for Skolkovo are in dual roles as high ranking FSB officers. that translates out to intelligence gathering and not to tech engineers.  Again a complete miss by Dame Hillary to weaken and expose the United States to danger through her Political Ineptitude,Personal Arrogance, Aeonian Greed, and Native Stupidity.

>

We must remember Hillary was the architect of the "Reset" with Russia and in typical gullible fashion (Lets hope it was not contrived as part of Soros' agenda she seems to be carrying out) decided to in the fashion of a modern day Neville Chamberlain, appease Putin and get on favorable terms with him by supporting the idea of aiding and abetting Moscow in the development of a Russian Silicon Valley. Did she not see anything, even the obvious that it would eventually compete with American interests and cost American jobs? Not to mention the effect it would have on businesses that provide our National Security.

>

What the American Public needs to know is how much did Hillary and her Clinton Slush Fund Foundation earn for selling America out to Russia's Military and Intelligence Services.

>

Here are three potential names of Clinton Foundation 'Donors', that bear investigating in regards to the Skolkovo Issue; Source of Top Donors information; http://www.forbes.com/pictures/hhge45l/hillary-clintons-top-do/#463...

>

1. Stephen Silberstein  Co-Founder of Innovative Technologies  a software creator. even though he sold his interest in the company in 2001 he gave $800,000 to Hillary. Background information at https://ballotpedia.org/Stephen_M._Silberstein

2. Henry&Marsha Laufer ; Henry B. Laufer was Vice President of Research at Renaissance Technologies. In addition to funding a research center at Stony Brook University with a $10 M grant  Donated $2 M to Hillary's Foundation. Henry's profile at https://www.msri.org/people/274

3. James Simons http://www.insidermonkey.com/hedge-fund/renaissance+technologies/5/ and Bio. and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Harris_Simons  Showing Renassiance Technologies he founded James is also a code breaker.

>

These are just three of the top investors in Hillary's campaign, all of them need to be investigated and cross checked to see if they had any involvement or profiteering from Hillary's Skolkovo deal.

 

 

[M]

You can also cross check this list (  https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors?category=%2410%2C000... ) of 'Donors the Foundation Officially listed and see who is listed there as compared to the Forbes list. You will be amazed what is missing from the Official Foundation Disclosure list.