We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

Comey's Layup for Clinton

Reopened just so he could exonerate her again right before the election?

Mark Alexander · Nov. 7, 2016

Over the weekend, Democrats and Republicans retreated to their initial assessments of FBI Director James Comey after he retreated to his initial exoneration of Hillary Clinton three months ago.

However, in my analysis 10 days ago regarding Comey’s “reopened investigation” into Hillary Clinton, I emphasized this caveat: It was possible this was an eleventh hour play for Comey to exonerate Clinton — again. I based this assessment on Barack Obama’s highly suspect praise of Comey right after the re-opened case announcement.

Then, I wrote that Obama’s affirmation of Comey could mean he already knows that Comey will announce, by the end of the week, that the FBI has completed a preliminary review of the new emails and that Comey will, again, clear Clinton of any wrongdoing.

Indeed, Comey did just that in a follow-up letter to Congress Sunday: “Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton. I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short-period of time.” (Apparently, his investigators were able to read 650,000 emails in seven days — that’s 92,857 a day…)

So, what to conclude about this latest political charade? Either Comey is profoundly inept, or his “case re-opened” notification to Congress was a lay-up for Clinton’s campaign — to raise her corrupt off-grid communications again just so he could exonerate her again right before the election.

And that leaves us right where we started regarding the Clintons' criminal enterprises, as I noted last Friday.

Our nation has survived two World Wars and a catastrophic Great Depression. Can our country survive the abject corruption of another Clinton administration in the wake and ruins of two Obama terms — and the appointment of Supreme Court justices who will shred our Constitution?

The nation will survive but the Republic, and its foundation of Liberty as affirmed in our Constitution, is on the eve of suffering the most significant insult in American history.

The only way to avoid nationalizing the Clinton’s crime syndicate is to defeat Hillary Clinton at the polls.

Views: 154

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

FBI Clears Clinton in Latest Email Review Two Days Before Election

FBI Director James Comey made the announcement in a letter to Congress

Hillary Clinton

Reuters

BY: Reuters
November 6, 2016 4:27 pm

By Alana Wise and John Whitesides

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The FBI said on Sunday it still believed no charges were warranted against Democrat Hillary Clinton after finishing its review of newly discovered emails related to her private server, lifting a cloud over her presidential campaign two days before the U.S. election.

FBI Director James Comey made the announcement in a letter to Congress on Sunday, saying the agency had not changed its conclusions from July that no criminal charges were warranted against Clinton for her use of a private email server for government work.

“The FBI investigative team has been working around the clock to process and review a large volume of emails from a device obtained in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation,” Comey said in the letter.

“During that process, we reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state.”

A law enforcement source told Reuters the conclusion closes for now the FBI probe of the former secretary of state’s email practices.

Comey had informed Congress of the newly discovered emails more than a week ago, throwing the race for the White House into turmoil and eroding Clinton’s lead over Republican candidate Donald Trump in the final stretch before Tuesday’s vote.

“I am very grateful to the professionals at the FBI for doing an extraordinary amount of high-quality work in a short period of time,” Comey said.

Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri told reporters aboard Clinton’s campaign plan that, “We are glad the matter is resolved.”

Federal investigators got a warrant a week ago to examine the emails to see if they were related to the probe into Clinton’s private server.

The latest emails were discovered as part of a separate probe of former Democratic U.S. Representative Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Weiner is the target of an FBI investigation into illicit text messages he is alleged to have sent to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina.

News of the renewed probe hurt Clinton’s poll numbers, with Trump cutting into her once formidable lead amid renewed worries about her trustworthiness. Trump had highlighted the issue as proof for his argument that Clinton is corrupt.

But at a rally in Minneapolis after news of the FBI conclusion broke, Trump delivered his standard lines about Clinton without mentioning the latest news.

“Hillary Clinton will be under investigation for a long long time,” he said, before his comments were overtaken by a chant of “Lock her up!”

(Additional reporting by Amanda Becker and Howard Schneider; Editing by Caren Bohan, Bill Trott and Paul Simao)

http://freebeacon.com/politics/fbi-clears-clinton-latest-email-revi...

BREAKING: Comey Caves AGAIN, Lets Hillary OFF The Hook

Have we been rope-a-doped?

Rush Limbaugh predicted as much, didn’t he? Was he right?

Here’s the letter, right from the horse’s ass mouth:

unknown

Or, to paraphrase the letter in more familiar terms:

We do not have federal investigations with that woman, Mrs. Clinton…

So, they got everyone to ‘turn the channel’ by baiting us with a red herring. The nation’s attention focussed on FBI investigations … ‘generally’… most not following closely enough to distinguish between the pay-for-play and the email cases, which are being investigated by different arms of the FBI.

Meaning, the Pay-for-play investigation has NOT been ‘closed’, it was never discussed at all. — Don’t let them get away with saying anything to the contrary.

The President praised Comey one day for his fairness, scolded him the next day for getting too involved in the political process, and now we have Comey announcing that we’re back to square 1.

Remember that without cooperation of the DOJ, nothing Comey does will lead to prosecution.

(Aaaaand… Lynch has been promised job security by Hillary… which she will NOT have under Trump — how’s THAT for conflict of interest? — right around the time Bill met her on the tarmac, most likely making an offer she ‘couldn’t refuse’.)

With the tangled web of potentially serious conflicts-of-interest in such a clandestine meeting — we are well within our right to suspect some sort of deal.

The bigger question is… what have we STOPPED talking about while everyone discussed Weiner?

— Pay for play Clinton machine… and FBI

— Collusion between DNC and ‘Journalists’

— Skyrocketing Obamacare premiums.

— Policy failures

— Latest Wikileaks (just like Rush warned us)
— including Hillary and ISIS paid by the same government!
— Podesta’s overall creepiness

— Hillary’s ACTUAL ties to Russia
–including multiple conflicts of interest

— Hillary’s backroom deals

— Hillary’s casual dismissal of Benghazi
— ‘post-game’

— Vote manipulation

— Paid Thugs protesting Rivals

— VERITAS Videos

You will notice, of course, that they are already building a narrative about ‘fake Wikileaks’… why? Because they probably already have an idea of what else could be coming.

http://clashdaily.com/2016/11/breaking-comey-caves-lets-hillary-off...

QUESTION: If All Questions Are Decided By Lynch, Comey & Obama, Why Have A Congress?

We DO take the time and trouble to HAVE one after all, don’t we?

Maybe we could let them… you know… do their appointed job?

congress-meme

Obama has already shown us he doesn’t need ‘We the people’ to start a war. (Who needs Congress for that?)

There was THIS objection about how the proper roles of House and Senate were ignored for Obamacare. Which is why some STILL maintain it is illegitimate.

Wiki had this to say:

One of Congress’s foremost non-legislative functions is the power to investigate and oversee the executive branch.[74] Congressional oversight is usually delegated to committees and is facilitated by Congress’s subpoena power.[75] Some critics have charged that Congress has in some instances failed to do an adequate job of overseeing the other branches of government. In the Plame affair, critics including Representative Henry A. Waxman charged that Congress was not doing an adequate job of oversight in this case.[76] There have been concerns about congressional oversight of executive actions such as warrantless wiretapping, although others respond that Congress did investigate the legality of presidential decisions.[77] Political scientists Ornstein and Mann suggested that oversight functions do not help members of Congress win reelection. Congress also has the exclusive power of removal, allowing impeachment and removal of the president, federal judges and other federal officers.[78] There have been charges that presidents acting under the doctrine of the unitary executive have assumed important legislative and budgetary powers that should belong to Congress.

Watching how the Executive branch tries to ignore, obstruct or limit the legitimate powers, one might wonder if George Will was right in calling the Capitol building a ‘tomb for the antiquated idea that the legislative branch matters.’

What do YOU think?

Hat tip to Michael Walsh for the question that follows.

A little about Walsh:

Author — The Devil’s Pleasure Palace: The Cult of Critical Theory and the Su...

In the aftermath of World War II, America stood alone as the world’s premier military power. Yet its martial confidence contrasted vividly with its sense of cultural inferiority. Still looking to a defeated and dispirited Europe for intellectual and artistic guidance, the burgeoning transnational elite in New York and Washington embraced not only the war’s refugees, but many of their ideas as well, and nothing has proven more pernicious than those of the Frankfurt School and its reactionary philosophy of “critical theory.” —

http://clashdaily.com/2016/11/question-questions-decided-lynch-come...

It’s A Miracle!! Comey Says FBI Went Through 650,000 Emails In Nine Days

Whoever says God no longer performs miracles has just been proven wrong. You see it took the FBI almost a year to go through the first 55,000 pages of emails. But by some miracle the FBI went through 650,000 emails in NINE DAYS. Holy cow they are good!

Think about it 9 days X 24 hours in a day X 60 minutes in an hour= 12,960 minutes. Therefore the FBI just went through 650,000 emails in 12,960 minutes or 50.15 emails every minute (with no breaks or sleep). Another way to look at it is 650,000 emails in 761,400 seconds or one email every 1.2 seconds. See it had to be a miracle.

Well either that, or once again Loretta Lynch pressured James Comey to save Hillary’s candidacy. Because only one week since we found out that there were 650,000 emails for them to go through, James Comey decided that there was nothing in the 650,000 emails that change his initial decision that despite the fact that Hillary was negligent in her handling of America’s secrets no one would ever prosecute her (because she is the Democratic Candidate and his boss the Attorney General wants her to win).

Continue Reading

I have a baseball bat with barbed wire wrapped around it. If I can be of any help, let me know.
Please do not give up without a fight.

What Did the Comey Investigation Accomplish? (Was It to Distract People from Wikileaks?)

By: Joe Scudder

The Comey investigation apparently ended abruptly on Sunday leaving us to figure out: Why?

The supposedly reopened Comey investigation found no reason to prosecute, we are told.

According to the Daily Mail,

The FBI has announced it will not make any changes to its July decision on Hillary Clinton’s emails, meaning the Democratic nominee will not be charged.

Congressman Jason Chaffetz first tweeted out the massive news on Sunday afternoon before FBI Director James Comey released a letter that said the investigation was closed.

‘FBI Dir just informed us ‘Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Sec Clinton’,’ Chaffetz wrote.

Speaking to reporters with Clinton in Cleveland, Ohio, Director of Communications Jennifer Palmieri confirmed the camp had seen Comey’s letter.

‘We have seen Director Comey’s latest letter to the Hill. We are glad to see that he has found, as we were confident that he would, that he has confirmed the conclusion that he reached in July, and we’re glad that this matter is resolved,’ Palmieri said.

The investigation was reopened on October 28 – sparked by a DailyMail.com story that revealed Anthony Weiner was sending sexually explicit messages to a 15-year-old girl. The emails in question were found on Weiner’s laptop.

It seems weird to me that the Comey investigation, if it could be resolved so quickly, would have warranted a letter to Congress that caused all the controversy.

What’s going on?

Read More:  http://constitution.com/

I dont know but it could just as well have resulted in more interest.

So much is happening I fear a future shock has set in and has people's heads spinning.

I can say for near certain if HRC does take the office it's legitimacy is zero with a majority of the country, imagine all the party games that implies. 

Now is that unintended consequence or the goal all along?

Seems right out of the playbook to me.

BREAKING: FBI JUST REVEALED HUUUGE FIND IN CLINTON INVESTIGATION! GET READY FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP!

252,109 views
Published on Nov 6, 2016

Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | UPDATE UPDATE: This report was recorded yesterday. Here is the latest update: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5qA5...

Got Kids or Grandkids? Take a break at our new Kids Channel:
(( SUBSCRIBE )) http://bit.ly/sub-to-Banchi-Brothers

See the updated report here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5qA5...

Read more:
http://www.libertywritersnews.com/201...

FBI Director James Comey: Hillary Should Not Face Criminal Charges. But Who Conducted the Investigation? FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe Whose Wife Received $467,500

Region: USA
In-depth Report: U.S. Elections
comey

FBI Director James Comey (image left) decided to issue a report two days before the November election confirming that there is no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hillary in relation to the recent release of  650,000 Emails on October 28th. 

First let us outline the official MSM story as presented by the media (November 6): Washington Post  echoed by CNN Anderson Cooper et al. What the reports intimate is that the FBI worked assiduously around the clock and found nothing incriminating in the trove of 650,000 emails:

From the moment they secured a warrant, dozens of FBI agents worked night and day to analyze a trove of messages that they thought might help advance their probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, according to a U.S. official.

The pressure was intense. …. The agents’ work, at first, seemed endless. They had to use special software to sift through some 650,000 emails.

(WP, November 9, 2016)

According to CNN, Hillary is Clean. “Cleared” by the FBI:  ”FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Sunday the agency hasn’t changed its opinion that Hillary Clinton should not face criminal charges  after a review of new emails.”

“Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July,” Comey wrote in the new letter to congressional committee chairmen. (CNN, November 6, 2016)

 There is however something fishy with the mainstream media story.  The report is accepted at face value by the media. No discussion, no debate of what’s in the emails, etc.  The Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus issued the following statement in a letter to Congress:

 “The FBI found evidence Clinton broke the law, that she placed highly classified national security information at risk and repeatedly lied to the American people about her reckless conduct.”

“None of this changes the fact that the FBI continues to investigate the Clinton Foundation for corruption involving her tenure as secretary of state. Hillary Clinton should never be president,”

 Washington Post Video at link below:

Who Was in Charge of the Investigation

About Turn at the FBI?  The media reports fail to mention the name of the FBI official who was in charge. It wasn’t Comey. It was his number two man, deputy director of the FBI Andrew McCabe. (image right).

While McCabe was in charge of the investigation, FBI Director Comey was entrusted with the release of a formal statement to the US Congressional committee.

There is reason to question the validity of the investigation led by Andrew McCabe.

To put it mildly: Andrew McCabe is in conflict of interest. (This has been the object of a previous article by the author)

Let us review the chronology.

1. Andrew McCabe is senior official of the FBI and husband of Dr. Jill McCabe who ran for the State senate of Virginia in 2015.

2. According to the WSJ, Hillary’s “Ally” Governor of Virginia Terry McAuliffe allocated $675,000 in support of Jill McCabe’s candidacy.

“The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use” (WSJ, October 23, updated October 24, 2016)

3. A few months later, in late January 2016, Andrew McCabe is promoted to the rank of Deputy Director of the FBI and put charge of the investigation into  Hillary’s Emails.

Screenshot of FBI Press Release, January 29,2016

4. Following the release of a WSJ report on October 23, the nearly $500,000 transaction in favor of Andrew McCabe’s wife is made public.

5. The WSJ as well as other reports suggest internal conflicts as well as corruption within the FBI: Possible divisions between Comey and his Deputy who was “indirectly” bribed by Hillary Clinton?

6. Five days later on October 28, FBI director James Comey decides “to go clean” with a Second letter to the US Congress.

7. Upon the release of Comey’s second letter, the FBI director is accused of breaking the law.

8. In a bitter irony, nobody actually points to the fact that Andrew McCabe rather than James Comey had broken the law. The fact that Andrew McCabe’s wife had received close to half a million dollars has gone totally unnoticed. Was James Comey being sidelined in favor of Andrew McCabe? Was Andrew McCabe involved in stalling the investigation? The Wall Street Journal (October 30, 2016) points to an Internal Feud within the FBI:

FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe

Laptop may contain thousands of messages sent to or from Mrs. Clinton’s private server

“…Others further down the FBI chain of command, however, said agents were given a much starker instruction on the case: “Stand down.” When agents questioned why they weren’t allowed to take more aggressive steps, they said they were told the order had come from the deputy director—Mr. McCabe.”

Was James Comey and the senior staff of the FBI pressured into accepting McCabe’s twisted report?

“… Others familiar with the matter deny Mr. McCabe or any other senior FBI official gave such a stand-down instruction. (Ibid)

9. Hillary had bought out the police chief, who in January 2016 was promoted Number Two Man of the FBI and put in charge of investigating her alleged wrongdoings. How convenient. Needless to say Andrew McCabe was NOT the object of a police investigation. If he had things would have turned out differently.

10.  While James Comey issued an official statement on November 6, “clearing Clinton” none of the news reports mentioned that Andrew McCabe rather than James Comey was in charge of the police investigation.

11. None of reports point to conflict of interest and the fact that Andrew McCabe was protected by Hillary Clinton.

12. Without getting into the detail of what’s in the trove of emails, which has been the object of  media coverage and analysis (See recent articles by Global Research), there are grounds to question the validity of both Andrew McCabe’s investigation as well as the official statement issued by FBI Director James Comey.

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service