Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

How The Government Has Infringed On Our 2A Rights

Through Deliberate Government Misdirection-Misrepresentation And Chicanery, Our Constitutional Rights As Intended By Our Founders Have Been Systematically Changed And Denied.

Unfortunately Congressional Progressive Democratic Gun Grabbers, are trying to outlaw all semi-automatic rifles, and the way it's written, possibly handguns too with the exception of the police agencies (all of them federal and local) and the military.That bodes evil for all Americans since throughout All of History, the ruling class has forbade weapons to their civilian populations to keep them in iron fisted control. Look how many innocent civilians have been murdered by their "Fearless Leaders" in the last 120 years. I am sure you know who said "Power Corrupts, Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely".Even though it's anathema to Americans, we are seeing a rapidly advancing situation with American leaders. I cite the Progressive/Socialist/Liberal Democrats, and much of the Republican Party, and possibly all of it, Sanders Socialist Party, and the list goes on and on.

Not much of our original Republic is left, only the semblance of it that is still useful to control the masses.That is the great hidden strength of our detractors; the fact that most Americans still believe America is the strong Constitutional Republic W/Democratic Principles we were taught in school it was. They still naively believe the basic morals and integrity remains, when what I see of our politicians denies that being true.Think back to the 40's and 50's when things were presented to the public as black and white choices between American Capitalism and Russian Communism.America was presented to us as the shining example of freedom for all the world to see. WE still had guns,(except machine guns) much of the non-lethal devices were forbidden to the public like the cattle prods that became stun guns.Tear gas and it's derivatives. We were allowed to keep our semi automatic rifles like the M1 Garand which was specifically designed for combat. We were even allowed to own the Sterling SMG until the govt. found out that putting the safety on half turned it into a full auto machine gun and had to issue grandfathered permits to those who legally bought them.

By the way, Machine Guns were and are not illegal to own provided you pay the tax for them, you pass an extensive background check, and they were made before the cut off date in the 1980's. Statistics show that there was never a legally owned SMG used in a crime or a mass shooting in the USA after 1930's gangster era. My point is, having all that we did not have mass shootings, nor did we have the implanted fear of fire arms in the hands of a law abiding public. If you check history carefully, you will find that the Democratic Party has always been the one that put restrictions and workarounds on our Constitutional Freedoms for their crony's benefits, from the original push for slavery being legal, through the Jim Crow laws, the Dixiecrat Era, Creation of the KKK, Sponsoring Planned Parenthood for genocidal purposes under Margaret Langer,and now the welfare slavery and illegal immigrants DACA defense, to bolster their voting base.

Democrat Gun Grabbers and their MSM Toadies/Lap Dogs;

I beg to differ with you on certain rifles that had counterparts of the military ones, like the AR-18 and it's civilian version the AR-180. (https://gundigest.com/more/classic-guns/ar-18-armalites-black-rifle) Here's a quote from that article "The AR-18 had a civilian counterpart called the AR-180. This was designed to be a sporting rifle or a police long arm, and was semi-automatic only. It sold marginally well. "

Much of the Deliberate Confusion Perpetrated on the public by the Gun Grabber Crowd, comes from the Military Only; Armalite AR 15 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArmaLite_AR-15) Quote from article; The ArmaLite AR-15 was a select-fire, air-cooled, gas-operated, magazine-fed assault riflemanufactured in the United States between 1959 and 1964. Designed by American gun manufacturer ArmaLite in 1956, it was based on its AR-10 rifle. The ArmaLite AR-15 was designed to be a lightweight assault rifle and to fire a new high-velocity, lightweight, small-caliber cartridge to allow the infantrymen to carry more ammunition.^[4] The rifle was not available for civilian use. It followed the AR10 created specifically as an assault weapon.

The Civilian AR-15 we have today is the Colt AR-15 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colt_AR-15) Quote from article; "The Colt AR-15 is a lightweight, 5.56×45mm, magazine-fed, gas-operated semi-automatic rifle. It was designed to be manufactured with the extensive use of aluminum alloys and synthetic materials. It is a semi-automatic version of the United States military M16 rifle. Colt's Manufacturing Company currently uses the AR-15 trademark for its line of semi-automatic AR-15 rifles that are marketed to civilian and law-enforcement customers. Notice it was always intended to be a civilian weapon. Today you can get look alike AR's chambered in the .22, .223, .308, .300, but not so much in the military 5.56x45 mm (NATO) round.

The M14 rifle, officially the United States Rifle, 7.62 mm, M14,^[5] is an American automatic rifle that fires 7.62×51mm NATO (commercial .308 Winchester) ammunition. It gradually replaced the M1 Garand rifle in U.S. Army service by 1961 and in U.S. Marine Corps service by 1965. It was the Last Battle rifle issued to US Troops. It to has a version specifically created for Civilian only use.( https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2011/2/22/springfield-m1a...) Quote from article; In 1962, the government’s Springfield Armory—the U.S. arsenal in Massachusetts that is linked by name only to the current Illinois-based company—was instructed to create some modified M14-based rifles for competition use. The guns were to have a number of modifications which basically worked toward the same end: The new rifles would have no full-automatic fire selector nor any means for accommodating one. Where practical, semi-auto M1 parts were installed to replace selective fire components. (See “The First M1As,” American Rifleman, August, 1990). Despite complying with BATF guidelines for a rifle readily suitable for sale to civilians, the gun ran afoul of DCM’s Maj. Gen. Nelson M. Lynde. Gen. Lynde felt the new rifles were not DCM-compliant as they could not be converted back to military issue configuration in the event of a national emergency.

This statement from the DCM shows that it was perfectly acceptable to own civilian versions dedicated to civilian marksmanship programs and personal use that in the event of a national emergency could be refitted as full military versions, which the Colt .223 AR-15 can not without a gunsmith reworking/remachining it.

I do see Oren's points (http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/forum/topics/school-shootings-and-cu...) about the Progressive element manipulating anyone who disagrees with them to argue among themselves about the differences and ignore the Constitution (Remember this fact; Any American could purchase and own any piece of Military equipment they could afford up until the FDR administration created restrictions, even a Machine gun emplacement if they wanted one. Granted most Americans did not want them, but one gunsmith I knew in Pa. had two different ones a German Maxim, and an American one called the Potato digger, the Colt-Browning M1895 air cooled. That was when the 2nd Amendment was still enforced against the Government as it was intended to be by our Founders and Framers of the Constitution.

0 members like this