We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

Have you ever noticed that Obama will only declare ISIL when talking about Terrorism and not ISIS? That is because many Muslims of the Sunni sect believe that ISIL should not be considered as having a place in Islam even though they do the same things through ISIS. That denotes that Obama is somehow connected with the Sunni sect and not the Shia one.
If you really want to read a lot about it:  more or less, they would likely be various jihadist sorts within the Salafi movement ,  see also: Salafi jihadism, and Wahhabi movement.   And  Takfirism: The Key to Understanding ISIL - OnFaith  as well.  
Note, some may call these phenomena "sects".   Others (like those who insist "there are no sects in Islam") may just say these are different kinds of interpretations, or movements.   But all are within Sunni Islam (in fact these types of Sunnis are usually radically anti-Shia, to the point of calling the latter not even Muslim).   It's an aggressive, extremist, puritanical kind of Sunni Islam, basically. With a good measure of geopolitics mixed in. It is considered general Knowledge that ISIL is basically Shia Muslim, and ISIS is basically Sunni Muslim.
Here is a better description of why Obama used the term ISIL instead of ISIS,
Excerpt;
"So by the President saying ‘this is ISIL,’ he is sending the message: I know who you are. I know what lands you are planning to take,” he concluded. “The President knows who these guys are. [But] he’s not telling you who they are.
He’s trying to downplay that they are putting together a caliphate from Egypt to Iran. It does not include Israel.

Maybe we should have a real frank conversation about what’s really going on.” So I disagree with Beck because I believe the President is in on the schism between Sunni and Shia Islam. The sects are in fact mortal enemies and are constantly fighting because of differences of Religious Dogma that determines who is the actual Leader. One side believes that only decedents of Mohammad are entitles to lead Islam, and the other side believes that the leader does not have to be a direct descendent of Mohammad. That makes the schism basically a political conflict and Obama seems to be siding with the Sunni beliefs.

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2014/09/15/why-obamas-use-of-the-term-isil-instead-of-isis-is-actually-really-important/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

Obama Blames The United States 'NOT' Islam For The Mass Murders In Orlando

Source; http://conservativebyte.com/2016/06/obama-finally-pulls-out-the-blame-card-for-the-orlando-massacre/ While this is a good rendition of background and information, but I don't think he is really saying that "He knows who they are and what they are going to do"

As Written By John Podhoretz for The New York Post:
Omar Mateen called the cops to pledge his fealty to ISIS as he was carrying out his mass murder in Orlando early Sunday. Twelve hours later, the president of the United States declared that “we have no definitive assessment on the motivation” of Omar Mateen but that “we know he was a person filled with hate.”
So I guess the president thinks Mateen didn’t mean it?
Here again, and horribly, we have an unmistakable indication that Obama finds it astonishingly easy to divorce himself from a reality he doesn’t like — the reality of the Islamist terror war against the United States and how it is moving to our shores in the form of lone-wolf attacks.
He called it “terror,” which it is. But using the word “terror” without a limiting and defining adjective is like a doctor calling a disease “cancer” without making note of the affected area of the body — because if he doesn’t know where the cancer is and what form it takes, he cannot attack it effectively and seek to extirpate it.
So determined is the president to avoid the subject of Islamist, ISIS-inspired or ISIS-directed terrorism that he concluded his remarks with an astonishing insistence that “we need the strength and courage to change” our attitudes toward the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community.
That’s just disgusting. There’s no other word for it. …..
KEEP READING, THERE IS WAY MORE!!!

Views: 183

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Between Obama, Hillary and various Media (both print and TV/Radio) American whites and the NRA are responsible for all the gun deaths and mayhem.  Shouldn't they all just leave, since we are so bad?   I'd be very willing to have Congress pass a law that they can all go to H---.

And if they really believe guns and gun owners are the root cause of all this, then they must believe they and their armed protectors are even more evil than the rest of America.  Right??  

It's time for everyone to start calling foul to every gun grabber and to Congress if they don't repeal the Slaughter House Shooting Galleries  Gun Free Zones, and start setting the laws of the land straight so good people can defend themselves from the bad guys.

Is this the battle standard for Hillary and the rest of the Elitist Controlled Gun Grabbers in Congress who make vulnerable targets of Americans to pay homage to their "Sacred Agenda" of disarming the public?

It appears that Congress still hasn't gotten the word - even the GOP is considering Gun control bills. And what the heck, is the NRA looking to approve a bit of gun control? I'm checking with Chris Cox and his group at the NRA.; I'm not sure how Wayne Laparre would feel about this,.  I trust no one in Congress or the Government to make a decision on who should have guns just because of a minor misdemeanor charge.

. Understand that none of us want Jihad radicals having guns, but the bills being considered are again directed at us. We all know that those who wish to attack us can get guns - no problem. And oh, by the way, who is the biggest gun pusher in the World? Obama - not only does he sell guns, he also provides them for the terrorists.

Virginia,

We already have gun control measures in every of the Fifty States and the territories. Believe it or not, that's Constitutional because they are State Laws not Federal ones except the ones concerning getting a license for machine guns and silencers. I can see a background check but only to see if someone is eligible to buy a gun meaning not a convicted felon or certified with specific mental problems.

>

Not a check that would disclose what kind and how many guns they bought or own.

>

As to the terror watch list, there needs to be a way that the Government notifies anyone on it and give them a chance to contradict what ever the Government feels is worthy of putting a person on it.

>

Most of the States already have a purchase permit system in place for the purchase of a hand gun, and that covers the private sale of a handgun just like buying one from a dealer.

>

Rifle and other weapons are already governed by a mandatory background check the Feds put on. That only leaves private sales and gifts. The Government wants to clamp down on those sales to make their control complete.

>

I would much rather that the NRA and other gun rights groups got together with the Law Makers and worked out reasonable measures that would protect the Second Amendment Rights of American Citizens while enforcing the laws and rules already on the books including straightening out all the contradictory laws between the States.

>

It's either that or mandate that every adult must own and carry a handgun at all times, everywhere, and be empowered to use it in self defense situations. Seeing that won't be done, We must remain vigilant in the protection of our Constitutional Rights and loudly and publicly challenge the gun grabbers at every turn regardless of the hate, vitriol, ridicule, and innuendo they heap on anyone who won't bow down and kiss their A**.

The Obama administration is using taxpayer dollars to fund a radical anti-Israel group that aims to drive Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from office in March parliamentary elections.

And the U.S.-based group receiving the U.S. government money, OneVoice International, in turn is working with V15, an "independent grassroots movement" in Israel, according to Ha'aretz. V15's unofficial motto is said to be "anyone but Bibi," a reference that includes the prime minister's nickname.
Makes me ask the QUESTION is oboma funding anybody but Trump?
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/250375/obama-funding-anti-bibi-camp...

The real question is; Why Aren't We Hearing It In The News?  Lets see how far we can spread this item around the net. Twitter, Facebook, any and all the networks so the people at least get to see the duplicity of Obama and his hidden puppet masters.

August 24, 2016
The Enemy Is Us
By Peter Gemma

Your government is on red alert: between 2006 and 2014, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), an agency of the Department of Agriculture, spent nearly $4.8 million to purchase shotguns, propane cannons, liquid explosives, pyro supplies, drones, thermal imaging cameras, and more.

APHIS describes itself as “a multi-faceted Agency with a broad mission area that includes protecting and promoting U.S. agricultural health, administering the Animal Welfare Act, and carrying out wildlife damage management activities.” Liquid explosives and shotguns are apparently necessary to carry out its “broad mission.”

This is one of many revelations found in a new investigative report titled “The Militarization of America: Non-Military Federal Agencies Purchases of Guns, Ammo, and Military-style Equipment” published by American Transparency, a nonpartisan watchdog group. Former U.S. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), chairman of the organization, points out that, “In the nine years until 2014, we found 67 agencies unaffiliated with the Defense Department bought $1.48 billion in weapons and ammunition. Of this total, $335.1 million was spent by agencies traditionally viewed as regulatory or administrative, such as the Smithsonian Institution and the US Mint.”

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/08/the_enemy_is_us.htm...
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service