We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

Reconciliation For The Total Repeal Of Obamacare Botched By Republican Infighting

Source of Article incorporated into thread; Heritage Action for America | 214 Massachusetts Avenue NE, Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20002 

When I read things like this I absolutely wonder what we are fighting, is it the Progressives? Is it the Progressive Democrats and RINO's, Is it in fact both parties with a few exceptions in the Republican Party that are actually Conservative? This piece came from Heritage Action and exemplifies what is wrong with our political system. Could you please ask Bill Pascoe to investigate this and determine it's veracity? If it is valid, we may have to reevaluate our fight after getting a predominant Republican Party in power in Washington and try to get a viable third party that embraces our ideology started up in the 4 year interim. Something like the split that came into being when the Republicans split off from the Democratic Republican Party before the Civil War and became the Republican Party. Maybe something like the Conservative Republican Party?

Here is the article;

Mr.&Mrs.,

I wanted to make sure you saw Mike’s Breitbart piece from this weekend. Instead of fighting for the full and total repeal of Obamacare, the GOP leadership fumbled the process and made a mess of reconciliation.

I'd encourage you to read the article below to help add some context to the current - less than ideal - state of play.

-Russ

 

By: Michael Needham

In May, Republicans voted for a budget agreement that “affirmed the use of reconciliation for the sole purpose of repealing the President’s job-killing health care law.” It was a position that united an all-too-often fractured party. The promise to repeal Obamacare in its entirety delivered Republicans the House in 2010 and the Senate in 2014.

 

As we explained back in May, the case for full repeal via reconciliation is straightforward.

The process of drafting and passing a reconciliation measure through both chambers would serve as a trial run. And as we’ve seen in recent months, a trial run is certainly needed. There is ample evidence that a one-provision repeal of all of Obamacare would be allowed by Senate rules, but proving that case should not wait until 2017.

 

Equally as important, the effort would reassure voters of the Republican-controlled Congress’s commitment to sending a bill repealing all of Obamacare to the president’s desk in 2017 — when it would be signed into law.

And it would remind every insurance company, hospital, industry group and boutique lobbying firm with a vested interest in Obamacare that the law remains unsettled. As insurance companies contemplate leaving the Obamacare market, the continued uncertainty surrounding the law would ensure it did not calcify.

 

Unfortunately, the reconciliation bill passed by the House earlier this year falls far short of Republicans’ promise to their constituents. A new Congressional Research Services memo found the bill would leave 82-percent of Obamacare’s tax burden in place. Obamacare’s main two entitlement expansions – the Medicaid expansion and the exchange subsidies – would remain in place and unchanged. And Obamacare’s new insurance rules and regulations would remain intact.

 

This bill would NOT repeal major portions of Obamacare, as some suggest. Not even close.

Yet, most Republicans went along with this approach because many in the pro-life community were eager for a way to avoid a fight on the September or December government funding bills. Planned Parenthood is a wretched, immoral organization that should not receive another dime. But the fake fight on reconciliation would not accomplish such a goal.

 

Republican leaders used this opportunity to turn two important conservative policy priorities into competing agendas and divide the conservative movement. This is leadership-orchestrated conservative sectarianism at its very worst.

 

Party leaders split the conservative movement, pitting the Obamacare repeal coalition against pro-life activists, by offering a fig leaf. They pretend they could accomplish both goals through reconciliation, and by co-opting some in the pro-life movement eager for victories they were able to undermine the party’s long-held public commitment to fully repealing Obamacare.

As The Hill’s Alexander Bolton observed last week, there is a growing sense that GOP leaders are not “fully committed to a wholesale repeal of the law.” The reconciliation measure passed through the House is exhibit A. Bolton continues:

“It would be embarrassing, to say the least, if most of the Senate GOP conference voted for a repeal package that the party’s future nominee rejected as too weak.”

 

No conservative can sit on the sidelines as party elites content with managing the status quo divide us, and force us to fight for scraps on our respective issues. Right now, pro-life leaders are attacking the likes of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) for their commitment to “fully repeal[ing] Obamacare pursuant to Senate rules.”

The elites eager to avoid fully repealing Obamacare and completely defunding Planned Parenthood are smiling. And laughing.

 

If pro-life leaders want to “pass strongest [reconciliation] bill possible with 51 Republican votes” they should join, not disparage, the Cruz-Lee-Rubio alliance. They should praise the likes of North Carolina’s Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC), not gin up primary threats. If they are genuine, pro-life leaders must tell Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) that they will not support any reconciliation bill unless it “fully repeals Obamacare pursuant to Senate rules.” And we will continue to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with leading pro-life groups in demanding the GOP leadership do everything they can to defund Planned Parenthood.

 

This is how conservatives win, by standing firm against leadership’s desire to divide and fragment the conservative base of the Republican Party. If we want 2017 to be as successful for conservatives as 2009 was for Barack Obama, we must get off the sidelines and unite around serious conservative policies.

Reconciliation isn’t a test for President Rubio or President Cruz – it is a test for the conservative movement, and one our nation cannot afford for us to fail.

Heritage Action for America | 214 Massachusetts Avenue NE, Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20002 

 

In my opinion, this fiasco has the stench of Karl Rove's fingerprints all over it. We must start discrediting the ability and capability of Rove and all Republicans like him if we are to see this mess through to a win for Conservatives and our values. Otherwise we will lose more than the election, we will lose the Constitution and Nation.

Views: 21

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

doesn't sound like infighting but more like the progressive arm of the GOP that wants a government healthcare fighting back against the  freedom loving Americans that joined the GOP to fight for FREEDOM...you know the true RINO"S..  the republican party is just another rot cancer on AMERICA!!!!

 

wish I could say this subject is still on the top of the list of grievances...but I cant ...so WTF where did all the tea party go or did they ever exist?????

starting to look like it was all a hoax to get votes for the GOP...not freedom for the people 

Blades, You gotta admit it showcases the problems we are having with the Establishment Republicans.

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service