We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

The Legal Side Of Using A Firearm To Protect Yourself Or Anyone

This is a recent article from Modern Combat & Survival ;

Jeff Anderson
Even though the parking lot was dark, Joe could clearly see the baseball bat in one guy's hand...
 
The other 3 hoodlums also moved into "attack position" as Joe made his way to his car and - fearing for his life - pulled his concealed handgun from its holster and forcefully told them to "STAND BACK!"
 
Joe didn't have to fire a shot - the thugs backed off - and a passing police officer stopped to hear both sides of the story.
 
A few months (and a mountain of lawyer bills) later, Joe Nichols is facing a 5-year sentence for Felony Menacing(called "brandishing" in some states) - a verdict that would make him a "felon for life" and never able to legally own a firearm again.
 
Joe's wife and kids prayed for a miracle from their courtroom seats and...

It Looked Like "Self-Defense" Until 
The Jury Saw THIS Piece Of Paper...
Click Here To Protect Yourself In Court
Here's how the transcript would likely sound during the DA's cross examination of Joe...
DA:  "Mr. Nichols you pulled that gun to scare these kids didn't you? They weren't really bothering you at all, you just had to show them you had the upper hand didn't you, and that you had a pistol?"
 
JOE:  "No, there were four of them, they were all moving to position on me at the same time and it was obvious they planned to attack me ... I was in fear for my life."
 
DA:  "In fear for your life? You're saying you wouldn't have displayed your gun and menaced these kids if you didn't feel threatened?"
 
JOE: "Well of course I wouldn't."
 
DA :  "That puzzles me Mr. Nichols because on the 'Guns a Blazing Blog' two months ago, someone posted how he felt a little uncomfortable when four youths were around him in a subway car.  
In response, you commented - and I quote - you wrote:'If that were me, those little sons of bitches would sh-t their pants when they saw my gun'.  Now which is it sir, were you lying then... or are you lyingNOW?!"
A little scary to think about, but this is the way courtrooms and DA's really work.
Congress and the American Bar Assoc. say it's legal to use anything you post online against you in court... and you can be damn sure the DA will twist it 'six ways from Hell' to boot.  
Now ask yourself... what have YOU posted on-line for eternity?
Here Are 4 Ways To Avoid A "Guilty" Verdict
If You're Ever Forced To Pull The Trigger…
1. Live It:  ALL Lives Matter
Life is precious and shooting someone isn’t “fun” - no matter how much you think they deserve it.
Ask any police officer or soldier who's had to watch someone die from a bullet from their weapon - even when their target was trying to kill them.
Pulling the trigger may be necessary to save your life or the life of someone you love - but the psychological scars are long-lasting.
Even more so if you’re spending the rest of your life behind bars and unable to attend your kid’s and grand-kid’s birthdays, graduations, weddings, etc. because you’re behind bars.
Don’t stroke your ego with b.s. smacktalk to your friends and in online comments.
2. Save The Sarcasm And Jokes
When you do post, remember… “sarcasm” can't be seen on a computer screen… or when 'printed out on paper.  
When the DA or Judge holds up a print-out of your blog comment about how “all those little dirtbags would be pushin’ up daisies in my backyard if they ever tried that with me”, it WON’T be read with a snicker and giggle to the jury.  
It will be read as if you’re the neighborhood gun-nutwho should be locked up “before you strike again”.
Grow up and be professional with your comments.
3. "Reverse" Your Public Image
Ok, so you’ve done your analysis and you’re thinking of all those “oopsies” you’ve littered around the internet that can be used against you now, eh?
Don’t worry - you’re not screwed (yet)…
It actually HELPS if you post comments online to show how your views have "changed"... but ONLY if you actually know your legal responsibilities in a shooting.
More on this in a second...
4. Adopt A “Legal Mind-Set”
I think it's completely irresponsible for any gun-owner to not fully understand the correct legal justification of when you can even pull out your "smoke wagon" in the first place.
I can tell you that 90% of the gun-owners I talk to are absolutely clueless about their “shoot-don’t shoot” decision-making (even those who consider themselves "experts").
Attorneys LOVE numbskull gun-owners who don’t understand the legal system.
They’ll run circles around you on the stand unless you can INTELLIGENTLY explain why you felt you were justified to pull the trigger.
You don't have to be a lawyer... but you DO have to know your legal responsibilities of when you can even pull out your firearm, let alone fire it (even in self-defense).
As you can see, the courtroom can be a virtual minefield of mistakes that can ruin the rest of your life.
The "Reasonable Man Doctrine" is what allows the prosecutor to pull in your frame of mind before the shooting as evidence against you.
But YOU can use this same Doctrine to your advantage as well by showing your efforts to take your legal responsibility seriously.
One way is to take a legal class that could back you up as "proof" of your prior knowledge before you were attacked.  But those are hard to come by and VERY expensive (lawyers aren't cheap, you know.)
As an alternative, we created the Bulletproof Defense DVD - to not only show you your legal responsibilities in a clear, concise and "visual way" (without all that "lawyer speak"), but to ALSO give you the evidence you need if you ever have to defend your actions in a court of law.
You see, this DVD can actually be submitted as evidential PROOF that you knew what you were doing when you defended yourself.
Not "tactically"... I'm talking LEGALLY!
But you MUST show that you owned (and watched) the DVD BEFORE you were forced to fire, or it does you no good in court.
I believe every single gun-owner is naked (in legal terms) without it.
Prepare. Train. Survive.
Image
Jeff Anderson   
Editor
MCS Magazine

Views: 17

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here is something that will make the cry baby Libs go postal against;

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service