Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

Just when we thought it could not get any more disgusting....

SICK! New Planned Parenthood Video Features Advisor Saying “EVERYTHING WE PROVIDE IS FRESH”

September 15, 2015 by Aleister

This may be one of the worst Planned Parenthood videos so far. An official laughs and sips her drink as she talks about eyes, hearts, spinal cords and gonads. She also says everything they provide is “fresh” as if she was talking about pieces of meat.

Watch:

Hot Air has a partial transcript:

“We’ve just been working with people who want particular tissues, like, you know, they want cardiac, or they want eyes, or they want neural,” says Dr. Westhoff to a prospective fetal organ buyer. “Certainly, everything we provide–oh, gonads! Oh my God, gonads. Everything we provide is fresh.” Westhoff continues, “Obviously, we would have the potential for a huge P.R. issue in doing this,” before offering to introduce the buyers to “national office abortion people” from Planned Parenthood.

If you made this up, no one would believe you. It’s like something out of a horror movie.

http://www.progressivestoday.com/sick-new-planned-parenthood-video-...

0 members like this

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by FreedomRider on November 13, 2015 at 3:32pm

Wendy Davis: I Aborted My Baby ‘Out of Love’

Former Texas state senator Wendy Davis said in an interview published Tuesday that she had an abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy “out of love” for her daughter.

Permalink Reply by FreedomRider on November 13, 2015 at 3:32pm

OMG now I have heard it all.

Permalink Reply by Love of Country on November 13, 2015 at 8:24pm

That is the lie she tells herself so she can look in the mirror everyday.

Permalink Reply by FreedomRider on November 14, 2015 at 2:08pm

Indeed.

Permalink Reply by Love of Country on November 13, 2015 at 8:23pm

Supreme Court to hear landmark challenge on abortion access

By Sarah Ferris - 11/13/15 02:26 PM EST

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday it will hear a challenge to a wide-reaching and contentious Texas abortion law, marking the beginning of the biggest legal fight over abortion in two decades.

It’s the first time in eight years that the justices have taken up a case involving abortion rights, and this one will have a particularly strong ripple effect. The decision in the case, Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole, will be expected less than six months before the 2016 elections — guaranteeing that abortion will break out as a top issue on the campaign.

In the case, the justices will determine whether a two-year-old law in Texas poses an “undue burden” on women’s legal right to terminate a pregnancy. That standard was set during the landmark 1992 ruling on Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and abortion opponents are hoping to change nearly 25 years of precedent.

The Center for Reproductive Rights, which filed the case on behalf of a Texas clinic at risk of closure, quickly cheered the court’s move.

“Today the Supreme Court took an important step toward restoring the constitutional rights of millions of women, which Texas politicians have spent years dismantling through deceptive laws and regulatory red tape,” Nancy Northup, the group’s president and CEO, wrote in a statement.

The Center for Reproductive Rights — as well as other abortion rights supporters — argue that the law has created barriers to abortion that violate the court's last landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade.

Already, more than half of the state’s clinics have closed because doctors cannot meet new regulations under the law. The regulations are considered the be the strictest in the country.

There are now 18 clinics left in Texas, down from 40 in 2013.

The law was signed by then-Gov. Rick Perry in 2013, drawing national attention after then-state Sen. Wendy Davis, later a gubernatorial candidate, staged a marathon 11-hour filibuster.

The case specifically challenges two parts of the law. One says abortions can only be performed at hospital-like ambulatory service centers, which have strict structural standards. The other requires doctors to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

The case does not challenge other controversial parts of the law, such as the 20-week ban on abortions, which would remain standing.

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/260083-supreme-court-to-hear-l...

Permalink Reply by DeeDee on November 14, 2015 at 9:11am

Roe V. Wade 2.0: Supreme Court Takes Up Abortion Case

Daily Caller News Foundation | Rachel Stoltzfoos

Anti-abortion activist delivered a signed declaration and a plastic fetus to Mick Krieger, chief of staff for House Minority Leader John Boeher (R-OH), during a meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill November 5, 2010 in Washington, DC. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Greatest threat to pro-abortion movement in decades

Permalink Reply by Love of Country on November 16, 2015 at 7:44pm

I have been an activist for almost 10 years. All the information I posted is coming true, all the things I warned of for years and fought trolls about is now obvious, so actually my work is done. Have no interest in being on sites that ultimately are controlled by progressives. Have no interest in being on a NING site although I wish M the best he is a great guy. Believe what your eyes see and prepare for what is likely to come. Good Luck and God Bless. Will be leaving my page and threads, however threads will be closed.