Questions from a member of the Peanut Gallery(tm)

[Rhodes]

A peanut gallery was, in the days of vaudeville, a nickname for the cheapest (and ostensibly rowdiest) seats in the theater, the occupants of which were often known to heckle. The least expensive snack served at the theater would often be peanuts, which the patrons would sometimes throw at the performers on stage to show their disapproval.

Answer if you wish ignore if you like and expect incoming peanut shells thrown very accurately for BS.

So without further delay;

Trump

Is some form of BFYTW still his leading selling point?

Frankly he is not that impressive, face it only a seriously devoted moron couldn't see the simple solutions that he offered on immigration/invasion (depending on ones view) are absolutely required if this land is retain any legitimacy. So he is not stupid... Trump he aint stupid... hmmm. Outside of that he isnt actively attempting to subvert the land, yeah the bar is set pretty damn low nowadays. 

Cruz

Exactly in what view is this man even considered qualified according to the text of the Constitution?

If a person is take an oath to protect and defend the document then they MUST be qualified by same. I can read and I know the term "natural born" was not defined expressly (such was the halfarsedness of the framers in such cases) but apparently THEY KNEW, so the writing of era is key and not one gives any credence to Cruz. In your own words please.

The rest of the gang dont matter any longer.

General:

Is the federal government in any way still a legitimate authority given it obviously operates FAR outside its legitimacy establishing document?

You get to think on that one with no prompting from me.

Think on this one a bit, knee jerks are easily spotted. 

Does the Tea Party, as it was founded by mass participation, even exist any longer?

Add your own questions if you like there are far more but my time is at an end for now.

[Hankelvis]

Unions control non-profits organized to commit voter fraud. It is widespread like the acorns under a large corrupt tree.

[Rhodes]

The "stupid" is a reference to the simple stupid nature of the obvious.

Kind of like the doctor telling you stop hitting yourself in the head with a hammer concerning those headaches.

Face it things have really gotten to that point.

It aint a job that requires a freaking genius in fact that may not even be a good thing if it was, given the downsides of the condition.

Never would I dream of naming that guy stupid, but neither has he done a lot to make me think him all that sharp. I dont even count Daddy's money he lost that long ago, and then made it back which is why hes here.

I read the books he's been around a long time we know that guy (or should) but I wonder if we understand the office as it exists with him (or anyone else) in it. See I strongly suspect Trump is much brighter than he lets on, great in business but now aint the time for it. We shall find out god willing.

[Rhodes]

Interesting which questions seem to draw the most interest.

Heh

[BLADES]

ANSWERS

#1

Donald Trump is a narcissistic, arrogant,megalomaniac with delusions of being a fascist dictator, but so far has just been more of a circus clown...worthy of nothing but ridicule when it comes to him being POTUS...

#2

so far you have failed to prove your case in as far as failing to give in detail your case against cruz but going as far as to mis quoting the law....so anymore time spent on it would be a waste of time

#3

of course the GOV. has overstepped its bounds ....this is old news

#4

the tea party is what it is

hope my answers suffice 

[Rhodes]

As expected.

but you do see it isnt me saying anything it is Vattel’s Law of Nations, the link I provided though I knew it futile, the inspiration and field guild of both founder and framer.

If original intent is meaningless then the entire document has transformed into a slave chattel agreement. Doing your part err?

[BLADES]

tell me rhodes WHY would you change the wording to make it fit your narrative ....that is very dis honest and only expected when talking to dems and reps...so PLEASE explain yourself and you misquote

[Rhodes]

Change what wording?

Be specific please I edit a good bit in the first few minutes of posting when I think a matter wasn't explained or a typo.

[BLADES]

go back and read yesterdays comments I laid it out in detail and you KNOW it so dont play games

[Rhodes]

Do you refer to the paraphrasing of what courts in the past had to say on the matter of a child born on a military base overseas or something else. 

Fortunately or not I am no psychic so again be specific so I dont assume something in error. Take less time in the long run.

Basically all you have been able to relate is how little the matter means to you as long as fast held delusions remain repeatable, facts be damned.

[Rhodes]

For instance notice how I just ignored your opinion on Trump, it holds no intellectual honesty and is nothing more than an overly emotional logic starved rant. But I let it pass as nothing is to be gained by beating walls down with one's head. 

Just as I also ignored the dismissal of what should the prime concern we face, if there is no longer a legitimate authority then indeed it is already far past voting as any means to remedy. Legitimacy is everything.

And that last bit well, it is what it is.

[BLADES]

next time dont ask the question if your not going to like the answer...so your going to leT youR altered phrase to stand ...says a lot about you ...oh and I like how you mis represented cruz by claiming he spent his whole life in a foreign country...another non truth on your part...

how do you expect to be taken serious when you cant speak facts and truth...

not worth anymore of my time....GOOD DAY SIR

[Rhodes]

Look I dont know you or have much clue to whats rattling around in your head. I have enough faults of my own to worry over yours more than 30 seconds.

You offered a position unsupported by anything except some vague reliance of anonymous experts, yeah think I know who, but your understanding of the matter should at least be defensible which you have failed to do in even the smallest part. Either you can not see this and thus gain my pity or you can and thus my scorn.

A person who cannot defend a position in their own words does not understand the position or else it is indefensible.