Hillary Again caught in a bald faced lie

[M]

Source; http://observer.com/2016/06/breaking-hillary-clinton-sent-informati...

How much longer will the public keep silent over President Obama's thwarting of justice to protect the Elites Chosen one for President;Hillary Clinton? We all know that the President is in collusion with Hillary to keep her from being indited before the November election, after which it would be impossible for her to be charged should she win. Maybe it's an added incentive to force her to use every dirty, underhanded, and possibly illegal; trick in the book to win. Postponing any indictment would leave the possibility of a looming punishment for failure hanging over her head. Could that be why?

>

Another possibility would be to create a lull in the release of the information over the proposed but unratified Trans Pacific Partnership becoming public knowledge and losing the election not only for Hillary but the entire compliment of the Democratic candidates in all the other races when the public finds out about the corruption and destruction to American Business, Jobs, ans yes even the til now sacrosanct Unions being the main losers in that shady deal. Didn't we learn how the Progressive Socialist Democrats despise any one that is not an invited member of their version of Crony Capitalism?

>

The current peccadillo that Hillary is facing was brought about by her penchant for telling lies as a matter of procedure. Remember when Mrs. Clinton swore there were no classified national security items posted through her personal e-mail server? Well, that old bugaboo of the progressive socialists namely FOX News published an 'Exclusive' report on June 11 revealing at least ONE had the marking Classified on it's header. That designation is used to denote Sensitive and Legally Protected Information. FOX even included a screen shot of the only now partially declassified e-mail

>

> 

This email, which was classified as “Confidential,” not to be De-Classified until 4/07/2027,was sent to Hillary Clinton on her private server and then forwarded by her. U.S. Department of State

>

As shown, this e-mail with the classified marking was sent 4/08/12. That was during the term Hillary was Secretary of State. Funny thing about the e-mail, it has a suspicious typo contained within it coresponding to the Benghazi debacle.

>

Let’s take a quick trip through the email. The original email with the classified information marking was sent on April 8, 2012, when Clinton was still the Secretary of State.

>

Excerpt from article;

{The original email has an uncomfortable typo, given Benghazi, where people died then Hillary lied. The sender, Monica Hanley, clearly meant time “windows” but, well, here’s the typo. Should the 7:30 AM time window not work for Clinton “we will find other widows that work for you tomorrow.”

Hanley cc’d Huma Abedin, one of Clinton’s chief accomplices.

Follow the trail of evidence: Clinton appears right there in the email thread, responding on April 8, 2012 at 10:37 pm. “7:30 works for me,” Clinton writes, confirming she has an available time “widow” for a phone call whose purpose is classified CONFIDENTIAL.} 

>

Speaking of Hillary aide Huma Abedin, Remember the flak about who she married and the suspicions of her passing information to Mid-Eastern Radicals and who squashed those rumors?

>

as you look down the page, everything is redacted and that redaction was before the e-mail was publicly released. That in and of itself is a flare lit tip off! 

>

The redaction signals the content was something that dealt with sensitive government information the public was not allowed to know about!!! How many so called "Innocent" "minor" dribs and drabs of information incriminating Hillary and her actions concerned with mishandling National Security Information with that Illegal Private Server makes sense of the FBI conducting Criminal Investigations and severly colors the reasons Obama is once again shielding someone from possible indictment like he did for Fast & Furious.

>

Why does the main stream propaganda machine media still insist on calling this criminal act  simply an "E-mail scandal" Although Hillary states she "Won't be indicted" . Could she have cut a deal with Obama, or could the hidden Elitist puppet masters ordered her to remain free and un-accused until after the election when it would become a moot point should she win the election? That is a possibility, but she also stated firmly that " NO INFORMATION MARKED CLASSIFIED PASSED THROUGH HER SERVER". We all can see how she again lied about that to the public and continues to do so in spite of the concrete evidence to the contrary  that "CLASSIFIED INFORMATION DID PASS THROUGH YOUR ROGUE ILLEGAL SERVER!".and with the latest release, we have the Proof Positive you LIED.

>

Even the State Departments "Office of the Inspector General" published a report that contradicted her lies claiming the she and her staff used that rogue server with "E-Mail Communication Procedures Permitted by the State Department, and it especially discredited the claim that the procedures used, were used by previous Seacretaries of State citing that specifically was a FALSE CLAIM!

>

The Question remains; How Long will the public at large accept that Hillary and others are being treated as "ABOVE THE LAW AND IMMUNE FROM IT'S CONSEQUENCES?"

[M]

[kevin kiernan]

That video would make a great Campaign add..

[jack ludwig]

most of the general public who votes could care less about this issue. Only those that dislike Clinton or the democrats in general will have some interest, but that is a very small number when considering the total voting population.

[M]

The truth is most people would care if their President was shown to be the compulsive Liar she actually is.

[jack ludwig]

most voters think Hillary is a compulsive liar but they also think most politicians are also. They think it is part of the package you get with a politician.

[jack ludwig]

Presidents are given a pass for withholding information because they have the responsibility of keeping the country safe and they have information no one else has that they cannot share, therefore some of the comments a president makes is not truthful because he can't be anymore truthful.  

[M]

Jack,

Hillary was Secretary of State not the President, and she mishandled classified information much more than Petraeus did but she seems to be getting a pass on her actions. Watch the subsequent video where Cormey is being questioned by Gowdey, you can see first hand where Cormey admits Hillary lied. in her statements to Congress.

[jack ludwig]

I mentioned Hillary as president because you brought that up and I gave my view that Presidents often aren't fully honest because they can't be. Secondly, I listened to the above video three times again very carefully and I still do not see where you can claim Hillary lied to congress. The video tape was pieced together to give the viewer that impression. If you take the time to dissect each statement you can clearly see there was no perjury. 

[M]

Issa Questioning about e-mails;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mcjp1VoCLOU

and here is a whole list of Gowdey questioning Comey, take your pick. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Trey+Gowdy+questionong...