Barack Obama Signing Executive Order Demanding Investigation into Donald Trump Victory

[Virginia Foulk]

Just a heading on Tea Party.Org.  but no article. So is this just an attention getter? 

Obama and his Executive orders. the GOP should and can stop it if they use their power - even now.

Sure wouldn't put it past Obama to try to do this. He is not concerned about America.

[JV]

without a link or something to confirm it I would say just another fake story

[Virginia Foulk]

Didn't post any link because it was the Tea Party.Org. newsletter. So yes, I'm not sure either. The Tea Party does this every once in a while, starting a newsletter with a one line heading, then do not provide a link.. And I get really upset by it. You see the top heading then you can't find a link to an article. They do show other article headings you can access on the letter.  Of course, their letters are for money.  Posted this here, just in case someone may have seen some other data about it.  OH well.

[Patriot Ozzie]

Easy to find Virginia

I was suspicious of your thread title because it included the word "Victory"! Would any Democrat call Trump's win a victory ?

This link seems authentic, or is it ? I'm not sure

http://abcnews.com.co/obama-signs-executive-order-declaring-investi...

[charles royer]

 http://abcnews.com.co/contact/

[jack ludwig]

I found no executive order on the whitehouse.gov site that listed this order or is there any record in the government files of executive order 13805? 

[Patriot Ozzie]

Breath a sigh of relief Jack, the story is as fake as they get

[Virginia Foulk]

That's why I posted this. I'm still upset with Tea Party.Org. for posting such an intro to their newsletter.  And Jack, thanks for checking the EO file. I'd forgotten how to get into that one.  (I did get in to check on EO 13605 - martial takeover, but hadn't checked any EOs after that.)  Not sure about 13805, several groups were posting the 13605 as 16305, and I sent them letters to fix their messages on that one. Any ideas about the 13805 - perhaps the same thing???