We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

Looks Like Wisconsin may be forced to a recount - DEMS are at 25% of the money they need

Well here we go again. Based on what happened several years ago, the Democratic party plays loose with our votes and I'm just wondering if they haven't some secret ballots stashed somewhere that they bring in. Dang. Media believes it will happen because they have 25% of the cost already ($46,000) needed. The recall will be forced if they get the money, and it's to be done by Dec 13.   Two other states, Michigan is one, are also being considered. Clinton will never give up.

Views: 191

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Seems Jill Stein is doing the work for Clinton. Not sure why she is pushing this, she sure won't get any more votes.  Oh well.

Making a name for herself and her agenda.Selfish greed over unity of country....If they ever took the election away from us. That would be the beginning of bloodshed. Not a smart move. But selfish greed has never been accused of being a smart strategy.

Next week, once Stein has paid in the money for recount.  I certainly expect Trump to maintain his lead - after all - the criminal party tried to remove Scott Walker, several times. They lost that one. And they tried to stop our selected state Supreme from winning. They lost that one too. (And it had to have a recount - guess what, discovery of missing votes, mostly for Judge Prosser were recovered)  And it was at the DEMS request - they maintained Prosser's vote was wrong.  So, here's to the truth and Trump wins in Wisconsin, again.

Oh, by the way Clinton conceded, just like Gore. And his concession stopped the recount for him. I would believe that Hillary will also stay in the lost bucket because she conceded.  That's my personal opinion.

Just heard: Clinton is joining Jill in the recount. So, effectively, she is behind the effort to recount the votes.

And now the cheating begins in earnest. The dems know how many votes they have to add and where, and those of the Obama coaltion who haven't noted, all of a sudden will have. 

Hillary didn't join Jill just to check if the election went smoothly. She must know something to give her encouragement that the outcome can be changed. I wonder if Virginia knows whether the GOP machine in Wisonsin can counter this effort. 

Clinton's move will backfire. Just imagine if the recounts in all three states give her the wins? What then?? 

Or imagine she loses. After that, every future election when the dems win, the GOP can simply go for recount, just to check if all is ok. Just use the Jill Stein's excuse to recount. The dem machines in big cities won't like that. And one thing more if she loses: do you think Trump will be so kind to her then??? 

By the way: my personal opinion, not based on any facts: I believe Obama does NOT want Hillary to win. And neither does Bill. 

Why Jill Stein is Full of Shit
The Stein website initially claimed that the recount effort would require $ 2.2 Million to conduct the recount in the three targeted battleground states. Once that goal was reached, and even exceeded, the goal was raised to $ 3+ Million to include the anticipated “attorneys fees”. When that goal was met Stein then increased the fund raising effort to $ 7 Million [Current goal at time of this Article].

Now, the State filing fee’s have not been raised over the Thanksgiving Holiday so why does the stated fundraising goal keep rising to amounts greater then Stein was able to raise even for her presidential campaign? What is also a little suspicious as that funds keep trickling in. One would expect that, upon announcing the news, there would have been the massive influx of donations within the first day or two. Most people were busy during the Thanksgiving holiday spending time with family and friends and looking forward to spending any excess cash on Black Friday. We find this rather suspect, unless you factor in some nerd sitting at Hillary’s old email server and logging into the Stein website trickling in donations periodically.
But here is the kicker…

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/newsy/jill-stein-is-crowdfunding-a-...
http://www.trunewsnet.com/news-network/red-flag-recount-whats-going...

An investigative journalist reports donations to Jill Stein’s recount campaign are being made programmatically at a steady rate of $160,000 per hour

A post on Reddit citing an investigative journalist reads as follows: “RED ALERT! JIM STONE DISCOVERS SOROS BOT FUNDING JILL STEIN’S RECOU...

According to the post a donations to Jill Stein’s election recount campaign are being made at a steady rate of $160,000 on the hour every hour of the day.

The constant rate of donation, 24 hours a day, suggest that a computer program is being used to post the donations as opposed to real people making grassroots donation.

However, the donations are being reported as grassroots donations from a myriad of online supporters to help her verify the integrity of the election.

http://alexanderhiggins.com/soros-bot-funding-stein-recount-campaig...

If this is true (does say in Michigan doesn't pertain to Presidential elections)  sure would make it harder for them to do a recount in Michigan and Penn.

(Not sure of the article creator, but Girls just wantta have Guns is where I found the article.)  

PIPE DREAM? Bitter Sisters’, Hillary & Jill, Dreams on PA Recount May Just be a Bust  Posted on November 27, 2016

Looks like the recount dreams in Pennsylvania, and Michigan for that matter, may be a BUST for Jill and Hillary.

Here are Michigan’s apparent recount rules. They aren’t looking good for the two ladies.

And Pennsylvania is not much easier. It may even be more complicated.

From Free Republic:

Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process.

BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a “prima facie case” showing that voter fraud took place.

While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than “beyond reasonable doubt,” it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was “probable.”

This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud.

In fact, the Medium reports that Clinton’s own legal team headed by Marc Elias has noted that Clinton’s team “had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.” The Obama administration echoed that by stating that the government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber-activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day.

According to Newsmax, Obama is standing behind the results which indicate that Trump won the election, saying the election was “free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.”

Elias also noted that in even the closest margin state, Michigan, Trump’s win “well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount.” Therefore, Elias says that is why Clinton herself did not pursue a recount effort. However, since Stein has funded and initiated the effort, Elias says that Clinton will participate to ensure fairness.

Poor ladies. We guess they’ll just have to accept that Trump will be the next president. Now, who’s happy about this? Cause we LOVE it!

H/T: Truth Feed  (http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/pipe-dream-bitter-sisters-hillary...)

So appears that Michigan was bought.  And if they start recount next week, probably won't be done by Dec. 13.   Then we have Penn. still counting their votes and Trump's lead has dropped from 72,000 to 49,000 - absentee and military and overseas votes???  Really? I wonder.  Anyway, if Wisconsin does make it to Dec 13 and the count is still close and Trump wins, without Michigan and Penn. he'll still have 270 - JUST.

Dang Democrats are trying their darnest to slow the recount so we don't get done by Dec 13.

Dang, things are sure getting screwed up. So I'm really praying for Wisconsin to come through for the Country. Wis. - 10, Mich - 16, and Penn - 20. from 306 with just Wisconsin = 270.

Just read an hour ago:

Jill Stein dropped her request for recount in PA!! 

So, Hillary can't possibly win now, and the dems have no further need to cheat. Hopefully this will stop the recounts in Wisonsin and Michigan. 

Unless they count absentee and military ballots and pad the count. They are still counting these ballots and Trump's lead dropped from 71,000 to 49,000.  That's a change of over 20,000. So how many more ballots haven't been screened and counted.  If Wisconsin stays true and gets completed by Dec 12, that's also a win for Trump. Even if Michigan and Penn. are not counted, he'd still have 270.   My concern is now there seem to be at least 10 GOP electors who say they will not vote for Trump. Texas already had one elector who resigned, because he could not vote for Trump. And of course, there are the 6 Bernie Sanders ones who won't vote for Hilary - just to mess up the count.  What a bunch of anti-America government officials we have generated. 

Over and done - of course Clinton got more votes - 172 - in Dane, but didn't do her any good. Trump won again. Done and burnt - now go away Clinton.

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service