We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

Why Republicans and Conservatives MUST Dominate in 2020

If we don't stop the Democratic/Socialists from keeping the majority in the House, and from gaining a majority in the Senate, Everything Trump has done for us will be wiped out. This is your wake up call!

>

This may seem like every other warning posted, but the problem being,  is it's a true appraisal of conditions we are facing right now. This is why the Conservatives MUST DOMINATE in 2020. 
>
The Democrats have finally exposed themselves for the Fanatical Communistic Socialist regime they have been for the last 100 years. They are not even pretending any more about who and what they are. Their rhetoric about the necessity of more regulations on firearms, like the Red Flag Laws, the proposed expanded universal background check system, and other freedom wrecking plans, are really set up to allow them to find out where all the guns are, so they can confiscate all the civilian arms. Every Democrat Running in 2020 has jumped on that band wagon. Beto O'Rourke even confirmed it. The Democrat Gun Grabbers are doing that to facilitate the imposition of a Communistic Styled Socialist State on America, and issuing in a One World Government, led by them of course, in perpetuity.
>
 However, The Second Amendment will stand in their way as long as everyone realizes exactly what it means. We can do that by looking at it in the Context of what the Founders and the Common people understood about it's words, in their time periods frame of reference. The Second Amendment specifically uses certain words that have changed their meaning, or more likely have had their meanings deliberately changed by the Progressives, who want an end to Civilian Firearms. I chose the Second Amendment because it is the Teeth and Protection for all the rest of the Constitutional Protections. The Second Amendment is all that stands between us and losing everything we hold sacred.
>
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: "well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the   people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
>
Lets take this apart;
Right To Bear ARMS; This must be broken down into two parts, the right to Bear, and the word ARMS. These words had specific meanings to the People and Founders who had just fought a bloody Revolutionary War. Right To Bear; meant the people were allowed to own and carry their own ARMS without hindrance by the Government. There is a hidden meaning to the Word ARMS, that somehow has been covered over and hidden since then, by what we now call Liberals IMHO. 
>
Arms; Definitions from the era when the Constitutions Second Amendment was created. It Expands the Meaning & Intent of what the Founders meant, when they specifically used the Word 'ARMS'. This transcends & expands the modern definition Justices and Politicians place on the Word 'ARMS'. The definition of "ARMS" in a period dictionary and in the minds of the Founders and Citizens meant ALL MILITARY WEAPONS. So in effect the Founders decided the American people could arm themselves with any weapon the military had.
>
If any Liberal decides to state that Repeating Rifles and Machine Guns didn't exist, and the Founders were only talking about Flintlock single shot muskets/Rifles, they are in for a rude awakening. These are types they had during the Revolutionary War. How about the Cookson repeater 1690.The Kalthoff repeater 1600's, The Belton repeating musket 100 ordered by Washington/Congress, Puckle gun 1718, Nordenfelt 10 barrel rifle-caliber machine gun 1783. Didn't know about those or they were deliberately hiding the references to them for their political agendas. The Gun Grabbers also complain Loudly about the Founders never meant to allow Assault Weapons to get into the hands of the people. That is ludicrous. Every Weapon used by the military could be considered an Assault Weapon even a flintlock. The Founders were not afraid of Law Abiding Americans owning any military weapon based on the that ERA's definition of ARMS. So, Why are todays Democratic/Socialists so afraid of us?
>
State Militias; The definition of Militia based on it's common usage from that time period meant all physically fit men from 15 to 48 years old. In effect that made the entire population the Militia and any regulation thought necessary was the responsibility of the States to decide instead of the Federal Government. Federal Government Politicians have changed the meanings and legal definitions over the decades, on their own recognizance, to mean something else. Something which that would bolster their agendas to disarm the public. Those definitions go directly against the Constitution. Massive Federal Government, was one of the greatest fears of the Anti-Federalists.
>
The general consensus of that time was; Armies were used to suppress Citizens, and the Federal Government should only be allowed to raise paid armies when faced by an enemy. They believed that the States Governments should use Militias, basically citizens armed with their own weapons for all other purposes.
>
Well - Regulated Militia; This used to mean the States were responsible for training the men, and the men of that period were expected to own and use their own firearms. Since then, the Federal Government has unilaterally changed it's meaning, to create the National Guard right after the Civil War. This says something about the Three words in the 14th Amendment "No State Shall", those words were put into the Amendment, specifically to stop the South from reversing the citizenship and voting rights of Freed Black Americans, but have subsequently been used to create Anchor Babies and other things that amendment was never intended to do. See; http://www.14thamendment.us/amendment/14th_amendment.html to see what the originators of that Amendment intended it to do and what they did not intend it to do.
Infringed; We now come to another word with specific meaning to the Founders and the Citizens of that period. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines Infringe as;
to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another.
an encroachment or trespass on a right or privilege.
the act of infringing VIOLATION OF LEGAL RIGHTS.
: to commit a breach or infraction of; violate or transgress
So according to the definitions from the time period that the Founders would have used, they and the public would have understood without interpretation being needed.
>
Therefore; Every Law that's been passed against guns and other weapons, since the Ratification of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, has UNCONSTITUTIONALLY INFRINGED on those specific protections the 2nd Amendment granted. The politicians saying it's to protect people is a line of HORSE SH*T, and they know it. It's to protect them from angered and/or abused citizens who would finally come after them, to end the excesses they have rained down on us.

Views: 30

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

YES ....We must hand out a devastating defeat to the Liberal Useful idiots of the Communist Party. Take the popular vote away from them as well. Do not let them have that talking point going forward.... This is another spot for me to put my old stand by video that points out the true agenda of the SOCIALIST PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT (communist) PARTY.........

This video shows the TRUTH OF THE COMMUNIST AGENDA....

RSS

Badge

Loading…

© 2025   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service