We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

The "albatross" tightens around Clinton's neck

Source; 

Friday morning:

M,

An investigation by the State Department's inspector general revealed damaging information about Hillary Clinton's improper use of a personal email server during her time as Secretary of State. In an 83-page report released on Wednesday, the government "watchdog" contradicted what Clinton has claimed since the scandal broke: that her use of personal email for government was "allowed." It wasn't.

A particularly stunning (and potentially incriminating) revelation is found on page 38 of the inspector general's report. It appears Clinton intentionally avoided using an official State Department email address to shield the content of her emails: 


In November 2010, Secretary Clinton and her Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations discussed the fact that Secretary Clinton's emails to Department employees were not being received. The Deputy Chief of Staff emailed the Secretary that "we should talk about putting you on state email or releasing your email address to the department so you are not going to spam." In response, the Secretary wrote, "Let's get separate address or device but I don't want any risk of the personal being accessible."

These revelations ensure the email scandal will remain an albatross around the neck of the Democrat presidential frontrunner. Even liberal-leaning media outlets have begun to ramp up their criticism. The Washington Post'seditorial board released a scathing opinion column yesterday entitled, "Clinton's inexcusable, willful disregard for the rules." Here's an excerpt:

What the new report from the State Department inspector general makes clear is that it also was not a casual oversight. Ms. Clinton had plenty of warnings to use official government communications methods, so as to make sure that her records were properly preserved and to minimize cybersecurity risks. She ignored them.

If you're a Democrat running for president and The Washington Post isn't on your side, you're in trouble. But's it's not just WaPo calling out Clinton. In an article published online this morning, The Associated Press reported: "[The]agency watchdog's discovery of at least three previously undisclosed emails has renewed concerns that Clinton was not completely forthcoming." Even the overwhelmingly liberal and Democrat-friendly editorial board of The New York Times admitted yesterday: "Hillary Clinton's campaign for the presidency just got harder."

What do you think? Should Clinton end up in the "big house" or the White House in 2016? Vote now in Grassfire's "Hillary For Prison?" Quick Poll.


HILLARY FOR PRISON: YES OR NO?



Click here or on the "YES" image if you think Hillary Clinton should face charges and a prison sentence for possibly using a private email server to transmit "classified" and "top secret" intelligence as Secretary of State.

Click here or on the "NO" image if you think the Democrat presidential frontrunner should NOT face charges and a possible prison sentence for using an unsecured, non-government network to conduct State Department business.


Click here to vote "Yes!"Click here to vote "No!"

Again, simply click on the "YES!" or "NO!" image to cast your vote.

Thanks, in advance, for voting.

The Grassfire Team

Resources:

The Washington PostState Department report on Clinton's email practices

The Washington PostClinton's inexcusable, willful disregard for the rules

The Associated PressORIGINS OF KEY CLINTON EMAILS FROM REPORT ARE A MYSTERY

The New York TimesHillary Clinton, Drowning in Email

+ + + + + +


(Note: Please do not reply directly to this email. This address is not designed to receive personal messages. To contact Grassfire with comments, questions or to change your status, see the link below.)

+ + + + +
Grassfire, a division of Grassroots Action, Inc., is a million-strong network of grassroots conservatives that's dedicated to equipping you with tools to give you a real impact on the key issues of our day. Copyright 2016 Grassroots Action, Inc.

+ + Comments? Questions?

www.grassfirehq.com/email.asp?ind=10

+ + For technical questions regarding this email, please click below:

www.grassfirehq.com/techemail.asp?ind=15

+ + + + +

Views: 28

Reply to This

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service