Conservative Action, [7/21/2022 8:32 PM]
[Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)]
[ Photo ]
Election Machine Scanners – Part 2
EAC EOC DVS-100543 added a Canon DR-G1130 scanner to the ICC. This scanner has interesting features like text enhancement, character emphasis, count only mode, pre-scan, skip blank page to name a few.
It also comes pre-loaded with Kofax VRS as well as Canon CapturePerfect. (In my previous post, I addressed CapturePerfect.)
Kofax VRS is another software product therefore it has release notes with it’s own set of bugs.
The point is that…. promising to not use “features” is not the same as ensuring that they are never used. How do you ensure that pages on a scan are never replaced or enhanced in a way that invalidates voter intent?
Conservative Action, [7/21/2022 8:32 PM]
[Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)]
The Election Industry
Here is a 55 page catalog of items sold to support elections, much of it is for the machines. Imagine if machines went away? Most of this would no longer be needed. How much tax money would that save?
Do you think the election industry wants to lose that revenue?
Conservative Action, [7/21/2022 8:34 PM]
[Forwarded from ElectionFraud20.org]
Serious Dominion Software Anomaly Discovered in Tennessee, Despite Certification
Key quotes:
“On November 3, 2021, the EAC received a report from the Tennessee Secretary of State’s (TN SoS) office that they were planning an investigation into an anomaly observed in Williamson County, Tennessee during a municipal election held on October 26, 2021, regarding Dominion D-Suite 5.5-B ImageCast Precinct (ICP) tabulators. Reports from 7 of the 18 ICP tabulators used during the election did not match the number of ballots scanned. Subsequent tabulation on the jurisdiction’s ICC central count scanner provided the correct tally. The central count tabulation was confirmed via hand count of the paper ballot records on October 27, 2021.”
“Analysis of audit log information revealed entries that coincided with the anomaly; a security error “QR code signature mismatch” and a warning message “Ballot format or id is unrecognizable” indicating a QR code misread occurred. When these events were logged, the ballot was rejected.“
“Further analysis of the anomaly behavior showed that the scanners correctly tabulated all ballots until the anomaly was triggered. Following the anomaly, ballots successfully scanned and tabulated by the ICP were not reflected in the close poll reports on the affected ICP scanners.”
“On February 11, 2022, Dominion submitted a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to the EAC. The report indicates that erroneous code is present in the EAC certified D-Suite 5.5-B and D-Suite 5.5-C systems. The RCA report states that when the anomaly occurs, it’s due to a misread of the QR code. If the QR code misread affects a certain part of the QR code, the ICP scanner mistakenly interprets a bit in the code that marks the ballot as provisional. Once that misread happens, the provisional flag is not properly reset after that ballot’s voting session. The result is that every ballot scanned and tabulated by the machine after that misread is marked as provisional and thus, not included in the tabulator’s close poll report totals.”
The report does not appear to indicate how many ballots were affected by the anomaly.
Software bug? Or algorithmic manipulation?
How many other states and counties used this software configuration and did not audit their results to identify the anomaly?
Anyone else ready to go back to hand-counting ballots? Say NO to opaque, “black box” election machines.
Hat tip: @KanekoaTheGreat
@ElectionFraud20_org