We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

EPA WILL COST YOU AND YOUR JOBS AND MONEY

The EPA’s potentially lethal assault on your quality of life, while the EU vastly increases coal importation

New Rules and Old Plants May Strain Summer Energy Supplies
By MATTHEW L. WALD


WASHINGTON — As 58 million people across 13 states sweated through the third day of a heat wave last month, power demand in North America’s largest regional grid jurisdiction hit a record high. And yet there was no shortage, no rolling blackout and no brownout in an area that stretches from Maryland to Chicago.


But that may not be the case in the future as stricter air quality rules are put in place. Eastern utilities satisfied demand that day — July 21 — with hefty output from dozens of 1950s and 1960s coal-burning power plants that dump prodigious amounts of acid gases, soot, mercury and arsenic into the air. Because of new Environmental Protection Agency rules, and some yet to be written, many of those plants are expected to close in coming years.


 No one is sure yet how many or which ones will be shuttered or what the total lost output would be. And there is little agreement over how peak demand will be met in future summers.


The E.P.A. estimates that a rule on air toxins and mercury that it expects to complete in November will result in a loss of 10,000 megawatts — or almost 1 percent of the generating capacity in the United States. Electricity experts, however, say that rule, combined with forthcoming ones on coal ash and cooling water, will have a much greater effect — from 48,000 megawatts to 80,000 megawatts, or 3.5 to 7 percent. (NYT)


Obama’s War on Coal
Killing jobs, causing blackouts
By William Yeatman
Originally published in The New York Post


President Obama claims to see the need to create jobs at this time of endless 9-plus percent unemployment — yet his administration continues to relentlessly destroy jobs for ideological reasons. The best example may be the Obama Environmental Protection Agency’s “war on coal.”


The EPA’s regulatory crusade directly threatens hundreds of thousands of jobs — and “rolling blackouts” that threaten even more.


Start with a proposed regulation under the Clean Air Act that’s set to be finalized in November. The Utility MACT (“Maximum Achievable Control Technology”) rule seeks to cut US power plants’ emissions of mercury from 29 tons a year to just five. Yet EPA itself estimates that cutting even as much as 41 tons out of total emissions of 105 tons “is unlikely to substantially affect total risk.”


For zero benefit, the Utility MACT is one of the most expensive federal regulations ever. In comments submitted to the EPA, Unions for Jobs and the Environment, an alliance of unions representing more than 3.2 million workers, estimated that this needless regulation would jeopardize 251,000 jobs.


Then there’s EPA’s out-of-the-blue ruling last month, ordering Texas to cut emissions of sulfur dioxide by 47 percent. This, when the draft version of the Cross State Air Pollution Rule had exempted the state entirely. The excuse for the change? A supposed need to slightly reduce emissions as monitored 500 miles away in Madison County, Ill. — a locale that meets the EPA air-quality standards in question. (CEI)


U.S. Coal Exports To Europe Treble
Saturday, 13 August 2011 15:45 Ying Diao and Mathew Carr, Bloomberg


U.S. coal exports to the Netherlands jumped to 1.1 million tons from 334,628 tons. Shipments to Germany went to 899,009 tons from 166,314 tons. Trade to the U.K. rose to 852,159 tons from 159,280 tons.


The U.S. may increase coal exports, further boosting supply of the commodity in Europe, Macquarie Group Ltd. (MQG) said.


“A big push” to encourage natural-gas burning in the U.S. may drive up coal exports to Europe, China and India, said Hayden Atkins, an analyst in London at Macquarie’s commodities unit. The closing of Germany’s nuclear plants will increase demand in that nation, Atkins said.


U.S. steam-coal exports to Europe in the first quarter more than tripled from a year earlier to 4.9 million metric tons from 1.5 million tons, according to a report on the website of the U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. coal exports are at their highest level since 1992, it said.


Exports to the Netherlands jumped to 1.1 million tons from 334,628 tons. Shipments to Germany went to 899,009 tons from 166,314 tons. Trade to the U.K. rose to 852,159 tons from 159,280 tons. (GWPF)


Tags: COSTENERGYEPAUNCONSTITUTIONAL

Views: 2167

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Now Texas has it's own nuclear uranium source.

A new report from the U.S. Geological Survey shows that the rolling hills just south of San Antonio have more than triple the amount of uranium than previously believed…
BIZJOURNALS.COM

Well, no wonder Texas is considering secession. And they may be the only state (republic) that just might be eligible to do so - though the Feds won't allow it.

Yes  we export food, energy and have our own electric grid. Oh yes we have several deep water ports and railroads?

From the PRINCETON UNIVERSITY and the department of 97% consensus and 911 Trutherism comes this study that I'd put zero stock in for two reasons: 1) Author…
WATTSUPWITHTHAT.COM

Reuters: Earthquake of 7.1 magnitude off Indonesia's Ambon island: USGS.http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwgaLOxyM

  • Earthquake of 7.1 magnitude off Indonesia's Ambon island: USGS
  • Earthquake of 7.1 magnitude off Indonesia's Ambon island: USGS
  • See more at REUTERS.COM
American Lands Council
Mangus -- 

http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/americanlandscouncil/mailings/..." alt="3_Minute_Messenger_logo.jpg" width="200" class="CToWUd"/>

Two days ago, the Department of Education for the state of Arizona made a public statement calling for the transfer of public lands to the states, recognizing that without it, our educational system is in big trouble.

http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/americanlandscouncil/mailings/..." alt="arizona-state-seal-color.png" width="150" class="CToWUd a6T"/>


On Dec. 7, 2015, the Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction and several state legislators gathered at Wesley Bolin Plaza to request the transfer of federal lands to the State of Arizona for long term education funding.

“Regaining land that is rightfully ours would create a larger state land trust,” said Superintendent Douglas. “When the land is returned to our state, Arizonians can determine how to more effectively leverage the land’s value and better fund education.”

Many people do not realize that our public education system derives its funding from the school trust lands in each state. The more public land a state owns, the higher the education revenue.

"The federal government currently owns nearly half of land in Arizona and loses 27 cents for every dollar they spend on land management, a loss to the taxpayers of approximately $2 billion per year. States, on the other hand, generate on average $14.51 for every dollar they spend on managing public lands. “There is absolutely no reason to waste all of this land when it could provide critical revenues for Arizona education,” Douglas said. “When it comes to today’s western states, the federal government has refused to honor the same promise made and kept with all other states east of Colorado,” said Rep. Mark Finchem, R-11.

“Our state has a proven track record of maximizing the land we do control, so it makes no sense to allow mismanagement of these resources.” 

(read original press release HERE)

Does your Department of Education support the Transfer of Public Lands? Do they understand the ramifications of not supporting it? Do they realize the tremendous resource that proper management of our public lands could be for your children? If not...who do you suppose should tell them?

SHARE this post

American Lands Council
http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/

American Lands Council · 859 W South Jordan Pkwy, 100, South Jordan, UT 84095, United States 
This email was sent to lockpiatt@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here
You can also keep up with American Lands Council on Twitter or Facebook.

Created with NationBuilder, the essential toolkit for leaders.

Blockbuster admission that may have legal ramifications for lawsuits against EPA CO2 rules.
JUNKSCIENCE.COM

Silly E=green pseudosciences can not find real facts and consensus of 97% is now failed.

RISING summer temperatures could mean LESS, not more devastating flash floods, according to the shock findings of a new study just released.
EXPRESS.CO.UK|BY JON AUSTIN

The E=Green policy loses yet again . .

Approximately 200,000 people have died due to global terrorism in the last 10 years. During the same time, many millions of people (mostly women and children) have…
US8.CAMPAIGN-ARCHIVE1.COM

Share this newsletter: Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit StumbleUpon Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
HOME     WHO WE ARE     LATEST POSTINGS     GWPF NEWSLETTER     CONTACT

09/12/15

China Accused Of Blocking Progress At Paris Climate Talks 

'Fireworks' Expected As New Draft Agreement Is Published 

 
http://www.thegwpf.com/content/uploads/2015/12/Chinese.jpg" width="450" class="CToWUd a6T"/>
 

Chinese negotiators at UN talks in Paris are being accused of trying to weaken the new global climate accord due to be finalised by Friday. “It is very frustrating,” said one negotiator from a developed country after a meeting where he said Chinese officials had tried to water down efforts to create a common system for the way countries report to the UN on their carbon dioxide emissions and climate change plans. China is supporting a general stocktaking review of countries’ pledges every five years but wants any updating of the carbon dioxide emissions reduction targets contained in these plans to be voluntary, this envoy said. --Pilita Clark, Financial Times, 9 December 2015
 
 
 
China was applauded by greens in the run-up to Paris for its high-profile (and widely reported) eco-friendly overtures, but now that delegates are actually sitting down to hammer out a deal, they’re being reminded that these talks have little to do with morality or some deep abiding love for Gaia. Even when mouthing green pieties, states come at issues like this as cynically as they come at everything else. While greens might have been able to kid themselves into believing the world was on track for some sort of breakthrough in Paris, the core calculus hasn’t changed, and a deal therefore isn’t in the offing. Not only that, but judging by the summit’s progress so far, it seems the three secondary objectives may be dead in the water, as well. --The American Interest, 8 December 2015
 
 
 
1) Surprise: China Accused Of Blocking Progress At Paris Climate Talks -Financial Times, 9 December 2015
 
2) Paris Climate Summit on the Rocks - The American Interest, 8 December 2015
 
3) Paris Climate Poker: 'Fireworks' Expected As New Draft Is Published -BBC News, 9 December 2015
 
4) BASIC Countries Face Off Developed Countries’ Demands - Business Standard, 8 December 2015
 
5) Cash Spent On Tackling Climate Change Abroad Is Double Amount Spent On UK Flood Defences - Daily Express, 9 December 2015
 
6) US Senate Hearing: Data or Dogma - Climate Etc., 8 December 2015

 
 
A critical "clean" draft text has been published at UN climate talks here in Paris after delays. This new version, 29 pages long, marks the first time the French presidency of the meeting has pulled together an outline of a deal. One observer warned that there could be "fireworks" if countries are unhappy with the compromises proposed. Observers were unsure as to how the parties would react to the new text. --Matt McGrath, BBC News, 9 December 2015
 
 
 
At the juncture when developed countries have joined hands to demand practically an end to the principle of differentiation in the Paris agreement,  the  BASIC  countries, including China, India, Brazil and South Africa came together to demand that the new pact must necessarily be stitched under the existing UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). In a language that showed there was no reconciliation with the developed countries on the fundamental demands or red-lines so far, the four countries said, “ambition and effectiveness of the agreement will be underpinned by operationalizing differentiation between developed and developing countries in each element of the agreement.” --Nitin Sethi, Business Standard, 8 December 2015
 
 
  
 Environment Secretary Liz Truss today defended the Government’s near £6billion spend on tackling climate change abroad, despite it being more than double the amount being spent on flood defences in Britain. The Tory minister yesterday told MPs devastating floods in Cumbria over the weekend were likely to be linked to global climate change. Amid the misery, the Government has come under pressure after it emerged spending on flood defences was cut by 14 per cent this year. And critics have also been left wondering why billions of pounds of taxpayers’ cash is being handed over to foreign countries for their own efforts in combating climate change when it dwarfs spending on the UK’s flood defences. --Greg Heffer, Daily Express, 9 December 2015  
 
   
Prior to 2009, I felt that supporting the IPCC consensus on climate change was the responsible thing to do. I bought into the argument: “Don’t trust what one scientist says, trust what an international team of a thousand scientists has said, after years of careful deliberation.” That all changed for me in November 2009, following the leaked Climategate emails, that illustrated the sausage making and even bullying that went into building the consensus. I came to the growing realization that I had fallen into the trap of groupthink. I had accepted the consensus based on 2nd order evidence: the assertion that a consensus existed. I began making an independent assessment of topics in climate science that had the most relevance to policy. --Judith Curry, Testimony to the US Senate Commerce Committee, Climate Etc., 8 December 2015
 
American Lands Council
Mangus -- 

BREAKING NEWS -- A Big Step Forward For More Effective State Control of Public Lands

The nation just took a big step forward toward better outcomes environmentally and economically for 50% of all lands west of the Rockies, which are still under the thumb of distant federal bureaucrats and politicians.

After receiving an exhaustive legal and historical analysis concerning federal control over public lands, the Utah Commission for the Stewardship of Public Lands voted yesterday to move forward with preparations for legal action against the federal government.

The analysis, produced by a team of renowned constitutional scholars and legal experts from across the nation, concluded the federal government has no authority to retain near permanent ownership of the public lands inside a state, noting, “legitimate legal theories exists to pursue litigation in an effort to gain ownership or control of the public lands.”

While presenting the legal report to the Utah legislative committee this week, preeminent constitutional scholar Ronald Rotunda likened Utah and other western states to “orphans” and “second class citizens” deprived of essential sovereign powers of statehood by unsanctioned federal dominion over their lands. This is critical to the nation, he said, because strong, self-governing states “are critical to the internal checks of the Constitution.”

At a time when the federal government seems widely out of control, the legal findings should encourage everyone who values these unique internal checks our system of federalism established “to protect the liberty of the individual,” as Professor Rotunda emphasized.

The overall conclusion of the legal analysis is that compelling legal bases exist for the State of Utah to challenge federal ownership of public lands in the state. The findings identify three primary legal theories as having merit:

  1. The Equal Sovereignty Principle, which mandates that the States in the U.S. federal system be equal in sovereignty with one another.
  2. The Equal Footing Doctrine, which requires that States admitted to the U.S. subsequent to the original 13 Colonies should receive all sovereign rights enjoyed by previously existing states, including the right to control land within their borders.
  3. The Compact Theory, which means that Utah's acceptance of admission into the U.S. entailed explicit and implicit promises that the federal government would "timely dispose" of public lands in Utah's borders, as it had done with the states admitted prior to Utah.   

 In Utah, the federal government still controls more than 66% of all of Utah lands, more than 50% of all lands west of the Rockies. By contrast, the federal government controls a less than 5% of lands east of the Rockies.

“This is a huge step forward in transitioning control of public lands to the States, and restoring balance so we can ensure locally-driven management practices that better provide for a healthy environment, abundant outdoor recreation, and safe vibrant communities,” noted Utah State Rep Ken Ivory.

In 2012, Ivory successfully carried legislation demanding the federal government relinquish title to most of the lands presently managed by the United States Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management. He has since been travelling the nation on a campaign to inform others of the issue which has attracted nationwide support from groups including the National Association of Counties and American Farm Bureau. Several states, both east and west of the Rockies have introduced legislation in favor of shifting control to the States.

Supporters of transitioning to state control over public lands note that one-size-fits-all federal bureaucratic management is not working. “Federal land management has been hijacked by foreign funded extremist groups, resulting in overgrown forests and record setting catastrophic wildfires that cause air pollution worse than Beijing, China, incinerate wildlife by the millions, and decimate water supplies and habitat for decades” said Montana State Senator Jennifer Fielder, chair of Montana's study of federal land management.

An independent report by the Property and Environmental Research Center (PERC) finds that the fiscally challenged federal government loses 27 cents for every dollar it spends “managing” public lands. States, on the other hand, generate on average a positive $14.51 for every dollar they spend for the millions of acres of public lands that they already control and manage effectively.

Kane County Utah Commissioner Doug Heaton noted that federal mismanagement of diverse western lands is harming the environment and costing taxpayers nationwide billions of dollars. "Federal land control deprives western communities of the ability to tax the lands or manage the resources in a beneficial manner to provide for essential government services" Heaton remarked. The federal government subsidizes these communities with PILT payments, Payments In Lieu of the Taxes these communities would otherwise generate but for federal control. According to U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, “There is no guaranteed amount. Washington just sends what it feels like sending.” This federally imposed dependency creates a serious vulnerability, as Sen. Lee describes it, for Congress to “lord[] its power over western communities to extort political concessions from them, like some two-bit protection racket.” For the nation, this means Washington can manipulate western votes to extract hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars and further metastasize federal power.

For the growing movement to #FreeTheLands for more effective local care, Wednesday’s news from Utah was truly historic. With the release of this key report, the State of Utah has taken a critical step towards finally wresting its lands out of federal hands, empowering other Western states to follow suit, and restoring much needed constitutional and fiscal balance for our nation as a whole. 

 If Utah's attorney general Sean Reyes decides to litigate, we believe this case merits close attention from all freedom-loving Americans nationwide. 

The American Lands Council and Federalism In Action are the leading organizations educating about the Free The Lands movement. For general information about how to #FreeTheLands for more effective locally-driven management, please have a look at this handbook and policy statement and share them with other concerned Americans searching for a real solution big enough for many of the pressing problems facing our nation.

 Here are some links to news stories on the unveiling of this historic legal report:


American Lands Council
http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/

American Lands Council · 859 W South Jordan Pkwy, 100, South Jordan, UT 84095, United States 

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service