Why Did The Justice Dept. File SECRET MOTIONS To Suppress Hillary's E-Mails From Becoming Public?

[M]

I guess that the Progressive Socialists keep protecting their own from Criminal Prosecution by using every dirty trick in the book that keeps it technically legal but definitely immoral. Take a look at the legal maneuverings the Justice Department is doing and then tell me there is not a Major Grade cover up going on to bluff the public into thinking Hillary is innocent.

Source; http://conservativebyte.com/2016/04/motions-filed-demanding-access-...

As Written By Josh Gerstein, POLITICO:

Lawyers for a reporter demanding access to email messages and files the FBI has reportedly retrieved from Hillary Clinton’s private server are objecting to a secret filing the Justice Department submitted to a federal court last month as part of a bid to keep those messages under wraps.

In a motion filed Tuesday, attorneys for Vice News reporter Jason Leopold formally protested the classified declaration the FBI filed offering U.S. District Court Judge Randy Moss additional details about the ongoing FBI investigation into how classified information wound up on Clinton’s private server, which hosted the personal email account she used in lieu of a government one during her four years as secretary of state…

Source;  http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/04/protest-lodge... 

By Josh Gershtein;

Lawyers for a reporter demanding access to email messages and files the FBI has reportedly retrieved from Hillary Clinton's private server are objecting to a secret filing the Justice Department submitted to a federal court last month as part of a bid to keep those messages under wraps.

In a motion filed Tuesday, attorneys for Vice News reporter Jason Leopold formally protested the classified declaration the FBI filed offering U.S. District Court Judge Randy Moss additional details about the ongoing FBI investigation into how classified information wound up on Clinton's private server, which hosted the personal email account she used in lieu of a government one during her four years as secretary of state.

Leopold's attorneys argue that the Justice Department violated normal legal protocol by failing to seek advance permission from the court or notice to the other side before filing the unusual "ex parte" pleading.

"Because Defendant submitted the declaration ex parte for in camera review without prior permission from the Court, or opportunity for Plaintiff to be heard, there is no public record justifying the need for such secrecy of the portions that are not classified, or for the court to rule on the lawfulness of the Defendant’s nondisclosure," lawyers Jeffrey Light and Ryan James wrote.

The protest gained some traction late Wednesday afternoon when Moss ordered the Justice Department to file publicly a redacted copy of the secret filing or "show cause why" that isn't possible. He gave the government until April 26 to do that.

The motion and order came in a Freedom of Information Act case Leopold filed seeking access to deleted messages the FBI is said to have obtained from Clinton's server, as well as other specified types of records about the probe such as records authorizing media statements or exchanged with the State Department about the matter.

The suit also sought correspondence between the FBI and Clinton representatives about the issue. The FBI said last month there is none. An FBI records official said disclosing other data and correspondence could "adversely" affect the pending investigation.

A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.

Consider these things and ask yourself what needs to be done to completely stop Hillary's Campaign and put her in jail where sher allegedly belongs? Also ask why the Democratic Socialist Progressives are trying so hard to squelch the information about Hillsary and how her E-Mails have severely damaged American Security.

[kevin kiernan]

They should not make them public. If they investigated me, I would not want my E-mails made public.

[Virginia Foulk]

I have to differ here. Yes, If I was under scrutiny, and my Emails were confiscated, I'd also want them kept out of the public eye. However, in Hillary's case, her supposedly private emails were part of the State Dept. and should be considered - unless, there were actual very classified subjects on them. But then she should not have used her private email. Kinda a catch 22 - the public should know what the "Witch" did, but then we'd want the classified info kept classified. 

Of course, it seems that she has already passed on all the classified stuff she could - to Russia, Germany, China, and Iran, North Korea. .

[M]

Thay are talking about the incriminating ones, not the personal ones

[kevin kiernan]

The incriminating ones belong to us .Not Her...So yes we should be able to look at the ones she did, as part of dealing with our countries workings.