Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic
Anyone thinking of voting for Hillary because they don't like Trump needs to read and assimilate this information!
Source; http://www.americanpatriotdaily.com/featured/a-list-so-sick-hillary...
Before taking the chance to expose Hillary as one of the biggest frauds in the realm of politics it’s important to say in a capitalistic society you should be paid what you’re worth.
If you provide value then you should be compensated accordingly.
Most free market capitalists aren’t going to argue with that.
However, when you’re a high earning individual you can’t pretend to be one of the people. You might have come from low stock but your income changes you and what you’re concerned about. That’s just the truth.
Hillary Clinton has been trying to pull the wool over Democrat voters’ eyes for decades pretending that she and her husband have always been and always will be nothing more than simple attorneys from Podunk Arkansas.
There’s only one problem with that – it’s simply not true. In fact in the past 3 years Mrs. Clinton has earned way more than what the average Hillary voter could ever imagine.
In the list below you’ll see a detailed report on how much she earned giving speeches in just two years.
Though the information is out there Mrs. Clinton hopes desperately to keep these numbers hidden from view, especially because she knows if Democrat voters see she’s been lying about her financially status for as long as she has they might turn their backs on her.
Total: $21,667,000
Those totals are simply staggering to think about, especially for the average Democrat voter. These speeches are probably 10x times what Democrat voters make in a year, and yet these same voters blindly support Hillary because they think she really cares about ending “unfair distributions of wealth.”
The truth is this is only brushing the surface when it comes to her impropriety in dealing with money.
There are ledgers full of how she and her husband have mishandled money for years.
If her voting base actually knew what she was guilty of they might reconsider voting for her.
How do you feel about this list and Democrats who support Hillary?
Tags:
AP calls it for hillary
It's Official: Hillary Clinton Wins The Democratic Presidential Nomination
What was supposed to be an all-important California primary tomorrow just became moot moments ago, when in a surprising announcement, AP just called the race for Hillary who according to the newswire's calculations has earned enough delegates to become the presumptive Democratic nominee, making her the first woman ever to win a major party nomination.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-06/ap-calls-race-hillary-clin...
Charles;
Now that the AP has crowned Hillary as the presumptive Democrat Party winner, thus making the people who still will be voting in primaries want to "Go With A Winner" that is the strategy to get the low to no information voters to vote like nice little robots for the politician of choice by the Elites. They use it constantly in the General Elections by posting the presumed winners long before the polls close, and in doing that they are able to legally skew the remaining votes towards their ( the Elites) pick for whatever office in National elections.
Further reasons why Hillary should not be President but should be charged and tried;
Source; http://eheadlines.com/every-time-she-opens-her-mouth-she-lies-judge...
Here's what Judge Janine has to say.
Judge Jeanine Pirro said on “Hannity” last night that she expects the FBI to recommend criminal charges for Hillary Clinton, but the question is whether the Justice Department proceeds with that recommendation.
“Every time she opens her mouth, she lies. I don’t think she even knows the difference between the truth and a lie,” Judge Jeanine said.
She pointed out that Clinton has repeatedly changed the narrative surrounding the private email she used as secretary of state, including claiming that her unusual email practices were allowed by the State Department – when they clearly were not – and also that she got permission.
“This woman is just a liar,” Judge Jeanine stated, noting that there are lingering questions not just about her emails, but also about the Benghazi terror attack and the finances behind the Clinton Foundation.
Judge Jeanine said that one reason she believes the Justice Department will be reluctant to indict Clinton in the email scandal is because President Obama was aware of her private email, meaning he would be called as a witness if she is indeed indicted.
Read Full Story At Fox News
“Wherever they go, whatever they do, ethics are trashed and suspicions of criminal conduct follow them like night follows day.”
as long as there is an opposing party that view will always be true,
Jack,
It's true because they are doing that not because of an opposing party. Democrats promoted Slavery. Democrats promoted the buffalo hunts to starve out the native American people who depended on them for everything. The Democrats reversed the reconstruction and took away the rights to citizenship and voting rights from the black race of freed slaves, under Rutherford B. Hayes, who won because of a back room deal when the original reports had Tilden the winner,( http://elections.harpweek.com/09Ver2Controversy/Overview-1.htm ) and Hayes made a deal to end reconstruction as Tilden had promised to do. That move by Hayes took away most of the rights of the Blacks for almost a century. Yes, I do know that Hayes was a Republican, but he promoted the Democrat agenda like Obama promotes the Elitist agenda today. The Democrats from the South (Dixiecrats) kept the bias against the blacks with the Jim Crow laws and kept them going until Eisenhower first integrated the Military Services. The Jim Crow laws kept on until Kennedy championed Civil Rights and then Johnson found a way to further enslave the black population through his "Great Society" that he paid for by Robbing the money that working people were required by law to put into Social Security and we are still paying for that failed fiasco today.
So Jack, how can you say or imply it's because of an opposing party's viewpoint instead of the reality of the situation?
Legislative News
Congressional Quarterly
C-SPAN
Roll Call
Stateline.org
The Hill
Washington Post
Politics Section
Boston Globe
Dallas News
Denver Post
Los Angeles Times
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Stop Island Park Wildlife Overpasses
Seattle Times
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times
USA Today
Beltway Buzz
CQ Politics
First Read
The Hotline
The Note
The Page
Washington Wire
Mike Allen's Playbook
Politico
Roll Call
The Hill
CNN Political Ticker
The Swamp
The Fix
Washington Whispers
Fish Bowl DC
Online Political Sites
Alternative Press Index
Capitol Hill Blue
CommonDreams.org
Digg.com Politics
Drudge Report
Political Insider
Political Wire
Politico
PopPolitics
Real Clear Politics
Salon.com
Slate
Stateline.org
TCOT Report
TomPaine.com
US Politics Guide
© 2024 Created by WTPUSA. Powered by