Exactly what is right to rise?

[charles royer]

Eye on 2016, Jeb Bush Launches 'Right to Rise' PAC
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/eye-2016-jeb-bush-launch...
Conservative CANDIDATES?
Is a Pro-Bush Super PAC Obscuring Its Spending?
Super PACs are supposed to be both transparent and independent from the politicians they are supporting.

But it’s not clear that Right to Rise USA, the super PAC formed by Republican Jeb Bush prior to his presidential bid, is either.

The super PAC’s biggest single vendor this year through June is a mysterious limited liability company, LKJ, LLC, whose owners are hidden behind the state of Delaware’s opaque registration laws. The company doesn’t appear to have a website or a physical office.
What other conservatives are they sponsoring?
http://time.com/4063597/jeb-bush-right-rise-super-pac/

[charles royer]

Las Vegas (CNN)In the unsparing judgment of the Twittersphere, there was one clear loser after Jeb's Bush's graceful exit from the Republican presidential race Saturday night: political strategist Mike Murphy and the Bush-allied super PAC Right to Rise USA, which he directed.

Murphy has long been one of Bush's closest advisers -- and the political world was in awe last year when Right to Rise raised $100 million just as Bush was launching his candidacy.

Now, the super PAC will go down in history as yet another failed Murphy juggernaut

Who will get the $ now?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/21/politics/mike-murphy-jeb-bush-drops-o...

[charles royer]

Jeb's Right to Rise (and Fall)
When Jeb Bush officially announced his candidacy for president last June, his campaign and super PAC, Right to Rise, already sat on a pile of money that outsized the fundraising hauls of all other Republican candidates combined. Jeb's fundraising machine was a behemoth. And when the former Florida governor suspended his campaign last month, pundits asked whether money really matters at all in an election season that seems to defy conventional wisdom at every turn.
When big money loses
There's a high probability, not a certainty, that a candidate who out-fundraises their opponent will win their election. Despite Jeb's exit, Trump's unorthodox campaign, and other features that have made the 2016 presidential race unique, that rule of thumb remains as relevant as ever.

In United States congressional races, the better-funded candidate wins their race 91 percent of the time. While that's not the case in the other nine percent of congressional races, the infrequency of those victories is proof of big money's influence in our elections.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-smith/jebs-right-to-rise-and-fa_b...

[jack ludwig]

unless you have the MSM on your side it is nearly impossible to run for public office without money or being a very liked incumbent candidate. Why Trump was able to do this is because he had the media funding his campaign and there were 17 candidates running. Trump with or without his money could not have achieved the success he was having without the help of the MSM and a large number of candidates. With a handful of candidates and no media backing, he would have been gone early in the campaign no matter what campaign style he choose. The MSM played this hand perfectly, they got the candidate they wanted and made money on their strategy at the same time.

[charles royer]

So , by accident or design?

[charles royer]

A Preview of Jeb Bush’s Super PAC Donors: Titans, Tycoons and Lobbyists
Former Gov. Jeb Bush has spent much of the year raising money for his Super PAC, called Right to Rise, without disclosing his donors.

He doesn’t have to — Bush’s Super PAC and traditional PAC are on a semi-annual reporting timeline, meaning they have until mid-July to file public campaign finance reports. Clues from a variety of sources, however, provide a preview of his donors, who include major leaders in technology, business and lobbying.

Agents for foreign governments fall under special transparency rules, meaning several have already had to disclose their donations in filings with the Justice Department. Ignacio Sanchez, a former trade official for President George W. Bush, is a lobbyist for Saudi Arabia. Sanchez gave $5,000 to Right to Rise on February 17, the same day that George Salem, another lobbyist retained by the Saudi government to influence American policy, gave the group $10,000. A day later, former Sen. Don Nickles, R-Ok., now a lobbyist for Wal-Mart, ExxonMobil, Taiwan and the Republic of Korea, among other clients, gave $5,000 to Right to Rise.

Glenn Youngkin, managing director of the Carlyle Group, the investment firm that owns Booz Allen Hamilton, gave $10,000, according to a disclosure statement posted on the company’s website. Because Carlyle manages pension fund money, the company faces special campaign finance requirements.

Although Bush has not named the donors giving to his PACs, certain donors, including state-level PACs, are obligated to disclose on a different schedule. These disclosures show that Florida politicians have dipped into their own campaign funds to support Right to Rise. The Florida Conservative Leadership Fund, associated with state Rep. Dana Young, R-Tampa, gave $5,000 to Bush’s Super PAC in February. Among other Florida PACs, Growing Florida’s Future chipped in $25,000, Liberty Florida gave $5,000, and the Treasure Coast PAC gave $1,000.
https://theintercept.com/2015/06/05/early-window-jeb-bushs-superpac...

[kevin kiernan]

I guaranty, that when the list of donors come out, most of them will also be listed on a Bilderberg meeting guest list.. If you remember. Jeb announced he was running after he came back from a trip to Europe. He was in Europe and missed his dads birthday party, during the secretive Bilderberg meeting. . He waited to announce because he waited to get the Bilderberg blessing.Bill Clinton went  to the meeting before he first ran in 1991.