Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic
The RNC is preparing a brokered convention...to not allow Marco Rubio to win...They will bring in an establishment candidate to give it to that candidate...What can be done about that..We know it will be Jeb or Rubio..They can do this because of the ways that they have structured the riles...this is incredible.. the pick at a brokered convention never wins..they said FDR was the last to ever win a brokered convention.What they are really doing is saying they had rather elect Hillary than have Trump win............I AM TOO DISGUSTED FOR WORDS
UPDATE:
The big winner in Iowa’s Republican caucuses on Monday night might not have been Ted Cruz. It may have been a nominating process that fails to yield a clear winner. A clear winner being a candidate who goes to Cleveland this summer with the presidential nomination in hand.
At the end of Monday night, which count really mattered? Delegates acquired. As of this writing, Cruz has bagged eight delegates, Trump and Rubio, seven each, with four other delegates going to also-rans.
Raw vote totals are what most folk tend to watch and weigh. But in 2016, it pays to more closely follow the candidates’ delegate totals. Thanks to the Republican National Committee (RNC), caucuses and primaries held prior to mid-March mandate proportional distribution of delegates based on candidates’ vote totals in given contests. Most early caucuses and primaries impose threshold minimums to win delegates (say, Alabama, with a 20% threshold).
Prior to Mid-March, 25 States, along with DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico, will hold proportional contests. That accounts for 1,022 bound delegates (“bound” being delegates committed to a candidate for the first vote). 45% of the bound delegates will be picked proportionally or in “hybrid” formats, which include triggering provisions for larger delegate yields for candidates who meet higher vote percentage thresholds. There are WTA (winner-take-all) thresholds, but those will be quite difficult to achieve.
Starting with Super Tuesday, March 15, most of the remaining states have opted to hold winner-take-all contests, though a handful will continue to make proportional distributions. From mid-March forward, 1,238 bound delegates will be chosen (Colorado’s delegates declare at convention).
The number of delegates needed to secure the GOP nomination is 1,237. There are a number of unbound (3 per state) and unpledged delegates. The unpledged delegates are mostly establishment picks who would factor in at a deadlocked convention.
Short of a breakout by one the major contenders (Trump, Cruz, and Rubio), it’s not hard to imagine a scenario where the proportional phase of the nominating process yields tightly packed delegate counts among the three. Complicating matters is if new life is breathed into the Carson, Kasich, or Christe campaigns (as improbable as that appears).
But, say you, won’t the nomination fight be resolved with Super Tuesday and the subsequent contests?
That could happen, but consider this prospect. Cruz, Rubio, and Trump take roughly a third each of the delegates in the proportional phase. For illustration, say, 340 delegates per man. That means in the winner-take-all phase, one of the principals would need to capture 897 of the available 1,238 bound delegates to win. That’s about 73% of the total or three out of every four delegates. Possible, but how likely? This assumes, too, that the principals are competitive with one another, affording each the chance to pick off states.
Cruz, Trump, and Rubio have the resources to stay the course. Trump is self-funding. Cruz’s fundraising operation is already solid and benefits all the more from his Iowa win. Rubio’s stronger than anticipated finish in Iowa boosts his fundraising. And as Rubio consolidates establishment voters -- as he began doing in Iowa -- and lesser establishment candidates drop out, expect a significant upswing in his campaign’s financial fortunes.
Writes Michael Snyder at “Before It’s News”:
[I]f no candidate is able to secure enough delegates, that means that we would end up with a “brokered convention”. The mechanics of a brokered convention can get quite complicated, but on a practical level what that would essentially mean is that the party establishment would get to hand select the nominee. And in case you are wondering, that would not be Donald Trump or Ted Cruz.
Snyder’s assessment is flawed in a couple of respects (though not his conclusion about the candidates).
“Deadlocked” versus a “brokered” convention, the more accurate designation is “deadlocked.” A brokered convention suggests that party bosses call the shots nearly exclusively. The party boss era in American politics is long past.
Though unpledged delegates -- who are likely establishment recruits -- will play a critical role at a deadlocked convention, it’s important to remember that bound delegates are only committed to their candidates on the first ballot.
Thereafter, they’re unbound. Candidates’ and, perhaps, dark horses’ (yes, a draft is possible) primary focus for vote gathering will be among all those plentiful unbound state delegates. If the convention deadlocks, it’s going to be the Wild West, with plenty of wheeling and dealing, barroom brawls, shoot-outs, shenanigans, and backroom deals. But all that will occur across delegations and not just among the establishment few.
Snyder’s guess that the nominee won’t be named “Cruz” or “Trump” should a deadlock occur is reasonable. Deadlocked conventions -- if past brokered conventions are any guide -- tend to nominee candidates who at least appear more centrist or moderate. At a deadlocked 2016 Cleveland affair, the buzz word may be “electable.” Right now, Marco Rubio seems to fit the bill. As Snyder pointed out in his article, that’s not an endorsement; it’s merely an observation.
If the Republican field narrows to two principal candidates, then the chances for a deadlocked convention melt away. But if, as anticipated, Cruz, Trump, and Rubio (and possibly one or two others) remain in the race, then a deadlocked convention moves from “maybe” to “probable” with each passing primary, caucus, and state convention. The Republican presidential nominee who emerges will have done so after the fight of his political life – and ours.
The big winner in Iowa’s Republican caucuses on Monday night might not have been Ted Cruz. It may have been a nominating process that fails to yield a clear winner. A clear winner being a candidate who goes to Cleveland this summer with the presidential nomination in hand.
At the end of Monday night, which count really mattered? Delegates acquired. As of this writing, Cruz has bagged eight delegates, Trump and Rubio, seven each, with four other delegates going to also-rans.
Raw vote totals are what most folk tend to watch and weigh. But in 2016, it pays to more closely follow the candidates’ delegate totals. Thanks to the Republican National Committee (RNC), caucuses and primaries held prior to mid-March mandate proportional distribution of delegates based on candidates’ vote totals in given contests. Most early caucuses and primaries impose threshold minimums to win delegates (say, Alabama, with a 20% threshold).
Prior to Mid-March, 25 States, along with DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico, will hold proportional contests. That accounts for 1,022 bound delegates (“bound” being delegates committed to a candidate for the first vote). 45% of the bound delegates will be picked proportionally or in “hybrid” formats, which include triggering provisions for larger delegate yields for candidates who meet higher vote percentage thresholds. There are WTA (winner-take-all) thresholds, but those will be quite difficult to achieve.
Starting with Super Tuesday, March 15, most of the remaining states have opted to hold winner-take-all contests, though a handful will continue to make proportional distributions. From mid-March forward, 1,238 bound delegates will be chosen (Colorado’s delegates declare at convention).
The number of delegates needed to secure the GOP nomination is 1,237. There are a number of unbound (3 per state) and unpledged delegates. The unpledged delegates are mostly establishment picks who would factor in at a deadlocked convention.
Short of a breakout by one the major contenders (Trump, Cruz, and Rubio), it’s not hard to imagine a scenario where the proportional phase of the nominating process yields tightly packed delegate counts among the three. Complicating matters is if new life is breathed into the Carson, Kasich, or Christe campaigns (as improbable as that appears).
But, say you, won’t the nomination fight be resolved with Super Tuesday and the subsequent contests?
That could happen, but consider this prospect. Cruz, Rubio, and Trump take roughly a third each of the delegates in the proportional phase. For illustration, say, 340 delegates per man. That means in the winner-take-all phase, one of the principals would need to capture 897 of the available 1,238 bound delegates to win. That’s about 73% of the total or three out of every four delegates. Possible, but how likely? This assumes, too, that the principals are competitive with one another, affording each the chance to pick off states.
Cruz, Trump, and Rubio have the resources to stay the course. Trump is self-funding. Cruz’s fundraising operation is already solid and benefits all the more from his Iowa win. Rubio’s stronger than anticipated finish in Iowa boosts his fundraising. And as Rubio consolidates establishment voters -- as he began doing in Iowa -- and lesser establishment candidates drop out, expect a significant upswing in his campaign’s financial fortunes.
Writes Michael Snyder at “Before It’s News”:
[I]f no candidate is able to secure enough delegates, that means that we would end up with a “brokered convention”. The mechanics of a brokered convention can get quite complicated, but on a practical level what that would essentially mean is that the party establishment would get to hand select the nominee. And in case you are wondering, that would not be Donald Trump or Ted Cruz.
Snyder’s assessment is flawed in a couple of respects (though not his conclusion about the candidates).
“Deadlocked” versus a “brokered” convention, the more accurate designation is “deadlocked.” A brokered convention suggests that party bosses call the shots nearly exclusively. The party boss era in American politics is long past.
Though unpledged delegates -- who are likely establishment recruits -- will play a critical role at a deadlocked convention, it’s important to remember that bound delegates are only committed to their candidates on the first ballot.
Thereafter, they’re unbound. Candidates’ and, perhaps, dark horses’ (yes, a draft is possible) primary focus for vote gathering will be among all those plentiful unbound state delegates. If the convention deadlocks, it’s going to be the Wild West, with plenty of wheeling and dealing, barroom brawls, shoot-outs, shenanigans, and backroom deals. But all that will occur across delegations and not just among the establishment few.
Snyder’s guess that the nominee won’t be named “Cruz” or “Trump” should a deadlock occur is reasonable. Deadlocked conventions -- if past brokered conventions are any guide -- tend to nominee candidates who at least appear more centrist or moderate. At a deadlocked 2016 Cleveland affair, the buzz word may be “electable.” Right now, Marco Rubio seems to fit the bill. As Snyder pointed out in his article, that’s not an endorsement; it’s merely an observation.
If the Republican field narrows to two principal candidates, then the chances for a deadlocked convention melt away. But if, as anticipated, Cruz, Trump, and Rubio (and possibly one or two others) remain in the race, then a deadlocked convention moves from “maybe” to “probable” with each passing primary, caucus, and state convention. The Republican presidential nominee who emerges will have done so after the fight of his political life – and ours.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/cleveland_cliffhang...
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Tags:
by Pam Key15 Jan 2016, 5:36 PM PST259
Friday on CNN’s “The Lead,” Gov. Terry Branstad (R-IA) noted Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump was getting “huge crowds,” to which he argued could bring new people to the GOP, just as Obama did for the Dems in 2008. Branstad said, “You
The demand started with Univision TV-host Jorge Ramos, a U.S.-naturalized Mexican with roots in Spain. He’s worked up because Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio argued in the Charleston debate — sincerely or not — that Americans’ safety is more important than the desire of perhaps 150 million foreigners to immigrate into the United States.
by Neil Munro15 Jan 2016, 2:24 PM PST64
President Obama blamed male lawmakers for sales taxes on tampons and pads for women, suggesting that they were ignorant of the struggles of women in America. Obama hosted a series of interviews with YouTube personalities this afternoon, including one interview
by Charlie Spiering15 Jan 2016, 1:36 PM PST1,907
President Obama says modern politics are overly loud and obnoxious – suggesting that’s part of the reason Donald Trump is getting so much attention.
by Charlie Spiering15 Jan 2016, 1:24 PM PST3,026
Former Supreme Allied Commander at NATO, Admiral James Stavridis stated that the Iran nuclear deal is “dropping a golden shower of money on them” “a significant portion” of which will be used to facilitate wars and terrorism during an interview
by Ian Hanchett15 Jan 2016, 1:09 PM PST111
[Adult language warning] Friday on ABC’s”The View,” while discussing Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina criticizing Bill and Hillary Clinton’s marriage at the Republican primary undercard debate a day earlier, the co-hosts agreed it was “offensive” and Michelle Collins commended Hillary
T.A. Frank, an often-reasonable liberal, in the often-unreasonable pages of Vanity Fair, writes: “Trump is on many fronts less extreme than his competitors, but he is without doubt a radical. And he has irrevocably changed the course of our politics.”
by Neil Munro15 Jan 2016, 12:22 PM PST675
With the Iowa caucuses just two and half weeks away, Hillary Clinton suddenly finds herself in a hyper-competive race against Vermont Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders.
by Mike Flynn15 Jan 2016, 12:02 PM PST309
President Obama confessed that he still hadn’t seen the new Star Wars movie – The Force Awakens.
by Charlie Spiering15 Jan 2016, 11:59 AM PST36
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio praised Donald Trump for his spirited defense of New York after Ted Cruz mocked the billionaire’s “New York values” in the Republican presidential debate last night.
by Charlie Spiering15 Jan 2016, 11:15 AM PST57
On the Friday broadcast of Fox Sports 1’s “The Herd,” host Colin Cowherd reacted to Thursday’s GOP Debate, saying Rubio is the only electable candidate of the bunch. Cowherd, who called himself a swing-voter, explained that Republicans “hate” President Barack Obama
by Trent Baker15 Jan 2016, 11:07 AM PST654
Hank ..Our Warrior against the unions...what you say cannot be discounted...Trump has no new record to vet him by...We love what he has said and done to rid us of PC speeh...That said we are judging him on what he ha said...Cruz..on the other hand..has his record in the senate from the get go... of what he has done to fight against the establishment and has fought along with Jeff Sessions to fight against amnesty and illegal aien immigration ..Cruz is Grass Roots...That is indeed why Fox News and all the establishment and all the dems are spinning against him..( they are all battling together to keep him in the spin zone) Marco Rubio whom FNC adores because he is so power hungry..that they know that they can control him...We know what Cruz will do...He will fight for us..and make the establishment mad as hell ....FNC will barely give time to Cruz..They are repubs but are establishment repubs...Read up on Breitbart today....
The GOP establishment sent a stealth pro-amnesty message to Spanish-language communities while Gov. Nikki Haley was delivering the GOP’s official response to President Barack Obama completed his State of the Union speech.
by Neil Munro15 Jan 2016, 10:39 PM PST2
This is another reason why they want a usable POTUS like Marco to bring in amnesty for illegals..Marco is as big a liar as any democrat...All con men speak beautifully...He will be a dupe in the hands of the old time stupid leaders of the GOP....
The GOP establishment sent a stealth pro-amnesty message to Spanish-language communities while Gov. Nikki Haley was delivering the GOP’s official response to President Barack Obama completed his State of the Union speech.
by Neil Munro15 Jan 2016, 10:39 PM PST2
HBO host Bill Maher dubbed the Republican Party “the party of impotent white rage” before arguing Texas Senator and GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz is “the child of Satan and a dog” and stating House Speaker Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI)
by Ian Hanchett15 Jan 2016, 9:21 PM PST10
As the presidential primary moves into a more urgent and combative phase, there is growing acceptance among Republicans, including the Washington and financial elite, that Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are the two candidates most likely to become the party’s nominee.
by Breitbart News15 Jan 2016, 9:10 PM PST232
On Friday, HBO’s “Real Time” host Bill Maher wondered if GOP presidential candidate Texas Senator Ted Cruz was making “a dog whistle” by referencing “New York values.” Maher asked, “But wasn’t he looking also to make a dog whistle? Because
by Ian Hanchett15 Jan 2016, 9:06 PM PST129
Dr. Cornel West, Union Theological Seminary Professor of Philosophy and Christian Practice, a Professor Emeritus at Princeton, argued GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump is “a multi-billionaire pseudo-populist with autocratic sensibilities, and some fascist proclivities” on Friday’s broadcast of HBO’s “Real Time.” During
by Ian Hanchett15 Jan 2016, 8:56 PM PST108
HBO’s “Real Time” host Bill Maher argued, “the idea that when Syrian refugees come to European countries, or to America, that they are going to completely fit in, is a fantasy” and “This is the one issue the Democrats are
by Ian Hanchett15 Jan 2016, 8:40 PM PST216
Rudy Giuliani on Friday said Ted Cruz should apologize to New York City for attacking its “values” in the presidential race.
by Breitbart News15 Jan 2016, 8:25 PM PST4,015
In an interview after Thursday’s presidential debate, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) talked about his dust-up with Donald Trump, both of which are candidates for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. Cruz explained to Neil Cavuto, a moderator in the debate, on
by Breitbart TV15 Jan 2016, 7:57 PM PST92
Sen. Ted Cruz, whose attack on Donald Trump during Thursday’s Republican presidential debate in South Carolina for his “New York Values” drew a pointed response from the Manhattan-based GOP front runner, issued an apology to New Yorkers tonight.
by Michael Patrick Leahy15 Jan 2016, 7:49 PM PST2,832
As Donald Trump called for cracking down on Chinese currency manipulation, other candidates—most notably, Marco Rubio—argued against Trump.
by Julia Hahn15 Jan 2016, 7:42 PM PST163
The left-wing Houston lawyer who filed a long-shot birther-suit against Sen. Ted Cruz has been suspended in Louisiana and Pennsylvania, according to a report from PJ Media.
by Neil Munro15 Jan 2016, 7:22 PM PST12
Texas Senator and Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz offered an apology to New Yorkers for the damage done to New York State and City by liberal policies on Friday’s “Sean Hannity Show.” Cruz said, “it’s been an interesting 24 hours,
by Ian Hanchett15 Jan 2016, 5:47 PM PST4,510
MYRTLE BEACH, South Carolina — GOP frontrunner billionaire Donald Trump and his chief rival for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), will take their battle on the road to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, on Saturday at the first day of the Breitbart News Network sponsored South Carolina Tea Party Coalition Convention.
by Matthew Boyle15 Jan 2016, 5:40 PM PST351
On WABC’s “Election Central with Rita Cosby,” Republican presidential candidate Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) said doing well in the New Hampshire primary is important for his campaign to continue. Kasich said, “If we come out of New Hampshire as a major
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read more: http://therightscoop.com/#ixzz3xQ9gy7sY
Calling BS on the official story of the Iranian capture of two US r... - 1/16/16 January 16, 2016"A pack of lies from the US and Iran" on what the hell happened that got our boats captured and taken to the Farsi Islands. More
============================================================================
Save Us from the Tyranny of 'Settled' Science John Horvat IIThe phenomenon of “settled” science is a sad reflection of the frenetic intemperance of these times. More
===========================================================================
It seems only those in the media are buying that story so pretty sure most everyone else is calling BS on both sides. Hell we know the Iranians and the US have little trouble spouting whoppers.
Good one Rhodes...Has anyone ever told you that you are a genuine Character??? that is what makes you soo fun to read....:)
It looks like Ted Cruz is about to put his campaign in another gear. The Donald better look out!
POLITICO – The Ted Cruz who came out swinging at Donald Trump on Thursday night is here to stay, now willing to not only answer Trump’s criticisms but to eagerly define his rival’s weaknesses as the 2016 race in Iowa becomes a two-man contest.
“Iowa is three weeks away,” Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler said. “People want to know how you’re different. It’s time to tell how we’re different.”
Indeed, Cruz’s staffers and backers indicated that while Cruz has until now publicly laid off Trump, his team has long been watching closely and waiting for the right time to pounce. They cited moments that took place last summer and in an interview that he gave close to two decades ago as they questioned Trump’s conservative credentials.
Now, after the debate, Cruz’s backers are foreshadowing a pre-Iowa push aimed at differentiating the senator from Trump on everything from policy to character, even as the campaign says it will stick to policy.
“If Donald wants to have honest, open policy contrasts, we’re ready for that,” campaign chairman Chad Sweet said. “If, on the other hand, he’s going to engage in discussions over nonsensical issues, over birther issues or who’s the real evangelical—which, by the way, someone from his background should be careful about questioning the faith of our candidate,” something Trump has also done recently.
Asked what he meant by Trump’s “background,” Sweet continued, referencing a Trump appearance at a cattle call in Iowa last summer. “I think it’s interesting that Trump … basically said at [a] family values forum he’s never asked for forgiveness, but yet he is Christian. I would ask most Christians the question, ‘What is the first thing you do to become a Christian?’ Christians know what the answer to that question is.”
Charlie Condon, the former attorney general of South Carolina and a newly minted surrogate, was more pointed in discussing Trump’s “background,” a preview of the potentially nasty nature of the new Cruz-Trump dynamic.
“A thrice-married man is going to come into South Carolina expecting to be the Republican nominee?” Condon asked incredulously. “He’s pro-choice. He’s pro- gay marriage. He’s against traditional values. He’s New York, and he’s got to talk about that.”
Still, a Cruz adviser cautioned that the relentlessly on-message Cruz is not planning to fly off the handle on Trump.’
“This is about our campaign and us, we’re not going to spend a lot of time reacting to everything,” the source said. “He’ll probably refer people to the debate. I think he’ll say, ‘I stood two-and-a-half feet from him and said it, and everything I said there stands today.’”
But, noted this source, “Ted’s not going to be Donald Trump’s caddy. I think that’s pretty clear from tonight.”
I’m so ready for this. People need to know the difference between Trump’s New York values and the rest of America and Cruz is the perfect person to do it, as we saw last night. But as the article says, don’t expect Cruz to act like Trump and fly off the handle trumping nonsense as legitimate issues
Read more: http://therightscoop.com/cruz-campaign-ready-to-talk-more-about-the...
Ever wonder how we got to the point where our most promising choices are a guy that is literally married to wall street and has the loans to prove it, or the billionaire with a mouth that only holds the distinction of BFYTW as his trump card.
Anyone really think this was just happenstance?
As Ive said before I've no horse in this race, any that do are IMO seriously deluding themselves.
We have entered very strange days.
I believe you have a point Rhodes, this whole republican campaign has been orchestrated by the MSM and the left wing democrats but it would have never worked as well as it has without having Trump in the plan too.
Legislative News
Congressional Quarterly
C-SPAN
Roll Call
Stateline.org
The Hill
Washington Post
Politics Section
Boston Globe
Dallas News
Denver Post
Los Angeles Times
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Stop Island Park Wildlife Overpasses
Seattle Times
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times
USA Today
Beltway Buzz
CQ Politics
First Read
The Hotline
The Note
The Page
Washington Wire
Mike Allen's Playbook
Politico
Roll Call
The Hill
CNN Political Ticker
The Swamp
The Fix
Washington Whispers
Fish Bowl DC
Online Political Sites
Alternative Press Index
Capitol Hill Blue
CommonDreams.org
Digg.com Politics
Drudge Report
Political Insider
Political Wire
Politico
PopPolitics
Real Clear Politics
Salon.com
Slate
Stateline.org
TCOT Report
TomPaine.com
US Politics Guide
© 2025 Created by WTPUSA. Powered by