Trump will clean house

[kevin kiernan]

Crooked politicians must be held accountable for the crimes they have done. Trump is the only one who will do it. To elect a POTUS who will not prioritize fixing our criminal political system will not be good enough for me.We will not get another one like Trump ,who will bitch slap the evil out of Washington politics..No one can deny that Trump is crazy enough to do it. But he needs us to want it fixed. He can not stand alone..This is that time in history. The time that many have hoped. Turn your back on this opportunity,and we are done. THAT IS THE TRUTH OF IT.

[jack ludwig]

Kevin you claimed in your original comment all the news outlets covered Trump rally. All I said was I watched it on Fox and could not find it on any other channels. It was not cover my the three main networks. If it was covered on CNN and MSNBC. It may have been but in my area when I switched to those cable shows I did not see them. That does not make you a liar or me. And explain to me how this shows the polls are rigged? They are not accurate but they certainly aren't rigged. They serve the purpose pollsters and media are looking for, making money off them. Kevin you can continue to call as you see it, that's your right but it doesn't make you right. Since when are you the judge who makes contribution to the discussion and does not.  

[kevin kiernan]

since I`m the moderator.

[jack ludwig]

since you are the moderator, you should use that position very carefully. Don't be so judgemental on others that may disagree with your views. If you find someone is offensive, including yourself, make the appropriate caution to that offender and always encourage all points of views. That is how we learn.

[kevin kiernan]

I do not need your advice.Instead of spouting off. Take a time out to figure things out. And if you do not like how I do my job. Let me just say there is no anchor on your ass. The door swings freely both ways.. Now listen and take warning. Do not attack any ones post without solid proof...Opinions on other hand are fair game.

[M]

Does this tell ya something?

[jack ludwig]

yes hedge funders would definitely prefer Hillary over Trump. They know Hillary will allow the speculation buying to continue. It is unknown if Trump would be so forgiving. He doesn't participate in that activity and he doesn't understand how it works and how it impacts the world economy. You will find out soon enough should Trump make it to the white house how little he understands.

[M]

Well Jack,

There is an old adage, An Honest Politician stays bought. Considering the Clinton Foundation, everyone can draw their own conclusions. Especially after what Assange is hinting he will release up to the election. 

[jack ludwig]

M I have no doubt the Clinton Foundation was setup exclusively to launder money especially from foreign sources because they expected to get favors for their donations. The Clintons used the foundation to build their wealth. Most foundations and organization operate under similar terms, to gain personal wealth. Few organization have a goal to help others or for a cause. It may be their second goal and sometimes that happens but the objective is to make money is always first. Politicians run for office to enhance their personal health. They believe they have ideas that will help others as their initial motive to run, but they learn soon there is great opportunity for wealth to be earned holding an elected office. Otherwise most politicians would leave office after one or two terms voluntary. Hillary is a fraud as is her husband as are most politicians. The question here is which fraud is worse for me and the country?

[M]

Jack,

Hillary has lied to Congress and three House committees have asked the U.S. Attorney for DC to investigate her statements which were captured on video and refuted by sworn testimony under oath by Comey. She still insiste in spite of real evidence that she did nothing wrong. I posted both video's on;

 http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/forum/topics/will-the-doj-act-on-thi...  

and you can go there and hear both sides. Too much is coming out lately that shows her to be a real loose cannon who can do much more damage to the U.S. than Trump, and she could even get us in the position of having China and Russia attacking us full force. Even the DNC acknowledges that she is hard left on social issues but is a hard right War Hawk that has used the military against foreign countries for her political gain. Namely Libya where she was the architect of destroying the Gaddafi Regime, and Syria where she knew the Rebels were ISIS and still authorized the weapons shipments. She even tried to cover up the fact that our Ambassador who was murdered was working with Turkey to clandestinely move arms to the Syrian Rebels and ISIS.

So, you make your choice as to who would be the worst to become President.

I also would like you to explain how China and Russia could destroy the U.S. without using Economic or Military means and where you got that information.

Actually I decided to repost those video's here;

I'll even throw in the full interview with Julian assange;

[M]

Jack,

I still would like you to explain how China and Russia could destroy the U.S. without using Economic or Military means and where you got that information/idea from.

Oh Yeah, I forgot to list the Committees that made the request of the DOJ to investigate. they were; 

Three House Committees Oversight, Government Reform (Chairman), Judiciary, asked the U.S. Attorney for DC to investigate stating the four specific instances on the video where Hillary gave false testimony or testimony that conflicted with FBI findings.  Lets see if Lynch will try to cover Hillary again and override the DC decision if it goes against Hillary. I'll be willing to bet Lynch does nothing to compromise Hillary..

>

[kevin kiernan]

Lynch will have to meet with Bill again on some tar mat.

[jack ludwig]

M I commend you for at least trying to put together as full picture of the testimony between Hillary, congressional committee and Cromy. On the surface one could easily come to the same conclusion you have, but that is not how evidence is compiled or reviewed. This presentation also would not be permitted in a court of law. Full transcripts of the testimony of Hillary with the congressional committee and her questioning with the FBI are available to both Cormy and Lynch. I am confident that they have reviewed all aspects of both documents and have concluded using their legal experience that proving intentional lying would be nearly impossible to prove in a court of law. I am sure after Lynch receives the request from the three sources she will come to the same conclusion unless they have presented new evidence that would help prove the case.

Now to address you question how I think Russia and China could destroy America without using military or economic means. M if there is no means of any form of electrical power in America and no forms of communications how would it be possible for America to function let alone defend itself. You ask me how I know this and all I can tell you is that I have worked in the power electric industry for decades and have traveled to both countries on specific projects. I have seen small demonstrations during these visits that I could easily see the impact it would have on electrical power and any form of communications. I cannot explain what I saw just like I can't explain how a person can read someone else's mind.

Technology is amazing particularly the technology we haven't learned or understand. I often hear the discussion of secure networks and servers. Hear is a little secret, there is no such thing today as secure data. Russia and China broke through that technology years ago. Finally, Assange is nothing more than a high priced extortionist. He provides a vehicle to anyone willing to pay to release information that would damage one person or organization. It doesn't matter to him. If you are willing to pay he will disseminate the  information.