Bullheaded Texan's "Open Thread"

Comment

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 3:19am

WATCH This Firefighter Catch a Three-Month-Old Baby Dropped From Raging Inferno.
04/25/18 The Daily Caller by: Henry Rodgers
An assistant fire chief caught a three-month-old baby after her father dropped her from a burning apartment building in Minnesota Sunday.
North St. Paul Assistant Fire Chief Dustin Kalis was seen catching the three-month-old baby girl after her father carefully dropped her over the second-floor balcony while smoke and flames poured out from their apartment, according to 5 Eyewitness News.
Assistant fire chief experiences a new first on the job, catching a baby carefully dropped from a balcony in apartment fire. “Never caught any babies from any balconies before."
The baby and her father had reportedly both been napping in the afternoon when the fire started. As the fire continued, Kalis and other firefighters were looking for movement in the apartment, when they saw the father and baby come rushing out to the balcony.
http://americanactionnews.com/articles/watch-this-firefighter-catch...

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 3:03am

How President Trump’s Vetting Rules Keep Americans Safe.
Apr/25/18
WHAT: President Donald J. Trump’s action to restrict the entry of individuals from certain countries is working to strengthen our screening and vetting capabilities.
On September 24, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed a Proclamation establishing entry restrictions for nationals from certain countries. The Proclamation followed an extensive, world-wide review, which determined that the selected countries were not adequately sharing information about their nationals with the United States or presented other risk factors that threatened our national security.
Following President Trump’s actions, other countries have adopted new security measures, strengthening our ability to identify and properly vet individuals entering or seeking to enter the United States. Information-sharing and identification practices between the United States and foreign governments have significantly improved as a result.
For example, in response to the President’s actions, 29 countries produced example travel documents that can be used to combat fraud, and 11 countries agreed to share information on known or suspected terrorists.
One country addressed by the Proclamation, Chad, made such significant strides in improving its information-sharing that the entry restrictions were lifted. The significant steps taken by Chad and other nations make clear that the Administration’s efforts to enhance our national security are working.
WHY: The restrictions established by President Trump are needed to prevent individuals who pose a threat to our safety and security from entering the United States.
President Trump’s top priority is the safety and security of the American people!
The Proclamation’s entry restrictions advance that priority. Without them, dangerous criminals or terrorists could evade detection and enter our country from nations that fail to fully provide the information we need for our screening and vetting processes.
Further, without the Proclamation, foreign governments would have little incentive to improve their information-sharing practices moving forward, only making the problem worse.
Simply put, the entry restrictions are needed to strengthen our national security and are succeeding in doing exactly that.

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 2:13am

NRA Rallies Opposition to Vermont Gun Bill Amid Talk of Backlash Against GOP Governor.
Apr/3/18 By Rod Kackley
Vermont Rep. Brian Savage (R) complained “227 years of Vermont tradition has just gone down the drain!” as the state House approved S. 55, a gun-control bill that included a ban on both bump stocks and high-capacity magazines. It also forbids the sale of guns to anyone under the age of 21.
The Vermont Senate followed suit Friday.
Republican Gov. Phil Scott’s spokesman said Scott would review the gun-control legislation, as is standard procedure, but it could be signed into law by the end of this week.
But the NRA is not surrendering yet. The nation’s largest gun lobbying group sent out a message Friday urging its Vermont members to call Scott’s office “immediately.”
“Vermont has historically been a state proud of its stellar public safety rating and long-held hunting traditions. Firearms have been forever cemented in the culture and responsible gun ownership has been a source of great pride,” the NRA statement read. “None of that has changed!
What has changed is a governor who emboldened an anti-gun legislature to pass a historic gun control agenda.”
If the NRA’s grassroots effort fails, Chris Bradley, president of the Vermont Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, promised to go to court to fight the new law.
At least one of the gun-rights advocates who rallied against S. 55 on Saturday said if Scott signs the legislation the Republican would never win another term in office.
"I think the governor's going to sign it and I think it's going to be real bad for him," John Helfant told the Bennington Banner. "I don't think he's going to win another term. He's lost his base, his Republican base. I don't think there was a single person here who's going to vote for him, and he didn't win by that much last time.”
Helfant was only echoing a warning that Republican Rep. Patrick Brennan gave supporters of S. 55 during last week’s debate on the floor of the state House. The Brattleboro Reformer reported Brennan said voters would have their say on the new law in November.
"I can't agree with anything we did here today," Brennan said. "We did a great disservice to Vermonters!"
Scott told reporters on Friday that he would sign the legislation even though he promised not to support the bill in January.
But then came the Parkland, Fla., school shooting in which 17 people were killed, and news the next day that police had arrested a teenager who had plans to kill as many people as he could at a Vermont high school.
“Vermont is currently one of the healthiest and safest states in America. However, as tragedies in Florida, Las Vegas, Newtown and elsewhere – as well as the averted plot to shoot up Fair Haven High School – have demonstrated, no state is immune to the risk of extreme violence,” Scott said in a statement.

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 2:03am

Remembering the Sea Burial of osama bin laden.
Apr/24/18 9:00 am By Stephen M. Kirby
On May 1, 2018, we will have the seventh anniversary of the killing of osama bin laden, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks on American soil that took almost 3,000 lives; these were attacks that bin laden later described as a “martyrdom operation.”
[1] One day after he had been killed bin laden was buried at sea from a ship of the United States Navy.
[2] Let’s take a look back at that event.
On May 1, 2011, late in the evening, resident obuma announced that osama bin laden had been killed by American forces. Resident obuma said that bin laden was
the leader of al qaeda, and a terrorist who’s responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children…
bin laden was not a muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of muslims!
So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.[3] On May 4, 2011, resident obuma was interviewed by the CBS program 60 Minutes. Here is what he had to say about bin laden:
Obviously bin laden had been not only a symbol of terrorism, but a mass murderer who’s eluded justice for so long, and so many families who had been affected I think had given up hope. And for us to be able to definitively say, “We got the man who caused thousands of deaths here in the United States and who had been the rallying point for a violent extremist jihad around the world” was something that I think all of us were profoundly grateful to be a part of.

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 2:02am

Pg 2)
[4] obuma ended this interview with these thoughts:
"As nervous as I was about this whole process, the one thing I didn’t lose sleep over was the possibility of taking bin laden out. Justice was done! And I think that anyone who would question that the perpetrator of mass murder on American soil didn’t deserve what he got needs to have their head examined."
[5] But in this interview, obuma also had this to say about the sea burial of bin laden:
We thought it was important to think through ahead of time how we would dispose of the body if he were killed in the compound. And I think that what we tried to do was, consulting with experts in islamic law and ritual, to find something that was appropriate that was respectful of the body.
[6] A more detailed explanation about the sea burial had been given in a press briefing on May 2, 2011 by John Brennan, then-Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.
In this explanation, Brennan emphasized the extensive pre-planning and how “islamic law” had been the major concern in dealing with bin laden’s body:
The disposal of — the burial of bin laden’s remains was done in strict conformance with islamist precepts and practices. It was prepared in accordance with the islamic requirements. We early on made provisions for that type of burial, and we wanted to make sure that it was going to be done, again, in strict conformance.
So it was taken care of in the appropriate way. It took place earlier today our time…The COAs – the course of action and the subsequent decisions that would have to be made have been developed over the course of the last several months.
Senior officials, and there was a working group that was working this on a regular basis, if not a daily basis, over the last several weeks, looking at every decision and based on what type of scenario would unfold, what actions and decisions would be made. It was looked at from the standpoint of if we captured him, what will we do with him? Where would he go? If he was killed, what will we do with him?
And it was determined that it was in the best interests of all involved that this burial take place, again, according to islamic requirements, at sea…there is the requirement in islamic law that an individual be buried within 24 hours.
We went inside of Pakistan, carried out the operation, he was killed, he was removed from Pakistan. There were certain steps that had to be taken because of the nature of the operation, and we wanted to make sure we were able to do that in the time period allotted for it.

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 2:01am

Pg 3)
Going to another country, making those arrangements, requirements, would have exceeded that time period, in our view. And so, therefore, we thought that the best way to ensure that his body was given an appropriate islamic burial was to take those actions that would allow us to do that burial at sea.
[7] Brennan said that after bin laden had been killed,
“There were certain steps that had to be taken,” and they had to make sure that those steps were taken within “the time period allotted for it.” So according to Brennan, the “islamic law” that required that an individual be buried within 24 hours after death also limited the amount of time for any forensic examination of the body because there had to be time allowed for the burial preparations of that body!
During this May 2nd press briefing, Brennan was also asked if he had consulted with a “muslim expert” about this sea burial. Brennan replied, "We consulted the appropriate specialists and experts, and there was unanimity that this would be the best way to handle that."
Brennan refused to identify any of these “specialists and experts.”
However, there were many muslim experts that disagreed with Brennan at the time and said that this burial did not conform to islamic law: e.g., mohammed al-qubaisi, the highest religious law official in Dubai;
abdul-sattar al-janabi, an islamic scholar from Iraq; the former mufti of Egypt, shaykh nasr farid wasiland; and al-azhar, Grand Imam ahmed el-tayeb.
[8] This is quite an impressive array of experts disagreeing with Brennan’s unnamed “specialists and experts.”
And according to U.S. Navy regulations, there are only a few “classes of individuals” who are eligible for “At Sea Disposition”:
1.Members of the uniformed services.
2. Retired members of the uniformed services.
3. Members of the uniformed services discharged under honorable conditions.
4. U.S. civilian marine personnel of the Military Sealift Command.
5. Dependents of members and former members of the uniformed services.
6. Other U.S. citizens who are determined eligible by the Chief of Naval Operations for at sea committal due to notable service or outstanding contributions to the United States.
[9] Since bin laden did not fall into any of these “classes of individuals,” apparently the obuma administration felt that its version of “islamic law” took precedence over U.S. Navy regulations.

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 2:00am

Pg 4)
So what does a “traditional” islamic burial at sea from a ship of the United States Navy consist of?
For that we need to look at the official United States Navy manual titled Navy Military Funerals (NAVPERS 15555D, Revised 1999).
[10] In “Appendix E” of that manual we find the “Service for the Committal of a Person of the muslim Faith.” This “Appendix E” is presented below.
But before reading it, keep in mind the following about this service:
1.Those gathered to pray have to be facing mecca, and as the body is lowered into the sea, its face must also be facing mecca.
2.The first chapter of the koran, al-fatihah, is recited – this chapter states that allah is angry with the Jews, and the Christians have gone astray.
3.If there is more than one body, those of the men shall be placed nearest to the appointed leader, and those of the women furthest away. This second-class treatment of women is straight out of a shafi’i manual of sharia law.
[11] 4.Those attending the funeral were not there as mere observers, they were actually there as “intercessors” for bin laden. This means that they were there to petition for and pray in favor of bin laden.
Here is “Appendix E”:
NAVY MILITARY FUNERALS (NAVPERS 15555D)
APPENDIX E SERVICE FOR THE COMMITTAL OF A PERSON OF THE mUSLIM FAITH
1. During the Committal service, if for a person of the islamic faith, the commanding officer or such person appointed by the commanding officer shall ensure that the service is set up as follows:

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 1:59am

Pg 5)
–It is not recommended to use a casket unless there is a need for it. The body must have been washed and wrapped as required for the bodies of muslims.
Plan the setting so that those who have gathered to pray will be facing toward mecca, with the appointed leader in front facing them.
Place the body (or bodies) in between the congregation and the appointed leader in such a way that the body is parallel to the congregation and so that, from the point of view of the congregation, the body’s head is to the right.
The appointed leader should face the congregation and stand by the middle of the body if the deceased is a man and by the shoulder if the deceased is a woman.
If there is more than one body, then they should be put one in front of the other, those of the men nearest to the appointed leader, and those of the women furthest away.
2. If ,muslims are present, permit them to come forward and perform the formal funeral prayer (allahu akbar) while others stand and pray silently.
3.al-fatihah, In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. Praise be to God, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the Worlds; Most Gracious, Most Merciful; Master of the Day of Judgment. Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek. Show us the straight way, the way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace, those whose portion is not wrath, and who go not astray.
[[12]] 4.Supplication of Funeral Prayer;
O allah, forgive our people who are still alive and who have passed away, forgive those who are present here and those who are absent, forgive our young and our elderly, forgive our males and females. O allah, the one whom you wish to keep alive from among us make him alive according to islam, and anyone whom you wish to die from among us, let him die in belief and faith. O allah, do not deprive us from his reward and do not put us in hardship or any type of trial after his death.
O allah, forgive him, have mercy on him, pardon him, grant him security, provide him a nice place and spacious lodgings, wash him off from his sins with water, snow and ice, purify him from his sins as a white garment is cleansed from dirt, replace his present abode with a better one, replace his present family with a better one, replace his present partner with a better one, make him enter paradise and save him from the trials of grave and the punishment of hell.
O allah, you are its Lord, you have created it, and you have guided it towards Islam, and you have taken out his soul and you know best about its secret and open deeds. We have come as intercessors, so forgive him.
O allah, grant us good in this life and good in the life to come, and save us from the torment of hell.
5.Supplication at the Committal site:
Lower the body into the water at this time, in such a way that the face is toward ka’aba, in Saudi Arabia.
O allah, this is your servant who is now your guest, and you are the best of hosts. Forgive him and expand his entrance.

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 1:58am

Pg 6)
So for a person repeatedly named as a “mass murder” by resident obuma, and responsible for the deaths of almost 3,000 innocent people on American soil, the focus of the burial service was on a “traditional” islamic burial that was “respectful of the body,” that disparaged Jews and Christians, that referred to bin laden as allah’s “servant,” that prayed for bin laden to enter Paradise, and that adhered to the dictates of “islamic law.”
In November of 2012, the Associated Press used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain heavily redacted internal e-mails that were exchanged among U.S. military officials about this sea burial.
Here is some of the information obtained from those e-mails[13]:
1.No sailors watched bin laden’s burial at sea from the USS Carl Vinson.
2.Fewer than a dozen of the ship’s leadership was informed of the burial.
3.According to a May 2nde-mail from Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette, Traditional procedures for islamic burial was followed…The deceased’s body was washed (ablution) then placed in a white sheet. The body was placed in a weighted bag. A military officer read prepared religious remarks, which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker. After the words were complete, the body was placed on a prepared flat board, tipped up, whereupon the deceased’s body slid into the sea.
The Defense Department stated that none of the following could be located:
1.Any images of bin laden’s body on the USS Carl Vinson. It was later reported that 11 days after bin laden was killed all photographs of the body were supposed to have been destroyed or turned over to the CIA.[14]]
2.bin laden’s death certificate, autopsy report or results of DNA identification tests. The obuma administration’s concern about complying with “islamic law” virtually precluded the chance for a thorough autopsy to be done.
With regard to the DNA tests, we know that on May 2, 2011 such tests had been done because this was so stated by a “Senior Intelligence Official” in a Department of Defense background briefing that same day.[15]]
3.Any pre-raid materials discussing how the government planned to dispose of bin laden’s body if he were killed.
This is interesting in light of the statements made above by resident obuma and John Brennan about the extensive contingency planning.
During the previously mentioned DOD Background Briefing on May 2, 2011, a reporter had asked a question that has subsequently been on the minds of observers for many years:
Who actually performed the rituals, the cleaning of his body? Were they American service members? And why all this for a fellow who most of the world determined was not a very good muslim anyway? And was in fact a cold blooded killer?
Geoff Morrell, then-Pentagon Press Secretary, replied, “I don’t think we care to get into those details.”[16]
So according to the obuma administration, osama bin laden was a “mass murderer” who was not even a “muslim leader.”
Yet resident obuma thought it was important enough to be “respectful” of bin laden’s body that there was extensive pre-planning and consultation with “experts in islamic law and ritual” to ensure that bin laden was accorded a funeral that conformed to “islamic law.” However, noted muslim scholars said this funeral actually violated islamic law, and, as we saw, it also violated U.S. Navy regulations! And when more information was requested, there were gaping holes in the information made available and relevant records went missing!
Why all this for such a fellow?
The “most transparent administration in history?” was not interested in those “details.”

Comment by Bullheaded Texan on April 26, 2018 at 12:34am

Catholic Church Attacked, 2 Priests & 17 Parishioners Dead! Why No Media Attention?
Apr/25/18 By Robert Spencer
Nigeria: muslims raid church, murder two Catholic priests, 17 parishioners.
What? A Catholic church? There must be some mistake. Pope Francis has claimed that “authentic islam and the proper reading of the koran are opposed to every form of violence!”
It has become a superdogma in the Catholic Church:
if you don’t believe that islam is a Religion of Peace, you will be ruthlessly harassed and silenced by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and the hierarchy elsewhere as well. The bishops of the Catholic Church are much more concerned that you believe that islam is a religion of peace than that you believe in, say, the Nicene Creed.
So we can only hope that Pope Francis and a few choice members of the USCCB is on his way to Nigeria now to explain to these Fulani herdsmen that they’re misunderstanding their peaceful religion.
“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)
“JUST IN: Herdsmen kill two Catholic priests, 17 parishioners in Benue,” by Rose Ejembi, Sun News Online, April 24, 2018 (thanks to the Geller Report):
At least 19 people including two Catholic priests and parishioners were, on Tuesday, killed by suspected Fulani herdsmen in Ayar Mbalon village, Gwer East Local Government area of Benue State.
Daily Sun gathered from sources that the parishioners and the priests had gone for early morning mass at about 5:30a.m. when the herdsmen who stormed the village and the church wasted no time in spraying bullets on everyone in sight.
Our correspondent observed that since Governor Samuel Ortom traveled out of the country, spate of killings in the state in the last few weeks seemed to be on the increase as hardly a day passes without news about herdsmen killing.
“The rampaging Fulani herdsmen this morning attacked Ayar Mbalom village in Gwer East Local government Area of Benue State and killed two Rev. Fathers and many others,” a source said.
Many were said to have died on the spot while several others sustained injuries even as remains of the dead were at the time of this report being moved to the morgue of St. Theresa’s Hospital.
Meanwhile, the Catholic Diocese of Makurdi has given the names of the deceased Reverend Fathers killed in the attack at their St. Ignatius Quasi Parish, Ukpor Mbalom as Joseph Gor and Felix Tyolaha.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 26
• 27
• 28
• 29
• 30
• …
• 40
• Next ›
• Page