call to take a stand

[Lorrayne]

REFERENCE:
As a usurper, Congress would be unable to remove Mr. Obama from the Office of the President on Impeachment.

This explains what America is facing. It is BIGGER then anyone wants to believe.

Should Mr. Obama proceed to assume the office of the President of the United States as anything but a bona fide natural born citizen of the United States that has not relinquished that citizenship, Mr. Obama would be inviting a national disaster, placing our Republic at great risk from untold consequences.

For example:

• Neither the Electoral College on December 15, nor the House of Representatives on January 6 would be able to elect Mr.

Obama, except as a poseur - a usurper;

• As a usurper, Mr.

Obama would be unable to take the required "Oath or Affirmation" of office on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or false swearing, for being ineligible for the Office of the President he cannot faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States;

• His every act in the usurped Office of the President would be a criminal offense as an act under color of law that would subject the People to the eprivation of their constitutional rights, and entitling Mr.

Obama to no obedience whatsoever from the People;

• As a usurper acting in the guise of the President Mr.

bama could not function as the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy and of the militia of the several states, as such forces would be under no legal obligation to remain obedient to him;

• No one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any of Mr.

Obama's proclamations, executive orders or directives, as such orders would be legally VOID;

• Mr. Obama's appointment of Ambassadors and Judges to the Supreme Court would be VOID ab initio (i.e.

, from the beginning), no matter what subsequent actions the Senate might take as well as rendering any such acts by such appointed officials void as well;


• Congress would not be able to pass any new laws because they would not be able to acquire the signature of a bona fide President, rendering all such legislation legally VOID;

• As a usurper, Congress would be unable to remove Mr. Obama from the Office of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos including a potential for armed conflicts within the General Government or among the States and the People to effect the removal of such a usurper.

I'm sure you agree that our Constitution is the cornerstone of our system of governance. It is the very foundation of our system of Law and Order – indeed; it is the supreme law of the land. I'm sure you also agree that its precise language was no accident and cannot be ignored if Individual, unalienable, natural Rights, Freedoms and Liberties are to be protected andpreserved.

As our next potential President, Mr. Obama has a high-order obligation to the Constitution (and to those who have fought and died for our Freedom) that extends far beyond that of securing a majority of the votes of the Electoral College.


No matter his promises of change and prosperity, his heartfelt intent or the widespread support he has garnered in seeking the highest Office of the Land the integrity of the Republic and Rule of Law cannot, -- must not -- be put at risk, by allowing a constitutionally unqualified person to sit, as a usurper, in the Office of the President.

No matter the level of practical difficulty, embarrassment or disruption of the nation's business, we must -- above all -- honor and protect the Constitution and the divine, unalienable, Individual Rights it guarantees, including the Right to a President who is a natural born citizen of the United States of America that has not relinquished his American citizenship.

Our nation has endured similar disruptions in the past, and will weather this crisis as well. Indeed, it is both yours and the People's mutual respect for, and commitment to, the Constitution and Rule of Law that insures the perpetuation of Liberty.

PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THIS:
As a usurper, Congress would be unable to remove Mr.

Obama from the Office of the President on Impeachment,

Usurper (lat. usurpare = to seize for use, to use) is a derogatory term used to describe either an illegitimate or controversial claimant to the throne in a monarchy, or a person who succeeds in establishing himself as a monarch without inheriting the throne, or any other person exercising authority unconstitutionally. It may also be applied to an official acting ultra vires, outside his authority or jurisdiction.

Some famous examples considered monarchical usurpers are Henry IV of England, Miguel of Portugal and Habibullah Ghazi of Afghanistan.

CONTACT THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES NOW !

Download this letter:

http://stayathomedaddys.com/supreme_court_letter.doc

I suggest we take Philip Berg's suggestion & contact the Supreme Court Justices.

Berg has been a lawyer for 35 yrs & has handled this case all the way to the Supreme Court. I think he knows what hes talking about.

I know this will take a little more effort on your parts then pressing a few keys & pressing send on the petition sites that may lead nowhere but its OUR COUNTRY AT STAKE.

Berg says....
As citizens, you can individually write letters to each of the Court Justices addressing your concerns with respect to Mr. Obama's fulfillment of the requirements to serve as the President of the United States laid out in Article II, Section I of The United States Constitution.

United States Supreme Court
1 First Street NE
Washington DC 20543

The Supreme Court Justices are as follows:

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts
Supreme Court Justice John Stevens
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy
Supreme Court Justice David Souter
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer
Supreme Court Justice Samual Alito

Letter to the Supreme Court:Berg Vs Obama now in Word Format here:
http://stayathomedaddys.com/supreme_court_letter.doc
Right click on the link to open it in a new browser

Please download this, print it, sign it & send it to the justices handling this case in the Supreme Court.

This might be the only possible way to stop this man.

All info you need is right on the letter

what you can do today!!

Honorable Justice David Hackett Souter
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.

Washington, DC 20543


Re: Case Nos.
:(08-4340)

On October 24, 2008, a federal judge granted a request to dismiss a lawsuit
by Citizen Philip Berg, who challenged Barack Obama's qualifications under
the "Natural Born Citizen" clause of the U.S.Constitution to legally hold
the office of President of the United States of America.


Mr. Berg presented factual evidence to the Court in support of his claim
that Mr. Obama is either a citizen of his father's native Kenya by birth, or
that he became a citizen of Indonesia, relinquishing his prior citizenship
when he moved there with his mother in 1967.


In Mr. Obama's response to the lawsuit, he neither denied Mr. Berg's claims
nor submitted any evidence which would refute Mr. Berg's assertions. Instead
he argued that the Court lacked the jurisdiction to determine the question
of his legal eligibility because Mr. Berg lacked "standing."

Astonishingly, the judge agreed, simply saying, "[Mr. Berg] would have us
derail the democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions
of people voted and underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the
most hotly contested presidential primary [sic] in living memory."

Unfortunately, Mr. Obama's response to the legal claim was clearly evasive
and strikingly out of character, suggesting he may, in fact, lack a critical
Constitutional qualification necessary to assume the Office of President: i
e., that he is not a "natural born" citizen of the United States or one who
has relinquished his American citizenship.


Before Mr. Obama can exercise any of the powers of the United States, he
must prove that he has fully satisfied each and every eligibility
requirement that the Constitution mandates for any individual's exercise of
those powers.


Regardless of the tactics chosen in defending himself against the Berg
lawsuit, significant questions regarding his legal capacity to hold this
nation's highest office have been put forth publicly, and he has failed to
directly refute them with documentary evidence that is routinely available
to any bona fide, natural born U.S. Citizen.


As one who has ventured into the fray of public service of his own volition,
seeking to possess the vast powers of the Office of President, it is not
unreasonable to demand that Mr. Obama produce evidence of his citizenship to
answer the questions and allay the concerns of the People.
Indeed, as the one seeking the office, he is under a moral, legal, and
fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence to establish his qualifications as
explicitly mandated by Article II of
the Constitution.


Should Mr. Obama proceed to assume the office of the President of the United
States as anything but a bona fide natural born citizen of the United States
that has not relinquished that citizenship, Mr. Obama would be inviting a
national disaster, placing our Republic at great risk from untold
consequences.
For example:

• Neither the Electoral College on December 15, nor the House of
Representatives on January 6 would be able to elect Mr.
Obama, except as a poseur - a usurper;

• As a usurper, Mr.
Obama would be unable to take the required "Oath or Affirmation" of office
on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or false swearing, for
being ineligible for the Office of the President he cannot faithfully
execute the Office of the President
of the United States;

• His every act in the usurped Office of the President would be a criminal
offense as an act under color of law that would subject the People to the
deprivation of their constitutional rights, and entitling Mr.
Obama to no obedience whatsoever from the People;

• As a usurper acting in the guise of the President Mr.
Obama could not function as the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy and
of the militia of the several states, as such forces would be under no legal
obligation to remain obedient to him;

• No one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch would be required to
obey any of Mr.
Obama's proclamations, executive orders or directives, as such orders would
be legally VOID;

• Mr. Obama's appointment of Ambassadors and Judges to the Supreme Court
would be VOID ab initio (i.e.
, from the beginning), no matter what subsequent actions the Senate might
take as well as rendering any such acts by such appointed officials void as
well;

• Congress would not be able to pass any new laws because they would not be
able to acquire the signature of a bona fide President, rendering all such
legislation legally VOID;

• As a usurper, Congress would be unable to remove Mr. Obama from the Office
of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos including
a potential for armed conflicts within the General Government or among the
States and the People to effect the removal of such a usurper.


I'm sure you agree that our Constitution is the cornerstone of our system of
governance. It is the very foundation of our system of Law and Order –
indeed; it is the supreme law of the land. I'm sure you also agree that its
precise language was no accident and cannot be ignored if Individual,
unalienable, natural Rights, Freedoms and Liberties are to be protected and
preserved.


As our next potential President, Mr. Obama has a high-order obligation to
the Constitution (and to those who have fought and died for our Freedom)
that extends far beyond that of securing a majority of the votes of the
Electoral College.
No matter his promises of change and prosperity, his heartfelt intent or the
widespread support he has garnered in seeking the highest Office of the Land
the integrity of the Republic and Rule of Law cannot, -- must not -- be put
at risk, by
allowing a constitutionally unqualified person to sit, as a usurper, in the
Office of the President.


No matter the level of practical difficulty, embarrassment or
disruption of the nation's business, we must -- above all -- honor and
protect the Constitution and the divine, unalienable, Individual Rights it
guarantees, including the Right to a President who is a natural born citizen
of the United States of America that has not relinquished his American
citizenship.


Our nation has endured similar disruptions in the past, and will weather
this crisis as well. Indeed, it is both yours and the People's mutual
respect for, and commitment to, the Constitution and Rule of Law that
insures the perpetuation of Liberty.


With due respect, we hereby request that Mr.
Obama provide the following documents to the Court:

(a) a certified copy of his "vault" (original long version) birth
certificate;

(b) certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates in the
names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and
Barry Dunham;

(c) a certified copy of his Certification of Citizenship;

(d) a certified copy of his Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity;

(e) certified copies of his admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia
University and Harvard Law School; and

(f) certified copies of any court orders or legal documents changing his
name from Barry Soetoro.


"In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled
if it fails to observe the law crupulously. Our government is the potent,
the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by
its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it
breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself;
it invites anarchy.
"

Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 469-471.


Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

--------------------------------------------------
and this is a letter I have also included with the above:

An Open Letter to the Democratic Party
By Lt. Colonel Frances Rice,U.S.
Army Retired: Contributor to the LHI

"We, African American citizens of the United States, declare and assert:

Whereas in the early 1600's 20 African men and women were landed in Virginia from a Dutch ship as slaves and from that tiny seed grew the poisoned fruit of plantation slavery which shaped the course of American development,

Whereas reconciliation and healing always begin with an apology and an effort to repay those who have been wronged,

Whereas the Democratic Party has never apologized for their horrific atrocities and racist practices committed against African Americans during the past two hundred years, nor for the residual impact that those atrocities and practices and current soft bigotry of low expectations are having on us today,

Whereas the Democratic Party fought to expand slavery and, after the Civil War, established Jim Crow Laws, Black Codes and other repressive legislation that were designed to disenfranchise African Americans,

Whereas the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party, and their primary goal was to intimidate and terrorize African American voters, Republicans who moved South to protect African Americans and any other whites who supported them,

Whereas, according to leading historians (both black and white), the horrific atrocities committed against African Americans during slavery and Reconstruction were financed, sponsored, and promoted by the Democratic Party and their Ku Klux Klan supporters,

Whereas from 1870 to 1930, in an effort to deny African Americans their civil rights and to keep African Americans from voting Republican, thousands of African Americans were shot, beaten, lynched, mutilated, and burned to death by Ku Klux Klan terrorists from the Democratic Party,

Whereas Democratic Presidents Franklin D.
Roosevelt and Harry Truman rejected anti-lynching laws and efforts to establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission,

Whereas the Democratic party has used racist demagoguery to deceive African Americans about the history of the Republican Party that: (a) started as the anti-slavery party in 1854, (b) fought to free African Americans from slavery, (c) designed Reconstruction, a ten-year period of unprecedented political power for African Americans, (d) passed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U. S.
Constitution granting African Americans freedom, citizenship, and the right to vote, (e) passed the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875 granting African Americans protection from the Black Codes and prohibiting racial discrimination in public accommodations, (f) passed the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965 granting African Americans protection from the Jim Crow laws, (g) established Affirmative Action programs to help African Americans proper with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan that set the first goals and timetables and his 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act that made Affirmative Action Programs the law of our nation, and (h) never sponsored or launched a program, passed laws, or engaged in practices that resulted in the death of millions of African Americans,

Whereas Brown vs.
the Board of Education of Topeka (a 1954 decision by Chief Justice Earl Warren who was appointed by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower) was a landmark civil rights case that was designed to overturn the racist practices that were established by the Democratic Party,

Whereas after Democratic President Franklin D.
Roosevelt received the vote of African Americans, he banned African American newspapers from the military shortly after taking office because he was convinced the newspapers were communists,

Whereas Democratic President John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Law, opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and was later criticized by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. for ignoring civil rights issues.


Whereas Democratic President John F. Kennedy authorized the FBI (supervised by his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy) to investigate Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
on suspicion of being a communist,

Whereas Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, made a 14-hour filibuster speech in the Senate in June 1964 in an unsuccessful effort to block passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and was heralded in April 2004 by Democratic Senator Christopher Dodd as a senator who would have been a great leader during the Civil War,

Whereas when the 1964 Civil Rights Act came up for vote, Senator Al Gore, Sr.
and the rest of the Southern Democrats voted against the bill,

Whereas in the House of Representatives only 61 percent of the Democrats voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act as compared to 80 percent of Republicans, and in the Senate only 69 percent of the Democrats voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, compared to 82 percent of the Republicans,

Whereas Democratic President Bill Clinton sent troops to Europe to protect the citizens of Bosnia and Kosovo while allowing an estimated 800,000 black Rwandans to be massacred in Africa, vetoed the welfare reform law twice before signing it, and refused to comply with a court order to have shipping companies develop an Affirmative Action Plan,

Whereas Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore created harmful racial division when he falsely claimed that the 2000 presidential election was "stolen" from him and that African Americans in Florida were disenfranchised, even though a second recount of Florida votes by the "Miami Herald" and a consortium of major news organizations confirmed that he lost the election, and a ruling by the U.S.
Civil Rights Commission declared that African Americans were not denied the right to vote,

Whereas the Democratic Party's soft bigotry of low expectations and social promotions have consigned African Americans to economic bondage and created a culture of dependency on government social programs,

Whereas the Democratic Party's use of deception and fear to block welfare reform, the faith-based initiative and school choice that would help African Americans prosper is consistent with the Democratic Party's heritage of racism that included sanctioning of slavery and kukluxery, a perversion of moral sentiment among leaders of the Democratic Party whose racist legacy bode ill until this generation of African Americans,

Now, therefore, for the above and other documented atrocities and accumulated wrongs inflicted upon African Americans, we demand a formal written apology and other appropriate remuneration from the leadership of the Democratic party.