Copy this below and share it with EVERYONE you know! District of Columbia Act of 1871

[tatoott1009 you tube channel]

United States Declaration of Independence

Constitution of the United States of America

Copy this below and share it with EVERYONE you know!

ACT OF 1871

Act of 1871
BOOKSTORE
Act of 1871
1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for
the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of
government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see,
Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).
The act — passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in
the aftermath of the Civil War — was a strategic move by foreign interests
(international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the
coffers and neck of America. Congress cut a deal with the international bankers
(specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because
the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without
serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the
United States.
The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The
corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original
Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was
defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized
and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of
the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic
capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the
Republic. It does is not! Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring
to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact
on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing
the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the
government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government. This
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Byron%20Wine/Desktop/Act%20of%201871.htm (1 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits
only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely
outside the original (organic) Constitution.
Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic
Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One
example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed
(under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to
be licensed. (Passports) By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed
TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees
of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. [Information
courtesy of Lisa Guliani, www.babelmagazine.com. The Act of 1871 became the
FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dove: The following is an expansion and further explanation of the above (an
adaptation of Lisa’s work, done with her permission), which you may want to
read for your own edification. Whereas my Chapter 9 is a time-map of the major
Headlines and Landmines of the 200-years-plus history of America, each
subsequent chapter goes into particular details. This section is from Chapter 18,
“The Tale of Two Governments, which overall addresses the difference between
a democracy and a republic as well as the fact of a federal government and a
shadow government practicing under the guise of The Corporation. I’m sure Lisa
won’t mind your using what you need in order to make whatever point you wish
to make in the moment. . . . C.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
The United States Isn’t a Country; It’s a Corporation! In preparation for stealing
America, the puppets of Britain’s banking cabal had already created a second
government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what the common
herd believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED
STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed the
common herd all rights of sui juris. [you, in your sovereignty]
Congress, with no authority to do so, created a separate form of government for
the District of Columbia, a ten-mile square parcel of land. WHY and HOW did
they do so? First, Lisa Guliani of Babel Magazine, reminds us that the Civil War
was, in fact, “little more than a calculated front with fancy footwork by
backroom players.” Then she adds: “It was also a strategic maneuver by British
and European interests (international bankers) intent on gaining a stranglehold
on the coffers of America. And, because Congress knew our country was in dire
financial straits, certain members of Congress cut a deal with the international
bankers (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into
everyone’s pie). . . . . There you have the WHY, why members of Congress
permitted the international bankers to gain further control of America. . . . . .
“Then, by passing the Act of 1871, Congress formed a corporation known as
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Byron%20Wine/Desktop/Act%20of%201871.htm (2 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
THE UNITED STATES. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, shoved the
organic version of the Constitution aside by changing the word ‘for’ to ‘of’ in the
title. Let me explain: the original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers
read: ‘The Constitution for the united states of America.’ [note that neither the
words 'united' nor 'states' began with capital letters] But the CONSTITUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ is a corporate constitution, which is
absolutely NOT the same document you think it is. First of all, it ended all our
rights of sovereignty [sui juris]. So you now have the HOW, how the
international bankers got their hands on THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”
To fully understand how our rights of sovereignty were ended, you must know
the full meaning of sovereign: “Chief or highest, supreme power, superior in
position to all others; independent of and unlimited by others; possessing or
entitled to; original and independent authority or jurisdiction.” (Webster).
In short, our government, which was created by and for us as sovereigns — free
citizens deemed to have the highest authority in the land – was stolen from us,
along with our rights. Keep in mind that, according to the original Constitution,
only We the People are sovereign. Government is not sovereign. The Declaration
of Independence say, “…government is subject to the consent of the governed.”
That’s us — the sovereigns. When did you last feet like a sovereign? As Lisa
Guliani explained:
“It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that
the U.S. Government has NOT been subject to the consent of the governed
since long before you or I were born. Rather, the governed are subject to the
whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the
ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia. In fact, it has
invaded every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO
jurisdiction beyond the District of Columbia. You just think it does. “You see,
you are ‘presumed’ to know the law, which is very weird since We the People
are taught NOTHING about the law in school. We memorize obscure facts and
phrases here and there, like the Preamble, which says, ‘We the
People…establish this Constitution for the United States of America.’ But our
teachers only gloss over the Bill of Rights. Our schools (controlled by the
corporate government) don’t delve into the Constitution at depth. After all, the
corporation was established to indoctrinate and ‘dumb-down’ the masses, not to
teach anything of value or importance. Certainly, no one mentioned that
America was sold-out to foreign interests, that we were beneficiaries of the debt
incurred by Congress, or that we were in debt to the international bankers. Yet,
for generations, Americans have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to
pay a massive debt that they did not incur. There’s an endless stream of things
the People aren’t told. And, now that you are being told, how do you feel about
being made the recipient of a debt without your knowledge or consent? “After
passage of the Act of 1871 Congress set a series of subtle and overt deceptions
into motion, deceptions in the form of decisions that were meant to sell us down
the river. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin until it was knocked down
and counted out by a technical KO [knock out]. With the surrender of the
people’s gold in 1933, the ‘common herd’ was handed over to illegitimate law.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Byron%20Wine/Desktop/Act%20of%201871.htm (3 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
(I’ll bet you weren’t taught THAT in school.)
“Our corporate form of governance is based on Roman Civil Law and Admiralty,
or Maritime, Law, which is also known as the ‘Divine Right of Kings’ and the
‘Law of the Seas’ — another fact of American history not taught in our schools.
Actually, Roman Civil Law was fully established in the colonies before our nation
began, and then became managed by private international law. In other words,
the government — the government created for the District of Columbia via the
Act of 1871 – operates solely under Private International Law, not Common
Law, which was the foundation of our Constitutional Republic. “This fact has
impacted all Americans in concrete ways. For instance, although Private
International Law is technically only applicable within the District of Columbia,
and NOT in the other states of the Union, the arms of the Corporation of the
UNITED STATES are called ‘departments’ — i.e., the Justice Department, the
Treasury Department. And those departments affect everyone, no matter where
(in what state) they live. Guess what? Each department belongs to the
corporation — to the UNITED STATES.
“Refer to any UNITED STATES CODE (USC). Note the capitalization; this is
evidence of a corporation, not a Republic. For example, In Title 28 3002 (15)
(A) (B) (C), it is unequivocally stated that the UNITED STATES is a corporation.
Translation: the corporation is NOT a separate and distinct entity; it is not
disconnected from the government; it IS the government — your government.
This is extremely important! I refer to it as the ‘corporate EMPIRE of the UNITED
STATES,’ which operates under Roman Civil Law outside the original
Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a corporation? You say you’ll ask
your Congressperson about this? HA!! “Congress is fully aware of this deception.
So it’s time that you, too, become aware of the deception. What this great
deception means is that the members of Congress do NOT work for us, for you
and me. They work for the Corporation, for the UNITED STATES. No wonder we
can’t get them to do anything on our behalf, or meet or demands, or answer our
questions.
“Technically, legally, or any other way you want to look at the matter, the
corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in
ANY State of the Union (the Republic) beyond the District of Columbia. Let that
tidbit sink in, then ask yourself, could this deception have occurred without full
knowledge and complicity of the Congress? Do you think it happened by
accident? If you do, you’re deceiving yourself.
“There are no accidents, no coincidences. Face the facts and confront the truth.
Remember, you are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don’t know the
law or, for that matter, your history. Why? Because no concerted effort was
ever made to teach or otherwise inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to
full disclosure of all facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than
what the corporation decides to ‘give’ you.
“Remember also that ‘Ignorance of the law is no excuse.’ It’s your responsibility
and obligation to learn the law and know how it applies to you. No wonder the
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Byron%20Wine/Desktop/Act%20of%201871.htm (4 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
corporation counted on the fact that most people are too indifferent,
unconcerned, distracted, or lazy to learn what they need to know to survive
within the system. We have been conditioned to let the government do our
thinking for us. Now’s the time to turn that around if we intend to help save our
Republic and ourselves — before it’s too late.
“As an instrument of the international bankers, the UNITED STATES owns you
from birth to death. It also holds ownership of all your assets, of your property,
even of your children. Think long and hard about all the bills taxes, fines, and
licenses you have paid for or purchased. Yes, they had you by the pockets. If
you don’t believe it, read the 14th Amendment. See how ‘free’ you really are.
Ignorance of the facts led to your silence. Silence is construed as consent;
consent to be beneficiaries of a debt you did not incur. As a Sovereign People
we have been deceived for hundreds of years; we think we are free, but in truth
we are servants of the corporation.
“Congress committed treason against the People in 1871. Honest men could
have corrected the fraud and treason. But apparently there weren’t enough
honest men to counteract the lust for money and power. We lost more freedom
than we will ever know, thanks to corporate infiltration of our so-called
‘government.’ “Do you think that any soldier who died in any of our many wars
would have fought if he or she had known the truth? Do you think one person
would have laid down his/her life for a corporation? How long will we remain
silent? How long will we perpetuate the MYTH that we are free? When will we
stand together as One Sovereign People? When will we take back what has been
as stolen from the us?
“If the People of America had known to what extent their trust was betrayed,
how long would it have taken for a real revolution to occur? What we now need
is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We need to change our thinking, then we can
change our world. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty our
ancestors fought to preserve, the legacy of a Sovereign and Fully Free People.”
[Posted 8/27/02, www.babelmagazine.com/]
Wisdom And Freedom produced by WORLD NEWSSTAND
Copyright © 2003. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
page image by Windy’s Design Studio
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Byron%20Wine/Desktop/Act%20of%201871.htm (5 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]
Act of 1871
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Byron%20Wine/Desktop/Act%20of%201871.htm (6 of 6) [8/21/2005 11:30:44 AM]The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 aka “An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia (41st Congress, 3d Sess., ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, enacted 1871-02-21) is an Act of Congress, which revoked the individual charters of the City of Washington, the City of Georgetown, and the County of Washington and created a new city government for the entire District of Columbia. The legislation effectively merged what had been separate municipalities within the federal territory into a single entity. It is for this reason that the city, while legally named the District of Columbia, is still commonly known as Washington, D.C. However, this act was abolished in 1874, and while the name did not change, the territorial Governor was replaced with a three-member Board of Commissioners appointed by the President. This system existed until 1974 when the District of Columbia Home Rule Act allowed for District residents to elect their own mayor.

Below is the text of the bill:

Continue reading the bill:

###########################################################

CITIZENSHIP STATUS V. TAX STATUS

PDF Web Capture of this Article

Table of Contents:

1. The Four “United States”
2. Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts
3. Summary of Citizenship Status v. Tax Status
4. Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status
5. Meaning of Geographical Words of Art
6. Citizenship and Domicile Options and Relationships
7. Four Types of American Nationals
8. Federal Statutory Citizenship Statuses Diagram
9. Citizenship Status on Government Forms
10. Capitalization within Statutes and Regulations

Related articles:

• Why the Fourteenth Amendment is NOT a Threat to Your Freedom, Form ... (OFFSITE LINK) -explains and rebut THE MOST prevalent flawed argument we hear from freedom advocates.
• Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but ...-Detailed research on citizenship to back up this page
• Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent
• Citizenship Diagrams -helps graphically explain the distinctions between nationality and domicile
• Your Exclusive Right to Declare or Establish Your Civil Status, For... (OFFSITE LINK)-proves that the First Amendment and your right to contract ensure that no one but you can determine your civil and statutory status.
• Citizens v. Nationals-which one are you?
• You’re not a “citizen” under the Internal Revenue Code
• Tax Deposition Questions, Section 14: Citizenship
• Great IRS Hoax, section 4.11 through 4.11.11 on Citizenship

Related remedies

• Getting a USA Passportas a “non-citizen national”  -how to apply for and obtain a passport as an exclusively private human who is neither domiciled nor resident on of federal territory, and is therefore not a federal statutory “person”, “individual”, or “U.S. person”.
  • HTML.  SEDM Form #09.007 (OFFSITE LINK.  COMPLIANT MEMBER ONLY FORM)
  • PDF.  SEDM Form #10.013  (OFFSITE LINK.  COMPLIANT MEMBER ONLY FORM)
• Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001 (OFFSITE LINK)-Attach to administrative correspondence with the government to protect and explain your citizenship and domicile and tax status and prevent being victimized by the usually false presumptions of others.
• Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status Options Summary, Form #10.003 (OFFSITE LINK)-use this form in response to legal discovery, and attach to your civil pleadings in court to protect your status.
• Tax Form Attachment, Form #04.201 (OFFSITE LINK)-Attach this to all tax forms you are compelled to fill out in order to correctly document your tax status and the obligations that attach to it on the part of all.
• Legal Notice of Change in Domicile/Citizenship Records and Divorce ... (OFFSITE LINK)-How to correct the government’s records to perpetually reflect your true domcile, nationality, citizenship, and tax status and permanently remove yourself from federal jurisdiction. Mandatory for all members and a part of our Path To Freedom, Form #09.015, Section 2, process.
• USA Passport Application Attachment, Form #06.007 (OFFSITE LINK)- develops evidence of your correct citizenship status AND rebuts LIES on the passport application instructions.

Related offsite articles

• Sovereign World Citizen Garry Davis Crosses Canada-USA Border With ... (OFFSITE LINK) -you don’t need a us passport
• Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #...-how domicile affects statutory citizenship.
• Our Non-Citizen Nationals, Who Are They?; Cal Law Review, Vol. XIII... – Describes the basis for being a “non-citizen national of the United States**”

SOURCE:

Great IRS Hoax, section 5.3, version 3.26

---

“Dolosus versatur generalibus. A deceiver deals in generals. 2 Co. 34.”

“Fraus latet in generalibus. Fraud lies hid in general expressions.“

Generale nihil certum implicat. A general expression implies nothing certain. 2 Co. 34.

Ubi quid generaliter conceditur, in est haec exceptio, si non aliquid sit contra jus fasque. Where a thing is concealed generally, this exception arises, that there shall be nothing contrary to law and right. 10 Co. 78.
[Bouvier's Maxims of Law, 1856]

1. THE FOUR “UNITED STATES”

It is very important to understand that there are THREE separate and distinct CONTEXTS in which the term “United States” can be used, and each has a mutually exclusive and different meaning. These three definitions of “United States” were described by the U.S. Supreme Court in Hooven and Allison v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945):

Table 1: Geographical terms used throughout this page

Term	# in diagrams	Meaning
United States*	1	The country “United States” in the family of nations throughout the world.
United States**	2	The “federal zone”.
United States***	3	Collective states of the Union mentioned throughout the Constitution.

In addition to the above GEOGRAPHICAL context, there is also a legal, non-geographical context in which the term “United States” can be used, which is the GOVERNMENT as a legal entity. Throughout this page and this website, we identify THIS context as “United States****” or “United States⁴“. The only types of “persons” within THIS context are public offices within in the national and not state government. It is THIS context in which “sources within the United States” is used for the purposes of “income” and “gross income” within the Internal Revenue Code, as proven by:

Nonresident Alien Position, Form #05.020, Sections 6 and 7
DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/NonresidentAlienPosition.pdf
FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The reason these contexts are not expressly distinguished in the statutes by the Legislative Branch or on government forms crafted by the Executive Branch is that they are the KEY mechanism by which:

1. Federal jurisdiction is unlawfully enlarged by abusing presumption, which is a violation of due process of law. See:
   Presumption: Chief Weapon for Unlawfully Enlarging Federal Jurisdiction, Form #05.007
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/Presumption.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
2. The separation of powers between the states and the national government is destroyed, in violation of the legislative intent of the Constitution. See:
   Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers Doctrine, Form #05.023
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/SeparationOfPowers.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
3. A “society of law” is transformed into a “society of men” in violation of Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803):
   

   “The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right.”
   [Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 163 (1803)]

4. Exclusively PRIVATE rights are transformed into public rights in a process we call “invisible eminent domain using presumption and words of art”.
5. Judges are unconstitutionally delegated undue discretion and “arbitrary power” to unlawfully enlarge federal jurisdiction. See:
   Federal Jurisdiction, Form #05.018
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/FederalJurisdiction.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The way a corrupted Executive Branch or judge accomplish the above is to unconstitutionally:

1. PRESUME that ALL of the four contexts for “United States” are equivalent.
2. PRESUME that CONSTITUTIONAL citizens and STATUTORY citizens are EQUIVALENT under federal law. They are NOT. A CONSTITUTIONAL citizen is a “non-citizen national” under federal law and NOT a “citizen of the United States”.
   Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory Citizen, Form #05.006
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/WhyANational.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
3. PRESUME that “nationality” and “domicile” are equivalent. They are NOT. See:
   Why Domicile and Becoming a “taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #05.002
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/Domicile.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
4. Use the word “citizenship” in place of “nationality” OR “domicile”, and refuse to disclose WHICH of the two they mean in EVERY context.
5. Confuse the POLITICAL/CONSTITUTIONAL meaning of words with the civil STATUTORY context. For instance, asking on government forms whether you are a POLITICAL/CONSTITUTIONAL citizen and then FALSELY PRESUMING that you are a STATUTORY citizen under 8 U.S.C. §1401.
6. Confuse the words “domicile” and “residence” or impute either to you without satisfying the burden of proving that you EXPRESSLY CONSENTED to it and thereby illegally kidnap your civil legal identity against your will.  One can have only one “domicile” but many “residences” and BOTH require your consent.  See:
   Why Domicile and Becoming a “taxpayer” Require Your Consent, Form #05.002
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/Domicile.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
7. Add things or classes of things to the meaning of statutory terms that do not EXPRESSLY appear in their definitions, in violation of the rules of statutory construction. See:
   Meaning of the Words “includes” and “including”, Form #05.014
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/Includes.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
8. Refuse to allow the jury to read the definitions in the law and then give them a definition that is in conflict with the statutory definition. This substitutes the JUDGES will for what the law expressly says and thereby substitutes PUBLIC POLICY for the written law.
9. Publish deceptive government publications that are in deliberate conflict with what the statutes define “United States” as and then tell the public that they CANNOT rely on the publication. The IRS does this with ALL of their publications and it is FRAUD. See:
   Reasonable Belief About Income Tax Liability, Form #05.007
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/MemLaw/ReasonableBelief.pdf
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

This kind of arbitrary discretion is PROHIBITED by the Constitution, as held by the U.S. Supreme Court:

‘When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are supposed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power.‘
[Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 369 , 6 S. Sup. Ct. 1064, 1071]

Thomas Jefferson, our most revered founding father, precisely predicted the above abuses when he said:

“It has long been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression,… that the germ of dissolution of our Federal Government is in the constitution of the Federal Judiciary–an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction until all shall be usurped from the States and the government be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed.“
[Thomas Jefferson to Charles Hammond, 1821. ME 15:331]

“Contrary to all correct example, [the Federal judiciary] are in the habit of going out of the question before them, to throw an anchor ahead and grapple further hold for future advances of power. They are then in fact the corps of sappers and miners, steadily working to undermine the independent rights of the States and to consolidate all power in the hands of that government in which they have so important a freehold estate.“
[Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:121]

“The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. They are construing our Constitution from a co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone. This will lay all things at their feet, and they are too well versed in English law to forget the maxim, ‘boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem.‘”
[Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Ritchie, 1820. ME 15:297]

“When all government, domestic and foreign, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.“
[Thomas Jefferson to Charles Hammond, 1821. ME 15:332]

“What an augmentation of the field for jobbing, speculating, plundering, office-building ["trade or business" scam] and office-hunting would be produced by an assumption [PRESUMPTION] of all the State powers into the hands of the General Government!”
[Thomas Jefferson to Gideon Granger, 1800. ME 10:168]

2.  STATUTORY V. CONSTITUTIONAL CONTEXTS

It is very important to understand that there are TWO separate, distinct, and mutually exclusive contexts in which geographical “words of art” can be used at the federal or national level:

1. Constitutional.
2. Statutory.

The purpose of providing a statutory definition of a legal “term” is to supersede and not enlarge the ordinary,  common law, constitutional, or common meaning of a term.  Geographical words of art include:

1. “State”
2. “United States”
3. “alien”
4. “citizen”
5. “resident”
6. “U.S. person”

The terms “State” and “United States” within the Constitution implies the constitutional states of the Union and excludes federal territory, statutory “States” (federal territories), or the statutory “United States” (the collection of all federal territory).  This is an outcome of the separation of powers doctrine.  See:

Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

The U.S. Constitution creates a public trust which is the delegation of authority order that the U.S. Government uses manage federal territory and property.  That property includes franchises, such as the “trade or business” franchise.  All statutory civil law it creates can and does regulate only THAT property and not the constitutional States, which are foreign, sovereign, and statutory “aliens” for the purposes of federal legislative jurisdiction.

It is very important to realize the consequences of this constitutional separation of powers between the states and national government.  Some of these consequences include the following:

1. Statutory “States” as indicated in  4 U.S.C. §110(d) and “States” in nearly all federal statutes are in fact federal territories and the definition does NOT include constitutional states of the Union.
2. The statutory “United States” defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10)  and 4 USC §110(d) includes federal territory and excludes any land within the exclusive jurisdiction of a  constitutional state of the Union.
3. Terms on government forms assume the statutory context and NOT the constitutional context.
4. Domicile is the origin of civil legislative jurisdiction over human beings.  This jurisdiction is called “in personam jurisdiction”.
5. Since the separation of powers doctrinecreates two separate jurisdictions that are legislatively “foreign” in relation to each other, then there are TWO types of political communities, two types of “citizens”, and two types of jurisdictions exercised by the national government.
   

   “It is clear that Congress, as a legislative body, exercise two species of legislative power: the one, limited as to its objects, but extending all over the Union: the other, an absolute, exclusive legislative power over the District of Columbia. The preliminary inquiry in the case now before the Court, is, by virtue of which of these authorities was the law in question passed?”
   [Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 6 Wheat. 265; 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821)]

6. A human being domiciled in a state and born or naturalized anywhere in the Union is a statutory “alien” in relation to the national government and a non-citizen national pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21) and 8 U.S.C. §1452.
7. You can be a statutory “alien” pursuant to 8 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3)(i) and a constitutional or Fourteenth Amendment “Citizen” AT THE SAME TIME.  Why?  Because the Supreme Court ruled in Hooven and Allison v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 653 (1945), that there are THREE different and mutually exclusive “United States”, and therefore THREE types of “citizens of the United States”. Here is an example:
   

   “The 1^st section of the 14^th article [Fourteenth Amendment], to which our attention is more specifically invited, opens with a definition of citizenship—not only citizenship of the United States[***], but citizenship of the states.  No such definition was previously found in the Constitution, nor had any attempt been made to define it by act of Congress.  It had been the occasion of much discussion in the courts, by the executive departments and in the public journals.  It had been said by eminent judges that no man was a citizen of the [***] except as he was a citizen of one of the states composing the Union.  Those therefore, who had been born and resided always in the District of Columbia or in the territories [STATUTORY citizens], though within the United States[*], were not [CONSTITUTIONAL] citizens.”
   [Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394(1873)]

   The “citizen of the United States” mentioned in the Fourteenth Amendment  is a constitutional “citizen of the United States”, and the term “United States” in that context includes states of the Union and excludes federal territory.  Hence, you would NOT be a “citizen of the United States” within any federal statute, because all such statutes define “United States” to mean federal territory and EXCLUDE states of the Union.  For more details, see:

   Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory Citizen, Form #05.006 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

8. Your job, if you say you are a “citizen of the United States” or “U.S. citizen” on a government form ( a VERY DANGEROUS undertaking!) is to understand that all government forms presume the statutory and not constitutional context, and to ensure that you define precisely WHICH one of the three “United States” you are a “citizen” of, and do so in a way that excludes you from the civil jurisdiction of the national government because domiciled in a “foreign state”.  Both foreign countries and states of the Union are legislatively “foreign” and therefore “foreign states” in relation to the national government of the United States.  The following form does that very carefully:
   

   Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

9. Even the IRS says you CANNOT trust or rely on ANYTHING on any of their forms and publications.  We cover this in our  Reasonable Belief About Income Tax Liability, Form #05.007.  Hence, if you are compelled to fill out a government form, you have an OBLIGATION to ensure that you define all “words of art” used on the form in such a way that there is no room for presumption, no judicial or government discretion to “interpret” the form to their benefit, and no  injury to your rights or status by filling out the government form.  This includes attaching the following forms to all tax forms you submit:9.1.   Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001
   http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm9.2.   Tax Form Attachment, Form #04.201
   http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

3.  SUMMARY OF CITIZENSHIP STATUS v. TAX STATUS

Below is a table that maps the various “Citizenship status” options in Title 8 of the U.S. Code to a “Income tax status” found in the Internal Revenue Code, which is Title 26 of the U.S. Code.  If a column contains the word “yes”, then the citizenship status row and the corresponding tax status column are equivalent to each other from a legal perspective.

Table 2:  “Citizenship status” vs. “Income tax status”

#	Citizenship status	Place of birth	Domicile	Accepting tax treaty benefits?	Defined in	Tax Status under 26 U.S.C./Internal Revenue Code
						“Citizen” (defined in 26 CFR 1.1-1)	“Resident alien” (defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(A), 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3)(i) and 26 CFR §1.1-1(a)(2)(ii))	“Nonresident alien INDIVIDUAL” (defined in 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3))	“Nonresident alien NON-individual” (defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B))
1	“U.S. citizen” or “Statutory U.S. citizen”	Anywhere in America	District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands	NA	8 U.S.C. §1401 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(A)	Yes (only pay income tax abroad with IRS Forms 1040/2555. See Cook v. Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924))	No	No	No
2	“U.S. national	Anywhere in America	American Samoa; Swains Island; or abroad to U.S. national parents under 8 U.S.C. §1408(2)	NA	8 U.S.C. §1408; 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B); 8 U.S.C. §1452	No (see 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B) )	No	Yes (see IRS Form 1040NR for proof)	No
3.1	“national” or “state national” or  “Constitutional but not statutory citizen”	Anywhere in America	State of the Union	NA (ACTA agreement)	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21); 8 U.S.C. §1452; 14th Amend., Sect. 1	No	No	No	Yes
3.2	“national” or “state national” or “Constitutional but not statutory citizen”	Anywhere in America	Foreign country	Yes	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21); 8 U.S.C. §1452; 14th Amend., Sect. 1	No	No	Yes	No
3.3	“national” or “state national” or “Constitutional but not statutory citizen”	Anywhere in America	Foreign country	No	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21); 8 U.S.C. §1452; 14th Amend., Sect. 1	No	No	No	Yes
4.1	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands	NA	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	No	Yes	No	No
4.2	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	State of the Union	Yes	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	No	No	Yes	No
4.3	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	State of the Union	No	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	No	No	No	Yes
4.4	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	Foreign country	Yes	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	No	No	Yes	No
4.5	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	Foreign country	No	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	No	No	No	Yes

---

4. EFFECT OF DOMICILE ON CITIZENSHIP STATUS

Table 3:  Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status

	CONDITION
Description	Domicile WITHIN the FEDERAL ZONE and located in FEDERAL ZONE	Domicile WITHIN the FEDERAL ZONE and temporarily located abroad in foreign country	Domicile WITHOUT the FEDERAL ZONE and located WITHOUT the FEDERAL ZONE
Location of domicile	“United States” per 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) , 7701(a)(39), 7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d)	“United States” per 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) , 7701(a)(39), 7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d)	Without the “United States” per 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 7701(a)(39), 7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d)
Physical location	Federal territories, possessions, and the District of Columbia	Foreign nations ONLY (NOT states of the Union)	Foreign nations states of the Union Federal possessions
Tax Status	“U.S. Person”26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30)	“U.S. Person”26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30)	“Nonresident alien”26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B)
Tax form(s) to file	IRS Form 1040	IRS Form 1040 plus 2555	IRS Form 1040NR: “alien individuals”, “nonresident alien individuals”No filing requirement: “non-citizen nationals”
Status if DOMESTIC national	Citizen 8 U.S.C. §1401(Not required to file if physically present in the “United States” because no statute requires it)	Citizen abroad 26 U.S.C. §911(Meets presence test)	“non-citizen National” 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21)8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B)8 U.S.C. §14088 U.S.C. §1452
Status if FOREIGN national	“Resident alien”26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(A)	“Resident alien abroad” 26 U.S.C. §911(Meets presence test)	“Nonresident alien individual”: 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3)(ii)“Alien”: 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)“Alien individual”: 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3)(i)

NOTES:

1. “United States” is statutorily defined as federal territory within 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 7701(a)(39), and 7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d).  It does not expressly include any Constitutional state of the Union and therefore, by the rules of statutory construction, they are purposefully excluded.
2. The “District of Columbia” is defined as a federal corporation but not a physical place, a “body politic”, or a de jure “government” within the District of Columbia Act of 1871, 16 Stat. 419, 426, Sec. 34.    See:  Corporatization and Privatization of the Government, Form #05.024; http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm.
3. American nationals who are domiciled outside of federal jurisdiction, either in a state of the Union or a foreign country, are “nationals” but not “citizens” under federal law.  They also qualify as “nonresident aliens” under 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B).  See sections 4.11.2 of the Great IRS Hoax for details.
4. Temporary domicile in the middle column on the right must meet the requirements of the “Presence test” documented in IRS publications.
5. “FEDERAL ZONE”=District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the territories and insular possessions of the United States in the above table.
6. The term “individual” as used on the IRS form 1040 means an “alien” engaged in a “trade or business”.  All “taxpayers” are “aliens” engaged in a “trade or business”.  This is confirmed by 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3), 26 CFR §1.1-1(a)(2)(ii), and 5 U.S.C. §552a(a)(2).  Statutory “U.S. citizens” as defined in  8 U.S.C. §1401 are not “individuals” unless temporarily abroad pursuant to  26 U.S.C. §911 and subject to an income tax treaty with a foreign country.  In that capacity, statutory “U.S. citizens”  interface to the I.R.C. as “aliens” rather than “U.S. citizens” through the tax treaty.

---

5.  MEANING OF GEOGRAPHICAL WORDS OF ART

A very frequent point of confusion and misunderstanding even within the legal profession is the definition of geographical terms in the various contexts in which they are used.  The table below is provided to clear up this confusion in order that people do not misinterpret geographical terms by applying them outside their intended context.  Using this page is VERY important for those who will be reading and researching state and federal law.  The differences in meaning within the various contexts are primarily a consequence of the Separation of Powers Doctrine.

Table 4: Meaning of geographic “words of art”

Law	Federal constitution	Federal statutes	Federal regulations	State constitutions	State statutes	State regulations
Author	Union States/ ”We The People”	Federal Government		“We The People”	State Government
“state”	Foreign country	Union state	Union state	Other Union state or federal government	Other Union state or federal government	Other Union state or federal government
“State”	Union state	Federal state	Federal state	Union state	Union state	Union state
“in this State” or “in the State”[1]	NA	NA	NA	NA	Federal enclave within state	Federal enclave within state
“State”[2](State Revenue and taxation code only)	NA	NA	NA	NA	Federal enclave within state	Federal enclave within state
“several States”	Union states collectively[3]	Federal “States” collectively	Federal “States” collectively	Federal “States” collectively	Federal “States” collectively	Federal “States” collectively
“United States”	states of the Union collectively	Federal United States**	Federal United States**	United States* the country	Federal United States**	Federal United States**

What the above table clearly shows is that the word “State” in the context of federal statutes and regulations means (not includes!) federal States only under Title 48 of the U.S. Code[4], and these areas do not include any of the 50 Union States.  This is true in most cases and especially in the Internal Revenue Code.  The lower case word “state” in the context of federal statutes and regulations means one of the 50 union states, which are “foreign states”, and “foreign countries” with respect to the federal government as clearly explained in section 5.2.11 of the Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302 (OFFSITE LINK) book.  In the context of the above, a “Union State” means one of the 50 Union states of the United States* (the country, not the federal United States**) mentioned in the Constitution for the United States of America.

If you would like to know all the implications of the separation of powers reflected in the above table, as well as a history of unconstitutional efforts to destroy this separation, see the following references:

1.  Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05...
2.  Sovereignty Forms and Instructions Online, Form #10.004, Cites by T... (OFFSITE LINK)

---

[1] See California Revenue and Taxation Code, section 6017 at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=rtc&group...

[2] See California Revenue and Taxation Code, section 17018 at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=rtc&group...

[3] See, for instance, U.S. Constitution Article IV, Section 2.

[4] See http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/48/

---

6.  CITIZENSHIP AND DOMICILE OPTIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS

Figure 1:  Citizenship and Domicile Options and Relationships

---

7.  FOUR TYPES OF AMERICAN NATIONALS

There are four types of American nationals recognized under federal law :

1.  Statutory “U.S. citizen” or “citizen of the [federal] United States**” or “national and citizen of the [federal] United States**”

1.1. A statutory privileged status defined and found in 8 U.S.C. §1401 and 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(A), in the implementing regulations of the Internal Revenue Code at 26 CFR §1.1-1(c ), and in most other federal statutes.

1.2. Born ianywhere in the United States* but domiciled in the federal zone only. Most inhabit the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States identified in Title 48 of the U.S. Code.

1.3. Subject to the “police power” of the federal government and all “acts of Congress”.

1.4. Treated as a citizen of the municipal government of the District of Columbia (see 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(39))

1.5. Have no common law rights, because there is no federal common law.  See Jones v. Mayer, 392 U.S. 409 (1798).

1.6. Also called “federal U.S. citizens”.

1.7  Owe allegiance to the GOVERNMENT of the United States and NOT the PEOPLE of the States of the Union, who are called United States***.

2.  Statutory “nationals but not citizens of the United States**” at birth (where “United States” or “U.S.” means the federal United States)

2.1. Defined in 8 U.S.C. §1408, 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B), and 8 U.S.C. §1452.

2.2. Born anywhere in American Samoa or Swains Island.

2.3. May not participate politically in federal elections or as federal jurists.

2.4. Owes allegiance to the federal “United States**”.

3.  “USA nationals” (but not “citizens of the United States**”)

3.1.     Defined in  8 U.S.C. §1452, 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21).

3.2.     Is not equivalent to a statutory “national but not citizen of the United States by birth” identified in 8 U.S.C. §1408.

3.3.     Called a “citizen of the United States” by the Supreme Court and in Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

3.4.     Born anywhere in any one of the several states of the Union but not in a federal territory, possession, or the District of Columbia.

3.5.     Not subject to the “police power” of the federal government or most “acts of Congress”.

3.6.     Owes allegiance to the “United States***” that comprise the several states of the Union.

3.7.     May serve as a federal jurist or grand jurist involving only parties with his same citizenship and domicile status. May vote in federal elections.

4. “State national”  (where “U.S.” or “United States” means only the union of states)”

4.1.     Defined in  8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21), under the Law of Nationas, under state laws, and under USA Constitution.

4.1.     Is equivalent to the term “state citizen”.

4.2.     In general, born in any one of the several states of the Union but not in a federal territory, possession, or the District of Columbia. Not domiciled in the federal zone.

4.3.     Not subject to the “police power” of the federal government or most “acts of Congress”.

4.4.     Owes Allegiance to the sovereign people, collectively and individually, within the body politic of the constitutional state residing in.

4.5.     May serve as a state jurist or grand jurist involving only parties with his same citizenship and domicile status.

4.6.     May vote in state elections.

4.7.     At this time, all “state Nationals” are also a “USA National”. But not all “USA Nationals” are a “state National” (for example, a USA national not residing nor domiciled in a state of the Union).  Is a man or woman whose unalienable natural rights are recognized, secured, and protected by his state constitution against state actions and against federal intrusion by the Constitution for the United States of America.

Statutory “U.S. citizens” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1401 have civil rights under federal law that are similar but inferior to the natural rights of state nationals in state courts.  We say almost because “civil rights” are statutory creations of Congress that may be taken away at any time and therefore are really privileges and franchises disguised to “look” like rights.  “U.S. citizens” are privileged subjects/servants of Congress, under their protection as a “resident” and “ward” of a federal State, a person enfranchised to the federal government (the incorporated United States defined in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution).  The individual Union states may not deny to these persons any federal privileges or immunities that Congress has granted them within “acts of Congress” or federal statutes.  Federal citizens come under admiralty law (International Law) when litigating in federal courts.  As such they do not have inalienable common rights recognized, secured and protected in federal courts by the Constitutions of the States, or of the Constitution for the United States of America, such as “allodial” (absolute) rights to property, the rights to inheritance, the rights to work and contract, and the right to travel among others.

Another important element of citizenship is that artificial entities like corporations are citizens for the purposes of taxation but cannot be citizens for any other purpose.

“A corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of that provision of the Constitution, which declares that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States.”
[Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall (U.S.) 168; 19 L.Ed 357 (1868)]

---

8.  FEDERAL STATUTORY CITIZENSHIP STATUSES DIAGRAM

We have prepared a venn diagram showing all of the various types of citizens so that you can properly distinguish them. The important thing to notice about this diagram is that there are multiple types of “citizens of the United States” and “nationals of the United States” because there are multiple definitions of “United States” according to the Supreme Court, as we showed in section 1 earlier.

Figure 2:  Federal Statutory Citizenship Statuses

9.   CITIZENSHIP STATUS ON GOVERNMENT FORMS

Table 5:  Citizenship status on government forms

#	Citizenship status	Place of birth	Domicile	Accepting tax treaty benefits?	Defined in	Social Security NUMIDENT Status	Status Specific Government Forms
							Social Security SS-5	IRS Form W-8 Block 3	Department of State I-9	E-Verify System
1	“U.S. citizen” or “Statutory U.S. citizen”	Anywhere in America	District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands	NA	8 U.S.C. §1401 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(A)	CSP=A	Block 5=”U.S. Citizen”	Can’t use Form W-8	Section 1=”A citizen of the United States”	See Note 1.
2	“U.S. national	Anywhere in America	American Samoa; Swains Island; or abroad to U.S. national parents under 8 U.S.C. §1408(2)	NA	8 U.S.C. §1408; 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B); 8 U.S.C. §1452	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A noncitizen national of the United States”	See Note 1.
3.1	“national” or “state national” or  “Constitutional but not statutory citizen”	Anywhere in America	State of the Union	NA (ACTA agreement)	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21); 8 U.S.C. §1452; 14th Amend., Sect. 1	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A noncitizen national of the United States)” OR “An alien authorized to work (statutory)”	See Note 1.
3.2	“national” or “state national” or “Constitutional but not statutory citizen”	Anywhere in America	Foreign country	Yes	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21); 8 U.S.C. §1452; 14th Amend., Sect. 1	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A noncitizen national of the United States)” OR “An alien authorized to work (statutory)”	See Note 1.
3.3	“national” or “state national” or “Constitutional but not statutory citizen”	Anywhere in America	Foreign country	No	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21); 8 U.S.C. §1452; 14th Amend., Sect. 1	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A noncitizen national of the United States)” OR “An alien authorized to work (statutory)”	See Note 1.
4.1	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands	NA	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A lawful permanent resident” OR “An alien authorized to work”	See Note 1.
4.2	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	State of the Union	Yes	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A lawful permanent resident” OR “An alien authorized to work”	See Note 1.
4.3	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	State of the Union	No	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A lawful permanent resident” OR “An alien authorized to work”	See Note 1.
4.4	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	Foreign country	Yes	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A lawful permanent resident” OR “An alien authorized to work”	See Note 1.
4.5	“alien” or “Foreign national”	Foreign country	Foreign country	No	8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3)	CSP=B	Block 5=”Legal  alien authorized to work. (statutory)”	“Nonresident NON-Individual Nontaxpayer”	Section 1=”A lawful permanent resident” OR “An alien authorized to work”	See Note 1.

NOTES:

1. E-Verify CANNOT be used by those who are a NOT lawfully engaged in a public office in the U.S. government at the time of making application.  Its use is VOLUNTARY and cannot be compelled.  Those who use it MUST have a Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number and it is ILLEGAL to apply for, use, or disclose said number for those not lawfully engaged in a public office in the U.S. government at the time of application.  See:
   Why It Is Illegal for Me to Request or Use a “Taxpayer Identification Number”, Form #04.205
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
   DIRECT LINK:  http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Withholding/WhyTINIllegal.pdf
2. For instructions useful in filling out the forms mentioned in the above table, see the following OFFSITE LINKS:2.1. Social Security Form SS-5:
   Why You Aren’t Eligible for Social Security, Form #06.001
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/AvoidingFranch/SSNotEligible.pdf2.2. IRS Form W-8:
   About IRS Form W-8BEN, Form #04.202
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/forums/index.php?app=downloads&module=display&a...2.3. Department of State Form I-9:
   I-9 Form Amended, Form #06.028
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/AvoidingFranch/i-9Amended.pdf2.4. E-Verify:
   About E-Verify, Form #04.107
   FORMS PAGE: http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
   DIRECT LINK: http://sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Procedure/E-Verify/E-Verify.htm

10.   CAPITALIZATION WITHIN STATUTES AND REGULATIONS

Whenever you are reading a particular law, including the U.S. Constitution, or a statute, the Sovereign referenced in that law, who is usually the author of the law, is referenced in the law with the first letter of its name capitalized.  For instance, in the U.S. Constitution the phrase “We the People”, “State”, and “Citizen” are all capitalized, because these were the sovereign entities who were writing the document residing in the States.  This document formed the federal government and gave it its authority.  Subsequently, the federal government wrote statutes to implement the intent of the Constitution, and it became the Sovereign, but only in the context of those territories and lands ceded to it by the union states.  When that federal government then refers in statutes to federal “States”, for instance in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(10)  or 4 U.S.C. §110(d), then these federal “States” are Sovereigns because they are part of the territory controlled by the Sovereign who wrote the statute, so they are capitalized.  Foreign states referenced in the federal statutes then must be in lower case.  The sovereign 50 union states, for example, must be in lower case in federal statutes because of this convention because they are foreign states.  Capitalization is therefore always relative to who is writing the document, which is usually the Sovereign and is therefore capitalized.  The exact same convention is used in the Bible, where all appellations of God are capitalized because they are sovereigns:  “Jesus” ”, “God”, “Him”, “His”, “Father”.  These words aren’t capitalized because they are proper names, but because the entity described is a sovereign or an agent or part of the sovereign.  The only exception to this capitalization rule is in state revenue laws, where the state legislators use the same capitalization as the Internal Revenue Code for “State” in referring to federal enclaves within their territory because they want to scam money out of you.  In state revenue laws, for instance in the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) sections 17018 and 6017, “State” means a federal State within the boundaries of California and described as part of the Buck Act of 1940 found in 4 U.S.C. §§105-113.  See the following URL to see what we mean:

 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=rtc&group...