We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

I have some questions regarding "fetuses" that are born alive during a failed abortion attempt, questions the Left will absolutely not address.

First, let me say that I strongly oppose abortion.   But, that is not the subject of this post.

I am talking about babies that are born alive during a failed abortion attempt and are outside the woman (I refuse to call her a mother).   Just exactly when does the fetus go from being a "tissue mass" to being "human"?

According to Virginia's Governor Norquist (a pediatrician by training), babies born alive despite an abortion attempt should be "put on a table, made comfortable, and left to die while the woman, her family, and the doctor discuss what to do".   This statement tells me two things.   First, it tells me that Governor Norquist is admitting that the baby feels discomfort and pain or there would be no point in making it "comfortable".   Second, it tells me that Governor Norquist knows it is alive or there would be no need to let it "die".   This shows him (and the Left) for the absolute hypocrite he is.

So, back to my question, "When, exactly, does a baby go from being a "tissue mass" to being "human"?

Again, according to Governor Norquist, in such a circumstance, the woman, her family, and the doctor should have a clam "discussion" on what to do about the baby; whether or not to kill it.  

How long does this "discussion" go on; 30 seconds, 30 minutes, 30 hours?   In the meantime, what about the baby?   When does it become human with full human and Constitutional rights?   Given that it is lying on a table, breathing, probably crying, is it not already human?   As a human, does it not have full human and Constitutional rights?   Does that not make anyone who kills it a murderer?

Before you think I am over the cliff on this one, let me take it to its logical extreme.   What if a woman takes the baby home and subsequently finds out it has, say, Autism?   Can she bring it back in a couple of years and tell the doctor to kill it?   Can she kill it herself?

According to one Harvard Professor, "Yes, up until the age of five years".   According to this "Professor", children under the age of five lack the consciousness and sentience to know they are alive or human, so they can be killed at the sole discretion of the mother (but not the father, of course).

So, once again, back to my question, "When, exactly, does a baby gain full human and Constitutional rights?   To my [feeble] mind, as soon as it is born alive and not a second later.

If a baby is human and does have full Constitutional rights, anyone who kills it is a murderer, period.

What say you?

Oren

Views: 25

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

ARE YOU aware a Baby in the Womb at 20 weeks,can feel just as much pain as a full grown adult can? THINK ABOUT IT! How many full grown adults could stand being systematically cut into pieces,in a drawn out process,to end them??? Barbaric Democrats Gleefully IGNORE this. The Democrats don't want to protect children, It's part of their hidden agenda to lower the world population IMHO. If they see nothing wrong with aborting a child after it's born, what do they care about any life? They have finally publicly declared themselves inhumanly EVIL! The question is "When are they going to come for you?"

I agree with you M!!  To me it is murder in the First Degree when they leave a baby to die or kill it within the womb.  And yes if we let this go then they will come after us which I think is their plan anyway.  We are in deep trouble as a Country!!!

Mickie,

It also conflicts with a Federal Law against Partial Birth Abortions that is still on the books;

 
18 U.S. Code § 1531 - Partial-birth abortions prohibited Title 18  Part I  Chapter 74 › § 1531

Thank you for the info, I forgot about it. 

Another DEMONCRAT Presidential candidate has officially came out in favor of third Trimester abortions and killing any baby that survived abortion. It was Beto O'Rourke.

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service