We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

EPA WILL COST YOU AND YOUR JOBS AND MONEY

The EPA’s potentially lethal assault on your quality of life, while the EU vastly increases coal importation

New Rules and Old Plants May Strain Summer Energy Supplies
By MATTHEW L. WALD


WASHINGTON — As 58 million people across 13 states sweated through the third day of a heat wave last month, power demand in North America’s largest regional grid jurisdiction hit a record high. And yet there was no shortage, no rolling blackout and no brownout in an area that stretches from Maryland to Chicago.


But that may not be the case in the future as stricter air quality rules are put in place. Eastern utilities satisfied demand that day — July 21 — with hefty output from dozens of 1950s and 1960s coal-burning power plants that dump prodigious amounts of acid gases, soot, mercury and arsenic into the air. Because of new Environmental Protection Agency rules, and some yet to be written, many of those plants are expected to close in coming years.


 No one is sure yet how many or which ones will be shuttered or what the total lost output would be. And there is little agreement over how peak demand will be met in future summers.


The E.P.A. estimates that a rule on air toxins and mercury that it expects to complete in November will result in a loss of 10,000 megawatts — or almost 1 percent of the generating capacity in the United States. Electricity experts, however, say that rule, combined with forthcoming ones on coal ash and cooling water, will have a much greater effect — from 48,000 megawatts to 80,000 megawatts, or 3.5 to 7 percent. (NYT)


Obama’s War on Coal
Killing jobs, causing blackouts
By William Yeatman
Originally published in The New York Post


President Obama claims to see the need to create jobs at this time of endless 9-plus percent unemployment — yet his administration continues to relentlessly destroy jobs for ideological reasons. The best example may be the Obama Environmental Protection Agency’s “war on coal.”


The EPA’s regulatory crusade directly threatens hundreds of thousands of jobs — and “rolling blackouts” that threaten even more.


Start with a proposed regulation under the Clean Air Act that’s set to be finalized in November. The Utility MACT (“Maximum Achievable Control Technology”) rule seeks to cut US power plants’ emissions of mercury from 29 tons a year to just five. Yet EPA itself estimates that cutting even as much as 41 tons out of total emissions of 105 tons “is unlikely to substantially affect total risk.”


For zero benefit, the Utility MACT is one of the most expensive federal regulations ever. In comments submitted to the EPA, Unions for Jobs and the Environment, an alliance of unions representing more than 3.2 million workers, estimated that this needless regulation would jeopardize 251,000 jobs.


Then there’s EPA’s out-of-the-blue ruling last month, ordering Texas to cut emissions of sulfur dioxide by 47 percent. This, when the draft version of the Cross State Air Pollution Rule had exempted the state entirely. The excuse for the change? A supposed need to slightly reduce emissions as monitored 500 miles away in Madison County, Ill. — a locale that meets the EPA air-quality standards in question. (CEI)


U.S. Coal Exports To Europe Treble
Saturday, 13 August 2011 15:45 Ying Diao and Mathew Carr, Bloomberg


U.S. coal exports to the Netherlands jumped to 1.1 million tons from 334,628 tons. Shipments to Germany went to 899,009 tons from 166,314 tons. Trade to the U.K. rose to 852,159 tons from 159,280 tons.


The U.S. may increase coal exports, further boosting supply of the commodity in Europe, Macquarie Group Ltd. (MQG) said.


“A big push” to encourage natural-gas burning in the U.S. may drive up coal exports to Europe, China and India, said Hayden Atkins, an analyst in London at Macquarie’s commodities unit. The closing of Germany’s nuclear plants will increase demand in that nation, Atkins said.


U.S. steam-coal exports to Europe in the first quarter more than tripled from a year earlier to 4.9 million metric tons from 1.5 million tons, according to a report on the website of the U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. coal exports are at their highest level since 1992, it said.


Exports to the Netherlands jumped to 1.1 million tons from 334,628 tons. Shipments to Germany went to 899,009 tons from 166,314 tons. Trade to the U.K. rose to 852,159 tons from 159,280 tons. (GWPF)


Tags: COSTENERGYEPAUNCONSTITUTIONAL

Views: 2167

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Wildfires and deadly heat wave hit Southwest U.S.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/20/us/heat-wave-southwest-united-states/...
Man made global warming?
Or not!
Why extremely rare events keep happening all the time
Something weird seems to be happening in the heavens. This week marks a coincidence of the full moon and the summer solstice. Some astronomers are calling this combination of maximum moonlight and the Northern Hemisphere's longest day a rare event.

It comes close on the heels of last month's rare passage of Mercury in front of the sun, September's rare pairing of a lunar eclipse with a so-called supermoon, the rare 2014 "tetrad" of lunar eclipses, the rare 2012 transit of Venus, and a plethora of once-in-a-lifetime planetary alignments, one earlier this year, one in 2014 and one in the summer of 2013. Next year there will be a rare total eclipse of the sun.

If these sorts of events are so rare, why do they happen so often?

Ask a statistician. David Hand, a professor at Imperial College London makes sense of world's abundance of rare events in his 2014 book, "The Improbability Principle: Why Coincidences, Miracles and Rare Events Happen Every Day."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-wp-blm-rare-comment-4355e7ec...
Just sayin!

Something of interest

This year the summer solstice is on June 20- and it has been as late as 22  which in the nature of things puts us in the longer summer  period.  When the planet is in a cooler period the solstice comes around June 9-11 which is the short summer period.

“Experts” is a funny word to throw around. For example, some experts found that children who eat candy are less likely to be overweight than those who don’t. Ignore that those experts were funded by the National Confectioners Association.

What I am trying to illustrate is that experts have a way of saying what the people who are paying them want to be said. It's a sad day and one of the reasons things like flat earthers and anti-vaxxers, anti-fluoride, anti-pesticides, people are able to flourish. Experts are the reason that the economy is in such horrible shape. Experts are why our school systems in many states are in shambles. Experts are the reason why cities and states all over the country are ether in bankruptcy or near bankruptcy.  Experts said purchasing middle eastern oil would have no ill effects on our economy even though billions of American dollars were leaving the country and build up radical Islamic kalifates. Experts have insisted that becoming a “service economy” is better than being a “manufacturing economy” leaving millions of people unemployed.  Experts said that all coastal cities would be underwater by now, the polar ice caps would be gone, and all polar bears would be dead.  Look what experts have done! They stopped all logging on federal lands to save the spotted owl that was not in danger.  They are in the process of closing all coal powered power plants to lower global temperatures by .2 degrees. Experts are busting dams to save a fish that in not endanger exasperating the drought in California.  

People don’t trust experts and the media anymore. They have manipulated and lied many times and while many are probably good people acting in good faith all it takes is a small percentage willing to find the answer that looks best for the man with the cash to destroy the public's trust.

Smart people know they are smart because they are smart. Dumb people think they are smart, because they are dumb. Thus, if you think you are smart, you probably believe that the world would be a better place if you (or people like you) were in charge of things, despite the possibility that your ideas might be profoundly stupid.

Since we can’t trust an expert who else are we gonna turn to?

Obama's little rulemakings, programs, and memorandums will still be impacting jobs and increasing costs long after he is out of office

Obama’s green energy plans, kill jobs, hurt consumers, and cost taxpayers


Marita Noon image

By Marita Noon —— Bio and Archives June 20, 2016

Proponents of green energy like to point out how the costs have come down—and they have. Though renewable energy, such as wind and solar, are not expected to equal fossil fuel costs anytime in the near future and recent growth has been propped up by mandates and tax incentives. But there are other, more subtle aspects of the Obama Administration’s efforts that have had negative impacts that are not felt for years after the policies are implemented. By then, it will be too late to do much about them.

We know that the push toward renewables has hurt the coal industry. As Hillary Clinton gleefully exclaimed: “we’re going to put a whole lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.” We are already seeing this happen all over the country. Dozens of coal mining companies have gone bankrupt since President Obama took office and those that are still functioning are doing so with far fewer workers.

http://canadafreepress.com/article/obamas-green-energy-plans-kill-j...

Climate change is falling apart as more "REAL" science is being used to review it.

GOP lawmakers also ask 17 state attorneys general to reveal communications with the Justice Department, Environmental Protection Agency, or White House.
DAILYSIGNAL.COM

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/20/greenpeace-co-found...

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore took a jab at the climate change movement Monday with a study arguing that far from endangering life on Earth, increased greenhouse gas emissions may be saving it.

Mr. Moore, a Greenpeace turncoat who now challenges the catastrophic climate change narrative, said in a treatise that carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere dipped so low about 18,000 years ago that plant life was threatened.

“All life is carbon-based and the primary source of this carbon is the CO2 in the global atmosphere,” Mr. Moore said in his executive summary. “As recently as 18,000 years ago, at the height of the most recent major glaciation, CO2 dipped to its lowest level in recorded history at 180 ppm, low enough to stunt plant growth.”

At about 150 ppm, plant life dies due to carbon dioxide starvation, he said in his paper, “The Positive Impact of Human CO2 Emissions on the Survival of Life on Earth,” released Monday by the Canada-based Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

“It is calculated that if the decline in CO2 levels were to continue at the same rate as it has over the past 140 million years, life on Earth would begin to die as soon as two million years from now and would slowly perish almost entirely as carbon continued to be lost to the deep ocean sediments,” according to the summary.

“The combustion of fossil fuels for energy to power human civilization has reversed the downward trend in CO2 and promises to bring it back to levels that are likely to foster a considerable increase in the growth rate and biomass of plants, including food crops and trees,” the study says.

As a result, said Mr. Moore, “Human emissions of CO2 have restored a balance to the global carbon cycle, thereby ensuring the long-term continuation of life on Earth.”

A senior fellow at the Frontier Centre, Mr. Moore has long been a burr in the side of Greenpeace, which has accused him of exploiting his ties to the international environmental group to cash in as a “paid representative of corporate polluters.”

Greenpeace has also said that while Mr. Moore “played a significant role in Greenpeace Canada for several years, he did not found Greenpeace.”


His defense of the importance of rising carbon dioxide at an October global warming conference drew a heated reaction from the anti-skeptics website Hot Whoppers.

“He thinks that pouring waste CO2 into the air is saving humanity and the planet. He’s nuts. (In case you haven’t figured that out for yourself.),” said the website in an Oct. 16 post. “Or you might prefer to think of him as one of those despicable disinformation propagandists.”

Anthony Watts, who runs the widely read skeptics’ website Watts Up With That, described the study as “a sensible and practical take on the issue.”

Mr. Moore’s 2013 book “Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout” details his experience as Greenpeace Canada president and Greenpeace International director.



Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

 

 Click to Read More 

Fearing Trump, greens run to Clinton


By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotJune 15, 2016 3:15 PM

Hillary Clinton is racking up endorsements from major environmental groups, solidifying support from the green movement for her presidential run.

The NRDC Action Fund, the Sierra Club and the billionaire green donor Tom Steyer have all endorsed Clinton for president in the last two weeks, joining the League of Conservation Voters, which backed her in November.

The presumptive Democratic nominee has now gotten support from nearly all of the major national environmental groups, save for Friends of the Earth Action, which endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders in August.

To the groups backing Clinton, the choice in the 2016 election is clear: someone who would continue and expand President Obama’s aggressive environmental agenda, or RepublicanDonald Trump, who says he would undo every piece of it that he could, including the Clean Power Plan and the Paris climate agreement.

“Secretary Clinton has a long record on the environment and is the leader we need to build on this progress made by President Obama and the climate movement,” Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune said Thursday in announcing the group’s endorsement of Clinton.

“She has listened to the grassroots and crafted detailed plans to safeguard our climate, air, water, and public lands, to protect the most vulnerable from environmental injustice, and to continue the rapid expansion of our clean energy economy.

“Contrasted with that, we have a reckless and misinformed candidate in Donald Trump, who has called climate change a ‘hoax,’ a ‘con job,’ and a ‘concept created by the Chinese.’ ”

Tom Steyer, who heads NextGen Climate and has donated tens of millions of dollars to Democrats who want to fight climate change, had a similar take.

“Now is the time to come together to defeat Donald Trump, who is utterly unfit to be our next president,” Steyer said. “Trump’s racist rhetoric is directly offensive to our American values and his dangerous actions would threaten our children’s future in every way.”

Adam Rome, a professor of environmental history at the University of Delaware, said greens are mobilizing like never before because they see such high stakes in this election.

“I think Trump really scares environmentalists. I can see that environmentalists would want to do everything possible to ensure that he’s not president,” Rome said.

The key concern for greens, Rome said, is preserving Obama initiatives like the Clean Power Plan that were achieved through executive authority and can largely be undone in the same way.

“Congress might still be divided or unfriendly, so executive action is really the only thing the federal government has been able to do and will be able to do on climate, barring a really big change,” Rome said.

Republicans argue Clinton’s emphasis on environmental issues over energy production will be a liability in the general election.

Core News, a project of the conservative group America Rising Squared, has lambasted Clinton’s green group endorsements.

“Brune forgot to mention the Sierra Club’s extreme plans to end American oil and gas production,” the group wrote about that endorsement.

It pointed out that some labor unions objected to Steyer’s alliance with the AFL-CIO, saying he sparked a “civil war” within the Democratic Party.

“Steyer and Clinton may be a good fit, though, given both have flip-flopped on energy over the years,” it said.

0
Share

Speaking at MC Greenfest, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy insists that climate change is "happening now." McCarthy: "You just need to get out of that telephone…
CLIMATEDEPOT.COM

One of the most “out there” climate activist groups is the Arctic Methane Emergency Group, collection of luminary scientists who are convinced we are on a one-way…
WATTSUPWITHTHAT.COM

Where have all the carbon sinks gone?
Long time passing
Where have all the carbon sinks gone?
Long time ago

Where have all the carbon sinks gone?
Gone to clathrates everyone
Oh, when will they ever learn?
Oh, when will they ever learn?

Where have all the clathrates gone?
Long time passing
Where have all the clathrates gone?
Long time ago

Where have all the clathrates gone?
Gone for methane everyone
Oh, when will they ever learn?
Oh, when will they ever learn?

Where has all the methane gone?
Long time passing
Where has all the methane gone?
Long time ago

Where has all the methane gone?
Gone for CO2 everyone
Oh, when will they ever learn?
Oh, when will they ever learn?

Where has all the CO2 gone?
Long time passing
Where has all the CO2 gone?
Long time ago

Where has all the CO2 gone?
Gone to carbin sinks, everyone
Oh, when will they ever learn?
Oh, when will they ever learn?

Planet Extinction - The Clathrate Time Bomb

They are called clathrates (or cathrates). They are stable only in the cold or under high pressure. Methane is 24 times more potent a greenhouse gas than CO2.

 

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service