The Border & Illegal Aliens, And What We Are Doing About It.

[Bullheaded Texan]

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said.

“We are not going to let this country be invaded!

We will not be stampeded!

We will not capitulate to lawlessness!

This is NOT business as usual.

This is the Trump era!," the Attorney General said.
 

[Bullheaded Texan]

Bombs Away in Syria:  Podcast   

 4/9/18  Matt Welch 

How will Trump and new national security adviser John Bolton respond to a reported chemical attack in a war-ravaged country?

 "Many dead, including women and children, in mindless CHEMICAL attack in Syria," President Donald Trump tweeted over the weekend. "Area of atrocity is in lockdown and encircled by Syrian Army, making it completely inaccessible to outside world. President Putin, Russia and Iran are responsible for backing Animal Assad. Big price...to pay." So what will that mean, precisely?

 The president said this morning that he would make a decision on responding to the "heinous attack" within the next 24-48 hours, adding that such a "barbaric attack...can't be allowed to happen!"

 As he was making that announcement, the Reason Podcast, featuring Katherine Mangu-Ward, Nick Gillespie, Peter Suderman, and me, was wrapping up its Monday episode. In addition to wargaming Syria, assessing new National Security Adviser John Bolton, and wondering what this all does to Trump's favored policy of troop withdrawal, the editorial quartet discussed refugee policy, the president's deployment of National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, our burgeoning trade war with China, and Facebook honcho Mark Zuckerberg's coming perp walk on Capitol Hill.

 

[Bullheaded Texan]

Worldwide Refugee Population Hits All-Time High, U.S. Intake Reache....  

 6/20/18 Matt Welch  

Mike Pompeo celebrates World Refugee Day, by bragging about America's "leadership" on the issue, but the numbers tell a different story.

 Today is World Refugee Day, which is when the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) releases its grim annual Global Trends report about people driven from their homes, and the world's politicians issue grave-sounding statements about all the work they're doing to ameliorate the crisis.

 So what did the UNHCR find for 2017? A record number of displaced people: 68.5 million. And a record number of refugees leaving their home country: 25.4 million, or 2.9 million more than 2016, making it "the biggest increase UNHCR has seen in a single year."

 There are currently "44,500 people being displaced each day, or a person becoming displaced every two seconds."

 The main generators of refugees are, in order, the wars in Syria, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Afghanistan, and South Sudan.

 Secretary of State Mike Pompeo commemorated the occasion with a statement asserting that "the United States will continue to be a world leader in providing humanitarian assistance and working to forge political solutions to the underlying conflicts that drive displacement," and that "the United States provides more humanitarian assistance than any other single country worldwide, including to refugees." That leadership, however, is not reflected in the number of refugees the U.S. now takes in.

 From October 1, 2017 to June 15 of this year, America has brought in 15,383 refugees. That puts the country on pace to accept just under 22,000 for this fiscal year, which would easily be the lowest number since the Refugee Act of 1980. (In Fiscal Year 2002, which began right after the September 11 attacks, the George W. Bush administration took in 27,131).

 Measured across presidencies:

Bush took in an average of 48,000 refugees per year.

barry obuma 70,000.

Ronald Reagan 82,000. 

slick willy 89,000. 

peanut carter 94,000.

and George H.W. Bush 119,000.

 We are contracting admissions right as the world is dramatically expanding people seeking shelter outside their home countries. The global population of refugees (minus the 5.3 million registered with the U.N. Relief and Work Agency for Palestinians in the Near East), was stable between 2008–2012, at between 10.4 million and 10.6 million, but since then we've seen this:

2013: 11.7 million

2014: 14.4 million

2015: 16.1 million

2016: 17.2 million

2017: 20.1 million

 The last time the world experienced such a sharp spike in refugees, the Carter and Reagan administrations took in about 1 out of every 70 global refugees.

 The Trump administration is on pace right now to accept 1 out of 900.

Pompeo in his statement nodded both to those prior eras of generosity, and Donald Trump's new era of America First stinginess:

"Since 1975, the United States has accepted more than 3.3 million refugees for permanent resettlement—more than any other country in the world. The United States will continue to prioritize the admission of the most vulnerable refugees while upholding the safety and security of the American people."

 Or as the president himself said Monday, "The United States will not be a migrant camp, and it will not be a refugee holding facility. Won't be. You look at what's happening in Europe, you look at what's happening in other places; we can't allow that to happen to the United States! Not on my watch!"

 

[Bullheaded Texan]

Rescued Woman alien Was Not Mother of Children She Brought Across Border.
6/18/18 by Bob Price
Border Patrol agents rescued a woman traveling with three children not her own after they became stranded in the middle of the Rio Grande River border with Mexico. Officials told Breitbart Texas the children traveling with the woman were unaccompanied minors.
The woman was also crossing with another and her two children.
Del Rio Sector Border Patrol agents battled strong currents and high water to rescue seven illegal aliens left stranded in the middle of the Rio Grande River, Breitbart Texas reported.
Agents assigned to the Eagle Pass Border Patrol station came across a group of illegal aliens on June 12 who were abandoned on a small island in the middle of the Rio Grande River border with Mexico.
They found two adults and five juveniles who became stranded, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Border Patrol officials indicated the two women put the minors in dangerous conditions while attempting to cross the border illegally.
“The individuals were trying to cross and make their way into the United States,” officials said in a written statement. “However, unusually swift and strong currents proved too much for the group.”
Officials did not say if the group was traveling with a human smuggler at the time.
Responding to an inquiry from Breitbart Texas, CBP officials confirmed that one of the adult women was traveling with her two children — ages one and three.
“Also in the group was another adult female and three unaccompanied children,” the CBP statement reported.
Del Rio Sector spokesman Dennis Smith confirmed to Breitbart Texas on Monday that the three minors were not the woman’s children by blood or legal guardianship.
Border Patrol officials turned the family unit over to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations officers for placement in a family residential facility, officials stated. “The other adult female will be processed for illegal entry, and the unaccompanied children – ages 11, 12 and 14 – will be turned over to Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement.”
Border Patrol officials told Breitbart Texas that they frequently find adults traveling with unaccompanied minors who "claim" they are family members.

[Bullheaded Texan]

Inside Shelter for Illegal Alien Children Separated from Parents.
6/15/18 by JOEL B. POLLAK
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2018/06/15/photos-inside-shelte...
The Department of Health and Human Services hosted Breitbart News and other media on a tour of a facility in El Cajon, Mexifornia, on Friday where migrant children are being sheltered after being separated from their parents.
The children are separated from their parents — or, to be precise, from the adults accompanying them, who may or may not be their parents — when their parents cross the southern U.S. border illegally and are caught and detained.
Previously, under the “catch-and-release” policy, the adults would be released. Under the “zero tolerance” policy of the Trump administration, the adults are being detained and prosecuted. Children cannot be incarcerated with them.
However, families that arrive together at legal ports of entry and apply for asylum status are generally not split up and are permitted to stay in the U.S. pending the adjudication of their applications (which can take several years).
Democrats and the mainstream media have accused the administration of separating the children of “aliens” from their parents and imprisoning them in “cages.”
On Thursday, CNN analyst and Playboy reporter Brian Karem shouted at White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders: “These people have nothing. They come to the border with nothing and you throw children in cages.”
NONE of the reporters in the briefing room corrected him.
The facility at El Cajon, however, is not a “cage!” It is a comfortable facility providing lodging, meals, clothing, medical care, education, recreation, counseling, and other services.
It is run by a nonprofit organization called Southwest Key as part of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) Program, run by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in the Administration for Children and Familes (ACF).
The facility is located on a main street in a quiet, suburban neighborhood. It has 65 beds, occupied by boys ages 6 to 17. The rooms are spare, with three to four beds in each; the boys are responsible for cleaning the rooms and making their own beds. There is an outdoor recreation area with picnic tables and a small soccer pitch.
There is a classroom area, and English lessons. The goal is “reunification”: letting each child depart with a legal guardian.
Some 90% of the children at the shelter arrived at the border without adults; the other 10% were separated from the adults accompanying them. Once the children arrive — usually brought by U.S. Border Patrol agents — they are greeted in the “intake” office, where they receive any urgent medical care, are assigned a case worker, and are given food, a shower, and new clothing.
They are also given toiletries and lessons in hygiene, {literally how to flush a toilet, brush their teeth, and operate the shower}, which some of the children have never seen in their lives.
The children receive six hours of education daily, which include lessons in English and physical education. The boys interact with girls who are housed offsite and brought to the shelter during the day to access its services.
They have limited access to telephones to call relatives, both in the U.S. and abroad. They receive therapy, both as individuals and in group sessions. They enjoy field trips to local museums, parks, and the zoo, where they can explore the city beyond the shelter. And they also have social activities, including a recent “prom” for which they dressed up.
*** HOW MUCH DOES THIS COST US? ****
“These are NOT Cages!,” What is immediately striking about the facility is the enthusiasm and care of the staff who work there. One administrator greeted the journalists on the tour: “Welcome to our home.” The children at the facility seemed genuinely happy, despite their unfortunate circumstances and the trauma of their long journey. Update: HSS provided a video of the visit:
https://youtu.be/yzat9MRNIlg
The real scandal is how the media have portrayed the shelters. When MSNBC’s Jacob Soboroff toured a similar facility this week in Brownsville, Texas, for example, he referred to the children there as being “incarcerated,” which is only true in the same sense that hospital patients, too, are not permitted to leave, for their safety. (One official who had seen Soboroff’s televised report accused him of “flat-out lying” about the facility — such as, for example, reporting on a mural of Donald Trump without noting 19 other presidents were similarly depicted.)
Southwest Key has operated its facilities, 27 in total, across Mexifornia, Arizona, and Texas — since 1997, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Flores v. Reno that unaccompanied illegal alien minors could not be held in detention facilities.
This is not a new problem, even though it took President Trump to make the media realize it existed!

[Bullheaded Texan]

White House Refuses to Endorse House GOP’s DACA Bill.
6/15/18 GOP Presidential Staff
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders did not offer an endorsement of any immigration bills when asked during Thursday’s press conference about two Republican bills, including Speaker Paul Ryan’s new bill that offers a form of amnesty.
The press secretary repeatedly pointed back to the immigration plan that President Donald Trump laid out months ago. That plan involved four pillars required for him to approve an immigration bill.
Sanders was asked if the President had a preference between one of two Republican immigration bills being brought to the forefront at the moment.
“The President’s already laid out a proposal that closes the legal loopholes and provides the resources to secure out border,” Sanders replied. “If the process leads to a permanent solution as outlined by the President then we would support it.”
Portions of a draft of Ryan’s bill reveal that it does not meet the four pillars requirement that President Donald Trump firmly laid out last January as requirements for an immigration bill deal.
Sanders didn’t answer a question about whether the president has looked at the two proposals yet. She simply replied, “we’ve laid out what we want to see and if this gets to a permanent solution then we would support it.”
A reporter asked if the Trump administration blames the Democrats for not closing those loopholes, given that Republicans now control both houses of Congress, though don’t hold a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
Sanders replied, “Look, if a handful of Democrats wanted to solve this problem, we could quickly get it done, but they don’t. And they’ve refused to come to the table and actually be part of a solution instead of just playing political games and attacking the president.”
“The majority of Republicans support fixing the loopholes, the president wants to work with them,” said Sanders. “We want to get something done and we’ve laid out a proposal to do that and we are hopeful that Congress, particularly Democrats in Congress, will come together and actually fix the system.”
She repeatedly said that the President wants to fix the loopholes and that the President has laid out what he wants to see in a bill to fix immigration problems. “We’d like to see a permanent solution to fix the loopholes and secure the border!,” she said.
“He wants to see all of the different components that we laid out several months ago addressed, and if any of the legislation comes to the table that would create a permanent solution that does that, then we would support it,” said Sanders.

[Bullheaded Texan]

*** NEWS BREAK ***
After having dug 10 feet last year outside of New York City,
New York Democratic scientists found traces of copper cable
dating back 100 years.
They came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a
"telephone network" more than 100 years ago.
Not to be outdone by the New Yorkers, in the weeks that followed,
a Los Angeles, Mexifornia Democratic archaeologist dug to a depth
of 20 feet somewhere just outside Oceanside.
Shortly after, a story in the LA Times read:
"Mexifornia archaeologists report a finding of 200 year old copper
cable, have concluded that their ancestors already had an advanced
'high-tech communications network' a hundred years earlier than the
New Yorkers."
One week later, a local newspaper in Galveston, Texas reported the
following:
"After digging down about 30 feet deep in his pasture near the community
of Mount Pleasant,Texas, Bubba, a self-taught Republican archaeologist, reported that he found ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
Bubba has therefore concluded that 300 years ago,
TEXAS HAD ALREADY GONE "WIRELESS"!
Just makes a person proud to be from Texas!

[Bullheaded Texan]

Weekly Update: The IG Report;
6/15/18
Inspector General Destroys DOJ and FBI Credibility.
Hearing Set on Motion to Compel Email Testimony from killary clinton
Major Judicial Watch Victory! The Supreme Court Decides for Clean Elections in Ohio!
DOJ Must Provide More Details on podesta-clinton Communications.
The Justice Department Inspector General’s report on the FBI’s investigation of killary clinton’s scandalous email practices is out, and as I predicted, it has destroyed the credibility of the Department of Justice and the FBI.
*It confirms what we have investigated and revealed for nearly two years. The obuma DOJ/FBI investigation of clinton was rushed, half-baked, rigged, and irredeemably compromised by anti-Trump and pro-clinton bias and actions. It is outrageous to see a politicized FBI and DOJ then so obviously refuse to uphold the rule of law.*
The IG report details repeated DOJ/FBI deference to killary clinton, her aides and their lawyers. Americans should examine the report and judge for themselves whether the over-the-top deference to killary clinton can be explained as anything other than political, especially from agencies that at the same time were actively collaborating with the clinton campaign’s Fusion GPS to spy on and target then-candidate Trump.
The IG report details how at least five top FBI agents and lawyers exchanged pro-clinton and anti-Trump communications.
The IG shares the concerns of Judicial Watch and millions of Americans that this bias cast a cloud over the credibility of the clinton email and Russia investigations.
An incredible example of this bias was found in a text message of FBI official Peter Strzok, who promised to “stop Trump” from becoming President. Strzok was both the lead FBI agent on the sham clinton investigation and on the anti-Trump Russia investigation!
As we have demonstrated through independent investigations and lawsuits, there is more than enough evidence that clinton knowingly and intentionally mishandled classified information while using a non-government email system to conduct government business.
Will the Sessions Justice Department now do the right thing and conduct a clinton email investigation properly? Or will it let james comey and loretta Lying linch have the last word on killary clinton’s evident email crimes?
In the meantime, we will continue our FOIA lawsuits and investigations into the clinton email scandal and the related obuma administration cover-up.
We have numerous lawsuits and document productions regarding the issues raised by the IG, including the conduct of andrew mccabe, the clinton-lynch tarmac meeting, the Strzok-Page communications, the FBI investigation into killary clinton, and DOJ collusion with the clinton campaign.
The IG report is just the beginning! And Judicial Watch will take it from here!
Hearing Set on Motion to Compel Email Testimony from killary Clinton.
Judicial Watch doesn’t wait for IG reports or Congress – we are an independent organization that does its own investigations and lawsuits!
So, for all the noise about the clinton email investigation, Judicial Watch is the only entity still in court that may get additional testimony from k. clinton about her email practices.
A federal court just ordered a hearing for Thursday, October 11, 2018, on a motion to compel testimony about the email practices of former Secretary of State killary clinton.
U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued the order.
This major development comes in our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit about the controversial employment status of huma abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to clinton.
The lawsuit, which seeks records regarding the authorization for abedin to engage in outside employment while employed by the Department of State, was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).
In 2016, killary clinton was required to submit, under oath, written answers to our questions. *clinton objected to and refused to answer questions about the creation of her email system; her decision to use the system despite warnings from State Department cybersecurity officials; and the basis for her claim that the State Department had “90-95%” of her emails.*
Judge Sullivan is considering our motion to compel answers to these questions.
In her responses sent to the court and us on October 13, 2016, crooked clinton refused to answer three questions and responded that she “does not recall” 20 times concerning her non-government clintonemail.com email system. She preceded her responses by eight “general objections” and two “objections to definitions.” The words “object” or “objection” appear 84 times throughout the 23-page document submitted to the court and Judicial Watch.
Judge Sullivan will also hear arguments on our motion to compel testimony from former State Department Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat John Bentel (who asserted his Fifth Amendment right and refused to answer 87 questions at his deposition) and our motion to unseal the audiovisual recordings of all depositions. We took the testimony of key clinton aides and State Department senior officials, including huma abedin and cheryl mills, but the videotapes of the depositions are currently under seal.
It is not surprising that crooked clinton refused to answer key questions about her conduct.
Perhaps she thought that we, like obuma’s FBI and Justice Department, would just let it go! We haven’t – and neither have the courts.
Major Judicial Watch Victory! The Supreme Court Decides for Clean Elections in Ohio
The Supreme Court issued important decision to uphold efforts by Ohio to maintain accurate voting rolls.It was a big victory for clean elections and, as you’ll see below, Judicial Watch!
It is also a clear victory for the citizens of Ohio and America who want clean and fair elections. Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections.
The Supreme Court decision should send a signal to other states to take reasonable steps to make sure that voters who died or moved away no longer remain on their voter rolls.
Leftists opposed to election integrity suffered a big defeat with this decision. Frankly, this and their other assaults on clean election measures suggest the organized left and their politician allies want to be able to steal elections if necessary. This is also a big institutional win for Judicial Watch, because it means that our current settlement agreement with Ohio is valid and enforceable.
The Supreme Court upheld an Ohio law providing that the State had to send address confirmation notices to all registered voters who had not voted in the previous two years.
This ruling has the effect of also upholding a 2014 settlement agreement between us and Ohio, which required Ohio to use that same procedure as part of a regular Supplemental Mailing designed to identify whether registered Ohio voters had moved away – one of many steps intended to fulfill Ohio’s obligations under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) to maintain the integrity of its voter list.
We filed several amicus briefs supporting Ohio’s efforts at every level of the federal court system as the case progressed from the trial court all the way up to the Supreme Court.
The case was on appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which held Ohio’s process was in violation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) (Jon Husted, Ohio Secretary of State v. Philip Randolph Institute, et al. (No. 16-980)).
Our amicus brief argued that the Sixth Circuit ruling would adversely affect its settlement agreement with Ohio were it allowed to stand. We also pointed out that failing to respond to an address confirmation notice does not mean that a registration is removed from the voter rolls. It merely triggers another waiting period, which can last up to four more years, during which the registrant still has the right to vote. In all, it can take up to six years before a registration is cancelled under the process.
Attorney Robert Popper, the director of our Election Integrity Project, joined with five other former attorneys of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department in filing an amici curiae brief in the Husted case.
We previously filed a lawsuit under the NVRA against Indiana, which resulted in the state taking several actions to clean up its voter rolls.
Our lawsuits against Ohio and Indiana were the first private lawsuits under the NVRA. We are currently suing Kentucky, Mexifornia and Los Angeles over their failures to remove ineligible voters as required by the NVRA, and we are suing the State of Maryland and Montgomery County over their failure to release voting-related records.
We won this latest Supreme Court battle, but the Judicial Watch fight for election integrity continues across the nation.
DOJ Must Provide More Details on podesta-clinton Communications
The bureaucrats in The Deep State Swamp know every trick in the book for blocking inquiries into their actions. It is a good thing when the courts see through these sleights of hand. Here’s a good example.
In an unusual Saturday ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney L. Friedrich ordered the U.S. Justice Department to provide more information about its search of former top obuma DOJ Official Peter Kadzik’s communications with then-clinton presidential campaign chairman john podesta, clinton campaign officials, and others.
The court order, issued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, requires the Justice Department to provide additional details by June 15, 2018.
According to WikiLeaks, on May 19, 2015, Kadzik, using a Gmail account, sent Podesta an email appearing to tip-off clinton’s campaign about the Justice Department’s review of clinton’s emails:
There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the emails.
Saturday’s order follows a June 6 hearing in our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Justice Department on January 15, 2017, for:
All email correspondence between Peter Kadzik on either his official Justice Department email account [e-mail] and any non-government employee concerning, regarding, or relating to former Secretary of State killary clinton’s use of non-state.gov email to conduct official government business;
All email correspondence between Peter Kadzik on either his official Justice Department email account or [e-mail] and John Podesta; and
All email correspondence between Peter Kadzik on either his official Justice Department email account or [e-mail] and any official, officer, or employee of killary rodham clinton’s presidential campaign.
We argue that the Justice Department has refused to provide sufficient details about the search of Kadzik’s personal email account.
Judge Friedrich found that the Justice Department’s sworn representations about Kadzik’s search of his records were “incomplete”:
Although the [Justice Department] states that “Mr. Kadzik confirmed that he did not recall ever using his personal Gmail account to send any other similar e-mails to john podesta, or to anyone else associated with the clinton campaign,” … this statement does not cover the full scope of Judicial Watch’s specific FOIA requests.
The court ordered the DOJ to submit a supplemental declaration by June 15, 2018, that provides any additional details regarding Kadzik’s representations regarding whether his Gmail account contained agency records or potential agency records.
The DOJ is to provide details regarding two manual searches that Mr. Kadzik reportedly conducted. Also, the DOJ is to indicate, whether Kadzik opened and reviewed individual e-mails or just reviewed the titles, and which folders Kadzik reviewed when conducting his manual searches.
We are obviously pleased that the court ordered the Justice Department to provide more details about its search for documents about obuma DOJ-clinton campaign collusion. Yet it is disappointing that we must continually battle the Sessions Justice Department for basic information on corruption in the obuma Justice Department.
Unsurprisingly, Kadzik’s conduct related to his communications with the clinton campaign are criticized in this week’s big IG report. And it is once again up to Judicial Watch to continue the accountability efforts on this scandal.

[Bullheaded Texan]

Court Sets Hearing on Motion to Compel Email Testimony from killary clinton.
6/13/18
Hearing in Judicial Watch Lawsuit Set for October 11th.
Washington, DC – Judicial Watch announced a federal court ordered a hearing for Thursday, October 11, 2018, on a motion to compel testimony about the email practices of former Secretary of State killary clinton.
The order was issued by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.
The development comes in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit about the controversial employment status of huma abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to clinton.
The lawsuit, which seeks records regarding the authorization for abedin to engage in outside employment while employed by the Department of State, was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).
In 2016, killary clinton 'was required to submit, under oath, written answers to Judicial Watch’s questions.'
Crooked clinton objected to and refused to answer questions about the creation of her email system; her decision to use the system despite warnings from State Department cybersecurity officials; and the basis for her claim that the State Department had “90-95%” of her emails.
Judge Sullivan is considering Judicial Watch’s motion to compel answers to these questions.
In her responses sent to Judicial Watch and the court on October 13, 2016, clinton refused to answer three questions and responded that she “does not recall” 20 times concerning her non-government clintonemail.com email system. She preceded her responses by eight “general objections” and two “objections to definitions.” The words “object” or “objection” appear 84 times throughout the 23-page document submitted to the court and Judicial Watch.
Judge Sullivan will also hear arguments on Judicial Watch’s motion to compel testimony from former State Department Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat John Bentel (who asserted his Fifth Amendment right and refused to answer 87 questions at his deposition) and
Judicial Watch’s motion to unseal the audiovisual recordings of all depositions. Judicial Watch took the testimony of key clinton aides and State Department senior officials, including huma abedin and cheryl mills, but the videotapes of the depositions are currently under seal.
“The clinton email scandal isn’t going away especially as Crooked clinton refuses to answer key questions about her conduct,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Judicial Watch uncovered the clinton email scandal, and since the DOJ and FBI have dropped the ball, is the last best hope for accountability and justice.”

[Bullheaded Texan]

[Bullheaded Texan]

Corrupt FBI and DOJ Activity Connects to the obuma Administration.
6/18/18 Chris Farrell
June 15, 2018- JW Director of Investigations and Research Chris Farrell appeared on “Lou Dobbs Tonight” on the Fox Business Network to discuss the newly released IG report. See video-->
https://youtu.be/ui5A9I40KGo