The Border & Illegal Aliens, And What We Are Doing About It.

[Bullheaded Texan]

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said.

“We are not going to let this country be invaded!

We will not be stampeded!

We will not capitulate to lawlessness!

This is NOT business as usual.

This is the Trump era!," the Attorney General said.
 

[Bullheaded Texan]

 FOX NEWS: Dems Colluded To Funnel Money To killary. 

06/11/18 by: TTN Staff 
 This massive killary scandal continues to pick up more momentum!

This time Fox News is getting in on the action, providing details of the $84 million scheme.
  According to Fox News:

As many as 40 state-level Democratic parties may have been involved in a scheme to funnel as much as $84 million to killary clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, a campaign finance lawyer contends.
 Dan Backer, an attorney based in Virginia, has filed a lawsuit alleging that a plan was in place to circumvent campaign contribution limits set by the federal government, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported.
 “You had individuals giving $300,000,” Backer told the newspaper Friday. “They’re not doing it because they care about Nevada’s or Arkansas’ state party. They’re doing it to curry favor with and buy influence with killary clinton.”
 Nevada’s Democratic Party may become the latest pulled into a federal lawsuit that Backer has filed, the paper reported. Backer represents the Committee to Defend the President, a pro-Donald Trump political action committee that initially lodged a complaint in December with the Federal Election Commission, the report says.

 The large donations at the state level raise a lot of questions and seem to have only helped killary.

Not the Dems down the ballot like they were intended to do. 

[Bullheaded Texan]

Alabama Governor Lets Schools Keep Gun Ready Against ‘Armed Intruders’.    

 6/09/18   Jeremiah Poff 

Alabama school administrators will now have the option of keeping a firearm on school grounds for dealing with an “armed intruder” incident if they meet certain qualifications after Gov. Kay Ivey signed a memo permitting the practice.

 Ivey’s May 30 memo will give all Alabama school administrators the option to keep a firearm on campus, provided they have a concealed carry permit, undergo training, are subject to random drug screenings, are sworn in as a deputy county sheriff, and work at a school without a school resource officer.

     https://youtu.be/ddTes0jhm10

“Unlike teachers, school administrators have complete access to their schools and are responsible for the safety of all students at the school, not an individual classroom,” the governor’s office said in a press release.

 The voluntary program requires any gun to be kept in a biometrically secure safe, along with ammunition and body armor, and only be taken out in the event of imminent threat from an “armed intruder.”

 Ivey said she signed the memo without waiting for a bill from the Legislature because “with the unfortunate continued occurrence of school violence across our country, we cannot afford to wait until the next legislative session.” The Alabama Legislature is out of session until early next year.

 Ivey’s action drew harsh criticism from Moms Demand Action, a pro-gun control organization, which released a statement saying “there is no evidence that arming teachers or other school staff or administrators will protect children in schools.” *** WELL DUH- THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OTHERWISE, EITHER! ***

 “School officials have other jobs they are meant to be doing. They aren’t trained sharpshooters and don’t have ongoing training,” the anti-gun group said. *** BUT, THEY WILL HAVE! ***

 Amy Swearer, a legal policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation, took issue with the Moms Demand Action claim! “There are numerous examples of lives being saved because active school shooters were quickly confronted by armed personnel, including just this year at schools in Maryland and Indiana,” Swearer said. “Even in Santa Fe, Texas, where 10 lives were tragically lost, the immediate response of armed school resource officers prevented the situation from becoming much worse.

 “Moms Demand Action apparently don't consider these instances ‘evidence’ of how protecting our children with armed and competent adults increases school safety, but the students whose lives were saved might beg to differ,” she said. Swearer also said that arming school administrators was “a much more financially practical solution for some school districts than hiring school resource officers,” adding that “the provision of armed personnel is most effective when used in combination with other security measures.”

 She noted that in Utah, qualified teachers have been permitted to carry concealed firearms for more than two decades, and “not one person has been injured as a result of the policy!”

 

[Bullheaded Texan]

6 Big Questions About What Comes After the Trump-Jong Meeting.

 6/11/18  Fred Lucas

About the historic meeting between President Donald Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, optimists and skeptics alike have questions about the next step.

 Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said last week the administration would seek progress toward a formal treaty to be ratified by the Senate.

 That would make it more difficult for a future president to unravel a deal, as Trump unraveled resident Evil barry obuma’s Iran nuclear deal. It also would provide assurance to Kim that the United States won’t pursue regime change after his country does away with its arsenal.

 A treaty also means contentious debate abroad and at home.

“It will really have to be substantial, with almost everything we hoped for, to get Senate confirmation,” Alexander Vershbow, ambassador to South Korea from 2005 to 2008, told The Daily Signal. “If they draw up a treaty, the Senate will want it airtight.”

 Here are the six of the big questions remaining:

1. How to Define ‘Denuclearization’?

A United Nations resolution and U.S. policy call for “complete, verifiable, irreversible, dismantlement” of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.

U.S. experts agree that Trump must stand firm on some version of this in an agreement that would guarantee Kim remains in power and lifts economic sanctions on the communist regime.

 “The president must reach a deal with North Korea that'’s verifiable and irreversible denuclearization,” retired Army Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin, a former deputy undersecretary for intelligence at the Defense Department, told The Daily Signal. “We need to let Kim know that we consider his nuclear program an existential threat to the United States and are willing to use all available means to oppose it,” Boykin said. “Kim will relay to the president that he needs a security guarantee to let the nuclear arsenal go, so he is secure the United States is not interested in regime change.”

 However, the guarantee that the U.S. will not support regime change may not be enough, Vershbow said.

“Some people believe Kim may have had his Deng Xiaoping moment,” said Vershbow, the former ambassador, referring to the communist China leader who succeeded the more brutal Mao Zedong and brought market reforms while maintaining authoritarian rule.

 “But the official ideology is that they must rule over all of Korea and that the South is illegitimate,” Vershbow said. “The question is how different will Kim Jong Un be from his father and grandfather?”

 Defining denuclearization will be a major difficulty, said Bruce Klingner, a former Korea expert with the CIA who is senior research fellow for northeast Asia at The Heritage Foundation. “This should include short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles that threaten allies South Korea and Japan,” Klingner said in a public statement. “North Korea has demonstrated for decades, that it has vastly different definitions of such terms as denuclearization and even what comprises the ‘Korean Peninsula.’”

2. What Language Is Needed for a Long-Term Deal?

In any agreement, North Korea must “publicly, explicitly, and unequivocally accept and commit to work toward the U.N.-required abandonment” of its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs, Klingner said.

“Any new agreement with North Korea has to be very specific and go beyond what has been written in the past,” he said. “It should be similar to the carefully crafted text, with robust verification requirements, of arms control treaties with the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact rather than the vague text of previous agreements with North Korea.”

 In the six-party talks joint statement from September 2005, North Korea pledged nonproliferation of nuclear weapons and to grant access to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

 “The Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea committed to abandoning all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs and returning at an early date to the treaty on the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons and to IAEA safeguards,” the statement said.

 Vershbow came to his job at a time when the six-party talks seemed promising, only to have North Korea—then under the rule of Kim Jong Il—back out and restart nuclear testing. “I’ve seen this movie before, but it might have a different ending this time, one that confounds the skeptics,” Vershbow said of the Singapore summit.

3. Will US Troops Leave South Korea? If So, When?

The current Kim regime wants the United States to withdraw its troops from South Korea.

 “Removing U.S. troops from South Korea is not something we can agree to upfront. For many South Koreans, that is a big concern,” said Boykin, the retired lieutenant general who is now executive vice president of the Family Research Council, a conservative advocacy group.

 Experts contend this will create a significant concern for U.S. allies in Asia, and the Trump administration should reach an agreement on other issues before talking about troops in South Korea.

 “If the North demands, and the U.S. agrees, to take away U.S. forces from South Korea, the allies in Asia such as Japan and Singapore will question whether the U.S. is committed to this part of the world,” Matthew Heiman, a lawyer formerly with the national security division of the Justice Department, told The Daily Signal.

4. How Will Sanctions Relief Work?

The Trump administration increased sanctions on Kim’s regime, which helped bring North Korea to the bargaining table, said Vershbow, the former ambassador to South Korea. “There's a combination of fear from the Trump military threats and the tighter sanctions that got Kim’s attention,” Vershbow said.

 No sanctions relief should come before North Korea makes a significant step toward denuclearization, Klingner said.

 Existing sanctions against North Korea are a combination of U.N. resolutions and sanctions the United States and other countries imposed individually. Also, legislation passed by Congress requires specific actions be undertaken by North Korea before the United States relaxes sanctions.

 “An agreement where Kim continues to run the country could be similar to Vietnam and Cambodia,” Heiman said. “These are countries that have economies open to the world and are enjoying the benefits, but still have communist dictatorships.”

 The young North Korean leader perhaps realizes an agreement is needed for his government and country to survive, said Lester Munson, former staff director of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where he negotiated committee priorities with the White House.

 “Clearly the current model is not sustainable long term,” Munson told The Daily Signal. “This country has had this system for 65 years. The norm for these types of oppressive regimes to survive is 70 years.”

5. What Must US Expect on Human Rights?

Trump administration officials said human rights haven’t been a focus of early talks, but experts say these matters will have to be addressed before any final agreement.

 “How do we not defend our values in a negotiation like this if we guarantee security to a despot with a record of doing terrible things to his people?” Munson said. “That is not a place we want to be. Human rights has to be part of any agreement. We cannot turn a blind eye to that.”

 North Korean prison camps contain between 80,000 and 120,000 prisoners, according to a report by Olivia Enos, policy analyst for Asian studies at The Heritage Foundation. Enos is in Singapore.

 “While the focus of the summit should no doubt be on convincing North Korea to abandon its missile and nuclear weapons programs, the U.S. should also raise concerns over North Korea’s abhorrent human rights record,” Enos writes. “If the U.S. is prepared to call for complete, verifiable, irreversible dismantlement of North Korea’s nuclear program, it should also be prepared to call for complete, verifiable, irreversible dismantlement of its vast system of prison camps.”

 Trump addressed North Korea’s horrible human rights abuses during speeches at the South Korean National Assembly, during the State of the Union, and when meeting with escapees from North Korea.

6. What Role Will China Play?

China could play a constructive or destructive role in the negotiations, and Kim might enjoy playing the two superpowers against one another.

 Heiman, the former Justice Department national security lawyer, said he wouldn’t compare the meeting with Nixon and Mao, but said China could have a critical impact. “China parted with the Soviets and became more aligned with the U.S.,” Heiman said of the result of the U.S. opening trade with China. “This meeting could move North Korea closer to the U.S. than China.

 For the Trump team, the primary goal is denuclearization. But the secondary goal has to be a strategy of a Chinese disadvantage.” Heiman said it’s to China’s advantage to keep a stable North Korea that poses a nuclear threat to U.S. allies Japan, South Korea, and other competitors in Asia.

 However, Boykin said he believes that ultimately China will be on board.

 “China does not want a unified Korea that is aligned with the West, but they don’t want war on the peninsula,” Boykin said. “That would only end one way. Kim would be dead and North Korea would be occupied by the U.S. military, with the potential threat, as in the 1950s, of a conflict with China.”

                     

[Bullheaded Texan]

Trump arrives in Singapore ahead of historic North Korea summit.

 Updated 8:57 AM ET, 6/10/18 

Singapore - President Donald Trump touched down in this Southeast Asian city-state Sunday evening, 36 hours before his highly anticipated summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is set to kick off.

 Trump arrived on Air Force One at Singapore's Paya Lebar Air Base at 8:21 p.m. local time, where he was greeted by Singapore's Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.

  Kim Jong Un arrived at Singapore's commercial airport on an Air China Boeing 747 just more than five hours earlier.

 Trump, asked by reporters as he arrived in Singapore how feels about the summit, said "very good" before climbing into his limousine and heading to the hotel.

 The US President flew to Singapore from Canada, where he participated in an especially contentious G7 summit that came after he triggered a trade dispute with several of the US' closest allies.

 The quick succession of combative G7 meetings and his arrival in Singapore for a summit with North Korea's dictator set up a striking contrast best captured by a pair of tweets Trump issued after leaving Canada in which he slammed Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as "very dishonest & weak" and reneged on US plans to sign a joint communique with the G7 leaders. 

 Trump, asked by reporters as he arrived in Singapore how feels about the summit, said "very good" before climbing into his limousine and heading to the hotel.

The US President flew to Singapore from Canada, where he participated in an especially contentious G7 summit that came after he triggered a trade dispute with several of the US' closest allies.

 "Based on Justin's false statements at his news conference, and the fact that Canada is charging massive Tariffs to our U.S. farmers, workers and companies, I have instructed our U.S. Reps not to endorse the Communique as we look at Tariffs on automobiles flooding the U.S. Market!" Trump tweeted.

 PM Justin Trudeau of Canada acted so meek and mild during our G7 meetings only to give a news conference after I left saying that, “US Tariffs were kind of insulting” and he “will not be pushed around.” Very dishonest & weak. Our Tariffs are in response to his of 270% on dairy!  

 Hours earlier, Trump had claimed his relationship with Trudeau and the leaders of France and Germany "is a 10" and slammed a CNN reporter as "fake news" for suggesting the US' ties with its closest allies had frayed.

During that same impromptu news conference at the G7, Trump said he felt optimistic about his meeting with Kim, which will be the first between a sitting US president and North Korean leader. But he also made clear Kim has a "one-time shot."

 "I feel that Kim Jong Un wants to do something great for his people, and he has that opportunity. And he won't have that opportunity again. It's never going to be there again," Trump said on Saturday. "He's got an opportunity, the likes of which I think almost -- if you look into history -- very few people have ever had. He can take that nation, with those great people, and truly make it great. So, it's a one-time -- it's a one-time shot. And I think it's going to work out very well."

[Bullheaded Texan]

 President Trump just tweeted that his Economic Advisor Larry Kudlow just suffered a heart attack:

 Trump announced on social media. 6/11/18

"Our Great Larry Kudlow, who has been working so hard on trade and the economy, has just suffered a heart attack. He is now in Walter Reed Medical Center". - President Trump

 Kudlow, 70, a former Reagan aide and CNBC host became President Trump's Economic Advisor in March 2018.
Kudlow's wife gave an update:
 Judy Kudlow to WashPost tonight. Note: she always wants to avoid being in public spotlight, but understands there is misinformation out there. "He's doing fine. Doctors here are fabulous."

 

[Bullheaded Texan]

 Terrifying Latin Gang Creates Chaos at Maryland Middle School.

  06/11/2018 by: AAN Staff

MS-13 gang members have created chaos at a Maryland Middle School a mere 10 miles from the White House.
 A stunning expose in the Washington Post details that a handful of gang members at Wirt Middle School in the suburb of Riverdale have openly threatened students, teachers, sold drugs, and are initiating fights. 

 Meanwhile, cowardly school administrators and negligent police officers seem content to ignore the root of the problem. (Hot Air)
 Gang-related fights are now a near-daily occurrence at Wirt, where a small group of suspected MS-13 members at the overwhelmingly mexicano school show gang signs, sell drugs, draw gang graffiti and aggressively recruit students recently arrived from Central America, according to more than two dozen teachers, parents and students. Most of those interviewed asked not to be identified for fear of losing their jobs or being targeted by MS-13.
 Although administrators deny Wirt has a gang problem, the situation inside the aging, overcrowded building has left some teachers so afraid that they refuse to be alone with their students. Many said they had repeatedly reported incidents involving suspected gang members to administrators, only to be ignored — claims supported by documents obtained by The Washington Post.
 “Teachers feel threatened but aren’t backed up. Students feel threatened but aren’t protected,” one educator said. “The school is a ticking time bomb.”…
 One educator was stunned when, at the beginning of the school year, a handful of students continually shouted obscenities and threw objects around the classroom. The educator soon noticed the same students scrawling “MS-13” on papers, desks and their skin. They bullied mexican-speaking classmates and sexually harassed the girls in class.

 Several students openly counted cash, allegedly money earned from selling marijuana in Wirt’s bathrooms, transactions that a student and several parents also described to The Post.

 Administrators have so far brushed aside all complaints, including one from a 14-year-old girl who claimed gang members raped her.

 The girl reported the incident to the police, but without support from her school, the girl recanted, apparently terrified that the gang would retaliate. Despite changing her mind, she later claimed a fellow classmate threatened her with a gun.
 Thirty-two students were suspended for the remainder of the year and the police responded to calls on campus 74 times as of May 1.

 That may sound like a serious response, but because the ringleaders act with impunity, the number of fights continues to rise!
 It's a small wonder no one has been killed yet at this suburban middle school turned prison.
Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/terrifying-latin-gang-create...

 

[Bullheaded Texan]

 Pompeo: NoKo Summit Is a 'Mission of Peace'.

 6/11/18 8:40 AM

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters Monday the historic meeting to take place between President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is “truly a mission of peace.”

 He reiterated that the goal of the summit remains the same: “the complete, and verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.”

 The meeting is set to take place Tuesday morning (Monday evening Washington time), when the leaders will talk one-on-one.

 "North Korea has previously confirmed to us its willingness to denuclearize, and we are eager to see if those words prove sincere," Pompeo said. "The fact that our two leaders are sitting down face to face is a sign of the enormous potential to accomplish something that will immensely benefit both of our peoples and the entire world."

 Pompeo added the U.S. is "hopeful" the summit will "set the conditions for future productive talks."

But North Korea’s complete denuclearization is “the only outcome that the United States will accept,” Pompeo said, and sanctions will not be lifted until that happens.

 Many analysts have suggested that the discussion about denuclearization means very different things to North Koreans than it does to American officials.

 That is, experts suggest Pyongyang may only agree to give up its nukes in exchange for the U.S. terminating its military presence in South Korea and ending its regional nuclear umbrella, a security arrangement in which Washington promises in-kind retaliation on behalf of close allies if they are attacked with nuclear weapons.

 Pompeo appeared to address that sort of North Korean concern on Monday, saying "President Trump recognizes Chairman Kim's desire for security and is prepared to ensure a North Korea free of weapons of mass destruction is also a secure North Korea."

 Responding to a reporter's question on the subject, the secretary of state added that the U.S. is "prepared to take actions that will provide North Korea sufficient certainty that they can be comfortable that denuclearization isn't something that ends badly for them." (CNBC)

 Commenting on his upcoming meeting with the North Korean dictator, President Trump said he will know very quickly whether the summit is going to be fruitful.  “You know they say you know if you like somebody in the first five seconds?  I think that very quickly I’ll know whether or not something good is going to happen,” Trump predicted Saturday. “I also think I’ll know whether or not it will happen fast ... it may not.”

[Bullheaded Texan]

 A look at what to expect from the Kim-Trump summit.

 6/11/18

SINGAPORE  — After a sudden and welcome turn to diplomacy following last year's threats, insults and fears of war — remember "fire and fury" and "dotard"? — Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un are ready to shake hands, sit down face-to-face and ... do what exactly?

 Some observers insist that it's the beginning of the complete denuclearization of North Korea. No, no, say others, you need to manage your expectations. This is just an elaborate get-to-know-you session, albeit between the two most famous leaders in the world, and nuclear armed at that.

 Actually, says another group, there will indeed be disarmament, a peace treaty ending the Korean War and North Korea's emergence as a contributing member of the international community — but just not right now.

 Whatever the results, it will be one of the more unusual summits in recent history as a flamboyant, often erratic U.S. president gets a close-up look at a hereditary socialist despot who sits on a nuclear weapons program.

 Here's a look at how Tuesday's first-ever meeting between the leaders of North Korea and the United States might turn out:

 WHAT DOES SUCCESS LOOK LIKE?

Success in Singapore would see Kim making a bold decision to exchange his nukes for economic support and security assurances, according to Ryan Haas, an Asia expert at the John L. Thornton China Center. Both leaders would offer "clear, specific, unequivocal statements" outlining a dismantlement of North Korean weapons, an inventory and removal of all nuclear fuel and an opening up to U.N. nuclear inspectors.

 Trump has faced intense pressure to win something similar to this.

A group of opposition Democratic lawmakers in the United States said in a statement that if Trump, a Republican, wants approval for a deal that allows an easing of sanctions on North Korea, he needs to get the permanent dismantlement and removal of "every single one of North Korea's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons," end all military nuclear fuel production and missile and nuclear tests, and persuade Pyongyang to "commit to robust compliance inspections including a verification regime for North Korea's nuclear and ballistic missile programs."

 This is a very high bar and probably unrealistic after one meeting. Laboriously negotiated past nuclear deals, considered breakthroughs at the time, broke down on North Korea's extreme sensitivity to allowing in outsiders to look at whether they're dismantling their nuclear facilities, many of which are thought to be hidden.

 "While a summit between Trump and Kim would be historic, it is unlikely to be decisive. This is not the fault of either Trump or Kim, but rather a reflection that intractable, decades-long strategic challenges rarely-if ever-get resolved in single encounters," Haas writes.

 SHOULD WE LOWER OUR EXPECTATIONS?

Probably. In fact, Trump has been doing quite a bit of this lately.

What was initially portrayed by the White House as a summit meant to completely rid the North of its nuclear weapons is now being cast as a chance to "start a dialogue" and for Trump the dealmaker to look into the eyes and take the measure of his nuclear-armed antagonist.

 Ferial Saeed, a former State Department official, writes that the summit will be a "getting to know you meeting, 'plus.' That means, lower your expectations, and that the president is likely to lean toward keeping his own counsel and eschew a script. The 'plus' refers to discussions on ending the Korean War."

 China, both Koreas and the United States would have to sign off on any legally binding treaty, so it is unlikely Kim and Trump will do more than express an intention to end the war.

 Trump, after meeting recently with a North Korean envoy at the White House, said the summit will likely be part of "a process. I told them today, take your time. We can go fast, we can go slowly," Trump said.

 "That is an extraordinary offer of flexibility, considering (North Korea) poses a direct security threat to the United States," according to Saeed.

 In part, these lowered expectations are a reflection of the extreme skepticism among many that the North can be persuaded to give up a nuclear program it has stubbornly built over the decades, often in secrecy and despite intense sanctions, international condemnation and widespread suffering among its people.

 "There is no chance to make North Korean leaders ... surrender their nuclear weapons," Andrei Lankov, a Korea expert at Seoul's Kookmin University, wrote recently on a Washington-based Asia newsletter. "They see denuclearization as a collective suicide (and they are probably right). However, now there are good chances to push North Korean nuclear/missile program back, for many years perhaps, and keep it that way for some time."

 WHAT IF THE SUMMIT FAILS?

If things fall apart, it could be because "Trump presents Kim with a hard-and-fast binary choice: relinquish nuclear weapons and live in peace and prosperity, or cling to them and risk the impoverishment of your people and the safety of your regime," Haas said.

 A failure Tuesday doesn't necessarily mean a return to the animosity of 2017.

That's in part because of South Korea's diplomatic outreach to the North, which was highlighted by two summits this spring between the rivals' leaders.

 If Trump and Kim fail in Singapore, "the result may be to enhance North Korean dependency on Seoul and Beijing as safety valves against the prospect of renewal of U.S.-North Korean confrontation," according to Scott Snyder, a Korea expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.

  "This circumstance in and of itself provides a new buffer against the prospect of military escalation in Korea that was not present at the end of 2017."

[Bullheaded Texan]

Liberals Put the Final Nail in California's Coffin.

 05/23/2018 Source: AAN  by: Remington Strelivo 

Mexifornia is weighing a plan to become the first state in the country to offer free healthcare coverage to illegal immigrants.
 Orange County Supervisor Michelle Steel, who represents the traditionally Republican coastal country in Southern Mexifornia, slammed the plan.
 "It's going to be a utopia for illegal aliens," warned Steel during an interview on Fox Business, claiming that such a giveaway would result in a wave of illegal aliens from both other states and other countries.
  "You’re getting welfare benefits, you have free healthcare coverage, and then you can hide because government itself is protecting these people even if they commit crimes," she added.
 Steel also attacked the cost of the plan -- which is predicted to be more than $3 billion in the 2018-2019 budget year alone, according to the state's Legislative Analyst's Office. Steel claimed that the actual total could be a lot more.  "When they say it's $3 billion, you don't know how much it’s going to cost," Steel added. "We're talking about 1.2 million people."
 Billions of dollars in added expenses, especially for a giveaway to illegal aliens, would add to the state's $1.5 trillion debt -- something that Steel finds unacceptable.
 "How are you going to add more money for health care coverage for illegals?" she asked. "I mean this is almost like obnoxious."
 The plan might have a chance of passing in deeply-liberal Mexifornia, where Democrats hold the state legislature and the governor's mansion.

 It could cause a massive backlash that could help revitalize the shattered state Republican Party.
"It would give Republicans relevance in Mexifornia they would never have before," predicted David McCuan, a political analyst and political science professor at Sonoma State University. McCuan predicted that Republicans could see a swelling of support over the proposal, which could also attract many of the states millions of independent voters.

[Bullheaded Texan]

Key Evidence Goes Missing in New Dem Scandal.
06/08/18 Source: AAN
 Florida Representative debbie wasserman schultz employed now indicted IT staffer Imran Awan for 13 years.
Awan and his brothers were begrudgingly fired after a lengthy investigation discovered they accessed restricted computer networks for the House Intel. and Foreign Affairs committees without permission – also known as hacking.
 Although federal prosecutors seemed willing to extend Imran a plea deal RELATED: NEW Dem Scandal Explodes With Possible Plea Deal), we're suddenly finding out the Awan brothers' server along with compelling evidence in the case has gone missing. DUH
 The bombshell could turn the painstaking hacking probe into disarray. (The Epoch Times)

The server had disappeared just weeks before Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), who was the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, left his position to become California’s attorney general.

 Police had informed Becerra that the server was the subject of an investigation and had requested a copy of it, the Daily Caller News Foundation reported last year, based on an account from a senior official.

 The official also said that the police were provided with an elaborate falsified image of the server.

According to the inspector general, the Awans made numerous unauthorized logins to systems of House members. Besides the members they worked for, they also accessed servers of 15 House representatives they didn’t work for.

"DON'T ASK ME, I DON'T KNOW WHERE IT WENT."