more on the illegal potus

[wakeupamerica]

http://unitedcivilrights.org/uscode-v-obama.html

11-03-09 [ don't see all the links? view this, online at: http://unitedcivilrights.org/uscode-v-obama.html ]
Greetings to all Plaintiff parties, counsel, and thousands of supporters, behind a selection of m-a-n-y Obama "eligibility" cases filed within the States' and U.S. federal court systems.
[ see list of all the many original recipients, online at: http://unitedcivilrights.org/uvo-distribution.html ]

The legal info below shall end the faux "Presidency", and shall result in: Re-Election 2010

Or, since the Constitution requires all VP candidates to *separately* run: Re-Election 2010

As provided to you all below, the various hammering statutory laws of the United States Code "shall.." be plenty enough to expose all of the pertinent records for Mr. Obama's lack-of-citizenship, lack-of-natural-born-status, and, accordingly, his utter lack of valid eligibility for the Presidency. No more caselaw, legal doctrine, or anything else that provides the judges any sort of "discretion"... These are the commanding statutes of the United States, and Obama "shall" vacate the office.

The main "social" and "political" problem? Lack of solid direction in having the new/proper Administration already to go, so that the transition of power, itself, is fairly described, predictable, definable, and reasonably dependable in confidence to the American public, especially under such an unusual Constitutional situation... Therefore, and pursuant to the Constitution's express design, I have provided the correct Acting President and Acting Vice-President, below, and also proposed a well-balanced selection of the entire new Joint Administration Cabinet's twenty-one (21) officials, most of whom are well-known.

Cheers and Blessings in Constitutional Truth,
little ol' me


Why haven't any of you used the simple power of the United States Code mandates that are directly on point??

Like, as in, uhm?.. U.S.C. Title 44, Chapter 22: "PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS"
[Thank veteran Congress members for passing the Presidential Records Act of 1978]

The statutory law of the United States Code is extremely clear, even often in multiple ways, that:
a) the AG *cannot* represent/defend Obama in any challenge that involves a question of his citizenship, for the relevant statutory laws mandate that the AG be on the *prosecuting* side against Obama, if the AG is involved, at all... In fact, whether intentional or not, Obama and Holder can be hit with "constructive fraud", at the very least...
b) the AG also *cannot* represent/defend Senators or the Senate body, itself, in these constitutional questions, either... Again, whether intentional or not, you have that "constructive fraud" against the rule of law thing again...
c) there are various statutory standings provided for even "mere" individual Citizens to sue Obama, Congress, etc.
d) Obama's "Presidential records" are expressly PUBLIC by mandate of simple written law (and, combined with using AG Holder & U.S. Attorneys, i.e., our *taxdollars*, in an expressly-unconstitutional manner, defending Obama in any citizenship issues, then Obama gets to pay back every single red cent of that $1.7+ million spent so far... plus interest and penalties, naturally... plus, getting deported, or imprisoned, or whatever else...).
e) additionally, there are all sorts of various federal agencies/heads to statutorily go after Obama's eligibility through.

I have detailed and provided the direct links to all of these applicable federal statutes, below.


Of course, we all know that Obama and his agents have fully admitted his dual-citizenship at birth, which precludes him from ever being President, even notwithstanding the obviously-suspicious concealment of virtually all pertinent records...

Who, then, are the lawful United States Prez and VP, per the original Constitution, right now, at this very moment??
That's easy enough to answer:
1. Mr. John McCain, Republican, *is* the President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.
2. Mr Ralph Nader, Independent, *is* the Vice-President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.
(and, those two are not my personal combo pick, but that IS the result of law per the original Constitution, so fine...).

Oh, and no worries about any "vacuum of power" anxiousness, because of this proposed new Joint Cabinet to be used during the temporary period, accepting this well-balanced set of American leaders (yes, every person listed is eligible and legally qualified to hold the position indicated - you better believe I double-checked that, first...):
http://www.editgrid.com/user/indianacrc/newJointCabinet
America needs officials that actually have skill and talent, as our Cabinet - not always a bunch of political flunkies. Further, I have balanced the new proposed Cabinet as 1/3 Dem, 1/3 Rep, and 1/3 all other legally-"major" parties, also indicated an increase in the number of resulting women upon the President's Cabinet, and additionally sought more harmonious balance within religious and ideological characteristics of the group of officials, plus added geographical and age diversity into the mix, so as to well-represent the vast majority of America, as the temporary power *within* the White House... you see.


NOTICE RE: MDL CONSOLIDATION OF "OBAMA ELIGIBILITY" CASES:

Since, even after allowing an entire year now since the fraudulent 2008 General Election, it STILL seems that nobody is able to get actually serious enough to throw a flagrantly-obvious impostor/usurper out of office, in using the court system and the laws already in force, it seems there's no choice but to soon enter into each of your own respective cases, immediately move to consolidate them all together under MDL (federal Multi-District Litigation), and maybe also bump it up into a huge mass-action or class-action suit, allowing for each and every U.S. Citizen, Taxpayer, Voter and Landowner to be able to self-join/self-intervene by geography (i.e., by jurisdiction), using simple checkbox "legal standing" forms made available online, and then self-filed per each of their own respective Divisional courthouses. And, I just happen to have a nationwide network of 3200+ online groups (for every single State, County, Parish, Borough and Independent City across the whole country) to actually do it, if really needed... That is, unless I can finally see some serious progress made *by the others leading* in these various "NObama" impostor/usurper cases still active in any court, and that good progress implemented in the most urgently quick and direct fashion, by using any or all of the legal info/ammo provided below.


APPLICABLE STATUTES RE: OBAMA'S "PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS":

Let's start out with THE most basic/direct way to end all of this nonsense, once and for all, ok???

A simple review of United States Code, Title 44, Chapter 22: "Presidential Records", provides what is needed.

Title 44, CHAPTER 22 — PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sup_01_44_10_22...
§ 2201. Definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002201...
i.e., Obama's "Presidential records", including all *Constitutional* and similar official documentation, are expressly NOT protected to any forms of privacy or concealment allowed, like his "personal records" are allowed to be..
and, indeed, since the United States now actually OWNS those same "Presidential records", and not Obama!, see
§ 2202. Ownership of Presidential records
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002202...
then the United States has NO possible legitimate reason, whatsoever!, to withhold documentation - from ITSELF, hint, hint - of the question of existence, or not, of the properly authenticated qualifications of Mr. Obama, et al... i.e., of it's own "CEO"... No, the "shareholders" of America are absolutely entitled to see authentication, proven and confirmed.

IN FACT, it is actually Obama's **STATUTORY DUTY** to ensure his "Presidential records" are made public...!!!
§ 2203. Management and custody of Presidential records
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002203...
and, to the point necessary:
§ 2204. Restrictions on access to Presidential records
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002204...
paragraph (c)(1) of which provides that those "Presidential records", i.e., THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND ANY OTHER SUCH "QUALIFICATIONS" DOCUMENTATION, "shall" be made public, pursuant to
Title 5, § 552. Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00000552...

Sooo.. merely use the existing jurisdiction of your current "eligibility" case, to subpoena the relevant collection of "Presidential records" from the Archivist and/or National Archives and Records Administration, pursuant to
§ 2205. Exceptions to restricted access
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002205...
under paragraph (2)(A) thereof, and, VOILA! Case closed, slam-dunk, Obama IS done. Over and out. The end.

(and Mr. McCain and Mr. Nader take over White House power until the Re-Election is held promptly thereafter, as acting President and acting Vice-President, per the original selection process order under the original Constitutional design, as the Presidential vote-getters # 2 and # 3 behind invalid Obama, who is not a natural born Citizen, "failed to qualify", etc.)

For further pertinent records handling info, see also:
CHAPTER 29—RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY THE ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sup_01_44_10_29...
and
CHAPTER 31—RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY FEDERAL AGENCIES
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sup_01_44_10_31...



REGARDING CONSTANT FAILURES VIA "STANDING" ISSUES:

Also, after all of these many cases **continually dismissed** for ONE recurring issue - i.e., STANDING TO SUE - I am simply a-m-a-z-e-d that none of the present cases, with maybe the exception of Donofrio, and that only to a limited degree, have even remotely-adequately addressed any of several available, concrete-solid standing postures of virtually any U.S. Citizen, eligible Voter, Taxpayer, Landowner, or the like. The wide range of standing postures at option includes all manner of first-person, second-person, and third-party standing scenario availabilities. Here, for those of you that wish to learn about LEGAL STANDING, are just several online options, of many out there, to begin with:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_(law)
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/s064.htm
http://dictionary.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/results.pl?co=www.findlaw....
http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/standing
http://www.yourdictionary.com/law/standing
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/563064/standing-to-sue
http://www.answers.com/topic/standing-to-sue
http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title4/civ... (i.e., "the Government ADMITS...")
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-StandingToSue.html
Sooo, as merely a FEW examples, only, there are easy, straightforward uses of either vertical and/or horizontal ‘privity’ for bulletproof standing, due to the running of Hillary Clinton, Dr. Keyes, and etc. against Mr. Obama for the same position – i.e., “Berg ex rel. Clinton v. Obama, et al.” or "Taitz ex rel. Keyes v. Obama, et al." - so as to not even be requiring the person of interest to be the petitioning party, in the first place... let alone the power of using the direct petitioning parties, themselves, if using ADEQUATE standing authorities... written into play... Then, there's an entire myriad of standing options under compelling various federal officers to do THEIR duty to investigate Obama's qualifications, see even the multiple *statutory* standings provided below. There's also other legal relational standings, like fiduciary duties of one person/entity to another.. hint, hint.. And, there were/are plenty of other solid, indisputable, and basic foundations for full legal standing for use in play, including, but not limited to, arguments under and via ‘collateral contract’, ‘trusts’, ‘agency’, and the ‘assignment of contractual rights.’ And, again, there's the direct legal standings of voters, taxpayers, and each Citizen... the KEY is all is well as long as the proper amount of binding authority is finally brought into written play, first! There is *overwhelming* authority on establishing *all kinds* of standing, so what IS the problem so far in sadly systemic, routine failures by "eligibility" Plaintiffs to adequately address the wide variety of indisputable STANDING authorities???

Heck, I, as a mere Citizen, have full standing by my own Citizenship, and its attributes of voting, paying taxes, Obama's and/or the Fed's and State's fiduciary duties to me, and also as a landowner, if I owned land at the moment.. Moreover, I have standing, again, but in the second/third-person, as "ex rel" on behalf of any other Citizen, to protect his or her Rights and Interests, as their "next friend", and the same "ex rel" on behalf of any part of Government towards another part, etc...

Remember, you are guaranteed a "remedy" for a wrong, Constitutionally... Gad-zoinks people!!!, even also under the Federal Constitution, there is *explicit* Citizen standing already provided. See Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1... cf. Amendments 9 & 10... see also Art. IV, Sec. 4, first participle/clause. You can also achieve citizen standing through being denied the right to a *meaningful* vote, and therefore making challenge under Amendment XIV, Section 2 (to compel changing the local basis of representation, duh, even if that is not your *primary* goal.. hint, hint..). Now then, go back and read the end of that First Amendment again..


But, enough about the utter joke of standing.. The following list is a selection of MANY statutory ways to throw Obama "out da house", quickly. Please now implement and use at least SOME of them in your own cases, right away, so that I can get back to preparing other key God, Country, and Family issues (SepChurchState, Creation-Evolution, ElectionFraud, Economy/SocialPrograms, FedRsrv/GoldStd/Dollar, rebalance of power, individual liberties, limited government, etc.), for their actual restorations, via a brand new kind of huge federal legal challenge, to get us back at least close to the Framers' original Constitutional design and intent, as soon as it is possible for one poor man to get it all frickin' done, and done right.

Yeah, that's right. I have chosen to live near poverty for years now, fighting part-time or more for restoration of America.
If you like my help, I could sure use donations, left side on http://unitedcivilrights.org, to upgrade to full-time restoration.

read more here - http://unitedcivilrights.org/uscode-v-obama.html