We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

Not good .. Obama and administration trying to change military oath to President and NOT the Consitutition!

Conservative News and Reporting
"News for the Rest of Us"
Michele Chang

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.

"The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself." the spokesman said, "At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution."

The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes to far.

"Technically, we can't talk about it before it becomes official policy." the spokesman continued. "However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass."

Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.

"The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib."

"We expect a lot of flak over this," ! the clas sified memo continues. "But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control."

The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years.

Views: 117

Comment

You need to be a member of We The People USA to add comments!

Join We The People USA

Comment by Richard Hjelte on February 1, 2009 at 1:20am
In my opinion, comments like this are put out to test the waters by those who want to implement "change." If there isn't a strong outrage that such a thing is being considered, they make plans to implement the change and try to put it through when people are least aware. Only if there is a strong pushback will they back pedal and say "it was just satire!" It's important for us to check such rumors thoroughly and try to only publish the truth, but there are times when we must say, "this is what I've heard - does anyone have corroboration or is this just a hoax?"
Comment by WTPUSA on January 31, 2009 at 4:33pm
If anyone can verify that this is actually true, please let me know asap. Otherwise, this could be something that was put out there to take our attention away from the important issues that we are dealing with today, like the passage of the SCHIP bill and the probable passage of the Economic Stimulus plan. We have to keep our eye on the ball, but you're right, we should keep our eyes and ears wide open.
Comment by Timothy P. Mayhak on January 31, 2009 at 3:43pm
God and Country (the Constitution) that's my agenda and I have it in the correct order too!!! Nothing else matters!!
Comment by wakeupamerica on January 29, 2009 at 6:04pm
let us hope it is satire but i wouldnt close my eyes if i were you keep ears and eyes open at all times

nwo bible prophecy coming true before our eyes whether we like it or not
Comment by Jesse S. on January 29, 2009 at 5:43pm
I hope so Jean. As Obama would say, "leave nothing to chance". It should be followed up on nonetheless.

Afterall, it would be a logical step in destroying further phasing out the Constitution.
Comment by WTPUSA on January 29, 2009 at 5:31pm
I think this is satire. I'm pretty sure this is not true.
Comment by Jesse S. on January 29, 2009 at 3:26pm
Yeah, this wouldn't be good .. this is dictatorial in nature and nothing but.
Comment by wakeupamerica on January 29, 2009 at 3:20pm
here is the website http://www.stopnaustopspp.org/stopnauw_002.htm


i knew this was coming any of us following the bible prophecies and nwo could see this coming this is what i was afraid of i sure hope our military and everyone will fight this or we are in big trouble
i heard some say they will not change their oath but then i also heard our military is being indoctrinated too like ayers and the colleges so God help us
Comment by WTPUSA on January 29, 2009 at 2:41pm
Exerpt from Military.com

Unlike the oath administered to enlisted personnel, the officer oath says nothing about obeying “the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me.” Officers merely swear or affirm that they will “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” This ensures, among other things, that officers have no moral obligation of obedience or loyalty to any individual in their chain of command--including the commander in chief--that trumps their duty to the Constitution.
Comment by WTPUSA on January 29, 2009 at 2:26pm
This is a link to the original article. http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2009/01/military-to-pledge-oath-to-obama-not.html

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service