The Border & Illegal Aliens, And What We Are Doing About It.

[Bullheaded Texan]

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said.

“We are not going to let this country be invaded!

We will not be stampeded!

We will not capitulate to lawlessness!

This is NOT business as usual.

This is the Trump era!," the Attorney General said.
 

[Landel Cathcart]

Classified Photo Released Of Hero Dog Who Hunted ISIS Terrorists.

 10/29/10 by  Kristina Wong 

 President Trump tweeted a photo of the hero dog who chased Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi into a tunnel, forcing him to blow himself up!

 “We have declassified a picture of the wonderful dog (name not declassified) that did such a GREAT JOB in capturing and killing the Leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi!” Trump tweeted.

 

3:02 PM - Oct 28, 2019

 ABC News reported that the dog’s breed is a Belgian Malinois — the same breed as the dog that was involved in the raid to get Osama bin Laden.

 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Mark Milley gave an update on the dog’s health during a press conference Monday.

“The dog is still in theater. The dog, the K-9, the military working dog performed a tremendous service as they all do in a variety of situations. Slightly wounded, and fully recovering, but the dog is still in theater, returned to duty with its handler,” Gen. Mark Milley said.

 Pentagon officials are also looking at whether the dog is eligible for a Purple Heart, but indicated it could depend on the extent of the injuries.

 Trump praised the dog,“Our K-9, as they are called — I call it a dog, a beautiful dog, a talented dog — was injured and brought back. But we had no soldier injured,” he said.during a press conference on Monday

 Trump indicated that the dog chased al-Baghdadi into a tunnel which prevented U.S. forces from being hurt.

“It’s incredible that nobody was killed — or hurt. We had nobody even hurt. And that’s why the dog was so great,” Trump said.

 Trump also said the U.S. forces involved in the operation will be invited to the White House.

“They’ll be invited. I don’t know if they’ll want to have their faces shown, to be honest with you. You know, they want to — they’re incredible for the country. They’re not looking for public relations,” he said.

“But they love doing what they’re doing. I’ve seen it. The first lady was out there recently looking at what they do. She came back; she said, ‘Wow, I’ve never seen anything like that.’ The training — you know, all of the training — and the power of the people,” Trump continued. “The men and women, the strength, the physical strength, the mental strength. These are incredible people. These are very unique individuals.”

 

 

[Landel Cathcart]

President Trump Announces The Death Of Another Major ISIS Leader.

 10/30/19  by William Davis

 President Donald Trump announced the death of another ISIS leader Tuesday, saying that U.S. forces killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s replacement.

 President Trump did not name the terrorist who U.S. troops purportedly took out, but claimed that he would have been Baghdadi’s “number one replacement.”

“Just confirmed that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s number one replacement has been terminated by American troops,” the president said on Twitter. “Most likely would have taken the top spot – Now he is also Dead!”

 Al-Baghdadi died in a U.S. raid over the weekend in Northern Syria after nearly a decade as one of the world’s most wanted terrorists. Al-Baghdadi became the head of ISIS in 2013, and participated in the brutal rape and murder of Arizona woman Kayla Mueller in 2015.

 Trump said Al-Baghdadi died “whimpering and screaming, He died after running into a dead end tunnel, whimpering and crying and screaming all the way,” Trump said.in a Sunday morning speech.

 The killing of Al-Baghdadi and his replacement mark a major victory for the U.S. and the Trump Administration over ISIS, at a time when the president has faced significant criticism from both sides of the aisle over his policy in the region.

 

[Landel Cathcart]

Trump Tasks Next DHS Chief with Major Border Goal.

by The Bearded Patriot about 6 hours ago

 President Trump’s signature campaign promise was to build a big beautiful wall to secure our southern border. While progress has been made, most of the border is lacking this barrier. Past Department of Homeland Security chiefs have dropped the ball. In fact, they seemed to oppose Trump’s agenda. But Trump has made his goals clear: the wall will go up in 2020.

 Under Trump, we’ve had two heads of the DHS. The first one seemed reluctant to secure funding and plans to build the wall. The second openly defied the president, all but accusing him of racism.

 It’s clear that far too many government officials are easily pressured by the D.C. swamp. They fear going all-in on Trump’s agenda, because they have their eyes on their future careers. Once Trump leaves office, they want cushy jobs with lobbying firms or other groups. Defying the corrupt D.C. machine would leave them in the cold. So they disobey their boss to curry the swamp’s favor.

Pathetic.

 But Trump hasn’t changed his vision for our country one bit since entering the White House. He is determined to secure our southern border—come hell or high water. He got rid of the last DHS head for his incompetence and is on the search for a new one. But this new guy better pay attention: Trump has big plans for him. President Trump’s next Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary will be tasked with completing more than 400 miles of border wall before the 2020 presidential election to fulfill the administration’s most crucial promise to voters…

Thus far, the Trump administration has built between 70 and 74 miles of border wall at the United States-Mexico border, with the process moving exceptionally slowly throughout 2017 and 2018 as then-DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen repeatedly failed to secure funding for the project…

 For years, DHS officials have been reluctant to release details on the number of miles of border wall constructed. In the last six months, though, DHS officials have routinely promised voters and Trump that they will have 500 miles of border wall fully constructed before the 2020 election — indicating that the project will need to move at a record pace to be completed in time.

 We know that the wall has been slow to go up, thanks to Congress. Even when Republicans had a majority in both the House and Senate, they refused to pass legislation to fund the wall. The swamp runs deep and there were far too many corrupt politicians who don’t want a secure border.

The head of the DHS has to fight to fulfill Trump’s vision. One of the big reasons the wall isn’t finished is because past DHS chiefs weren’t on board with Trump’s plans. They could have pushed to get funding, worked with lawmakers, and made things happen.= Instead, they sat on their hands as the fake news and D.C. swamp pushed them around.

President Trump needs fighters in his corner, not government flunkies who cower to the mob.

Regardless, the president has serious plans for the wall. He wants nearly 400 miles of border wall built by the next election!

 Sound impossible? Hardly. Trump is known for getting projects done on time and under budget. He has consistently defied the odds during his presidency. Even now Democrats scramble to oppose him with a bogus impeachment push—knowing their chances at success are slim.

  But the chances that Trump will succeed are very high.

He’s made good on nearly every campaign promise so far. The wall is simply a matter of time.

Even if most of it isn’t up by November 2020, Trump is in a good position.

  The real opposition comes from congressmen who don’t want the wall.

 All that Trump has to do is point to the D.C. swamp and their constant obstruction. Voters will come out in droves to tell Congress just what they think about them.

Maybe then they’ll finally get the message.

 

President Trump’s signature campaign promise was to build a big beautiful wall to secure our southern border. While progress has been made, most of the border is lacking this barrier. Past Department of Homeland Security chiefs have dropped the ball. In fact, they seemed to oppose Trump’s agenda. But Trump has made his goals clear: the wall will go up in 2020.

[Landel Cathcart]

ICE Drops a Half-Million-Dollar Charge On Illegal Alien Who’s Refusing To Leave The US

 10/23/10  By Jim Hayek

ICE is no longer fining several illegal aliens who are defying court orders to leave the United States, marking a reversal from several months prior, according to a letter.

 ICE told Daily Caller News Foundation that, while most of the charges have been dropped for now, these individuals are still unlawfully present in the U.S., and the decision could be reassessed in the future.

 One illegal alien allegedly hiding in a church for at least two years was charged nearly half a million dollars for remaining in the U.S. illegally, despite a judge’s order to leave.

 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is no longer charging illegal aliens hundreds of thousands of dollars for refusing to leave the United States, according to a letter sent to immigrant families.

 ICE — the agency tasked with carrying out immigration enforcement, including the deportation of illegal aliens — began mailing high-dollar fines in June to numerous foreign nationals who repeatedly ignored orders to leave the country, according to letters made public. One of the fines neared half a million dollars. However, in recent letters to these same illegal aliens, the agency said those fines have been retracted.

 An immigration judge told Edith Espinal Moreno, for example, to leave the country over two years ago. Instead of following the court’s ruling, Espinal has chosen to remain in a local church in Ohio with her children. The Mexican national received a letter from ICE in June, informing her that she owes the government a total of $497,777.

  

In what appears to be a major reversal, ICE sent her another letter earlier in October, informing her that the fine has been dropped.

“Following consideration of matters you forwarded for ICE review, and in the exercise of the its discretion under applicable regulations, ICE hereby withdraws the Notice of Intention to Fine,” ICE officer Lisa Hoechst wrote to Espinal in the letter, according to NPR.

Numerous other letters were doled out to illegal aliens who had been previously slapped with fines. Grassroots Leadership, a left-wing organization, published an Oct. 17 letter given to Hilda Ramirez-Mendez, notifying her that she no longer owed the agency money.

However, there is no reason for these illegal aliens to believe they are off the hook just yet. In a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation, the agency made clear that their decision to remain in the country is a violation of U.S. immigration law, and the decision to drop the fines could be reassessed in the future.

“These individuals are subject to final orders of removal and they remain in the United States in violation of law. ICE will pursue enforcement of these removal orders using any and all available means, and has reserved the right to reassess fines in these cases,” ICE spokesman Richard Rocha told the DCNF on Wednesday.

“ICE remains committed to utilizing this enforcement tool, as provided by Congress, which serves an important role in promoting compliance with our immigration laws,” he continued.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the government is authorized to impose civil fines on foreign nationals who defy orders to leave the U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order when he first entered office, pledging to collect fines and penalties owed from aliens unlawfully present in the country.

ICE issued Notice of Intention to Fine, or NIF, letters to nine illegal aliens in June. Eight of these NIFs have been dropped, but the agency is still pursuing one.

The way the government calculates how each alien is charged explains how the fines can become exorbitant over time.

“Existing Department of Homeland Security regulations have set the financial penalty for failing to voluntarily depart the United States at $3,000 — currently adjusted for inflation — unless an immigration judge specifically orders a higher or lower amount within a statutory range of between $1,000 and $5,000,” the agency stated. “Under the INA, the civil penalty for willfully refusing to depart the United States pursuant to a final order of removal is no more than $500 per day; currently adjusted to $799 due to inflation.”

[Landel Cathcart]

ICE Drops a Half-Million-Dollar Charge On Illegal Alien

By Jim Hayek October 23, 2019

 

Who’s Refusing To Leave The US!

 

[Landel Cathcart]

killary clinton Has Become Completely Delusional !

 10/17/19 by Joseph Curl 

 There’s a book you can buy on Amazon called “killary clinton in Wonderland,” a retelling of the Lewis Carroll classic with killary as the young heroine. Sound far-fetched? It isn’t. It’s real, and it works because clinton has been in a fantasy world since she lost to Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election!!

 In the months and years since her humiliating loss, she blamed James Comey, Russia, computer bots, WikiLeaks, Bernie Sanders, Facebook, Joe Biden, fake news, Twitter, voter ID laws, the vast right-wing conspiracy, sexism, barack obuma, ageism, Anthony Weiner, white women, xenophobia, black people, the Electoral College, the DNC, misogyny, and women cowed by their husbands.

 So we’ve got to wonder: What color is the sky in killary’s clinton’s world?

It never ends. clinton is still on TV all the time, and last week she came out with the most delusional statement yet, saying she could beat Trump “again.”

 Uh, killary, we have some terrible news. Really awful news. See, nearly three years ago, when we held a national election, YOU, um, LOST !

 Unbeknownst to you, apparently, America has this thing called the Electoral College.

It was designed by the Founding Fathers, in all their wisdom, and here’s how it works:

  Each state selects “electors” —  today, 538 in all — and to win the presidency, a candidate needs to have at least 270 electoral votes.

 Here’s where the bad news comes in, Killery. Yes, more people voted for you, and you won the popular vote 65,853,652 to 62,985,134. But that doesn’t matter. Not in the least. In the Electoral College, you lost — really, really bad!! Trump pulled in 304 electoral votes, and you got just 227.

 See, you lost Michigan and Wisconsin and Ohio and Pennsylvania and a whole bunch of other states.

In fact, Trump won 30 states, you won 20. And Trump won 2,626 counties while you won just 487.

 Trump, in a helpful post on Twitter last week, showed the map: Nearly all states were red, with a few small blue splotches on the coasts and in the Midwest.

 The president also posted a tweet in which he said he hoped clinton would run again. “I think that Crooked Killary clinton should enter the race to try and steal it away from Uber Left elizabeth warren. Only one condition. The Crooked one must explain all of her high crimes and misdemeanors including how & why she deleted 33,000 Emails AFTER getting ‘C’ Subpoena!” he wrote.

 killary, of course, had to respond. “Don’t tempt me. Do your job.”

But wait. She just said it — HIS job. So … he IS president. You didn’t really win after all.

 killary’s lucidity was fleeting. The two-time presidential loser, a short time later went on TV again to claim that Trump is “obsessed” with her.

 “It truly is remarkable how obsessed he remains with me,” she said on the PBS “News Hour.” “But this latest tweet is so typical of him. Nothing has been more examined and looked at than my emails. We all know that. So he’s either lying or delusional or both.Then she said, “Maybe there does need to be a rematch.=Obviously, I can beat him again. But, just seriously, I don’t understand, I don’t think anybody understands what motivates him other than personal grievance, other than seeking adulation.”   “Beat him again”?

 Some think clinton is getting ready to jump into the race. Former White House aide Steve Bannon has predicted she will make a third attempt for the presidency in 2020. “killary clinton is doing a whole thing,” he said on Fox Business. “She is running. She’s just throwing to decide how to fit her way in.”

 BNL News said last week that Hillary is “thinking about” entering the race. “BREAKING: killary clinton ‘thinking about’ running for President in 2020, according to multiple sources,” the site wrote on Twitter.

 Rasmussen Reports also reported that clinton performs well in an' imaginary' race against Trump, each garnering 45% with 11% undecided. “In a repeat matchup of the 2016 election, clinton runs dead even with President Trump, but even most Democrats don’t want her to get into the race,” the polling site wrote.

 The news wasn’t all good for killary. “Just 18% think clinton should enter the race for next year’s Democratic presidential nomination. 71% don’t think she should run,” Rasmussen wrote.

 But in clinton’s delusional world, she’s already beaten Trump once.

 Let’s hope she tries to beat him again.

*Joseph Curl ran the Drudge Report from 2010 to 2014 and covered the White House for a dozen years. He can be reached at [e-mail] and on Twitter at @JosephCurl. A version of this article ran previously in The Washington Times.

[Landel Cathcart]

Trump Erects Major New Wall in San Diego, Then This Happens

 10/17/10 .by  The Bearded Patriot

As Democrats push impeachment in D.C., Trump continues to win for Americans around the country.

 The media has all but buried news of his progress along the border. Yet despite their lack of coverage, Trump is erecting his big beautiful wall. New impressive barriers have been built in San Diego. And the locals have this to say about it.

 Let’s get one thing straight: the Democrats are running their impeachment hoax just to undermine Trump’s success. They’ve got nothing on the man. Yet they keep up this charade, knowing the fake news will report on it like it’s the most important thing in the world.

 But Americans aren’t fooled. We still want Congress to get off its butt and do something for the American people. They continue to obstruct Trump’s America First agenda. But as they waste time and tax dollars, Trump is getting things done.

 Since declaring a state of emergency earlier this year, the president has been able to relocate funds to get the border wall built. In key places across the border, he is erecting modern, un-climbable fencing. In some areas, the barrier system is double-layered, meaning it’s impossible for anyone to cross it.

 That’s the case in San Diego, where pathetic landing mat barriers have been replaced by an 18-foot bollard fencing, backed with a 30-foot barrier. The new system is 80% complete and border patrol is already saying it’s making a difference!

 They replace the 8-foot landing mats, which were often supported by a steel mesh behind that. The difference is dramatic!! But the barrier not only lowers apprehensions, it allows officers to make apprehensions more safely and closer to the border — rather than within border communities. Harrison says that, as a result, there has been a surge of construction taking place as better barriers go up, with construction of warehouses, housing, shopping outlets and restaurants. [Source: Fox News]

 Border Patrol could only sit and watch as migrants “trampled over” the old barrier to get into the country. It was zero% affective at keeping the border secure. The new construction is coinciding with a drop in apprehensions.

Why? Because as would-be illegals see the new barriers go up, they don’t even try! Every place that has this secure barrier system is seeing attempts at the border go down. Not only that, but thanks to the new border wall, companies feel safe enough to build near the border. Border Patrol said, in the past, they would have never considered building so close to the border. Crime was out of control. But now, because of Trump’s wall, they are building warehouses, even housing and shops.

 We’re seeing the border wall impacting the economy in ways nobody would have foreseen. Except, maybe President Trump.

 The new system isn’t just a wall. The double barrier contains a road between the bollard fencing. This provides Border Patrol an easy and safe way to patrol the border and apprehend or stop anyone trying to get in. In addition to this, there is new technology that aids agents, making their jobs much more efficient.

 It’s shocking to think that none of this was happening before Trump.

Our border was a revolving door for criminals, smugglers, and sex traffickers. But nobody in Washington cared. Border Patrol was overwhelmed and underequipped. Not a single president tried to make a difference.

 Today, things are rapidly turning around. President Trump is making good on his signature campaign promise to put Americans first and secure the border.

 What is the rest of Washington doing? Oh, they’re wasting your money trying to find dirt to remove Trump from office!  Wow. These people don’t deserve the jobs they have.

  2020 can’t come fast enough!!

 

[Landel Cathcart]

Dan Coats To Resign As Director Of National Intelligence; Trump Selects Rep. John Ratcliffe As Replacement.    

 7/29/10  By Gregg Re

 President Trump on Sunday announced that Texas GOP Rep. John Ratcliffe, a staunch White House ally, will replace Dan Coats as director of national intelligence (DNI), following months of speculation and public spats between the president and the intelligence community.

 The move prompted immediate outrage from many top Democrats who accused the president of seeking to appoint a blindly loyal 'yes-man' to the key post.

 A source close to the matter told Fox News that Coats never saw his 2017 appointment as a long-term proposition. Ratcliffe has been well-versed in the intelligence community after driving key sections of ongoing Republican-led probes into apparent Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses by the FBI and Justice Department, Fox News is told.

 Coats submitted his letter of resignation to President Trump on Sunday. Part of it read: “The Intelligence Community is stronger than ever, and increasingly well prepared to meet new challenges and opportunities. As we have previously discussed, I believe it is time for me to move on to the next chapter of my life.”  “Dan Coats, the current Director, will be leaving office on August 15th. I would like to thank Dan for his great service to our Country. The Acting Director will be named shortly.”

 “I am pleased to announce that highly respected Congressman John Ratcliffe of Texas will be nominated by me to be the Director of National Intelligence, A former U.S. Attorney, John will lead and inspire greatness for the Country he loves,” Trump added.

 Coats frequently appeared out of step with Trump during his two-year tenure, and their frayed relationship reflected broader divisions between the president and the government’s intelligence agencies. For instance, Coats revealed to then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigators how Trump, angry over investigations into links between his campaign and Russia, tried unsuccessfully in March 2017 to get him to make a public statement refuting any connection. “Coats responded that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has nothing to do with investigations and it was not his role to make a public statement on the Russia investigation,” Mueller’s report said.  And, last year at the Aspen Security Forum, Coats did a double-take when host Andrea Mitchell broke the news on stage that Vladimir Putin was planning a trip to Washington. “Say that again?” he asked, to laughter in the audience. “OK, that’s going to be special.” Coats later said he meant no disrespect to Trump and admitted the moment was “awkward.”

 “Some press coverage has mischaracterized my intentions in responding to breaking news presented to me during a live interview. My admittedly awkward response was in no way meant to be disrespectful or criticize the actions of the President,” Coats said.

 In a statement, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., condemned Ratcliffe’s selection and pointed to the congressman’s performance during last week’s hearings with Mueller.

 During his questioning, Ratcliffe told Mueller that he had acted improperly — and trampled on the presumption of innocence — by saying in his report that Trump had not been “exonerated.”

 “It’s clear that Rep. Ratcliffe was selected because he exhibited blind loyalty to President Trump with his demagogic questioning of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller,” Schumer said. “If Senate Republicans elevate such a partisan player to a position that requires intelligence expertise and non-partisanship, it would be a big mistake.”

 Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., meanwhile, responded: “I was very sorry to learn today that Director Coats will depart his position as Director of National Intelligence later this month. My friend and former colleague has devoted decades of his life in service to our country. I was reassured knowing that a man who took such a deliberate, thoughtful, and unbiased approach was at the helm of our intelligence community.”

 “The departure of DNI Coats is bad news for the security of America,” House Speaker nancy pukelosi, D-Calif., said. “DNI Coats’ successor must put patriotism before politics, and remember that his oath is to protect the Constitution and the American people, not the President.”

 Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., praised Coats’ tenure for staying “true” to the intelligence community’s mission and “speaking truth to power.”

 CNN national security analyst Shawn Turner, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Sen. elizabeth warren, D-Mass., and Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haass also each separately praised Coats specifically for “speaking truth to power” on social media — prompting Republican consultant Arthur Schwartz to note that “talking points have been distributed.”

 Reaction from Republican lawmakers to Ratcliffe’s selection appeared positive across the board. House Homeland Security Committee Ranking Member Mike Rogers, R-Ala., called Ratcliffe an “excellent pick to be director of national intelligence. His experience on the Homeland Security Committee and as former Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, & Innovation Subcommittee chairman will serve him well in this new role,” Rogers said. “I thank Director Coats for his leadership and years of public service.”

 And, House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said Ratcliffe was a “great pick.”

Speculation about Coats’ ouster had been lingering in recent days. Sources told Fox News earlier this month that  Trump spoke to two people recently about the job. Among the candidates he was considering at the time were Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Fred Fleitz, who previously served as chief of staff to National Security Adviser John Bolton.

 Trump raised the possibility of the job with Fleitz as far back as February and asked if he was interested but did not offer it to him officially. It’s unclear how many other potential candidates may have been in the mix.

 Trump regularly and openly sparred with Coats and the intelligence community. “Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!” he tweeted in January, after Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel testified about a threat-assessment report that called into question some of Trump’s foreign policy judgments.

 Coats said North Korea would be “unlikely” to give up its nuclear weapons or its ability to produce them because “its leaders ultimately view nuclear weapons as critical to regime survival.” Coats and other officials also contradicted Trump’s positions on Iran, Afghanistan, and the Islamic State terror network.

 “The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong!” Trump responded. “When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, but a source of potential danger and conflict.”

 Ratcliffe, by contrast, appeared to be on the same page as the president. He grilled Mueller and Democrats at  last week’s congressional hearings, and told Fox News on Sunday that Mueller had effectively destroyed the presumption of innocence by saying Trump had not been “exonerated.”

“By requiring Donald Trump to prove his innocence, they were depriving him of the one thing no one can be deprived of, which is a presumption of innocence,” Ratcliffe said in an interview with Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures.”

 Ratcliffe, who won re-election with more than 70% of the vote in his district in 2018, echoed that argument in the House Judiciary Committee hearings.

 “The special counsel’s job, nowhere does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald Trump’s innocence or that the special counsel report should determine whether or not to exonerate him,” Ratcliffe told Mueller. He added: “So, Americans need to know this as they listen to the Democrats and socialists on the other side of the aisle as they do dramatic readings from this report that Volume II of this report was not authorized under the law to be written. It was written to a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department and it was written in violation of every DOJ principle about extra prosecutorial commentary,” he continued. “I agree with the chairman this morning when he said Donald Trump is not above the law. He’s not. But he damn sure shouldn’t be below the law, which is where Volume II of this report puts him.”

 A Republican former senator from Indiana, Coats was appointed director of national intelligence in March 2017, becoming the fifth person to hold the post since it was created in the wake of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to oversee and coordinate the nation’s 17 intelligence agencies. Coats had been among the last of the seasoned foreign policy hands brought in to surround the president after his 2016 victory, of whom the president steadily grew tired as he gained more personal confidence in Oval Office, officials said. That roster included Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, and later, national security adviser H.R. McMaster.

Coats developed a reputation inside the administration for sober presentations to the president of intelligence conclusions that occasionally contradicted Trump’s policy aims.

 

[Bullheaded Texan]

 “Freedom of speech is dead in Europe!

  And now our American right to free speech is under siege!,

We must wake up and fight!

  If America falls, all is lost, there is no other place else to go!“

[Bullheaded Texan]

10/14/19

I don’t usually send out this type of communication but this one should be read by everyone.  I believe it reveals our Achilles heel.  I have attended this Centennial Colorado event in previous years. K.W. 

 

How Islam is extinguishing free speech in EU, UK

John Andrews intro: On October 1 in Centennial, Colorado, a capacity crowd heard an urgent warning for Americans to protect our freedoms before it’s too late.

We heard the harrowing personal testimony of Elisabeth Wolff from Vienna and Katie Hopkins from London. Both have paid the price for speaking their minds about the impact of Islamic inroads in Europe -- losing their jobs, almost losing their children and homes, one threatened with her life.

I wasn’t a sponsor of the event, but helped promote it, for which Westword, the local mouthpiece for Hamas doing business as CAIR, called me an ally of “global hate groups.” Pretty rich, since the only hate voiced that night was what the speakers, Katie and the Wolff, have had to endure from Islamists and their apologists—as the following report from Gary Greeno makes clear.

As Gary Greeno saw it

The dauntless Austrian free-speech advocate Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff and the fiery British journalist Katie Hopkins gave firsthand accounts of the consequences of speaking their minds in a European community increasingly flooded with, and intimidated by, immigrant Muslims.

The hall was filled to overflowing with about 200 attendees. Most were boomers, white hair, supportive, alarmed at what had happened to these women, concerned about their own future and that of their kids. Little sign of the younger generation, the millennials, however.   

I was there because my research after 9/11 asking “Why do they hate us so?” had brought an alarming realization that the Islamist vision is to reclaim the world for Mohammed and replace the laws of men with the Laws of God (Sharia). Sharia mandates political, social and personal conformance with the ways of Mohammed.  Deviancy is punishable by death.  There is no freedom of speech, thought or personal practices. 

I learned that the extremist (Islamist) view of Sunni Islam called Wahabism asserted that the reason the West dominated Islam in the 20tth century was because Muslims had strayed from the ways of Mohammed.  After WWI brought the fall of the Islamic Ottoman empire (The Caliphate) -- allied with Germany—this view was considered validated.  The Shia branch of Islam holds a similar animus against the West, just as virulent and focused on the same end, even though frequently at war with the Sunni branch. 

Gary’s impressions of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff’s testimony

A child of an Austrian diplomat, she experienced various middle eastern cities where her father was posted. At 9 years old, she enjoyed pre-revolution Iran in the days of the Shaw.  Women moved freely, no head covering, attended schools; then she noticed an increasing number of black clad woman.  Her mother secretly cooked for two American hostages who had taken refuge in the Austrian Embassy in July 1980.  “Islam changes people!”  Their Islamic maid set their house on fire for mom’s actions. 

On August 2, 1990 while in the Austrian Embassy in Baghdad, Kuwait was invaded and she experienced war again. Her landlord burst in without knocking screaming “The Jews Did it”!  She met her husband there and was later posted to Libya – War again.

Back in Austria, she became an English teacher as Muslim Bosnian refugees flooded the country.  She began to teach the Consequences of Islam, her topic became increasingly popular, she had posed the question, “What do you call a man who lusts after children, if not a pedophile?” (Referencing the undisputed fact that Mohammed married a 6-year-old girl and consummated the marriage when the girl turned 9.)

 She was found guilty of denigrating an officially recognized religion. She was fined, then lost appeal after appeal, finally to the European Court of Human Rights where the final ruling against her amounted to, in Elisabeth’s words,

“THE RIGHT TO NOT BE OFFENDED SUPERCEDES THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH”.  

Her call to action for you and me as Americans is this: “Freedom of speech is dead in Europe! And now your American right to free speech is under siege, you must wake up and fight! If America falls, all is lost, there is no other place else to go!“

Gary’s impressions of Katie Hopkins’s testimony

Before us stood small British woman, attractive, an incisive, unapologetic sense of humor who made you laugh with her pithy remarks.  Twice married, three children, a proud Christian mother. A British Ann Coulter. 

Discharged from the Royal Military College of Sandhurst for health reasons (Epilepsy), she served in British Intelligence then into journalism. A million followers on Twitter.  Katie was the ‘most read’ columnist at DailyMail.com; a popular host on London talk radio; a regular guest with Sean Hannity; and a familiar face on Tucker Carlson and Fox News.  

However, Katie was forced out of her UK media jobs and is now barred from Fox.   Could it beSaudi royalty influence with a significant ownership in the parent company of Fox, News Corpand admitted friendship with the owner of News Corp, Rupert Murdoch?  I have noticed a change in Fox reporting.  So has Judge Jeanine Pirro, who was suspended for criticizing Rep. Ilhan Omar. So have Rush Limbaugh and President Trump.  First Amendment under siege?

The first objective to tear down a culture is to tear apart the family and institutions:  Attack the family, attack the flag, attack authority (My view)!

In Great Britain, no parental consent is required for public schools to teach children about transition identity; Notre Dame was not burned by accident.    Is it happening here? Mandating behavior in spite of religious beliefs? (Wedding Cakes).  

“They come after your children”. social services were sent to check on her children.  If you are conservative, you may not beallowed to adopt children. “Diversity means no white people!”, “A racist is a white person with an opinion”

“They come for your home”: She no longer has any property in her name.

In Great Britain, the flag is no longer displayed in many places.  Pride in nation is not respected.   Is it happening here? Students in Denver tear down the American flag and put a Mexican flag in its place.

If you suggest Mohamed was a pedophile, you are charged with contempt of court, even threatened with beheading by Islamic jihadis.

Sidiq Kahn, mayor of London, has speech and thought control squads.  Two men dressed in black knocked on her door- they would not show any ID - Intimidation.  Government services provide housing for Muslims only. Many major cities in England and Northern Ireland have Muslim Mayors. (See Fact Check).  Jews have been called the canary in the coal mine.  They are leaving Great Britain.  

She says, “We are starting to fight back”.  17 ½ Million Brits voted to exit the European Union, voted for Boris Johnson, 64 million voted for Trump. Salvini in Italy, Poland and Ukraine refuse to accept. Russia & China fight back.  However Muslim fertility far exceeds European birth rates.  By 2025 she estimates that Muslim births in the UK will exceed Non-Muslim births and by 2050, Muslims will be in the majority.  

Katie Hopkins’s summation: “Americans, you are in for a tough time!  Remember, be proud of who you are.  Take two people with you and fight back.”

To learn more and stay current, keep up with Katie and the Wolff at EncounterTruth.com

beth Wolff & Katie Hopkins warn Americans