Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic
Election 2016 and other NEWS
REPUBLICAN PARTY:
 |
Businessman Donald Trump (New York) |
 |
Former Governor Jeb Bush (Florida) |
 |
Dr. Ben Carson (Florida) |
 |
Governor Chris Christie (New Jersey) |
 |
US Senator Ted Cruz (Texas) |
 |
Former IRS Commissioner Mark Everson (Mississippi) |
 |
Businesswoman Carly Fiorina (Virginia) |
 |
Former Governor Jim Gilmore (Virginia) |
 |
US Senator Lindsey Graham (South Carolina) |
 |
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee (Florida) |
 |
Governor Bobby Jindal (Louisiana) |
 |
Governor John Kasich (Ohio) |
 |
Former Governor George Pataki (New York) |
 |
US Senator Rand Paul (Kentucky) |
 |
US Senator Marco Rubio (Florida) |
 |
Former US Senator Rick Santorum (Pennsylvania) |
|
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by charles royer on
-
Ask FactCheck
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records
Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.
What’s the bottom line?FactCheck.org is a LEFT-BIASED organization that has sold itself as “Politically
NEUTRAL” to America’s voters and media personnel.
The fact is, the ANNENBERG Public Policy Center (APPC), the sponsoring agency behind FastCheck.org, is itself supported by the same foundation, the ANNENBERG FOUNDATION, that Bill Ayers secured the 49.2 million dollars from to create the Chicago ANNENBERG Challenge “philanthropic” organization in which Barack Obama was the founding Chairman of the Board for and Ayers served as the grant writer of and co-Chair of for its two operating arms.
Just sayin!
-
-
Permalink Reply by FreedomRider on
-
FactCheck.org is a LEFT-BIASED organization that has sold itself as “Politically
NEUTRAL” to America’s voters and media personnel.
Just like all the other BS they try to sell us.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Love of Country on
-
November 6, 2015
NY attorney general to investigate Exxon for denying climate change
For the last few years, climate hysterics have demanded that government prosecute those who disagree with their notions of climate change. The New York Times is reporting that New York's attorney general has opened an investigation into ExxonMobil, accusing the oil company of making false statements about climate change to its investors while its scientists were telling company officials of the dangers of global warming.
“We unequivocally reject the allegations that Exxon Mobil has suppressed climate change research,” Mr. Cohen said, adding that the company had funded mainstream climate science since the 1970s, had published dozens of scientific papers on the topic and had disclosed climate risks to investors.
Mr. Schneiderman’s decision to scrutinize the fossil fuel companies may well open a new legal front in the climate change battle.
The people with knowledge of the New York case also said on Thursday that, in a separate inquiry, Peabody Energy, the nation’s largest coal producer, had been under investigation by the attorney general for two years over whether it properly disclosed financial risks related to climate change. That investigation was not previously reported, and has not resulted in any charges or other legal action against Peabody.
Vic Svec, a Peabody senior vice president, said in a statement, “Peabody continues to work with the New York attorney general’s office regarding our disclosures, which have evolved over the years.”
The Exxon inquiry might expand further to encompass other oil companies, according to the people with knowledge of the case, though no additional subpoenas have been issued to date.
The people spoke on the condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to speak publicly about investigations that could produce civil or criminal charges. The Martin Act, a New York state law, confers on the attorney general broad powers to investigate financial fraud.
To date, lawsuits trying to hold fuel companies accountable for damage they are causing to the climate have failed in the courts, but most of those have been pursued by private plaintiffs.
Attorneys general for other states could join in Mr. Schneiderman’s efforts, bringing far greater investigative and legal resources to bear on the issue. Some experts see the potential for a legal assault on fossil fuel companies similar to the lawsuits against tobacco companies in recent decades, which cost those companies tens of billions of dollars in penalties.
And so, the witch hunt begins. It seems inevitable now that, failing to win the argument in the court of public opinion, climate hysterics will now use the U.S. federal courts to intimidate and punish their opponents.
If this is the only way they can get what they want – the destruction of industrialized society – they may find it more difficult than they imagine. Nobody stood up for the tobacco companies when the government mugged them for tens of billions of dollars. I think they will find that the pushback from the skeptical community will be far more vigorous – especially if they are going to go after nonprofit groups who happen to disagree with the hysterics.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/11/ny_attorney_general_to_...
-
-
-
DUH! Of course!
November 6, 2015Can Politicians be Manipulated?
Why do politicians pass legislation that is obviously contrary to the wishes of their constituents? Undoubtedly there are politicians who vote contrary to their constituents’ wishes out of principle. But at the risk of sounding paranoid, there may be more sinister reasons.
It is not a secret that the government occasionally spies upon it citizens. We know that Attorney General Robert Kennedy authorized the wiretapping of Martin Luther King Jr. It is a matter of record that First Lady Hillary Clinton had more than 900 FBI files in her possession at one point during her time in the White House. It is also a matter of record that Kathleen Willey’s personal protected information was released to the public. Also during the Lewinsky affair, officials at the Department of Defense leaked Linda Tripp’s personal information to the press.
These may be considered isolated cases where a small number of individuals violated the law. These things happen. However, what if government surveillance is more extensive? Perhaps Congresswoman Maxine Waters let that particular cat out of the bag. On February 4, 2013 Congresswoman Waters told journalist Roland Martin:
The president has put in place an organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful. That database will have information about everything on every individual on ways that it’s never been done before and whoever runs for President on the Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They’re going to go down with that database and the concerns of those people because they can’t get around it. And he’s [President Obama] been very smart. It’s very powerful what he’s leaving in place.
If Congresswoman Waters is correct, this could be a powerful tool for any administration. Could it be used to influence legislation? Could it influence court decisions?
Government officials are vulnerable in two areas: sex and money. State Department officials are warned about what Soviet defector Victor Kravchenko called “Liubyanka ladies.” These young ladies are employed by foreign governments to entrap unsuspecting government officials, journalists, and businessmen into compromising situations. (this was, of course, standard procedure under the USSR) More often, however, people engage in extramarital affairs that could possibly destroy their careers. Is it plausible that intelligence agencies are unaware of these activities even when they do not initiate them? This knowledge can be kept in reserve for when it is necessary to remove an uncooperative official. How long did the FBI know about General David Petraeus’ affair before he was induced to resign? There are also those who indulge in more unconventional sexual appetites. Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert appeared to be a stodgy and respectable politician, yet he had a past that he was desperate to conceal. Were officials in the government unaware of his past? Rep. Mark Foley and Senator Larry Craig also had unconventional sexual preferences. What compromises would they be willing to make in order to conceal their behavior?
The second area of vulnerability is money. It’s interesting to note how many congressmen and senators enter government with modest means and retire as millionaires. How did Speaker Hastert, a former schoolteacher, acquire a fortune large enough to pay a $3.5 million dollar bribe? Where did Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. acquire the funds to buy a $40,000 Rolex?
Foreign intelligence agencies also maintain files on American politicians. With widespread computer hacking they are obviously aware of activities that these politicians would prefer to keep secret. Would a foreign power hesitate to attempt to influence legislation? Within the government there are also competing power blocs that have embarrassing information. According to Edward Klein in his book Unlikeable: The Problem with Hillary, former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, told the president to, “Call off your (bleep) dogs.” She was more concerned about the damaging leaks of her emails than the investigation by the FBI. The Obama administration obviously has information that Hillary Clinton would prefer not to have made public. Hillary Clinton also has information that the Obama administration would prefer to keep secret.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/can_politicians_be_...
-
-
-
For sure!
-
-
-
RNC Chief Strategist Blasts Debates for Being More About ‘Gotcha’ Q...
On Breitbart News Saturday on Sirius XM Patriot channel 125, Sean Spicer, the Republican National Committee’s chief strategist, criticized the media for making GOP presidential debates more about “gotcha questions” and the moderators than the candidates.
-
-
-
Poll: Most Leading Republicans Beat Hillary
Clinton in Head-to-Head Matchup
Three out of four leading Republican presidential candidates would beat Democrat Hillary Clinton if the election for the White House were held today, a recent poll shows.
-
-
Permalink Reply by DeeDee on
-
That is why they are going to be RELYING heavily on voter fraud and foreigners.
UP TO DATE VOTER FRAUD NEWS and RESOURCES
Go here :
Links posted for your information in the middle of page.
http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/profile/show?id=loveofcountry
-
-
-
RNC Chief Strategist: Growth of Outlets Like
Breitbart Showing Mainstream Media ‘the Game Is Over’
On Breitbart News Saturday, Sean Spicer, the Republican National Committee’s (RNC) chief strategist, said the growth of new media outlets such as Breitbart News is showing the mainstream media that “the game is over.”
-
Badge
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Birthdays Tomorrow
American Thinker Commentary
Polls
Politics
Legislative News
Congressional Quarterly
C-SPAN
Roll Call
Stateline.org
The Hill
Washington Post
Politics Section
Boston Globe
Dallas News
Denver Post
Los Angeles Times
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Stop Island Park Wildlife Overpasses
Seattle Times
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times
USA Today
Beltway Buzz
CQ Politics
First Read
The Hotline
The Note
The Page
Washington Wire
Mike Allen's Playbook
Politico
Roll Call
The Hill
CNN Political Ticker
The Swamp
The Fix
Washington Whispers
Fish Bowl DC
Online Political Sites
Alternative Press Index
Capitol Hill Blue
CommonDreams.org
Digg.com Politics
Drudge Report
Political Insider
Political Wire
Politico
PopPolitics
Real Clear Politics
Salon.com
Slate
Stateline.org
TCOT Report
TomPaine.com
US Politics Guide
© 2025 Created by WTPUSA.
Powered by
