Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic
Tags:
your right DV We dont have to let those who want us dead in...but their is this thing called the first amendment and it protects religions from the gov....so maybe Mr Trump should read it and then change his words to say stop the terrorists...not Muslims....so whats next blacks or might it be irish...or we say no more eastern Europeans...they are a real pain in the arse...
WORDS HAVE MEANING!!!
trumps statement makes it clear he does not know the CONSTITUTION
Immigration is not bound by the BoR as the potential immigrants are not within the jurisdiction of the US, illegal immigration is also on the same ground.
Using it in the way you have is just not logical or rational.
Still waiting on an answer for that other constitutional question I posed.
BUT IT DOES SAY THAT CONGRESS SHALL MAKE no LAWS EITHER WAY ABOUT RELIGION oopS!! cap loc
now if trump was a constitutional scholar he would know that it is the congress that has the power to regulate imigration not the potus...SO WHILE THOSE SUPPORT TRUMP TO BAN AN ENTIRE RELIGION...maybe they should push to take that power away from potus and put it back where it belongs and then we can go about vetting immigrants the way they should be...
why would someone complain about Obama using EO and then cheer trump for saying he will use them....I'M SO CONFUSED ...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
No state religion and no impeding religion on these shores. That is it.
The ones that are here are covered and cannot be singled out by the feds. How this has anything to do with immigration which Congress has pretty much unchallenged sway is beyond me.
I am not cheering Trump I am defending the Constitution of the USA.
Now given the Constitution is not a suicide pact then if a particular religion was to make a threat of itself by killing people then I doubt the framers intended it to impede their progeny in working the issue out. See this is why the Constitution was not intended to apply to the states beyond the requirement for a form of government and other designated points.
One could charge the entire religion with insurrection just based on the Koran texts and the acts of its adherents if one were to be honest.
The constitution only applies to US citizens and has no bearing on laws effecting who we accept immigrants from. The constitution only states the congress has the sole responsibility to create such law.
Actually its a restriction on the acts of government within its jurisdiction and does not respect citizenship if prohibited acts are executed. One may violate it in Texas concerning an Englishman, one cannot violate it in England against an Englishman, which actually explains a lot.
Where things get a little messy is dealing with US citizens on foreign shores, but that was once fairly worked out until the document was thrash canned by the American people.
Immigration is outside the jurisdiction of the document other than the granting of Congress the power to regulate as they see fit.
THANKS RHODES was just about to say that ...better coming from you since ms constitution doesnt listen to me
your right ...only congress has power to create law...NOT THE PRESIDENT...that would make him a dictator
Congress has delegated powers to the executive since the War of the States.
Remember that little thing that upsets us from time to time? Yeah that one
How did you think all these agencies popped up?
Again should Trump win I doubt it would be difficult for them to just to delegate more, it is what they do and yes it makes whomever takes the oath a dictator including your guy just by virtue of that wrongful delegation.
my real problem is by making this case it gives other pres. power to not allow ...lets say Catholics, or baptist or any other religion...so its a slippery slope
but for congress to pass a law that no muslums are allowed is in my opinion making a law based on religion
so a better mind than mine will make the final say...hey we can always depend on SCOTUS to get it right...
trump would have been better to leave the religion out and make it about people coming from terrorist nations or those that are currently war torn and put focus on real vetting...
and why is there no talk about refugees going home after the conflict...just relocating them
Trump is the only one calling it for what it is. Killing is in the Islam religion. It is called Jihad. Trump says we should not allow people here who will kill for their religion. And he is getting told he is wrong for saying it. That should show us our flaws in our immigration laws..The law needs to be updated to the times.
Legislative News
Congressional Quarterly
C-SPAN
Roll Call
Stateline.org
The Hill
Washington Post
Politics Section
Boston Globe
Dallas News
Denver Post
Los Angeles Times
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Stop Island Park Wildlife Overpasses
Seattle Times
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times
USA Today
Beltway Buzz
CQ Politics
First Read
The Hotline
The Note
The Page
Washington Wire
Mike Allen's Playbook
Politico
Roll Call
The Hill
CNN Political Ticker
The Swamp
The Fix
Washington Whispers
Fish Bowl DC
Online Political Sites
Alternative Press Index
Capitol Hill Blue
CommonDreams.org
Digg.com Politics
Drudge Report
Political Insider
Political Wire
Politico
PopPolitics
Real Clear Politics
Salon.com
Slate
Stateline.org
TCOT Report
TomPaine.com
US Politics Guide
© 2024 Created by WTPUSA. Powered by