Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic
The RNC is preparing a brokered convention...to not allow Marco Rubio to win...They will bring in an establishment candidate to give it to that candidate...What can be done about that..We know it will be Jeb or Rubio..They can do this because of the ways that they have structured the riles...this is incredible.. the pick at a brokered convention never wins..they said FDR was the last to ever win a brokered convention.What they are really doing is saying they had rather elect Hillary than have Trump win............I AM TOO DISGUSTED FOR WORDS
UPDATE:
The big winner in Iowa’s Republican caucuses on Monday night might not have been Ted Cruz. It may have been a nominating process that fails to yield a clear winner. A clear winner being a candidate who goes to Cleveland this summer with the presidential nomination in hand.
At the end of Monday night, which count really mattered? Delegates acquired. As of this writing, Cruz has bagged eight delegates, Trump and Rubio, seven each, with four other delegates going to also-rans.
Raw vote totals are what most folk tend to watch and weigh. But in 2016, it pays to more closely follow the candidates’ delegate totals. Thanks to the Republican National Committee (RNC), caucuses and primaries held prior to mid-March mandate proportional distribution of delegates based on candidates’ vote totals in given contests. Most early caucuses and primaries impose threshold minimums to win delegates (say, Alabama, with a 20% threshold).
Prior to Mid-March, 25 States, along with DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico, will hold proportional contests. That accounts for 1,022 bound delegates (“bound” being delegates committed to a candidate for the first vote). 45% of the bound delegates will be picked proportionally or in “hybrid” formats, which include triggering provisions for larger delegate yields for candidates who meet higher vote percentage thresholds. There are WTA (winner-take-all) thresholds, but those will be quite difficult to achieve.
Starting with Super Tuesday, March 15, most of the remaining states have opted to hold winner-take-all contests, though a handful will continue to make proportional distributions. From mid-March forward, 1,238 bound delegates will be chosen (Colorado’s delegates declare at convention).
The number of delegates needed to secure the GOP nomination is 1,237. There are a number of unbound (3 per state) and unpledged delegates. The unpledged delegates are mostly establishment picks who would factor in at a deadlocked convention.
Short of a breakout by one the major contenders (Trump, Cruz, and Rubio), it’s not hard to imagine a scenario where the proportional phase of the nominating process yields tightly packed delegate counts among the three. Complicating matters is if new life is breathed into the Carson, Kasich, or Christe campaigns (as improbable as that appears).
But, say you, won’t the nomination fight be resolved with Super Tuesday and the subsequent contests?
That could happen, but consider this prospect. Cruz, Rubio, and Trump take roughly a third each of the delegates in the proportional phase. For illustration, say, 340 delegates per man. That means in the winner-take-all phase, one of the principals would need to capture 897 of the available 1,238 bound delegates to win. That’s about 73% of the total or three out of every four delegates. Possible, but how likely? This assumes, too, that the principals are competitive with one another, affording each the chance to pick off states.
Cruz, Trump, and Rubio have the resources to stay the course. Trump is self-funding. Cruz’s fundraising operation is already solid and benefits all the more from his Iowa win. Rubio’s stronger than anticipated finish in Iowa boosts his fundraising. And as Rubio consolidates establishment voters -- as he began doing in Iowa -- and lesser establishment candidates drop out, expect a significant upswing in his campaign’s financial fortunes.
Writes Michael Snyder at “Before It’s News”:
[I]f no candidate is able to secure enough delegates, that means that we would end up with a “brokered convention”. The mechanics of a brokered convention can get quite complicated, but on a practical level what that would essentially mean is that the party establishment would get to hand select the nominee. And in case you are wondering, that would not be Donald Trump or Ted Cruz.
Snyder’s assessment is flawed in a couple of respects (though not his conclusion about the candidates).
“Deadlocked” versus a “brokered” convention, the more accurate designation is “deadlocked.” A brokered convention suggests that party bosses call the shots nearly exclusively. The party boss era in American politics is long past.
Though unpledged delegates -- who are likely establishment recruits -- will play a critical role at a deadlocked convention, it’s important to remember that bound delegates are only committed to their candidates on the first ballot.
Thereafter, they’re unbound. Candidates’ and, perhaps, dark horses’ (yes, a draft is possible) primary focus for vote gathering will be among all those plentiful unbound state delegates. If the convention deadlocks, it’s going to be the Wild West, with plenty of wheeling and dealing, barroom brawls, shoot-outs, shenanigans, and backroom deals. But all that will occur across delegations and not just among the establishment few.
Snyder’s guess that the nominee won’t be named “Cruz” or “Trump” should a deadlock occur is reasonable. Deadlocked conventions -- if past brokered conventions are any guide -- tend to nominee candidates who at least appear more centrist or moderate. At a deadlocked 2016 Cleveland affair, the buzz word may be “electable.” Right now, Marco Rubio seems to fit the bill. As Snyder pointed out in his article, that’s not an endorsement; it’s merely an observation.
If the Republican field narrows to two principal candidates, then the chances for a deadlocked convention melt away. But if, as anticipated, Cruz, Trump, and Rubio (and possibly one or two others) remain in the race, then a deadlocked convention moves from “maybe” to “probable” with each passing primary, caucus, and state convention. The Republican presidential nominee who emerges will have done so after the fight of his political life – and ours.
The big winner in Iowa’s Republican caucuses on Monday night might not have been Ted Cruz. It may have been a nominating process that fails to yield a clear winner. A clear winner being a candidate who goes to Cleveland this summer with the presidential nomination in hand.
At the end of Monday night, which count really mattered? Delegates acquired. As of this writing, Cruz has bagged eight delegates, Trump and Rubio, seven each, with four other delegates going to also-rans.
Raw vote totals are what most folk tend to watch and weigh. But in 2016, it pays to more closely follow the candidates’ delegate totals. Thanks to the Republican National Committee (RNC), caucuses and primaries held prior to mid-March mandate proportional distribution of delegates based on candidates’ vote totals in given contests. Most early caucuses and primaries impose threshold minimums to win delegates (say, Alabama, with a 20% threshold).
Prior to Mid-March, 25 States, along with DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico, will hold proportional contests. That accounts for 1,022 bound delegates (“bound” being delegates committed to a candidate for the first vote). 45% of the bound delegates will be picked proportionally or in “hybrid” formats, which include triggering provisions for larger delegate yields for candidates who meet higher vote percentage thresholds. There are WTA (winner-take-all) thresholds, but those will be quite difficult to achieve.
Starting with Super Tuesday, March 15, most of the remaining states have opted to hold winner-take-all contests, though a handful will continue to make proportional distributions. From mid-March forward, 1,238 bound delegates will be chosen (Colorado’s delegates declare at convention).
The number of delegates needed to secure the GOP nomination is 1,237. There are a number of unbound (3 per state) and unpledged delegates. The unpledged delegates are mostly establishment picks who would factor in at a deadlocked convention.
Short of a breakout by one the major contenders (Trump, Cruz, and Rubio), it’s not hard to imagine a scenario where the proportional phase of the nominating process yields tightly packed delegate counts among the three. Complicating matters is if new life is breathed into the Carson, Kasich, or Christe campaigns (as improbable as that appears).
But, say you, won’t the nomination fight be resolved with Super Tuesday and the subsequent contests?
That could happen, but consider this prospect. Cruz, Rubio, and Trump take roughly a third each of the delegates in the proportional phase. For illustration, say, 340 delegates per man. That means in the winner-take-all phase, one of the principals would need to capture 897 of the available 1,238 bound delegates to win. That’s about 73% of the total or three out of every four delegates. Possible, but how likely? This assumes, too, that the principals are competitive with one another, affording each the chance to pick off states.
Cruz, Trump, and Rubio have the resources to stay the course. Trump is self-funding. Cruz’s fundraising operation is already solid and benefits all the more from his Iowa win. Rubio’s stronger than anticipated finish in Iowa boosts his fundraising. And as Rubio consolidates establishment voters -- as he began doing in Iowa -- and lesser establishment candidates drop out, expect a significant upswing in his campaign’s financial fortunes.
Writes Michael Snyder at “Before It’s News”:
[I]f no candidate is able to secure enough delegates, that means that we would end up with a “brokered convention”. The mechanics of a brokered convention can get quite complicated, but on a practical level what that would essentially mean is that the party establishment would get to hand select the nominee. And in case you are wondering, that would not be Donald Trump or Ted Cruz.
Snyder’s assessment is flawed in a couple of respects (though not his conclusion about the candidates).
“Deadlocked” versus a “brokered” convention, the more accurate designation is “deadlocked.” A brokered convention suggests that party bosses call the shots nearly exclusively. The party boss era in American politics is long past.
Though unpledged delegates -- who are likely establishment recruits -- will play a critical role at a deadlocked convention, it’s important to remember that bound delegates are only committed to their candidates on the first ballot.
Thereafter, they’re unbound. Candidates’ and, perhaps, dark horses’ (yes, a draft is possible) primary focus for vote gathering will be among all those plentiful unbound state delegates. If the convention deadlocks, it’s going to be the Wild West, with plenty of wheeling and dealing, barroom brawls, shoot-outs, shenanigans, and backroom deals. But all that will occur across delegations and not just among the establishment few.
Snyder’s guess that the nominee won’t be named “Cruz” or “Trump” should a deadlock occur is reasonable. Deadlocked conventions -- if past brokered conventions are any guide -- tend to nominee candidates who at least appear more centrist or moderate. At a deadlocked 2016 Cleveland affair, the buzz word may be “electable.” Right now, Marco Rubio seems to fit the bill. As Snyder pointed out in his article, that’s not an endorsement; it’s merely an observation.
If the Republican field narrows to two principal candidates, then the chances for a deadlocked convention melt away. But if, as anticipated, Cruz, Trump, and Rubio (and possibly one or two others) remain in the race, then a deadlocked convention moves from “maybe” to “probable” with each passing primary, caucus, and state convention. The Republican presidential nominee who emerges will have done so after the fight of his political life – and ours.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/cleveland_cliffhang...
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Tags:
Wonderful news DV...:You seem to be on top of what is going on...:)
Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson is going after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) for allegedly spreading false rumors on caucus night that the retired neurosurgeon was ending his presidential bid.
by Michelle Fields4 Feb 2016, 10:36 AM PST5
What a soor loser..........
The first national poll taken all after the Iowa caucus hit today from PPP, it shows Trump support crashed to 25% Cruz moved up to 21% and Rubio jumped to 21%. PPP has tended to lag other polls for both Cruz and Trump and over stated polls for Rubio. This clearly suggests the drop out from the debate and Trumps loss in Iowa are effecting Trumps numbers in a negative way.
We may soon be talking about a two man race between Cruz and Rubio if this trend continues.
that's the plan DV but not for awhile. We need Trump to showcase his stupidity for policy for awhile. The longer Trump stays in the race the better for Rubio or another moderate candidate.
Read more: http://therightscoop.com/#ixzz3zE7O68tU
GOP frontrunner Donald Trump took to Twitter well after midnight to praise Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly and Karl Rove for their comments regarding the Iowa caucus controversy between Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Dr. Ben Carson.
by Alex Swoyer4 Feb 2016, 6:35 AM PST111
In New Hampshire yesterday, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie repeated to voters that he did not hug President Obama after Hurricane Sandy.
by Charlie Spiering4 Feb 2016, 6:12 AM PST77
Columnist Charles Krauthammer argued that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump “can’t admit to coming second” in Iowa because he can’t accept that he lost and that Trump’s accusations against fellow candidate Texas Senator Ted Cruz are “just a psychological need”
by Ian Hanchett4 Feb 2016, 6:08 AM PST25
At the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington D.C. this morning, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi quoted from the Prophet Mohammad before she read from the gospel of John.
by Charlie Spiering4 Feb 2016, 6:06 AM PST1042
Republican presidential candidate Florida Senator Marco Rubio commented on the controversy between fellow candidates Texas Senator Ted Cruz and Dr. Ben Carson over Cruz’s campaign spreading rumors Carson was dropping out during the Iowa caucuses by saying his campaign never
by Ian Hanchett4 Feb 2016, 6:04 AM PST312
In both parties, Monday’s Iowa caucuses proved that politics in the United States today is a revolution, not a revolt. Fortunately, while not a violent revolution a la France, it is every bit as serious for American politics and American life. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this election is not about ideology, issues, or items on a resume. Voters are carrying out an insurgency.
by Patrick Caddell4 Feb 2016, 6:02 AM PST1403
Days after attending GOP frontrunner Donald Trump’s fundraiser that raised millions of dollars for veterans as the billionaire skipped a Fox-hosted debate, former Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Rick Santorum announced he would back donor class favorite and amnesty advocate Sen. Marco Rubio.
by Katie McHugh4 Feb 2016, 5:58 AM PST1214
I can't remember when the last time the PPP poll was accurate....they even got the Iowa caucus wrong three days from the caucus date.
Everyone got the Iowa caucus wrong, I was the only one that got it right and posted it here the day before. Missed on voter turnout by 30K and pointed out Cruz would win by smaller margin if turnout was higher. Just follow everything I say and you will be OK. LOL
yes you got the top three finishers correct but almost everyone with a brain would have that ticket...the surprise was the amount of Trump supports bailing and where they went and why?
[Warning: Adult Language] Thursday at a rally in Exeter, NH, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said politicians can not solve problems like the veterans care crisis because they are “full of shit.” Trump said., “We are going to make the veterans happy,
Thursday on MSNBC, former Gov. Jeb Bush (R-FL), a candidate for the 2016 Republican nomination, took aim at his fellow Floridian, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who is also a candidate for the GOP nod. Bush touted his own candidacy, but questioned
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz’s campaign has shot back at Donald Trump’s latest attacks, saying the media mogul should check himself into Twitter rehab.
by Michelle Fields4 Feb 2016, 10:40 AM PST4
Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson is going after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) for allegedly spreading false rumors on caucus night that the retired neurosurgeon was ending his presidential bid.
by Michelle Fields4 Feb 2016, 10:36 AM PST5
As voters were preparing to caucus in Iowa, Conrad Close, a self-identified Rubio supporter and the vice chairman of Georgia Students for Rubio, sent out a tweet.
by Charlie Spiering4 Feb 2016, 10:26 AM PST11
Perhaps you have heard or read that Donald Trump has admitted that he did not really spend a lot of time or effort in trying to build an effective “ground game” for getting his supporters to the Iowa caucuses to actually cast votes for him.
by Daniel J. Schultz4 Feb 2016, 10:14 AM PST11
Thursday in an appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), who dropped his bid for the Republican presidential nomination on Wednesday, was asked name any accomplishments of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), the candidate he endorsed upon departing
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush seem to have formed a de facto alliance against fellow Presidential contender Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), with the New Hampshire Republican primary just days away.
by Jordan Schachtel4 Feb 2016, 9:47 AM PST9
Yesterday I described the Iowa Democratic caucus as “a circus of ineptitude, bad planning, ambiguous rules, and deliberate obfuscation of the results.” The Des Moines Register is even more harsh in its call for a full audit of the contest between Hillary
by John Hayward4 Feb 2016, 9:46 AM PST17
A new national survey from Public Policy Polling finds GOP frontrunner Donald Trump shedding 9-points since early January. The race for the Republican nomination is now essentially a 3-way tie between Trump and Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
by Mike Flynn4 Feb 2016, 9:33 AM PST158
After being excluded from the upcoming New Hampshire debate, Presidential candidate Carly Fiorina is upping the ante in her outspoken campaign to make the stage with a new message to the Republican National Committee.
Sources tell Politico that House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) plans to proceed with an investigation into federal record-keeping practices, with the blessing of House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI)… provided the probe proceeds with “caution” when it hits Hillary Clinton’s email server.
by John Hayward4 Feb 2016, 8:28 AM PST11
Thursday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” host Joe Scarborough doubled down on the claim Republican presidential hopeful Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is the “Republican Obama.” Scarborough pointed to the two arguments against Rubio when laying it out, explaining that Rubio was seen
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie debuted a new line of attack against Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking him for his pro-life views and opposition to abortion.
by Charlie Spiering4 Feb 2016, 7:39 AM PST37
President Obama warned Americans to stay away from fear, as the world grows more troubled under his leadership.
by Charlie Spiering4 Feb 2016, 7:37 AM PST1507
Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson is reportedly cutting 50 positions from his campaign.
by Michelle Fields4 Feb 2016, 6:54 AM PST161
The latest tracking poll of New Hampshire finds Donald Trump dropping slightly, losing 2 points through Wednesday. Marco Rubio has moved into second place, gaining three points as Trump and Cruz extend their battle from Iowa.
by Mike Flynn4 Feb 2016, 6:47 AM PST238
Ben Carson and his closest advisers are going nuclear against Ted Cruz and his campaign for spreading false rumors that he intended to drop out ahead of the Iowa caucuses.
by Breitbart News4 Feb 2016, 6:43 AM PST245
FOX NEWS IS GOVERNMENT FILTERED NEWS..!!!!
IMHO ever since the Megan / trump debacle fox has come out of the closet!
Legislative News
Congressional Quarterly
C-SPAN
Roll Call
Stateline.org
The Hill
Washington Post
Politics Section
Boston Globe
Dallas News
Denver Post
Los Angeles Times
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Stop Island Park Wildlife Overpasses
Seattle Times
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times
USA Today
Beltway Buzz
CQ Politics
First Read
The Hotline
The Note
The Page
Washington Wire
Mike Allen's Playbook
Politico
Roll Call
The Hill
CNN Political Ticker
The Swamp
The Fix
Washington Whispers
Fish Bowl DC
Online Political Sites
Alternative Press Index
Capitol Hill Blue
CommonDreams.org
Digg.com Politics
Drudge Report
Political Insider
Political Wire
Politico
PopPolitics
Real Clear Politics
Salon.com
Slate
Stateline.org
TCOT Report
TomPaine.com
US Politics Guide
© 2024 Created by WTPUSA. Powered by