We The People USA

Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic

EPA WILL COST YOU AND YOUR JOBS AND MONEY

The EPA’s potentially lethal assault on your quality of life, while the EU vastly increases coal importation

New Rules and Old Plants May Strain Summer Energy Supplies
By MATTHEW L. WALD


WASHINGTON — As 58 million people across 13 states sweated through the third day of a heat wave last month, power demand in North America’s largest regional grid jurisdiction hit a record high. And yet there was no shortage, no rolling blackout and no brownout in an area that stretches from Maryland to Chicago.


But that may not be the case in the future as stricter air quality rules are put in place. Eastern utilities satisfied demand that day — July 21 — with hefty output from dozens of 1950s and 1960s coal-burning power plants that dump prodigious amounts of acid gases, soot, mercury and arsenic into the air. Because of new Environmental Protection Agency rules, and some yet to be written, many of those plants are expected to close in coming years.


 No one is sure yet how many or which ones will be shuttered or what the total lost output would be. And there is little agreement over how peak demand will be met in future summers.


The E.P.A. estimates that a rule on air toxins and mercury that it expects to complete in November will result in a loss of 10,000 megawatts — or almost 1 percent of the generating capacity in the United States. Electricity experts, however, say that rule, combined with forthcoming ones on coal ash and cooling water, will have a much greater effect — from 48,000 megawatts to 80,000 megawatts, or 3.5 to 7 percent. (NYT)


Obama’s War on Coal
Killing jobs, causing blackouts
By William Yeatman
Originally published in The New York Post


President Obama claims to see the need to create jobs at this time of endless 9-plus percent unemployment — yet his administration continues to relentlessly destroy jobs for ideological reasons. The best example may be the Obama Environmental Protection Agency’s “war on coal.”


The EPA’s regulatory crusade directly threatens hundreds of thousands of jobs — and “rolling blackouts” that threaten even more.


Start with a proposed regulation under the Clean Air Act that’s set to be finalized in November. The Utility MACT (“Maximum Achievable Control Technology”) rule seeks to cut US power plants’ emissions of mercury from 29 tons a year to just five. Yet EPA itself estimates that cutting even as much as 41 tons out of total emissions of 105 tons “is unlikely to substantially affect total risk.”


For zero benefit, the Utility MACT is one of the most expensive federal regulations ever. In comments submitted to the EPA, Unions for Jobs and the Environment, an alliance of unions representing more than 3.2 million workers, estimated that this needless regulation would jeopardize 251,000 jobs.


Then there’s EPA’s out-of-the-blue ruling last month, ordering Texas to cut emissions of sulfur dioxide by 47 percent. This, when the draft version of the Cross State Air Pollution Rule had exempted the state entirely. The excuse for the change? A supposed need to slightly reduce emissions as monitored 500 miles away in Madison County, Ill. — a locale that meets the EPA air-quality standards in question. (CEI)


U.S. Coal Exports To Europe Treble
Saturday, 13 August 2011 15:45 Ying Diao and Mathew Carr, Bloomberg


U.S. coal exports to the Netherlands jumped to 1.1 million tons from 334,628 tons. Shipments to Germany went to 899,009 tons from 166,314 tons. Trade to the U.K. rose to 852,159 tons from 159,280 tons.


The U.S. may increase coal exports, further boosting supply of the commodity in Europe, Macquarie Group Ltd. (MQG) said.


“A big push” to encourage natural-gas burning in the U.S. may drive up coal exports to Europe, China and India, said Hayden Atkins, an analyst in London at Macquarie’s commodities unit. The closing of Germany’s nuclear plants will increase demand in that nation, Atkins said.


U.S. steam-coal exports to Europe in the first quarter more than tripled from a year earlier to 4.9 million metric tons from 1.5 million tons, according to a report on the website of the U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. coal exports are at their highest level since 1992, it said.


Exports to the Netherlands jumped to 1.1 million tons from 334,628 tons. Shipments to Germany went to 899,009 tons from 166,314 tons. Trade to the U.K. rose to 852,159 tons from 159,280 tons. (GWPF)


Tags: COSTENERGYEPAUNCONSTITUTIONAL

Views: 2167

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

LdB commented on Environmentalists manage to kill the last nuclear power station in ....

in response to Anthony Watts:

From Forbes: The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) issued a press release today stating that they have signed a deal with PG&E PCG +0.10%, IBEW local 1245, the Coalition of California Utility Employees, Friends of the Earth, Environment California, and the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility. There is an implied quid pro quo. The groups will […]

Griff it’s got worse, I was reading up on all the changes to the Swedish decision to abandon wind and go back to nuclear. Finland is considering doing the same it already has Hanhikivi 1 under construction.

It was interesting what the Swedish electrical utilities did which was call the politicians bluff and refused to sign electricity supply contract extensions and stated they intended to close the reactors back in Oct 2015. There are lots of news articles about it and the greens very happy.

Quote: “Vattenfall, Sweden’s largest utility, threatened earlier this year to shut by the end of the decade the country’s six remaining reactors if the tax – which raised about $484m (€430m) last year – was not scrapped.”

The stark reality obviously sinks in when all the government experts tell them there country is about to go back to the dark ages. They drop the special tax imposed on nuclear power which was then used to subsidize renewable energy .. I can imagine the nuclear industry was a bit peeved with it.

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NP-Sweden-abolishes-nuclear-tax-1...

Then they basically sign in to building up to 10 more nuclear power plants.

I think there is a lesson here for other countries to call the Bluff of the greens.

Can not even live off grid anymore with out regulations.

Are Scientists Preparing for a FlipFlop Back to Global Cooling Predictions?
The alleged weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation appears to be triggering a growing amount of speculation about abrupt cooling, like the plot of the movie “The Day After Tomorrow”.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/07/02/are-scientists-preparing-for...

You bet the grant scientists are running for cover and will not get more money. the end of Al Gores shakedown? 

They will just say that its all because of the Co2 in the atmosphere, it was bound to happen just like the Movie said it would. It will always be our fault no matter what the weather does.

The best scenario is to hope for nothing to happen nothing at all.

Bull,

The political powers that be just want to control through fear. Someone should have them look up the settled science on sun spots and the sun cycles and how they are the controlling force for our weather. The secondary problem is the rain forests in South America being hewn down and the results of that changes the wind and weather patterns they are attributing to CO2 and CO emissions. That does not mean that people are not responsible for some of the changes, because the rain forest being cut down has changed wind patterns and that is contributing to the western drought and other world wide climate changes. Nothing will be done to stop the ones who are stripping the rain forests because they are Socialist countries doing it. Oh yes, don;t forget the negative effect on our pharmacopia it is causing too. We get 85% of our basics for medicine from the rain forest.

Fear is a powerful motivator and has been very effectively used by the government to justify spending billions of dollars to save the world. We have to be very carful about being too efferent at curbing Co2 emissions all plant life will die at150ppm. IMO 400 to 800 ppm would be ideal to feed our ever growing population of people. 

On planet earth Carbon is life.

M,

Seems that I remember reading somewhere that the Rain forest is actually bigger than years ago?

Source; http://www.rain-tree.com/facts.htm#.V3va2GgrLIU

and

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-talks-daily-destruc...

and

https://news.mongabay.com/2015/09/how-many-trees-are-cut-down-every...

I hope you are right Mangus. I've checked several sources and they say this;

Mongabay says this;

 When it comes to the world’s forests, two of the commonly asked questions are “How many trees are are on Earth?” and “How many trees are cut down each year?” A new study proposes answers: three trillion and 15.3 billion.

The Scientific American says;

 Pinning down exact numbers is nearly impossible, but most experts agree that we are losing upwards of 80,000 acres of tropical rainforest daily, and significantly degrading another 80,000 acres every day on top of that. Along with this loss and degradation, we are losing some 135 plant, animal and insect species every day—or some 50,000 species a year—as the forests fall.

Rainforest Facts says this;

  • We are losing Earth's greatest biological treasures just as we are beginning to appreciate their true value. Rainforests once covered 14% of the earth's land surface; now they cover a mere 6% and experts estimate that the last remaining rainforests could be consumed in less than 40 years.

Most responsible forest industries look at trees as a renewable resource which provides the incentive to plant trees when trees are harvested. the only problem is the monolithic reforestation that results. But should a country be forced by external influences not use the recourses within it's boundaries to bring themselves out of poverty?   That is like Russia telling us not to grow corn in Kansas because of the global destruction it may cause the environment. Should that be our decision?

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Online Magazines

Accuracy In Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
American Conservative
Amer Conservative Daily
The American Prospect
Atlanta Const Journal
The Atlantic Monthly
Boston Review
Blacklisted News
The Bulletin
Canada Free Press
Capitalism Magazine
Chronicles Magazine
City Journal
CNS News
CNIN Truth
Conservative Economist
Consortium News
Commentary Magazine
The Conservative Edge
Conservative Outpost
Corruption Chronicals (JW)
The Corzine Times
CounterPunch
The Daily Caller
Daily Mail UK
Deep Journal
Digital Journal
Dissent Magazine
The Economist
Examiner
Florida Pundit
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Policy
The Freemen Institute
The Gouverneur Times NY
The Guardian UK
The Foundry (Heritage)
Free Market News
FrontPage Magazine
Gateway Pundit
The Guardian UK
The Globalist
Harper's Magazine
Harvard Inter Review
The Hill
Human Events
In These Times
The Land of the Free
Liberty Unbound
Mission America
Mother Jones
Monthly Review
The Nation
National Interest
National Ledger
National Review
New Internationalist
The New American
The New Ledger
New Left Review
New Media Journal
News Hounds
Newstin
The New Republic
News Busters
News Fifty
NewsMax
Newsweek
News Daily
News With Views
Online Journal
Oohja.com
The Palestine Chronicle
Planet Daily
Policy Review
Poligazette
Politics Daily
The Post Chronicle
Pravda
The Progressive
Reality Check
The Real News Network
Reason
Real Clear Markets
Real Clear Politics
Red Pepper
Roll Call
Russia Today
Salon
Slate
Spectator Magazine
Spiked
Telegraph UK
Time
Toward Freedom
Townhall
U.S. News & World Report
Utne Reader
Wall Street Journal Magazine
Washington Examiner
The Washington Independent
Washington Monthly
The Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
World Magazine
World Press Review
World Reports
World Tribune
Vanity Fair

© 2024   Created by WTPUSA.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service