Trump will clean house

[kevin kiernan]

Crooked politicians must be held accountable for the crimes they have done. Trump is the only one who will do it. To elect a POTUS who will not prioritize fixing our criminal political system will not be good enough for me.We will not get another one like Trump ,who will bitch slap the evil out of Washington politics..No one can deny that Trump is crazy enough to do it. But he needs us to want it fixed. He can not stand alone..This is that time in history. The time that many have hoped. Turn your back on this opportunity,and we are done. THAT IS THE TRUTH OF IT.

[jack ludwig]

I don't care M who is putting out the videos, they are not truthful and Trump has no problem repeating the garbage.  I see and read so much of this stuff it is beginning to get to be a real waste of time just checking out the information only to find it is full of half truths. I don't have time to spend on such foolishness. Again I am not a supporter of Hillary, I just am a firm believer Trump will cause great harm to America. He can't help it, that has been his style his entire life. Yes Hillary as president will be able to advance her liberal programs which is not good for the average citizen, but not life threatening. Trump is life threatening for every citizen, liberal or conservative or moderate or independent.  No one will escape the devastation he will bring down on America. In order to see this you have to understand the position America occupies with respect to Russia and China. Once you understand that you will see we are walking right into the lions mouth. Not a good place to be when the animal is hungry.

[kevin kiernan]

Jack what did I tell you about going off your meds and playing on the keyboard. And I advise you not to miss any appointments with your therapist.

[charles royer]

Jack! Hillary went on national tv Sunday and gave her rendition(completely different) of what FBI director comey said.
The clintoons are the crookedest ,sleasyest, boldest liars alive today.
If the selling off of America is ok with U why bother posting here?

[M]

Sorry Jack,

That statement about Trump being able to cause great harm to the US, While true from one standpoint, and I believe you do honestly feel that way, just does not wash considering the other factors you have left out. Those factors being multiple sources that indicate Hillary will do irreparable damage to the US beyond a shadow of a doubt. Those multiple sources have been laid out in many other posts so I won't waste space repeating them. I will say if you revisit those multiple sources you will see that the damage Hillary will do is about ten times the damage you yourself have indicated Trump will do just concerning reactions with Russia and China alone. 

Look at the meager few following examples I cite, out of the many many out there from the multiple sources including the Left Wing Progressive Socialist ones; Consider the Russian Uranium deal the Clintons actually facilitated at; http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundat...

that deal sent money into the coffers of the Clinton Foundation and gave Russia control of 1/5 of all uranium production capacity in the US. Or This article from Liberation, an acknowledged Socialist paper outing Hillary on China and Russia as a bad fit; https://www.liberationnews.org/hillary-clinton-russia-china-dangero...  Even this cautionary tale from the Atlantic about Hillary http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/where-does... During the Bush Administration,Hillary used to be dead set against cooperating with China, and is on record for that, http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/05/hillary-cl... . She has only during the current administrations agenda to 'pivot to Asia', softened her stance. Along with that she has taken a hard line against Russia. This one concerns what She could do to American Business in Trade deals thatb would further damage busiiness and move jobs away from our shores; http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/hillary-clintons-china-pr...  These are all the things I believe you ascribed to what Trump could potentially do to harm america. However there is no 'Potentially' about this with Hillary because she has ALREADY DONE IT. So I submit in view of the evidence, your fears about Trump Should be quickly and profoundly shifted to Hillary!

 

[M]

Jack,

Just another little insight into my position that Trump would be beneficial and Hillary would incur a foreign policy and economic disaster of biblical proportions with Russia and China should she become President.;

Source;http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/donald-trump-hillary-clinton...

Check out what the Wall Street Journal has to say about Trump and Hillary on foreign policy.

Trump on Russia; DONALD TRUMP

I believe an easing of tensions, and improved relations with Russia—from a position of strength only—is possible, absolutely possible. Some say the Russians won’t be reasonable. I intend to find out.— April 27 speech in Washington, D.C. »

Mr. Trump has floated the idea of creating a new alliance with Russia, saying a reset of relations is necessary to help ease tensions in Syria and elsewhere

Hillary on Russia; HILLARY CLINTON

Well, my relationship with [Putin], it’s—it’s interesting. It’s one, I think, of respect. We’ve had some very tough dealings with one another. And I know that he’s someone that you have to continually stand up to because, like many bullies, he is somebody who will take as much as he possibly can unless you do.— Jan. 17 debate in South Carolina »

Mrs. Clinton has called Mr. Putin a “bully,” and has described the relationship between the U.S. and Russia as complicated. During the 2008 presidential election, she said Mr. Putin “was a KGB agent, by definition he doesn’t have a soul.” Mr. Putin later responded by saying, “I think at a minimum it’s important for a government leader to have a brain.”

Trump on China; DONALD TRUMP

China’s entrance into the World Trade Organization has enabled the greatest jobs theft in history.

— June 28 speech »He opposes the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, the trade agreement which includes the U.S., Japan and 10 other countries.

Hillary on China; HILLARY CLINTON

Countries like Russia and China often work against us. Beijing dumps cheap steel in our markets... So I know we have to be able to both stand our ground when we must, and find common ground when we can.— June 2 speech in San Diego »

Mrs. Clinton has been a constant critic of China’s human-rights record. She has called the current U.S./China dynamic “one of the most challenging relationships we have,” 

Even though the article is about much more concerning Foreign policy between the two candidates I stayed with Russia and China because they were what you said were your major concerns about Trump becoming President and Russia and China uniting to destroy the USA by means other than Military. Who do you think Russia and China would dislike more and because of past practice be less likely to cooperate with? Hillary who has an on the record background of condemning them ? Or, Trump who has not had a background of that but does have a background of amiable and respectful business dealings with them?

 

[Hankelvis]

Bill Clinton is Satan seeking world domination using his power crazed lesbian partner from hell.
They could put pee wee herman up against them and I would vote for him even if he fondled himself during the debates.
He is a master at that anyway.

[Hankelvis]

Jack you just love Bill Clinton admit it.
You are just as corrupt and satanic as he is.
Make no mistake, Hillary will really be Bill's third term.
He tried executive overreach before. After Obama, he will become dictator.

[jack ludwig]

Imagine that Hank, you know who I love! I never voted for Bill and would never support his agenda. He is a politician but happens to be good at the that skill then most. Republicans seem to have slightly better policies but are very bad politicians, they lack the skill to communicate in a positive way.   

[Hankelvis]

No, they lack the skill to navigate the hostile media controlled by the unions who are controlled by the mafia.

[jack ludwig]

no Hank there is no great secret how to control the media and the unions or the mafia are certainly not the ones who have that worked out. 

[M]

Jack,

>

You are right there, it's not the mob or unions. It's the Monied Elite doing it. The leaders of that group are the ones controlling the Democratic/Socialists better known as Democrats, and to lesser extents the other political parties.. The way the media are controlled is the way they have become controlled historically. People of a certain political persuasion, and either are part of the monied Elite or are backed by them, buy up the little independents, small and medium agencies, and keep that snowballing until they become mega media outlets. 

>

It's a straight forward business technique that works for Progressive Socialist and Free Market Capitalists alike. The main difference between the two is that; Capitalism allows for more wiggle room for the individual to enter and succeed, whereas in the Progressive/Socialist model the State strictly controls who can do business successfully, basically their approved Crony Capitalist groupies maintaining Monopolistic Dominance of All Business and Finance. 

>

The Feee Market Capitalist Dominance in field media business model has been going on since Pulitzer and Hearst fought each other for the top spot. Now you have the Progressive/Socialist Model Dominating through such Corporate entities as Gannet, AOL/Huffington Post,etc. The AOL/Verizon news groups are controlled by Tim Armstrong, a self avowed Progressive/Socialist pretending to be a Liberal Democrat like Hillary, yes, just like Hillary. The same Tim Armstrong who bought AOL and it's affiliates to continue his drive for dominance in the marketplace and control of creating public opinion in favor of the Progressive/Socialist agendas.

>

Progressives have slowly bought up News Media, Social Media, and the Information Media Nodes to suppress any opposition viewpoints. That's how you control media, through Crony Capitalism sanctioned by the Progressive/Socialist movement. 

>

Same thing happens with the political parties Leadership. That is why one of the reasons we need to stand firm against Hillary in this election, and in doing so, standing firm against the Progressive onslaught that is attempting to overwhelm us. 

>

It's the same take over techniques used by Lenin and used better by Stalin and Hitler to take over and suppress information. 

>

Now all dictatorships and fledgling dictatorships use these tactics to take over. We used to call them Monopolies like Standard Oil once was until Benjamin Harrison Also a Liberal who would now be called a Progressive Socialist signed the Sherman Anti-Trust act into law to break up the Capitalist Monopolies of that era and open the door to Progressive monopolies controlled by Liberals.

[Thomas Vincent Coffey]

Been Watching a number of Trump episodes during the past week and they are well beyond alarming, as follows:

* His need to chronically repeat himself in the same sentence, like a broken record, has moved from the annoyance point to the very dangerous, turn the channel point.

* Wit is an instinct he simply does not have; as his normal face pictures a frowning and humorless person. Therefore, incidents such as telling a mother to remove her crying baby from the audience, while he laughs, and then telling a war  veteran that he always wanted a Purple Heart but getting one this way is much easier, while laughing; make him look and sound like an intolerant fool.

Trump is rich and famous largely by his own hand, all to his credit; yet the downside to this is that no one has ever dared to put their finger in his face and told him to "shut the hell up." As a result he is oblivious to the impression his behavior has on ordinary people.

Principled Conservatives have much invested in Trump, as an agent of change but we need to be very wary now, as the R Establishment is in a frenzy over his clownish behavior in creating these self inflicted wounds.