Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic
Donald Trump is licking his chops. He has a good chance to win the Republican nomination. He knows he can beat Hillary as I do also. .Donald is in the know of people that can take Hillary And Bill out of the picture for good. The Career politicians are not privy to the same knowledge that Mr. Trump is. This is a little sample of what I mean.
Tags:
From: "James Wollenweber"
Sorry guys and gals. I believe that you all are missing what Jack does for this forum It gets the rest of you to look for more reasons to address what he posts and are learning more about the actual dealings going on. Sure, I sometimes find some of his posts against what I feel and believe. He understands that. BUT! After doing some more digging - though I still feel the same about Hillary and Trump, I have learned more than I would have on my own. (I do not look at any progressive articles if I can help it, so do miss out on what the other side may be planning) Jack is exposing us to his opinions and isn't that what we want? Don't we want everyone to express their opinion? That is what I believe, I want to be allowed to express my opinion, and to be able to review another's opinion. . And though my opinion many times differs from what Jack posts, I like it that he is willing to express his opinion and that is why I'm independent (now part of the Reform Party, since changed to Tea Party) and voting for Trump.
Hey, I just got my 5 year renewal CCW letter. So have to sign up and go thru the process again. And I have to prove I'm not a drone. What the heck. So I'll be hearing back in 21 days (not sure if that includes weekends, though.
Suppose I shouldn't have posted that here, but what the heck, I have a feeling everything about me is already known by the FEDS and the Clintons..
Forgive me Virginia.. Jack is a proven troll..
Kevin, if I am a proven troll, please supply the evidence you have that I am just sowing discord and not just trying to present a different viewpoint. If you can define a troll, then maybe you and few others are presenting views that will sow discord to some of my views. I always believed that when an issue can be viewed differently each supporting view offers their presentation of the facts and at that time we dispute each fact presented. You cannot own the fact if the fact can be disputed by either view.
Jack you are a liberal we do not share your reprobate mindset.
I was sent this from LH better known as pgroup on the local leader webinars. What do you think about it?
Trump says No Path to Legalization Unless They Leave the Country and Come Back;
Well, that just gets my mind humming.
If the illegal aliens have to leave first in order to obtain a
path to legal status, somebody has to take care of their crap
while they are gone. I think a few of us right-wing crazies
should form a foundation/corporation and apply for a grant
from the feds. We can have offices in every alien barrio in
the country and we sign up aliens who want to leave before
they are caught so that they can come back and their stuff
will be waiting for them.
We agree to protect their property (even real estate) that
they can't take with them in exchange for their promise to pay
us for having protected it upon their return. The property is
our collateral. We cap the time of the contract at two years,
renewable (if they're unable to return in 2 years) if they pay
for the first two years.
If we spin it correctly, the fed money would be in the form of
grants (thus not paid back). Politically, the loony left would
have nothing to bitch about since we're being 'caring' and
'sensitive' to the needs of the pitiful aliens being picked on
by President Trump.
Since this is a serious topic, permit me a response.
Firstly, this sounds to me like the malarkey only politicians and their cronies could conjure up.
The Treaty of Westphalia/1648, defined the concept of Sovereignty which gave nation-states sole control over their territory, its citizens and its domestic affairs; through their system of governance which was traditionally parliamentary.
As such, illegals have no rights in the sovereign domain of another nation; none whatsoever.
Suggest this fact, rather than sanctimonious gestures be the starting point for any discussion involving illegals.
Thomas,
That is why the 14th needs to be repealed since the Progressives agenda had SCOTUS rule in favor of anchor babies. As long as theos three toxic words "No State Shall" are in the amendments, the Feds have total control instead of being controlled by the Constitution.
Thomas exactly how does this fit in with American constitutional law?
Legislative News
Congressional Quarterly
C-SPAN
Roll Call
Stateline.org
The Hill
Washington Post
Politics Section
Boston Globe
Dallas News
Denver Post
Los Angeles Times
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Stop Island Park Wildlife Overpasses
Seattle Times
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times
USA Today
Beltway Buzz
CQ Politics
First Read
The Hotline
The Note
The Page
Washington Wire
Mike Allen's Playbook
Politico
Roll Call
The Hill
CNN Political Ticker
The Swamp
The Fix
Washington Whispers
Fish Bowl DC
Online Political Sites
Alternative Press Index
Capitol Hill Blue
CommonDreams.org
Digg.com Politics
Drudge Report
Political Insider
Political Wire
Politico
PopPolitics
Real Clear Politics
Salon.com
Slate
Stateline.org
TCOT Report
TomPaine.com
US Politics Guide
© 2025 Created by WTPUSA. Powered by