The country is turning into a comic book. Americans are supposed to dig in and wonder whether Trump will go to a debate or not… MORE
Citizens Dedicated To Preserving Our Constitutional Republic
The RNC is preparing a brokered convention...to not allow Marco Rubio to win...They will bring in an establishment candidate to give it to that candidate...What can be done about that..We know it will be Jeb or Rubio..They can do this because of the ways that they have structured the riles...this is incredible.. the pick at a brokered convention never wins..they said FDR was the last to ever win a brokered convention.What they are really doing is saying they had rather elect Hillary than have Trump win............I AM TOO DISGUSTED FOR WORDS
UPDATE:
The big winner in Iowa’s Republican caucuses on Monday night might not have been Ted Cruz. It may have been a nominating process that fails to yield a clear winner. A clear winner being a candidate who goes to Cleveland this summer with the presidential nomination in hand.
At the end of Monday night, which count really mattered? Delegates acquired. As of this writing, Cruz has bagged eight delegates, Trump and Rubio, seven each, with four other delegates going to also-rans.
Raw vote totals are what most folk tend to watch and weigh. But in 2016, it pays to more closely follow the candidates’ delegate totals. Thanks to the Republican National Committee (RNC), caucuses and primaries held prior to mid-March mandate proportional distribution of delegates based on candidates’ vote totals in given contests. Most early caucuses and primaries impose threshold minimums to win delegates (say, Alabama, with a 20% threshold).
Prior to Mid-March, 25 States, along with DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico, will hold proportional contests. That accounts for 1,022 bound delegates (“bound” being delegates committed to a candidate for the first vote). 45% of the bound delegates will be picked proportionally or in “hybrid” formats, which include triggering provisions for larger delegate yields for candidates who meet higher vote percentage thresholds. There are WTA (winner-take-all) thresholds, but those will be quite difficult to achieve.
Starting with Super Tuesday, March 15, most of the remaining states have opted to hold winner-take-all contests, though a handful will continue to make proportional distributions. From mid-March forward, 1,238 bound delegates will be chosen (Colorado’s delegates declare at convention).
The number of delegates needed to secure the GOP nomination is 1,237. There are a number of unbound (3 per state) and unpledged delegates. The unpledged delegates are mostly establishment picks who would factor in at a deadlocked convention.
Short of a breakout by one the major contenders (Trump, Cruz, and Rubio), it’s not hard to imagine a scenario where the proportional phase of the nominating process yields tightly packed delegate counts among the three. Complicating matters is if new life is breathed into the Carson, Kasich, or Christe campaigns (as improbable as that appears).
But, say you, won’t the nomination fight be resolved with Super Tuesday and the subsequent contests?
That could happen, but consider this prospect. Cruz, Rubio, and Trump take roughly a third each of the delegates in the proportional phase. For illustration, say, 340 delegates per man. That means in the winner-take-all phase, one of the principals would need to capture 897 of the available 1,238 bound delegates to win. That’s about 73% of the total or three out of every four delegates. Possible, but how likely? This assumes, too, that the principals are competitive with one another, affording each the chance to pick off states.
Cruz, Trump, and Rubio have the resources to stay the course. Trump is self-funding. Cruz’s fundraising operation is already solid and benefits all the more from his Iowa win. Rubio’s stronger than anticipated finish in Iowa boosts his fundraising. And as Rubio consolidates establishment voters -- as he began doing in Iowa -- and lesser establishment candidates drop out, expect a significant upswing in his campaign’s financial fortunes.
Writes Michael Snyder at “Before It’s News”:
[I]f no candidate is able to secure enough delegates, that means that we would end up with a “brokered convention”. The mechanics of a brokered convention can get quite complicated, but on a practical level what that would essentially mean is that the party establishment would get to hand select the nominee. And in case you are wondering, that would not be Donald Trump or Ted Cruz.
Snyder’s assessment is flawed in a couple of respects (though not his conclusion about the candidates).
“Deadlocked” versus a “brokered” convention, the more accurate designation is “deadlocked.” A brokered convention suggests that party bosses call the shots nearly exclusively. The party boss era in American politics is long past.
Though unpledged delegates -- who are likely establishment recruits -- will play a critical role at a deadlocked convention, it’s important to remember that bound delegates are only committed to their candidates on the first ballot.
Thereafter, they’re unbound. Candidates’ and, perhaps, dark horses’ (yes, a draft is possible) primary focus for vote gathering will be among all those plentiful unbound state delegates. If the convention deadlocks, it’s going to be the Wild West, with plenty of wheeling and dealing, barroom brawls, shoot-outs, shenanigans, and backroom deals. But all that will occur across delegations and not just among the establishment few.
Snyder’s guess that the nominee won’t be named “Cruz” or “Trump” should a deadlock occur is reasonable. Deadlocked conventions -- if past brokered conventions are any guide -- tend to nominee candidates who at least appear more centrist or moderate. At a deadlocked 2016 Cleveland affair, the buzz word may be “electable.” Right now, Marco Rubio seems to fit the bill. As Snyder pointed out in his article, that’s not an endorsement; it’s merely an observation.
If the Republican field narrows to two principal candidates, then the chances for a deadlocked convention melt away. But if, as anticipated, Cruz, Trump, and Rubio (and possibly one or two others) remain in the race, then a deadlocked convention moves from “maybe” to “probable” with each passing primary, caucus, and state convention. The Republican presidential nominee who emerges will have done so after the fight of his political life – and ours.
The big winner in Iowa’s Republican caucuses on Monday night might not have been Ted Cruz. It may have been a nominating process that fails to yield a clear winner. A clear winner being a candidate who goes to Cleveland this summer with the presidential nomination in hand.
At the end of Monday night, which count really mattered? Delegates acquired. As of this writing, Cruz has bagged eight delegates, Trump and Rubio, seven each, with four other delegates going to also-rans.
Raw vote totals are what most folk tend to watch and weigh. But in 2016, it pays to more closely follow the candidates’ delegate totals. Thanks to the Republican National Committee (RNC), caucuses and primaries held prior to mid-March mandate proportional distribution of delegates based on candidates’ vote totals in given contests. Most early caucuses and primaries impose threshold minimums to win delegates (say, Alabama, with a 20% threshold).
Prior to Mid-March, 25 States, along with DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico, will hold proportional contests. That accounts for 1,022 bound delegates (“bound” being delegates committed to a candidate for the first vote). 45% of the bound delegates will be picked proportionally or in “hybrid” formats, which include triggering provisions for larger delegate yields for candidates who meet higher vote percentage thresholds. There are WTA (winner-take-all) thresholds, but those will be quite difficult to achieve.
Starting with Super Tuesday, March 15, most of the remaining states have opted to hold winner-take-all contests, though a handful will continue to make proportional distributions. From mid-March forward, 1,238 bound delegates will be chosen (Colorado’s delegates declare at convention).
The number of delegates needed to secure the GOP nomination is 1,237. There are a number of unbound (3 per state) and unpledged delegates. The unpledged delegates are mostly establishment picks who would factor in at a deadlocked convention.
Short of a breakout by one the major contenders (Trump, Cruz, and Rubio), it’s not hard to imagine a scenario where the proportional phase of the nominating process yields tightly packed delegate counts among the three. Complicating matters is if new life is breathed into the Carson, Kasich, or Christe campaigns (as improbable as that appears).
But, say you, won’t the nomination fight be resolved with Super Tuesday and the subsequent contests?
That could happen, but consider this prospect. Cruz, Rubio, and Trump take roughly a third each of the delegates in the proportional phase. For illustration, say, 340 delegates per man. That means in the winner-take-all phase, one of the principals would need to capture 897 of the available 1,238 bound delegates to win. That’s about 73% of the total or three out of every four delegates. Possible, but how likely? This assumes, too, that the principals are competitive with one another, affording each the chance to pick off states.
Cruz, Trump, and Rubio have the resources to stay the course. Trump is self-funding. Cruz’s fundraising operation is already solid and benefits all the more from his Iowa win. Rubio’s stronger than anticipated finish in Iowa boosts his fundraising. And as Rubio consolidates establishment voters -- as he began doing in Iowa -- and lesser establishment candidates drop out, expect a significant upswing in his campaign’s financial fortunes.
Writes Michael Snyder at “Before It’s News”:
[I]f no candidate is able to secure enough delegates, that means that we would end up with a “brokered convention”. The mechanics of a brokered convention can get quite complicated, but on a practical level what that would essentially mean is that the party establishment would get to hand select the nominee. And in case you are wondering, that would not be Donald Trump or Ted Cruz.
Snyder’s assessment is flawed in a couple of respects (though not his conclusion about the candidates).
“Deadlocked” versus a “brokered” convention, the more accurate designation is “deadlocked.” A brokered convention suggests that party bosses call the shots nearly exclusively. The party boss era in American politics is long past.
Though unpledged delegates -- who are likely establishment recruits -- will play a critical role at a deadlocked convention, it’s important to remember that bound delegates are only committed to their candidates on the first ballot.
Thereafter, they’re unbound. Candidates’ and, perhaps, dark horses’ (yes, a draft is possible) primary focus for vote gathering will be among all those plentiful unbound state delegates. If the convention deadlocks, it’s going to be the Wild West, with plenty of wheeling and dealing, barroom brawls, shoot-outs, shenanigans, and backroom deals. But all that will occur across delegations and not just among the establishment few.
Snyder’s guess that the nominee won’t be named “Cruz” or “Trump” should a deadlock occur is reasonable. Deadlocked conventions -- if past brokered conventions are any guide -- tend to nominee candidates who at least appear more centrist or moderate. At a deadlocked 2016 Cleveland affair, the buzz word may be “electable.” Right now, Marco Rubio seems to fit the bill. As Snyder pointed out in his article, that’s not an endorsement; it’s merely an observation.
If the Republican field narrows to two principal candidates, then the chances for a deadlocked convention melt away. But if, as anticipated, Cruz, Trump, and Rubio (and possibly one or two others) remain in the race, then a deadlocked convention moves from “maybe” to “probable” with each passing primary, caucus, and state convention. The Republican presidential nominee who emerges will have done so after the fight of his political life – and ours.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/cleveland_cliffhang...
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Tags:
Read more: http://therightscoop.com/#ixzz3yYDVsdRP
The country is turning into a comic book. Americans are supposed to dig in and wonder whether Trump will go to a debate or not… MORE
On Tuesday’s Mark Levin show, Sen. Ted Cruz calls in and challenged Donald Trump to come and debate him, one on one, on Mark’s show. The challenge comes after Trump said he would not participate in the Fox News debate on Thursday. Cruz said if Trump is afraid of Mark Levin or Megyn Kelly hosting…… MORE
The phrase conservative purist is an attack from the left by establishment types who support more government and ethanol subsidies… MORE
Americans should never forget that it’s not about the candidate it’s about the country. Donald Trump is running a very unique campaign in the way he moves from portraying himself as an outsider to attracting more inside establishment support… MORE
Senator’s Orrin Hatch and Richard Burr are taking a second look at Donald Trump. Why are the establishment Republicans considering him electable over Ted Cruz?… MORE
Conservatives are against crony capitalism, where statists use the power of the federal government to subsidize one industry against another. So why is Donald Trump supporting ethanol?… MORE
Perot Quits Race Perot Drops Out Of The Race Clinton To Give Acceptance Speech Tonight
Daily News Wire Services
Posted: July 16, 1992
DALLAS — Ross Perot today abandoned his once-flourishing bid for the White House, saying he had concluded he "cannot win in November."
http://articles.philly.com/1992-07-16/news/26026323_1_perot-candida...
Originally posted by Jim Marrs
. Recall that Perot said he dropped out because of fears over the safety to his family. What force was to be feared if the Secret Service, FBI, CIA and the U.S. military were there to protect him and his family? Think about that.
By Onan Coca / 28 January 2016 / 0 Comments
That's the problem that you have with Ted Cruz. He is a guy that nobody likes and nobody trusts, and he is a nasty guy. He says things that are very nasty. So I […]
By Onan Coca / 28 January 2016 / 0 Comments
I think Donald is bold, I think he's brash, I think he's energized a lot of people to focus on this election and that's a wonderful thing, but policy distinctions are what we should […]
By eaglerising / 28 January 2016 / 2 Comments
From the Daily Caller News Foundation: A progressive advocacy group colluded with Obama administration officials to undermine a report critical of federal power plant regulations. The Advanced Energy Economy (AEE), a green energy trade group […]
By Onan Coca / 27 January 2016 / 10 Comments
Earlier this week Fox News’ Ed Henry bre a shocking story about a recently uncovered video about a former State Department official by the name of Wendy Sherman. The video is of a speech […]
By Tim Brown / 27 January 2016 / 12 Comments
Hillary's email scandal now potentially a matter of high treason - 1/28/16 January 28, 2016Memories of the Walker family spy ring and British double agent Kim Philby could be resurrected if a new angle of the FBI investigation works toward its logical conclusion. More
========================================================================
=========================================================================================
Hillary Decides What’s Top Secret, What’s Not Jonathan F. KeilerIf Hillary does it, it's right. More
=================================================================
Picking Moderators ‘Destruction of the Free Press’
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) said that allowing someone to pick a debate moderator is “the destruction of free press as we know it” and that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is “using a veterans event as a way to further
by Ian Hanchett28 Jan 2016, 6:00 AM PST5
Texas Senator and Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz stated that the challenge issued by one of his super PACs to donate to veterans groups if fellow candidate Donald Trump will debate Cruz is “an opportunity for 1.5 million apparently, to
by Ian Hanchett28 Jan 2016, 5:59 AM PST54
Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) stated, “The media failed to vet President Obama 2008, and right now, I don’t think the people in your profession are doing a very good job of asking Trump real questions” and that while Trump’s articulated
by Ian Hanchett28 Jan 2016, 5:59 AM PST17
GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, who is boycotting the Fox News GOP debate tonight, says two candidates have called and want to attend the event for veterans that Trump is holding instead.
by Alex Swoyer28 Jan 2016, 5:56 AM PST15
With the Iowa Caucus just days away, pundits, observers, voters and campaigns are poring through every new poll, hoping to divine a winner.
by Mike Flynn28 Jan 2016, 5:31 AM PST4
GOP presidential candidate Carly Fiorina is now the second candidate challenging GOP frontrunner Donald Trump to a debate ahead of the Iowa caucus.
by Alex Swoyer28 Jan 2016, 5:15 AM PST817
Cruz has the organization, the data, and the must-win attitude to mount a comeback. Yet even if he does win, he has missed an opportunity to unite the party, beat the media and prepare for the general election.
by Joel B. Pollak28 Jan 2016, 5:13 AM PST14
DES MOINES, Iowa — Corey Lewandowski, the campaign manager for 2016 GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, exposed a blatant conflict of interest on Wednesday that the Fox News Channel has been hiding for months. Lewandowski showed how Fox News has been
by Matthew Boyle28 Jan 2016, 12:45 AM PST936
Donald Trump’s decision not to participate in the Fox News debate has shined a spotlight on the advocacy efforts and undisclosed conflict of interests of the news network’s founder, Rupert Murdoch. These advocacy efforts may perhaps explain some of the motivations underlying the network’s treatment of the GOP frontrunner.
by Julia Hahn27 Jan 2016, 10:47 PM PST48
Wednesday on Fox News Channel’s “The Kelly File,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) explained to host Megyn Kelly where he saw inconsistencies from Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), one of his opponents for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination, on the issues of
Conservative commentator and best-selling author Michelle Malkin slammed Fox News on Twitter for the network’s decision to allow someone who entered the country illegally to participate as a questioner in tomorrow night’s Republican presidential debate. Malkin tweeted: “FoxNews debate questioner Dulce Candy
by Julia Hahn27 Jan 2016, 9:24 PM PST1,363
GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) held a standing room only campaign rally in West Des Moines, Iowa where reporters noticed the crowd welcomed Cruz’s swipes at GOP frontrunner Donald Trump.
by Alex Swoyer27 Jan 2016, 7:32 PM PST92
A national conservative group intends to spend $1 million on ads in New Hampshire that refer to GOP 2016 contender Gov. John Kasich as an “Obama Republican.”
by Dr. Susan Berry27 Jan 2016, 7:29 PM PST19
DES MOINES, Iowa — A pair of pro-Ted Cruz Super PACs just offered $1.5 million for veterans if Donald Trump will debate Cruz one-on-one in Iowa before Sunday evening.
by Matthew Boyle27 Jan 2016, 6:47 PM PST13,334
On the January 27 Breitbart News Daily show on Sirius XM Patriot channel 125 from 6AM to 9AM EST, host and Breitbart News Chairman Stephen K. Bannon will interview a number of guests, including former anchor and managing editor of
by Breitbart News27 Jan 2016, 6:46 PM PST28
If you're like most Tea Party Patriots, you're tired of the mainstream media driving the narrative on the GOP primary and our candidates. We've already seen several debates, but they've always left us wanting more. More substance, a better explanation of ideas, and most of all, more one on one time with the candidates themselves.
Tea Party Patriots is a proud sponsor of the convention, and we want to let our supporters in the area know about this exciting event.
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid insists he wasn’t serious when he told reporters he was cheering on Donald Trump in the Republican presidential contest.
“I remember the good old days when he did a fundraiser or two for me,” the Nevada Democrat said Wednesday. “With that bunch of people running, I’m kinda pulling for him.”
Trump has in fact been a Reid donor over the years, with obvious interests in the casino business, but Reid’s quip about the real estate developer and Republican front-runner was not well received by one of his top lieutenants, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y.
“I was just trying to be funny with Donald Trump, but obviously it wasn’t too funny,” Reid said. “Schumer kicked me in the back of the leg … a little higher than the leg.”
Reid went a step further after the press stakeout, going to the Senate floor to say what he said about Trump wasn’t funny.
“The danger of a Donald Trump candidacy to our country is not a joke,” Reid said. “Since he launched his bid for the Republican nomination, he has proven over and over again that he is a hateful demagogue who will do immeasurable damage to our country, if elected.”
As for the 2016 GOP contest itself, Reid was gleeful, even after getting the kick from Schumer.
“I am watching with pleasure the Republicans fumbling around. It is a cadre of people who are really a mismatch for president of the United States,” Reid said. “I just think it has made a mockery of our Republican Party.”
http://hoh.rollcall.com/reid-pulls-for-trump-then-thinks-better-of-...
DV..Good post I just found this post ...Thanks Buddy...FNC is pulling for Trump in the debate tonite as well...freezing out Cruz by not calling on him...Marco and fatso and Rand are being given question after question...petting Rand for the indies and Marco and Fatso for establishment..hoping one of them will gain on Cruz..knowing that neither will take Trumps Crown...They know now that Trump will be the most useful of anyone to keep the status quo going in their own political kingdom....God help Cruz with these shameful moderators...
LOL..Marco is soooo slick he is talking fevershily about how his own state is not really supporting him....he is absolutely desperate.....
What I did find interesting, a mention by the media that GOP new registrations in Iowa has vastly increased over the 2012 new GOP registrations. WHY? just thinking about that - Trump, country failures, against Hillary, for Cruz, against illegal immigration? I really find it a positive indication - at least in Iowa.
Legislative News
Congressional Quarterly
C-SPAN
Roll Call
Stateline.org
The Hill
Washington Post
Politics Section
Boston Globe
Dallas News
Denver Post
Los Angeles Times
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Stop Island Park Wildlife Overpasses
Seattle Times
NY Times
Washington Post
Washington Times
USA Today
Beltway Buzz
CQ Politics
First Read
The Hotline
The Note
The Page
Washington Wire
Mike Allen's Playbook
Politico
Roll Call
The Hill
CNN Political Ticker
The Swamp
The Fix
Washington Whispers
Fish Bowl DC
Online Political Sites
Alternative Press Index
Capitol Hill Blue
CommonDreams.org
Digg.com Politics
Drudge Report
Political Insider
Political Wire
Politico
PopPolitics
Real Clear Politics
Salon.com
Slate
Stateline.org
TCOT Report
TomPaine.com
US Politics Guide
© 2025 Created by WTPUSA. Powered by