Now it starts. Soros Machines not calibrated for GOP members (16 states)

[Virginia Foulk]

Republican state representative candidate Jim Moynihan Discovered this.

Calibration Error’ Changes GOP Votes to Dem in Illinois County Josie Rudd  October 22, 2016

Cook County ballot box tries to cast GOP votes for Democrats  By Contributor  /   October 22, 2014        By Paul Miller

CHICAGO — Early Voting in Illinois got off to its typical start Monday, as votes being cast for Republican candidates were transformed into votes for Democrats.

Republican state representative candidate Jim Moynihan went to vote Monday at the Schaumburg Public Library.

MACHINE ISSUES: Republican state representative candidate Jim Moynihan had trouble voting for himself on Monday when early voting started in Illinois.

“I tried to cast a vote for myself and instead it cast the vote for my opponent,” Moynihan said. “You could imagine my surprise as the same thing happened with a number of races when I tried to vote for a Republican and the machine registered a vote for a Democrat.”

The conservative website Illinois Review reported that “While using a touch screen voting machine in Schaumburg, Moynihan voted for several races on the ballot, only to find that whenever he voted for a Republican candidate, the machine registered the vote for a Democrat in the same race. He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.

Moynihan offered this gracious lesson to his followers on Twitter: “Be careful when you vote in Illinois. Make sure you take the time to check your votes before submitting.”

Cook County Clerk’s Office Deputy Communications Director Jim Scalzitti, told Illinois Watchdog, the machine was taken out of service and tested.

“This was a calibration error of the touch-screen on the machine,” Scalzitti said. “When Mr. Moynihan used the touch-screen, it improperly assigned his votes due to improper calibration.”

Scalzitti stressed that at no time were Moynihan’s votes actually registered, and that voters are always asked to make sure the votes they cast are correct before they are counted. Scalzitti praised Moynihan for checking his ballot and alerting the election judge of the machine’s failure.

[Virginia Foulk]

Texas county has electoral machine problems now - they are using Paper ballots until the problem is fixed. Again, the machines switch from GOP to Democrat when a voter selects by party line.

Then in Virginia early ballots include letters from the Dem Gov. and Democrat party data - no GOP data. And in Arizona, Soros has been caught in a fraudulent situation. And in North Carolina, Hillary is out in front of the early polling areas, pushing her agenda. I know that in Wisconsin you cannot do that within 10 feet, and cannot even wear a Vote for shirt. (I learned about that - I wore a Recall Gov. Doyle to vote , but refused to remove it. I was chastised - even though the recall had been several years before and had nothing to do with the current voting

[marrand]

I read about the same problems in Texas also. Ok, in Illinois the dems control almost everythihng, but aren't there enough Republicans in charge of voting machines? Or their certification? I am sure all of you heard about the dems sending people to Trump rallies to cause problems. Why not send people to the places where they handle voting machines? Those trained to hack would have chances to be with the machine alone, and probably it wouldn't take long to change the results ON THAT MACHINE after true calibration. I am sure dems have enough money to hire such hacker trainees to mess with the machines; they don't need to change all of them. As long as no one notices the error, that "fixed" machine should continue voting for HIllary. Sure, once discovered, the machine can be rmoved; but what about all the wrong votes it has recorded prior to discovery?

I don't see how this problem can be solved at all. It's impossible to prevent every "bad" guy from making changes on the electronic machines. And of course, the same principle applies to the paper method, where the filled out ballot is scanned. The machine reads the result, records it in memory, but again it is a computer which does the counting and can be hacked. 

[Hankelvis]

While you were distracted by Obama Killing cops,they were rigging the machines.

[Virginia Foulk]

now it appears that the actual ballets list Clinton/Kaine twice, but no Trump/Pence - SC and even Texas.

IT’S RIGGED?! Voters are Reporting Trump-Pence Choice is MISSING From Ballot

Posted on October 27, 2016

Today The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft allegedly received a message from a woman who had some startling news. It seems like there have been steps taken to prevent people from voting for Trump.

I am a single, Republican mother of two younger kids in small town Illinois. Within my friends, I keep seeing and hearing of all these examples of voter fraud going on right now with Trump supporters.

A friend of mine in South Carolina went in to fill out their ballot, only to find there were no Republican nominees on the ballot showing Democrat, Pacific Green/Progressive, Libertarian (however there were 2 Democrat boxes for Clinton/Kaine).

Two friends of mine in separate areas in Texas had the same issues with their Republican ballot.

Then three well-respected people within the same household in my town who mailed in their ballots in favor of Trump went online to make sure their votes were counted – only to find they were not going to be counted because the signatures on the ballot didn’t match those on their letter. They would have never seen this if they hadn’t gone online to verify!

If this is happening all over the country then we have a serious problem. Granted, the signatures could have been a precaution that was in place to prevent voter fraud but there is no excuse for the ballot with two Hillary options. Isn’t one bad enough? What are your thoughts on all of these happenings?

•  

[marrand]

The problem, Virginia, is that these people observe the cheating, and proceed to report to friends and websites which the media reject. As long as this problem circulates as a "story", without proof, nothing will be done about it. 

Election fraud has to be proven, something like the undercover project veritas.